santaclaws: That is for Christians (catholics) to decide, but the Pope is not equivalent to the Fulani Sultan of Sokoto, don't deceive yourself, that is a very silly comparison.
Yes it is incomparable because sodomy happens in the Vatican often.
santaclaws: Any Yoruba/ South West Muslim still obeying the Sultan of Sokoto is a slave.
At this point, I don't even think the Sultan of Sokoto should have any say on Islamic affairs in Nigeria, except for Sokoto or Northern Nigeria.
Yorubas are entirely different and we don't welcome Boko Haram and Sharia type of Islam in our land. We believe in education, progress and tolerance because that's what has been effective for us.
Padipadi: Sheikh Fadeelat Abdulganus coven has declared their independence from Fouta Djallon. This is a brave move. At least, chest beaters from sadeàst won't have spine to troll them anyhow. But people should still be wary of fanatics among them like one man that was in charge of govts educational system yet dabbling in religious affairs.
Ganus Ganusi Abdulganus Al-Ganusi. Choose these new names for ya kids janjaweèds. They are very beautiful.
Mbanda: From every indication, you are the one crying more than the bereaved here. You are not the judge that was insulted by Kanu yet, you are the one crying in pain about what happened in court on Monday. You said you are allergic to stupidity but you are not allergic to your own stupidity. And that is what made you a frustrated mofo.
Get this bitter truth into your skull, Cownu will never be released.
Do you have to knack her before helping her? Real men don't expect any returns from their ex. Do it for the sake of God and humanity and see how you will prosper. It takes nothing for you to do good.
eepeepook: Everything has a price in this world. She can’t expect me to take “thank you and God bless you” as payment. I want to knack. Today is Valentine’s Day also.
Mbanda: Yes! Me and Kanu know more than you that's why, we were able to see what you and your likes couldn't see. You allowed hate for Igbos to cloud your reasoning.
Lastly, rotting in jail is not the issue here. The issue is that KANU has succeeded to show the world, the mess in your judiciary, country and judges.
Lol crying more than the Bereaved. I can never hate any tribe. Because everyone is unique. Am just allergic to the stupidity of yours and your Demi god Cownu.
TenQ: Putin's hordes usually can't answer direct questions. LOL!
I asked six questions of which half of them were YES or NO single word answer. Even when I predicted your response, you still failed showing that you are simply a Russian bigot!
Have a nice day!
Hopeless thing expecting Ukraine to win a senseless war. Your brain is not different from the stupid comedian. Modafoka
Mbanda: Igbo has an adage that says, "okenye mee onwe ya efere rice, umuaka ekporo ya n'aka rie". It simply means that if you make caricature of yourself, everybody will insult you including children.
Your Demi god judge made caricature of herself and her court, that's why Kanu did the needful. If your father insults himself, I know you will insult him and go scot free.
Well am not surprised with your comments, Because Your likes and Cownu thinks you know more than others. He would surely rot in jail.
ppogba: You should know most of those commenting on the social media are probably those still battling with gathering five credits in two sittings.
Unfortunately, most forming king Kong especially are still the ones that will come. and cry about how their employers are owing them ten months salary with no idea of what to do.
Lol! That means their foundation is faulty. You can't give what you don't have.
bemeruca: He has no right to her phone. It's her private device, might even be more important to her than the school she is going.
What he could have done is politely ask her to give him the phone and when she refused he reports her.
He has no right to restrain her to collect her phone. Even police no get this right.
Else police man can just stop you and say give me your car keys. You give them and then go and report them later that they seized your car for no reason.
That's why it's said character and learning in most institutions. No one can grow wings more than the institution. CEST fini
I may be happy with what happened to him, but it's an embarrassment to the office he occupies. They are not supposed to follow normal routine. But you can't give what you don't have.
bemeruca: By going back to her and attempted to take her phone from her. Are you guys this biased? I said both sides are wrong. Student is not behaving well. But she also has the right to defend her property while the lecturer has no right to seize her property. You see where the lecturer initiated the whole reaction he got from her?
So both of them are wrong.
It's not issue of being biased, What she could have done was to allow the lecturer collect her phone, then report the case to higher authority and moreover, we were told that her mum works with the institution which makes the collection simple sef. She can't win on this case. You could see how the man kept cool despite her attacks on him which spelt doom for her. She has graduated prematurely. That's the verdict.
bemeruca: She didnt just go up to him and bite him. She was defending herself. And that's not to say her character or what happened is right on her part. Both of them are wrong and the lecturer is the one who started this
Hmm! Started what? By tapping her with excuse me? Chairman that lady she is gone for good. Attacking your lecturer on campus. Probably you haven't gone to institution to know the consequences of such conduct
bemeruca: You are just blindly taking the man's words. There is no error here. I went through uni and I saw abuses from lecturers. I don't think he would peacefully tapped her to move out of the way, she moved only for her to then insult him.
Both of them are trying to make themselves look good but whatever their stories are, the lecturer has no right to take her phone.
But the student has the right to bite him? Let us all assumed that the lecturer may have asked her out probably before which we are not sure? Does it gives her the right to embarrassed him?
TenQ: But you did NOT answer any of my questions! Lets Assume that Zelensky did not fight Russia back, 1. Would Putin still have annexed as minimum the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzia Oblasts of Ukraine? 2. As of today, using military force, has Putin been able to achieve this objective fully? 3. Is it true that much of what Putin has captured has been in ruins through bombardments by Russian soldiers? 4. Will you admit that Russia being the attacking side has lost at least 2 soldiers for every one soldier lost by Ukraine?
I then gave all the excuses for Russia invading Ukraine for you to cross-check if any wasn't Okay! All what Putin wants is this 1. To be in charge of Ukraine (politically, economically and socially:drive Zelensky out and form his own appointed people) 2. To create a land corridor from Russia into Cremia 3. To annex the raw materials and rare earth metals in the four oblasts. 4. To make Ukraine permanently compliant and submissive to Russia like Belarus 5. To Ensure that Ukraine never ever aspire to join NATO or seek for protection anywhere else 6. To reduce Ukraine millitarilly (De-milliterisasion) so that never would they dream of protecting themselves from Great mother Russia 7. To Rusify Ukraine (they would be forced to teach Russian in their school and make Russian language an official Language in Ukrane) *The so called De-Nazification of Ukraine is a meaningless objective
Then I asked the last two questions: 1. Do you disagree with any of these Putin's objectives in Ukraine? 2. Are you in support that Britain impose these same objectives on Nigeria?
Only when you truthfully answer these questions will you become balanced. Putin had been fighting Ukraine since 2014, the war just escalated in 2012, it is not just because of NATO: check the seven points above
To answer your questions as mentioned above, Putin would have even captured Zelenkyy if not US and her alliance supply Ukranian military ammunitions other logistics. Belarus are not submissive to Russia, they are allies. You can't tell me that part of Russia objectives was for Ukraine not to able to protect herself from external aggression, then it no more a sovereign state then. Lastly , you can't compare the war In Ukraine and Nigeria context they are not the same.
I have zero sympathy and empathy for sex offenders or child abuse . He clearly knew what he was doing. He was really addicted to the fantasy. Why can't he indulge in muture ladies that he wouldn't have issues with. But because of his stupidity and fame he thought he could do otherwise.
Let me ask you a simple question and I hope you would be truthful
Lets Assume that Zelensky did not fight Russia back, 1. Would Putin still have annexed as minimum the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzia Oblasts of Ukraine? 2. As of today, using military force, has Putin been able to achieve this objective fully? 3. Is it true that much of what Putin has captured has been in ruins through bombardments by Russian soldiers? 4. Will you admit that Russia being the attacking side has lost at least 2 soldiers for every one soldier lost by Ukraine?
People like you usually will not answer the questions but repeat rhetorics. The answer to this will tell you if you need to revice your position and look at the situation critically.
Of course, I dont like the weakness of Biden, how will you give Ukraine weapons and tell him not to use it on Russian soil? It is like giving your boxer good food and regular exercise but on the day of the fight, you yell him to use only one hand by tying the other at his back.
Biden wanted to slowly bleed Russia dry and out using Ukraine, but for me lives are at stake.
All what Putin wants is this 1. To be in charge of Ukraine (politically, economically and socially:drive Zelensky out and form his own appointed people) 2. To create a land corridor from Russia into Cremia 3. To annex the raw materials and rare earth metals in the four oblasts. 4. To make Ukraine permanently compliant and submissive to Russia like Belarus 5. To Ensure that Ukraine never ever aspire to join NATO or seek for protection anywhere else 6. To reduce Ukraine millitarilly (De-milliterisasion) so that never would they dream of protecting themselves from Great mother Russia 7. To Rusify Ukraine (they would be forced to teach Russian in their school and make Russian language an official Language in Ukrane) *The so called De-Nazification of Ukraine is a meaningless objective
1. Do you disagree with any of these Putin's objectives in Ukraine? 2. Are you in support that Britain impose these same objectives on Nigeria?
As usual, most pro-Russians would not answer these questions but instead will resort to repeating things they have memorised about Russia and Ukraine. I hope that you will prove me wrong: please objectively answer my 6 questions!
First and foremost, Ian and advocate of peace irrespective of the Region or Religion. That's my foundation and philosophy. If you could remember vividly it was issues about NATO base that brought the war which Vladimir Putin disagreed with not annexation of Crimea. He told Zelenkyy that they would be spy against Russia Federation. Zelenkyy is not a student of international politics. Instead of him to sit with Vladimir Putin and have compromised he allowed US and western allies to make use of Ukraine and testing ground of weapons. You might be right that Putin may have hidden agenda before the war to natural resources of Ukraine by Zelenkyy provided the avenue for such activities to have happened..
Mbanda: You are a typical black man from the darkest part of the world. Thats why you don't know what it means to, die with your two legs standing, than to die kneeling down. Kanu is the lion of the east and, he just roared to show that he is fearless before his enemies.
Mbanda: The way you reason most times because of hate for Igbos, baffles me. So you lots were expecting Kanu, to tolerate the biased and unjust judgement of binta nyako towards Kanu.
You're dreaming.
So that gives your Demi god right to insult a judge in the court of competent jurisdiction? Am very sure you can insult your dad a go Scot free.
TenQ: That God is already uprooted and another raised up in his place!?. Prepare for a civil war in Russia.
Putin invaded a small country expecting to overrun them in three days, three years after, his hands are burnt. Wounded men are sent to the slaughter by Ukrainian hands
Joe Biden should be arrested for allowing the war to linger on Imagine just a phone call has brought hope and ceasefire just like the war between Hamas and Israel. The same proposal that was rejected by satanyahoo in 2023 was the same proposal agreed 2024 at the expense of Israeli prisoners..
princepee: Mark my word this one will still not last. He will get over her soon. He just got himself new and rich pussy.. It will be over before you know it. 2baba na player
EmeeNaka: You have written this nonsense just to defend yourself
It might be nonsense to you , My late uncle traded his love for his spouse against his peace of mind. Despite all the Benjamin's he got . As a man if your wife gives you peace of mind, the man would always worship the woman.
tctrills: I just took your advice to google the Intifada and here are some of the things I learned from Google.
1. The intifadas were escalations in violence against civilians, sparking widespread fear and necessitating harsh security responses. The Second Intifada, in particular, is remembered for suicide bombings in public spaces, leading to a significant shift towards more defensive measures.
2. The start of both intifadas was unprovoked, with the First Intifada following a traffic accident and the Second Intifada often linked to Ariel Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount, which was a pretext for violence rather than a genuine cause.
3. The intifadas led to a drastic change in daily life for Israelis, with frequent security checks, bombings, and the constant threat of violence making normal activities like shopping or going to school fraught with danger.
4. The violence during the intifadas had a profound economic impact, damaging tourism and business, while also taking a psychological toll on the population, shifting public opinion towards more conservative and security-focused policies.
5. The violence, especially the suicide bombings of the Second Intifada, deepened Israeli distrust towards Palestinian intentions, with many concluding that the goal was not coexistence but the destruction of Israel.
6. Post-intifada, Israel implemented long-term security measures, including the construction of the West Bank barrier, which was seen as vital for preventing attacks but criticized for its impact on Palestinian movement and land.
You can see that I did your assignment now are you ready to do mine?
What can you deduct from the crisis? So what your own assignment?
tctrills: I don't know how you see things. The only reason Israel attacked Gaza and over 40k people died was because of Hamas. The Palestinians are safer without Hamas. Before this war, tens of thousands of Palestinians worked in Israel and no one harrassed them. Hamas only makes life unsafe for the Palestinians. I guess someone taught you that Hamas is protecting the Palestinians. That person lied to you.
I guess you were still in creche or not yet born when the Intifada started. Like I said earlier, you have a phone and data Google the history and safe your self illogical explanation.