₦airaland Forum

Eto disappeared here, his “Telebulu” couldn’t displace NATURAL WINGERS.

timbros:
I ask again, is Pandev Ronaldo your issue with this lineup?

Use your metric to rate Pandev and Ronaldo.

Why are you finding it difficult?

timbros:
Is Pandev Ronaldo your issue with this lineup?

Use your treble metric to rate Pandev and Ronaldo under Mou, that way, you’ll understand what it means rating Eto ahead of Son as a WINGER.

It’s as simple as that.

timbros:
Who is discussing Pandev Ronaldo with you?

Both played under Mou
One achieved a treble, one didn’t.

Use your metric and rate them.

timbros:
Which metric?

“Treble” to rate Pandev and Ronaldo.

You need to see how your take looks..

timbros:
Stick to Eto'o vs Son

Stick to your metric

andrewbaba44:
Eto is better than anything than son in a front 3 no suppose give you my answer ba ?

Abi winger no Dey for front 3

Keep running from the question.

timbros:
Show me where I typed a metric for Pandev vs Ronaldo

Use your metric to rate them under Mou.

andrewbaba44:
Eto was a better Anything than son in a front 3

Mourinho wey play am there no be Mumu

Why that question dey hard you?

timbros:
Stick to Eto'o vs Son

Stick to your metric for Pandevv and Ronaldo.

andrewbaba44:
Samuel eto any day anytime for anything that concerns front 3

Eto was a better winger?

timbros:
Shouting winger winger winger like it's a 442 that wingers hug the touchline. Even at that, there are wingers ahead of Son in Mourinho's coaching career. Where the heck did Son come from?

Doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting different result is madness. Mentioning every player in this planet in a Son vs Eto'o discussion and expecting me to engage you in it is pure madness.

Stick to Eto'o vs Son.

So are you now ready to use your treble metric to admit that under Mou, Pandevv was better than Ronaldo and Hazard?

It’s a simple question.

andrewbaba44:
I will play son as a winger ahead of iniesta

But you see that headless chicken maximin,iniesta over him

Son vs Eto as a winger?

timbros:
You have not said anything here.

Just because Son is a winger doesn't qualify him to walk straight into Mourinho's XI.

The formation is 433. Three forwards. It MUST not be a pure winger in that forward line.

That aside, if you MUST choose a winger, Son is not the best winger Mourinho coached that should be in that XI.

Son should not be anywhere close to that lineup, using your Mane vs Salah metric.

Failed amala turning....

Kindly leave all these ones and tell me using your treble metric, if Pandevv was better for Mou than Ronaldo.

timbros:
Eto'o played as a winger and delivered more to Mou than Son did for him. Remember this is a Mou XI.

Even if you MUST put a natural WINGER there, there are other natural wingers Mou coached that should be ahead of Son in the XI.

Pandev played as a winger and delivered more to Mou than Ronaldo did for him.

Remember this my take on Eto and Son as WINGERS.

hensben:
Mou can not choose son over Etoo in that position due to achievement.

Why did he choose Ronaldo over Pandev?

timbros:
Then why spamming my mention with Pandev and other players?

Stick to your argument.

Tell us WHY Son should be in that position and not Eto'o? What did Son ACHIEVE that Eto'o didn't?

Son is a proven and natural WINGER, Eto is a proven and natural CF.

So??

timbros:
What was your problem with this lineup?

Pandev over Ronaldo or Son over Eto'o?

Talk so I will know what I am discussing.

That Son was better in that POSITION.

popizaino:
No he is not better than Son but will make Mourinho's all time xi ahead of Son in the wings.

Very simple

Skimpledawg:
Kai, you be maduman true true Don.

Eto was a CF
Inesta was a midfielder.

Both can’t perform better than natural wingers like Zaha and Saint-Maximin in Crystal Palace and NewCastle if played as wingers.

timbros:
Do you want a fresh player comparison?

Are you scared to admit Pandevv was better than Ronaldo?

timbros:
Stick to Eto'o vs Son

Stick to your metric for Pandevv vs Ronaldo

Pandev:
well, I wouldn't say that I'm better than Ronaldo and Hazard but I was really underrated, I gave Mou everything. So let's end it here, I take God beg una

popizaino:
There is no way Son will make Mourinho's attacking third before Samuel Eto fils. It is just impossible.

Is Samuel Eto a better WINGER?

timbros:
I never said you used treble metric. You are sounding ridiculous now.

Treble is an ACHIEVEMENT same way AFCON is an achievement.

Your metric is achievement.

Now use that your metric to rate Pandev vs Ronaldo under Mou.

Pandev:
logging in to my nairaland account only to see 47mentions, I was like fvck! Abeg donstan18, timbros and others, make una free me na

He said you’re better than Ronaldo and Hazard because you won treble with Mou.

timbros:
You set the metric in Salah/Mane.

I only followed the metric you set. Any other player you are mentioning is a discussion that will happen later. You don't even know my take on those player comparisons. You are just speculating.

Stick to Eto'o vs Son.

Nobody used “Treble” metric for Mane against Salah, stick to your metric for Pandev vs Ronaldo.

That your take wey you dey hide, talk am here.

timbros:
Stick to Eto'o vs Son

Stick to your metric

timbros:
In that particular position under Mou, Eto'o achieved treble. Show me Son's achievements in that position under Mou.

In that particular position under Mou, Pandev achieved treble, show me Ronaldo and Hazard’s treble in that position under Mou.

timbros:
You used achievement.

Mane AFCON = achievement.
Eto'o treble = achievement.

Say something else.

As a player in general or in a particular position?

timbros:
Its a metric you set in Salah/Mane, achievement. Also, It's a reason WHY I say Eto'o deserves his place in that XI.

Tell us WHY you feel Son should be there ahead of Eto'o.

Show me where I used “Treble” metric to defend Mane againt Salah.

And I’ll show you where used treble metric to defend Eto over Son as a winger, but won’t use it to defend Pandev over Ronaldo under Mou.