₦airaland Forum

Who is helping us with the willian vs hazard defensive stat? I dnt have the resources to do it nw.

Nihilist:
I'm at a pub right now with my wife and son.

Once I get back to the hotel room, I will run the simulation again.

Did you want Willian in a 352 too?

u cn play willian wt the one u used earlier and any other of ur choice.

nateevs:
This is open to debate. Having one good season is proof that you are prolific, or at the very least, capable of it.
Plus you specifically mentioned 2 years ago. That specific year Mahrez was prolific.

One thing is for sure. You CANNOT say categorically, that Mahrez IS NOT prolific.

That's the difference.


If however, there's overwhelming consensus with your POV, then I will give you the money. Until then......

is the goalkeeper part of the eleven or nt? Maybe u shld luk at that angle b4 u lose ur money. U roped ur self when u used prolific instead of intelligent.

diggz:
You return late braaah...we don discuss am finish Nihilist wan even collect 100pounds wey nateevs promise drop for the matter self


And yes I am team willian

ok. Let me say this.
The issue of 11 hazards and 11 willian is an issue of set up and formation.
If 11 hazards are set up to play on the counter attack with a 352 formation, the team wl hv a higher probability of beating both a possession based and a counter attack based 11 willians. This is because, 11 willians wt possession wl do little or ntin to breakdown a a 352 hazard with more bodies in defence that cn transform into an organized counterattack force. This wl also b d same result wt an 11 counterattacking willian that doesn't have the intelligence to do something in a counter.


Btw, cn someone please help us with the defensive stat of hazard vs willian in frm our two title winning season, cus i am nt sure if willian has a beta stat than hazard in that aspect.
Cc. Airmark, ibime, nateevs

@Nihilist, cn you pls play a 352 counter attack hazards against that of willian let us see the result.

diggz:
What is wrong in the statement he made?

will u prefer 11 willians to 11 hazards in your team?

FBS:
Just seeing this.

Forget what Ibime said. Ian Wright said Willian was fantastic.
Scratch that...

I'd rather have 11 Willians in my team than 11 Hazards.
You sef know which team go win hands down.

FYI
Against
Brazil match today - Willian MOTM.

Don't understand why you guys easily give some certain players millions of excuses yet berate others even when they are trying. Win or lose they always get the blame. Double standards and I'm sick of that.

hmm. If you cn type d bolded, then there is no need going further wt the issue. Let us leave it.

Ibime:
With all the prices flying around though, I'm surprised no one considers £45m a good deal for Mahrez.

the thing baffle me. Upon say em dn submit transfer request for over a month.

souloho19:
That's true he wouldn't be able to whop in the crosses like he does from the right. Anyway Alonso is still my number one man on the left but apart from upping his defensive game he needs to improve his crossing technique cos one of Morata's strengths is his air prowess.

yeah

Skimpledawg:
That's what Dayo calls Facts and he is so good at it. He should be a professor of Logic

lol.

souloho19:
Oh..my bad bro, but he can cover both sides perfectly

i am nt sure of wat azpi's contribution in attack wl b in a lwb position.

diggz:
Wasting your time braaah....wait till dayo returns for you

lol

souloho19:
I saw something on optajoe that since November 2015 no other premier league player has more auccesfuo tackles than drinkH2O. If we can get him and land mahrez we're gud to go, IMO azpi can cover moses WB and I remember he started his Chelsea career in lwb.

But if spurs hijack llorente why don't we hijack their own Aurier deal? Just up the bid to 30m

azpi did nt start his chelsea career at lwb o. He was our no1 RB in 2012/2013 season.

Skimpledawg:
Yepaa .

In my Lil days here on this sports thread, you cannot just argue with baba Dayo and want to stop cos he will leave you with annoying facts for you to process by yourself and the more you do, the more you want to dissuade him from his ideas... And the chain continues

lol. True. Bt, sometimes they are nt facts, bt senseless logics nd falsehood.

diggz:
Lol...I think say u bin just promise Ursef say u no go answer dayo again?

lol. the thing dy hard sha. Bt, i just make i clear those ones then i go stop.

raumdeuter:
So whats your reason for Falcao? The same falcao who at his peak destroyed Chelsea defence

i hv already answered u.


The same falcao that distroyed man city defence last season.

raumdeuter:
Some of them parked the bus. How can you have 30% possession in a game where you didn't go down to red card. When you are not deliberately parking the bus.

the bolded shld end this argument, because it agrees with my earlier statement of nt "every low possession translates to parking the bus, bt every bus parking gv low possession."

Check the Bournemouth game most times there wasn't any of their player in city's half

this is nt true, with emphasis to the bolded. Don't tell lies to win argument.

raumdeuter:
Failure has levels. This same Monaco won the French league over PSG

Compare that to being 15th on the table

the same psg that man city beat that season won the ligue 1 that season. The same madrid that beat city that season won the ucl and finished 1 point behind the league champs.


In all, the issue is nt abt the level of failure, bt that there was a failure, and it came frm pep.

diggz:
No answer dayo

i no go answer am for this issue again. I knw that he has seen the truth, bt wants to do his normal "i alone cn be right".

airmark:
You should have asked apari raumdeuter to tell us the number of attempts on goal, west ham had against us in 2014 and that of bournemouth against pep's man city, to juxtapose. Dayo is a joke.

no mind am

raumdeuter:
Probably because Falcao was injured and just recovering plus Utd and Chelsea didnt have the patience Monaco had

do you really want me to believe this? So, one full season each were nt enough for falcao?
This your excuse is really hard to believe, judging by wat zouma is doing at stoke nw.

raumdeuter:
So what else could low possesion mean?

when barca used to dominate clubs in laliga with high possession, were the teams parking the bus? No. They simply couldn't get the possession 4rm barca because, they were very gud at keeping it.

raumdeuter:
Is that at the level of Chelsea in 15th position and dragging with Hull city?

the main point there is nt the position, bt the fact that man city crashed out of the ucl in d round 16 to monaco compared to the previous season when they won the league cup and reached the semi final and were ousted by a real madrid that could only manage an own goal.

raumdeuter:
So why didnt Bony for example work under 3 different coaches Pellegrini Pep and Stoke city coach?

i dnt knw the answer to that.

Why did falcao nt do well at utd nd chelsea, bt is doing well at monaco and also did well at atm?

raumdeuter:
In the game Mourinho said West Ham parked the bus, West Ham had 28% possesion, In the bournemouth vs city game Bournemouth had 30% possesion

every bus parking yields low possession, bt nw every low possession means that bus was parked.

raumdeuter:
The Chelsea players were much better than 16th position from 1st that Mourinho took them to, There is no way the caliber of players in Chelsea at any time in the past 15 seasons should be 15th midway into the league

Pep took the team to 3rd where they finished with 78points from 4th where they had 66points the previous season before he got there

pep took a team that finished in the ucl semi final (crashing out against madrid) and won a league cup to crashing out in round 16 against madrid and winning nt even a spoon.

diggz:
Bwuahahahaha.....Greatihex

i dey see am.

raumdeuter:
How is this different from what Bourneouth did

if that is what u saw frm d game frm d starting, then you watched a different match.

raumdeuter:
They probably werent good enough for City level or elite level football which is what whoever bought them failed to factor in

That a player is good at Swansea doesnt mean he will make it at Chelsea

such factors exist, bt, we both knw that it wasn't the case with city. This is because they are nt the only club buying frm lower clubs.

Even if we are to use that, it therefore means that pep is also guilty of the same thing cus his buys have nt done wel. Check bravo, nolito, stone.

VargasVee:
Bro that's not the issue. City were offering better personal terms and they were mostly afraid of competition, not like it was their dream clubs.

Chelsea were ahead in Aguero race but City bought him instead, So was the case of Stones and Mangala.

you are misunderstanding me. Your post is actually buttressing my point.

raumdeuter:
I blamed Mourinho when he almost relegated Chelsea, I will also blame Pep if he almost relegates City understand?

thank you for answering the bolded.

If you blame mou who used the productive players of chelsea to win d league and league cup in 2014/2015 for the failures of 2015/2016, why dnt you blame pep that used the productive players that won the league cup and finished at semi final in the ucl in 2015/2016 for the sub per performance of 2016/2017.

raumdeuter:
So which of these do you think made Chelsea finish 10th

do you answer question with question? I asked u first u shld answer me first.

raumdeuter:
Are you saying Pellegrini, Guardiola and Stoke coach dont know how to use Bony

Or that Leicester coach isnt using Iheanacho well

Or Torino coach Guardiola, and Bilic are not using Joe Hart well

Or all coaches who refused to buy Sagna arent using him well?

are you saying that the person that was using them b4 they were signed by city with big money were using magic to use them or weren't they coaches?