₦airaland Forum

Classic Shehu Sani

"He has given all the key institutions and ministries to the North. A Northerner from Kaduna State is the Chief of Defence staff. A Northerner from Adamawa State is the National Security Advisor. A Northerner is the minister of Agriculture, and also the minister of State for Agriculture. A Northerner is the minister of Defence and also minister of State for Defense from Jigawa and Zamfara States respectively. Until now, a Northerner was the Minister of Education.
Let us tell ourselves the home truth. When our own was in power for 96 months, what did he do? For all the failures, people kept quiet. They refused to hold him to account. They refused to criticise him. They refused to say we voted for you and you failed.
For eight years, he couldn’t construct any major road to Northern Nigeria. He spent eight years, yet he couldn’t activate the Mambila power plant. He spent eight years; he couldn’t revive or dredge the River Niger. He spent eight years; he couldn’t dualise the Abuja -Kaduna- Kano express route. He spent eight years; he couldn’t dualise the Kano, Kaduna, and Lagos express route. He spent billions of naira in the name of agriculture for which there is nothing to show for it.
He appointed Northerners into offices and they have not served the interests of the North. So, if you cannot hold your son to account, if you kept quiet, if you remain silent, if you folded your arms during Buhari’s administration, what conscience do you have now to threaten someone else with re-election?”


Copied

Evil family






i know having sex in a dream is evil , but damn! those spirits can f^ck . 😩

It's also very horrible




i know having sex in a dream is evil , but damn! those spirits can f^ck . 😩

Edusouls:
So work Dey hard like this to find for abroad Be like say uk don become small Nigeria in unemployment

but to get babes there is very sheep

UK is overrated jare. Cost of living in the UK is very expenses

NNAMDI KANU:The Shame of Igbos and Nigeria!

That the Nigeria government that had and it still releasing the Boko Haram and ISWAP Islamic terrorists it arrested, reinterpreting and even paying them compensation but Nnamdi Kanu is locked up in detention against court order for close to 3 is a SHAME
The Islamic terrorists the Nigeria government is re-integrating have killed about 40,000 people, kidnapped and raped hundreds of school children, bombed and killed innocent people in churches, UN building and schools.
Yet, Nigeria government under Buhari granted the murderous animals who shoud be prosecuted for murder and rape a clear pass but kept Kanu in prison for years. Tinubu the so called Democrat is also playing the script of wannabes.
The actions of Buhari and Tinubu are not as shameful as that of Igbo governors, national and state legislators, Igbo elites and the multitude of the so called Igbo billionaires who do not care about the injustice against their tribe.
El-Rufai as governor of Kaduna state once used the state funds to pay ransom to Fulani herdsmen who were killing innocent people especially Southern Kaduna Christians. Former Zamfara state governor now Minister of Defence was paying millions of naira of state to a terrorist kingpin and bought him utility trucks as governor
Today in Nigeria, no prominent Boko Haram or ISWAP Islamic terrorist is facing prosecution but they are still killing, raping and kidnapping innocent people daily. Today, no single Fulani herdsmen now terrosts is facing prosecution for hundreds of people they had killed A whole village was razed and killed under Buhari by Fulani terrorists but not a single one was prosecuted. The same Buhari who ordered the Kidnap of Kanu from South Africa
The continued unjust detention of Nnamdi Kanu by Nigeria government that dining with Islamic terrorists is a big shame on any Igbo man or woman anywhere in the world.

Written by Solomon Adebayo



Copied

Sheuns:
15k now will get you just 1 chicken, 2 packs of juice and 1 tortilla bread.

with 15k person no fit see olosho carry for Lagos o, except those women in their late 60s

Scam

Dis one no go sweet for bed. Na so so bone, no flesh

Touch not my anointing. I stand with Natasha. I am Natashalised

Buhari just dey laff.




Abeg, Mynd44 na wetin you cook? Dat beans still remain?

Na who do the calculations?

essentialone:
[size=8pt][/size]

That is why you will forever be an Enemy of Peace

you wey be friend of peace where you dey today?

I stand with Natasha

Azazyel:
This one that palmer ain't in the game, Chelsea go collect

him get boil for blokos

Dominique no go allow us to hear word again for office tomorrow
Mtcheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew

Kobojunkie:
Why is the food smoking?

na sacrifice meant for amadioha

Olodo.com

Yomit71:
Yoruba know where to travel to, not all these useless places.

yes o. We don't travel to useless places wey dem dey chop human beings. Awon oniranu.

It is the man who should be beated not this one that they did

So Buhari no fit defend him people?

Yinmu! Nothing change. I don't see Natasha getting justice in this matter. It's still going to be the same georgement

What did you did for them?

Hiaaaan! Mynd44 you no dey advice dis una gender. Imagine her cutting one thousand naira which is our highest currency detonation in Nigeria. It's wrong, very very wrong.

Dog of a man. Anything in skirts goes

The developers of the world

The Office of the First Lady is not a constitutional entity, yet successive Nigerian presidents have embedded it into the system over the years. Today, it operates with a formal office, staff, a dedicated budget, and nationwide project commissioning.

Now, Seyi Tinubu appears to be laying the groundwork for yet another informal institution—the Office of the First Son of the Federation. As with many new innovations in Nigeria, initial resistance is expected.

He has been actively engaging in philanthropic activities across the country, steadily building his presence and creating public awareness around himself. However, a critical question remains—who is funding these philanthropic endeavors, along with the extensive security detail and the associated costs?

If we are not scrutinizing the source of funding for the Office of the First Lady, should we also turn a blind eye to the emergence of this new, unofficial position? After all, neither is recognized by the Constitution or the laws of the land.

Congratulations, Seyi Tinubu, for pioneering the Office of the First Son of the Federation.

© SEGUN BEN-AJAYI



Copied

Enough of talk talk. Make una fight, I want to see blood

Blood money

obyno82:
😆 🤣 bring statistics...... this repetition you are doing like a robot are you a bot

No wonder our brothers from the east see it as their small London. It's the prayer and dream of every igbo man/woman to visit Lagos before they die

EXCLUSIVE: Fresh controversy trails Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension as senators disown committee report
Signatures attached to the report were allegedly taken from the attendance register.

The controversy surrounding the suspension of the Kogi Central Senator, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has deepened, with allegations that the signatures attached to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions’ report were not for the endorsement of the suspension but rather attendance records.

This led to confusion at a closed-door Senate meeting as some senators reportedly claimed their signatures were misrepresented to give the impression of unanimous support for the suspension.

Attendance or endorsement?
On 5 March, members of the Senate Committee on Ethics convened to investigate the seat rearrangement dispute between Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio. On that day, senators who attended the committee’s sitting signed the attendance register, while others abstained.

Based on the Senate’s rules, all senators can attend committee meetings, whether or not they are members of such a committee. Also, all the senators who attend a committee’s meeting can sign the attendance register.

On 6 March, when the ethics committee chairman, Neda Imasuen, presented its report on the floor of the Senate, the attendance sheet’s signatures were included, creating the impression that all signatories endorsed the committee’s recommendations.

One of the key recommendations in the report was to prohibit Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan from identifying herself as a senator, both locally and internationally, for the six months she would be on suspension.

Some senators who signed the attendance register have now reportedly distanced themselves from the report with the argument that they were not allowed to review the final draft before it was presented on the floor of the Senate. A senator who attended the meeting where the matter was discussed but requested not to be named told PREMIUM TIMES that the proper process should have been for the committee members to examine and approve the report before its presentation. However, members were unaware of its content until it was publicly read on the Senate floor.

The suspension
On 6 March, the Senate voted to suspend Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan for six months following the ethics committee’s recommendations.

The decision was based on the ethics committee’s report which indicter her for alleged misconduct during a plenary session on 20 February and her refusal to adhere to the chamber’s sitting arrangement.

The Senate also imposed several penalties on her, including the withdrawal of all her security aides and the closure of her office within the National Assembly.

All Senate properties in her possession would be handed over to the Clerk to the National Assembly. At the same time, she was also prohibited from entering the National Assembly premises during the suspension period.

Her salary and allowances were also suspended for the duration of the suspension, just as she was banned from representing herself as a senator, both locally and internationally

However, the Senate left a door open for the suspension to be lifted if Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan submits a written apology, which the leadership may consider before the full six-month period expires.

On Tuesday, Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan took her case to the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), seeking international intervention in her suspension from the Senate.

She addressed delegates at an IPU meeting held at the United Nations headquarters in New York, during which she also raised allegations of sexual harassment against Mr Akpabio.

The Kogi senator described her suspension from the Senate as unlawful and a deliberate attempt to silence her for speaking out against alleged misconduct in the Nigerian upper legislative chamber.

Senators push back against signature use
Our source also confirmed that some of Mr Imasuen’s colleagues in the committee expressed concern about the improper use of their signatures during a closed-door meeting on Wednesday, which lasted about two hours.

According to the lawmaker, those who objected to using their signatures were two senators from the North-west geopolitical zone, one from the North-east and another from the North-central.

They reportedly argued that their signatures were misused because they did not explicitly consent to the report’s recommendations.

Their position is based on the principle that signing an attendance register does not equate to endorsing a resolution. They insisted that their signatures should not have been attached to a report they neither reviewed nor approved.

The senators also emphasised that the report should have been circulated among all committee members before being presented to ensure transparency and due process.

Despite these senators raising their concerns at the closed-door meeting, none of them has done so publicly and PREMIUM TIMES’ efforts to reach out to them individually were unsuccessful.

Argument on endorsement
On the opposing side at the closed-door meeting, some senators argued that attendance at a meeting implies participation in any decisions made during that session. They contended that once a decision is reached within a committee, there is no need for additional signatures.

The opposing argument implies that a senator’s presence at a meeting means they acknowledged the decision, whether they explicitly signed the recommendation or not.

This controversy arround signatures further fuels concerns that the suspension of Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan was decided without due process.

Mr Imasuen could not be reached for comment. He did not pick up PREMIUM TIMES’ calls to his mobile telephone or respond to a text message.

Also, this newspaper could not reach the trio of Daura, Katung and Kingibe as their phones were not connecting.



Copied