₦airaland Forum

princesa:
since when was it a law to stick to one guy

princesa:
the thread derailer

lysaa:
yeah I know, how are u? so many stories behind my absence from nl, DC aint far from one of em . . . but i'm here now thats what matters. what have u been up to? who's bn bad, who's bn good, who's bn ugly? i need to spank a monkey!

Kuns:
Question:   so y dd u say it was Jesus christ?
Answer: I've clarified that and told you it was Judas, why are you asking again?
k, u gotta amend ur post on page 1 then 2 reflect that.

Question:  that stil doesnt prove Yashua Pantera (Jesus Christ?) made n sold perfume
Answer: If you know anything about alchemy and herbology this would be clear. Also the fact that Judas saying saying the bottle of perfume should of being sold and the proceeds given to the poor shows Jesus was selling perfumes, because Judas was working for Jesus, why should Judas otherwise be telling Jesus they could of sold the oil (perfume) for money.
could we also deduce then that jesus christ was into fishing too seeing he seemed to know which part of the ocean to tell the disciples to throw their nets?

again frm ur answer, u hold then that what d next verse said about Judas that he made that suggestn not because he cared 4d poor but co.s he was afta his own pockets (seeing he was the treasurer) was false?.


Get your bible out and Check it up again.

Judas was the treasurer. Ok, I ask you treasurer to whom or what?

So why was he talking about selling ointment for three hundred pences? If they were not selling ointments?
doesnt follow sir. itz just like concluding that because i'm passionate about soccer then i'm a player.

Question: ow? dd d writers say ds 3 xters r 1 n same Jesus Christ?
Answer: Do you think the writers will tell you "the world" they made it all up?

datz exactly d point of my questn: if they made it up, then they couldnt av recorded their incidents to show they r diff Jesuses and not 1 and same Jesus. Each was distinct. so ow was this claim possible, that ".  .   . Jesus character was based on the life of many real people including Yashua Pandara (the Jesus of the synoptic gospel), Simon Bar Jesus (his son) and Jesus Justus (Son of Kleopatrah and Mark Anthony). What the Biblical writers in the new testament have done is tie all those characters into one Character (Jesus christ)"

To see that you have to study the languages of the Scriptures in the Hebrew and Greek and the real history of event i.e Mark Anthony, Cleopatra etc. Then you will see that Bar in hebrew means Son of or illegitimate son of, howeve, in the English KJV instead of using the English translation of the word "Bar". as in son of Jesus, they left in the hebrew giving to Bar Jesus. This will make you think this was someone else, when in fact it meant son of jesus.
but they know we can alwayz check for meaning of words, just as u've done. at least a diligent faith adherent will seek to understand all about his faith. so i dnt think they were that dumb to have left 'Bar' in the english xlation just to not let us know the meaning. and FYI, that word was used also in connection with Simon Peter long before d incidient of Bar Jesus. so d meaning of d word was obvious from Peter's incident 'Simon Bar-Jona'.

Again, Bar Jesus could have been son of one of d 'many' Jesuses as u earlier agreed. so it stil got nofin 2do with Jesus Christ as far as i can see from your points. he wasnt Jesus Christ, neither his son. or u got any link that can trace Bar Jesus genealogy back to jesus christ?

If the writers told you they lied will you still belief their lies? That's why they don't want people to ask question, they teach people to just be[b]lie[/b]ve, don't ask no question. Is this what they teach in church?

Do you follow?

Question: that bar-jesus was son of Jesus Christ or son of one of d many Jesuses?
Answer: Bar-jesus was the son of Jesus Christ and tied into the Jesus story. Remember that Bar-Jesus was also killed. (cruxi (cross) fiction).
please show me d link that traced genealogy of Bar Jesus to Jesus Christ. and how was he tied into the Jesus story? his incident occured afta Jesus Christ, so watz d correlation please?

Again, d fact that he died by crucifixon (?) doesnt prove he was son of Jesus Christ. if that were true, then Simon Peter (crucifyd upside down) too was son of Jesus Christ

Question: so ow come
Answer: What do you mean how come? I said Jesus Justus is not the Jesus Christ character.

I need to clarify this point, Jesus Justus = Jesus, which is called Justus, and not Jesus Christ. Colossians 4: 11 was making reference to real people not a ghost or spirit of Jesus christ, like the christians would have us believe
o i see, but which kind christian be that who would do that? that one na simple passage, easy to understand.

See the quote again for certainty and clarification.
datz y i quoted from verse 10 too, just to show it was not J Christ. so he wasnt weaved into the jesus story then, agreed?

Question:  (ghost of Jesus Justus? because obviously Jesus Christ wasnt mentnd here at all )paul was talking about here.
Answer: Thanks, for correcting me, I made typing error missing out the word Not. I meant to say "It was not a ghost of Jesus", sorry about that. I'm typing and I.m using short hand like you are.
ok
Do you follow?

Question:  d link plz, at least u c ow i provided one
Answer: Waterstone or Foyle bookshop or visit your local bookstore.

why go to b/store when you can get the info on Net or na only book the info dey? remember itz etymology of 'testament' we are after here, not anything so far-fetched.

k, what is the title of the book and the page; i maybe lucky to have someone who has it