₦airaland Forum

HellVictorinho8:
insensitive

IxBet:
Hello!

We would like to assure you that the bookmaker operates in accordance with the Curacao license, which indicates the legality and legality of all actions, as well as a high level of fairness. All sections of our casino have been thoroughly checked, and online casino games and tables are provided only by reputable providers, a list of which you can find on the website.
We are only an entertainment platform, not for making money, and responsible for gaming.

1xBet Team

HellVictorinho8:
itz a fallacy that whites gave or
give you phone,data,books,
names,clothes,etc



Whites gave or give
you nothing!


So you owe them nothing!


Rather

If u can scam them,
then go ahead.


Good riddance!


Nigerian politicians and their 1999 constitution seem 2 be a business deal btw them and sum white bastards


B4 you condemn me or add 2 my burdens, remember that i will never die trying 2 be nicer to you than youve been 2 me


Go ahead and accuse me of everything!


nonsenses and rubbishes






whether i make it or not






fvck what av seen!



u keep asking me 2 find a solution 2 my setbacks as if i was ever waiting 4 you 2 solve everything 4 me

spits



fvck mark zuckerberg!

at least
ok

Verbtips:
what are you asking

Verbtips:
Everyday247 all of us get our own.

Gbadugbakun:
I hate to say this but I do stammer. Yesterday my boss called me to his office to explain something to him. I was stammering and hitting the table to enhance my speech. I now hit the table very hard and his bottle of water poured on all the documents there. He now to me to leave his office. I'm very sad. is there a cure for it?

Verbtips:
Think of a word that if you remove any letter you still get a meaningful word.

i.e SEAT
remove S

eat



remove E
sat



remove A
set




removeT
sea


YOUR TURN

AlphaNugget:
Lol, no, make I clear all my post

AlphaNugget:
Ok, the guy don drop 3500, remaining 1500.

But that statement "desist from making false accusation" is what I find offensive to the steps I took......are you saying that I made false accusations?
Make I just delete Twitter posts 😁

ayjay45:
I’m trying to learn martial arts. I don’t know which to learn karate or taekwondo etc

jaephoenix:
Nice argument. Watched all through.
1.Only problem is he committed a whole truckload of fallacies while putting his point across.
A. Fallacy of Appeal to ignorance. The fallacy of appeal to ignorance, also known as the argument from ignorance or burden of proof fallacy, occurs when someone claims a statement is true or false because there is a lack of evidence or information to prove it otherwise. Example god exists because there is no evidence he doesn't exist. The mathematician John Lennox never dropped one shred of evidence about the existence of a god, but shifted the burden of evidence to atheists.
B. Fallacy of Appeal to Authority. The appeal to authority fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone accepts a claim as true because it was made by an authority figure, such as a celebrity, scientist, or expert, regardless of the figure's actual knowledge of the subject. In this case, he was quoting Einstein etc. Even though those authorities aren't even christians and didn't specifically say there is a god, it didn't stop him from using their words to promote his sham. Yet he still didn't provide any evidence
C. Fallacy of Appeal to Popularity. The appeal to popularity fallacy, also known as the ad populum fallacy or bandwagon fallacy, is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone claims something is true because many people believe it. This fallacy is problematic because popularity does not necessarily indicate something is true. A claim might be widely accepted because of cultural beliefs, social conformity, or misinformation. Not an evidence of god

2. Throughout his ramble, he was appealing to an unknown entity, which he attributed to a god, and not just any god, but his own personal god. His favorite candy flavor. He blissfully ignored the fact that there are thousands of other gods, who perfectly fits that narrative of an 'omniscient creator' but somehow only his fits the bill, even though he couldn't prove it/he/she/they/etc exists and the others don't.

3. Even if one decides to believe this his favorite god(for the sake of this argument), his only book which contains his instructions to us, is severely flawed in that it is scientifically, historically and logically challenged. It is also strewn with all sorts of errors and contradictions which if one pauses for a moment to reflect, doesn't point an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent being.
So no, with his views, no intelligent and rational person would believe he destroyed atheism. Not by any stretch of the imagination. He in fact, proves blatantly, the ignorance perpetuated by religion.

Reloadedisraelp:
Glo n Airtel ..fools

SamueItem337:
Student way he 5k don go
You will be lucky to see ₦1

Tobichima:
1 year facebook account....

1k

SamueItem337:
₦101

Reggaero:
boss no whine me

shey make i post my account balance make u confirm

Reggaero:
werey



Boss,i don tell you say this matter no be fight

I really dont understand why this matter dey pain you

Mademan7:
I hope she will still pay her own bride price?