₦airaland Forum

gibberish:
The owners said you are not the winner and you are challenging them.
Is it because they made mistake and declared you the winner before coming to their senses. They should have declared Morocco the winner and told you to go to court.
If I say more than this now they will say I'm talking gibberish.
Let me hold my peace.

if they had ended the match it would have been better, but they allowed play to continue and Morroco even missed the penalty that caused the protest, then Senegal scored the winning goal. Now they want to collect the trophy and handing over to Morroco.

killsmith:
That means there should be no punishment for walking off the field, yeah?

you don't understand what happened?

After walking off the pitch, they returned and continued the match. The penalty they protested against was missed by the Moroccans. The game went on, and they eventually scored the winning goal.
Now, CAF wants to take the trophy and hand it over to the losers. Everything was decided on the pitch—the CAF officials and the FIFA president were there.
Go and watch the match again. Football is played and won on the pitch.
Senegal did not field an ineligible player.
The officiating in the tournament was terrible. The referees seemed to be doing everything to favor Morocco.

This one wey this powerful king dey hype Tinubu and Nigeria since, the man get plan o. I hope they never pack our resources go there... Una see the wey him welcome Tinubu so?

https://www.nairaland.com/8638301/trump-distances-u.s-israeli-strike

I just came across the above on frontpage now

dfrost:
A gas facility in Qatar is US milirary base? Really?

Hhhmmm

ConDawah:
Yes, they have been sponsoring terror groups there because you decided to ignore this part.

Honestly, I can't explain the reason for that particular one

dfrost:
A gas facility in Qatar is US milirary base? Really?

Sirleo05:
It is simple, stop the US from using ur country to lunch attack on iran , and in return iran will stop to attack you. You can't tell them to stop and the US is still attacking them from ur country, e no jell.

A lot of people are ignorant of this. They only come here to comment as if Iran has been attacking those countries for nothing

dfrost:
Iran can't make enemies of their 'brothers'. It should be calming down. The Gulf states are not standing with you on this. One needs allies no matter what.

Iran, think it through.

You guys don't get this thing right. Iran is attacking the facilities of USA in those countries because, USA a has been attacking Iran from these countries.

These Iran neighbors allow USA to spy and attack them from their countries....

Iran was able to kill few Americans because they attacked theses countries... USA can't attack Iran from their own country...

USA use other countries to attack people. I'm sure if Iran were neighbors to USA, USA wouldn't dear to attack them because they know the consequences

This one wey these guys dey treat Tinubu like this, you sure say Tinubu never pack our resources go there?

sagenaija:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oklgsH1mXOY?si=82i2ioSLnZYUdSYw
Most Disgusting Hadith Ever? Shabir Ally, Ali Dawah & a Muslim Woman
The Hadith So Bad Even Muslims Call It Disgusting Hatun looks at one of the most shocking hadiths found in the Islamic tradition – the narration that says if a husband was covered from head to toe in sores, pouring out pus, and his wife came and licked that pus, she still would not have fulfilled his rights over her. Shabir Ally, Ali Dawah, Naima B Robert

A wife leaking filth from her husband's body and still being told she has not fulfilled his rights.
You have a hadith uh that that says that if a man's body was covered in sores from head to toe and his wife uh were to lick the pus out of these sores to cleanse them, then she still would not have fulfilled her duty to her husband.
Antichristian, Rashduct4luv, hassinho707 what do you guys think?

That narration is either weak or misunderstood. Scholars explain it as hyperbole (exaggeration), not a literal command. Islam teaches mutual rights, mercy, and respect between husband and wife.

Those two evil men get plan

Putindbutt:
Only the two satanists had a different reaction.

Their plan A failed - kill Ali Khamenei and instigate an uprising among Iranians for regime change.

Their plan B also failed - infiltrate the Kurdish minority in Iran and neighbouring Iraq as foot soldiers to attack both military institutions and Govt leadership in Iran to effect a new regime change.

As e be now, Nentayahu is hiding under his wife's skirt in an underground bomb shelter.

Nice one Seun, you are doing well. We don complain tire about the old version

Keep upgrading. Another part of the upgrade that I love so much is the dollar to naira exchange rate on the frontpage

Weldon

The new leader has lost many people to this war

Parachoko:
Absolute Majority of the People in Iran still Support the Islamic Government

Those people are not terrorists. The USA just want to use the narrative to remove the government so the can take over their mineral resources as they don't want to bow to them

Henix:
It's a welcome development, if well implemented. Though bank chiefs and top politicians will always have their way

The bank Chiefs are the real cooperate criminals

johngwain:
Everytime summon, nothing is happening, saboteurs full Nigeria army

saboteurs many, Boko Haram sponsors are many

May help our military to defeat them

dibunotion:
No be say tomorrow you go say you wan go bigger club o. You must return this love

So if bigger clubs come him no go go forward?

No be so na

EponObi:
You don't even need any briefing to know that the USA went to the war without any plan.

As an outsider, if you have sense, you can see this.

The only plan they had was to use the same system they executed in Venezuela - take out Khamenei, and think the entire regime will collapse and fall in line or run away with their tails between their legs. Dey play!

Mind you, these two nations have supreme intelligence agencies like CIA, Mossad and have been gathering and sharing intelligence for decades, with billions of dollars in yearly funding.

Anyone with basic knowledge of geopolitics knows that the Iranian government is decentralized - you can't break them like Libya or Venezuela. It didn't even feel like the US assassinated their supreme leader. Counter assaults went into overdrive immediately without him.

Now the US has replaced him with a die-hard son who is not diplomatic like his father. He has canceled all standing nuclear weapons agreements already. Everything. He has declared Iran has a fundamental right to nuclear weapons and they going to get them. Decades of agreements torn to pieces in a day.

People don't even know the late Ali Khamenei issued a fattwa against making a nuclear weapon. Iran would have made it a long time ago - they have the technology. He also capped the range of their missiles to 2000 km, when their scientists insisted they have the capability of going farther. This is the same person Trump lied wanted to destroy America. The Islamic regime existed only to protect the sovereignty of Iran against the West and most especially Israel.

For those fan of Israel and Trump on this forum who thinks the US will win this war, you are sleeping. I don't think you can find a nation with citizens who are hardcore nationalists like Iran. Those guys would rather die than allow Trump dopple the regime or impose a leader on them.

And if the US and Israel won't launch ground invasion, they are only wasting their time. Nothing else will make regime change happen. If they invade, it will end in absolute disgrace for them.

Kill Mojtaba Khamenei today, there are more people waiting in line to replace him.

Trump and Netanyahu are going to learn. They finally met a match to their craze. Don't play!

Bro this is a powerful write up. Nice one

lightwind:
If Iran were targeting those countries, millions of people would have been killed by now.

According to your comment, then Iran will no longer exist by now.

Are you aware

You have changed it. If you check the message I quoted you will understand what I mean.

insidelife22:
Imagine if Iran is allowed to develop nuclear weapons, just take a minute to imagine what they will do with it

If the USA had not been attacking Iran from bases in other countries, Iran would not have struck those countries.
Iran was not attacking Saudi Arabia. Iran has only been targeting U.S. bases and facilities in those countries.
This is one of the reasons the UK and Spain refused to allow the USA to use their bases to attack Iran.
Iran is attacking many U.S. facilities in the Middle East; they are not attacking the people of those countries.
Do you expect them to fold their arms and allow themselves to be killed by the USA and Israel?
If Iran were targeting those countries, millions of people would have been killed by now.

Kobojunkie:
Again, this is all false information you spew here regarding what is stated in Surah Al-Maidah vs 33. The Pact of Umar, from the 7th-9th century rule of Islam over the Kafirs, instead reveals that the Surah Al-Maidah vs 33 was instituted against any of the Kafirs who would attempt to violate the Dhimmi status imposed on them by the Mohammedans.🥱🥱

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/The_Pact_of_Umar

You are mixing three different things: the Qur’an, later political agreements, and historical debates.

First, the Pact of Umar is not part of the Qur’an. It is a historical document attributed to the time of Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab, and many historians debate its authenticity and the exact period it came from. Some scholars even believe parts of it were written centuries later.

Second, even if we discuss it historically, the pact was a political agreement about how non-Muslim communities would live under a Muslim state at that time. Similar restrictions existed in many empires in history, including Christian empires in Europe. It was not a command in the Qur’an telling Muslims to kill people for disagreeing with Islam.

Third, Qur’an 5:33 is specifically about people who wage war and spread violent corruption in society. It is not about ordinary Christians, Jews, or anyone who simply disagrees with Islam. If that were the case, Jewish and Christian communities would not have existed for centuries in Muslim lands.

Historically, Jews and Christians lived in Muslim-ruled regions for hundreds of years in places like and . Their continued existence shows that Islam did not command the killing of people simply because they had different beliefs.

So bringing up the Pact of Umar does not change the meaning of Qur’an 5:33, which is about dealing with violent criminals who wage war and spread chaos, not peaceful people with different religions.

bigpriik:
Taqyiyya at its peak, you dey apologise still dey bomb

Can you check online for the meaning of Taqqiya?

Kobojunkie:
It is draining the way you continue to deny the information literally presented in each of the verses...even after the other verses that are in the same context are present to help you...

Anyways, the internet has made at least 32 different versions of the Quran available to anyone out there willing to read. And we all know that the true Mohammedans are not those of you who claim you are moderates, but rather those we refer to as fundamentalists, the terrorists as well. Islam, from Mohammed's very own example, was never designed as the peaceful religion we are being gaslighted into believing today, and never was. 🥱

No one is denying what the verses say. The issue is that verses must be read in their full context, not isolated and given a meaning the text itself does not support.

For example, in the **, ** 5:33 explicitly describes people who “wage war and spread corruption in the land.” That is clearly describing violent criminals who attack society, not ordinary people who simply follow another religion.

Your second claim about “32 different Qurans” is also a common misunderstanding. Muslims use the same Arabic Qur'an worldwide. What you are referring to are different translations into English and other languages not different scriptures. Even in the earliest manuscripts the Arabic text has remained the same.

Finally, judging a religion of nearly two billion people only by extremists is not a fair standard. By that logic, any religion could be defined by the actions of its worst followers. The teachings of **** include clear instructions against killing innocent people and against injustice.

Criticism and discussion are fine, but they should be based on accurate information and proper context, not on internet talking points that misrepresent the text.

Kobojunkie:
1. Laws that apply to other people do not apply to Mohammedans. That is what Surah Al-Maidah 5 vs 32 points to. 🥱🥱

2. Wrong! Surah Al-Maidah 5 vs 33 does not say any of what you claim. Rather, it insists that all those who are against Allah and Mohammed should be killed or maimed and exiled, which constitutes disgrace in this world and the next. Allah declares death on those who want nothing to do with Allah and Mohammed, aka those who are against or speak out against them. 🥱🥱

3. Wrong! Mohammedans, those whom you regard as extremists, in fact, uphold Allah's words as expressed there in Surah Al-Maidah 5 vs 33. 🥱🥱

4. These leaps of yours are clearly against the content of Surah Al-Maidah. Allah calls for the death, crucifixion, maiming, and/or exiling of those who are against Allah and Mohammed, as is written. 🥱🥱
Seun

You are still mixing verses that discuss the sanctity of life with verses that describe legal punishment for violent crimes, and that is where the misunderstanding is coming from.

First, in ** 5:32**, the **** emphasizes the value of human life by stating that killing one innocent person is like killing all humanity. The verse mentions the Children of Israel because it refers to an earlier ruling given to them, but the Qur'an presents it as a moral lesson about the gravity of unjust killing.

Then 5:33 moves to a completely different subject: punishment for those who “wage war against Allah and spread corruption in the land.” Classical scholars understood this as referring to violent criminals such as armed bandits, rebels, or those who terrorize society. In Islamic law this crime is known as ****, which is essentially violent banditry or terrorism against the public.

So the verse is not talking about ordinary non-Muslims or people who simply disagree with Islam. It is describing the punishment for people who commit severe violent crimes against society.

Regarding ****, his commentary does not claim that only Muslim lives matter. Islamic teachings clearly forbid killing innocent people, including non-Muslims who live peacefully or who are under protection. There are authentic narrations from **** warning that anyone who kills a protected non-Muslim unjustly will face severe accountability.

So when the verses are read in their full context, they are addressing the seriousness of unjust killing and the punishment for violent crime, not saying that only Muslim lives are valuable.

Kobojunkie:
1. Surah Al-Baqarah states instead states that, "Let there be no compulsion in religion, for the (Allah's) truth stands out clearly from falsehood." Essentially, the passage makes abundantly clear that only those religions that hold the claims of Allah have no compulsion against them. All other religions are to be brought under submission to Allah's truth. That is clearly not a religion that tolerates any others. 🥱🥱

2. That never happened! There is no historical situation, since the time of Mohammed, until now, in which Muslims considered themselves equal citizens of any land with the Jews, especially under Islamic rule. Jews were particularly regarded as Dhimmis(second-class citizens)in pretty much all of the Islamic world, even to this day. 🥱🥱

3. There is no statement made in Surah Al-Maidah regarding violent crimes. The verse, which I have posted several times now, simply states that all those who do not accept Allah and Mohammed are subject to death, maiming, or exile. No need to add ideas to the passage that are not suggested there. 🥱🥱

Seun

Your arguments are based on interpretations that ignore the historical and textual context of the ****.

First, the verse in ** 2:256** clearly states “There is no compulsion in religion.” The verse does not say “no compulsion only for those who already believe.” Classical Islamic scholars explained that faith must be accepted freely because belief forced by coercion has no value before God. That is why historically Jews and Christians continued practicing their religions under Muslim rule instead of being forced to convert.

Second, regarding Jews, history is more complex than the picture you are presenting. Jewish communities lived for centuries under Muslim civilizations such as **** in Islamic Spain and the ****, where they maintained their synagogues, courts, and religious leadership. The term dhimmi referred to a protected minority with legal autonomy in exchange for a tax, which was a common system in pre-modern states. Calling it “second-class” using modern political standards ignores the historical context.

Third, the verse in ** 5:33** does not say that people who simply do not accept Allah and the Prophet must be killed. The verse explicitly refers to those who “wage war against Allah and spread corruption in the land.” Classical scholars understood this as punishment for violent crimes such as armed rebellion, banditry, or terrorism against society — not for ordinary disbelief.

So when these verses are read in their proper context, they are addressing freedom of belief, social order, and criminal justice — not forcing people into Islam. Criticism is fine, but it should be based on accurate readings of the text rather than selective interpretations.

Kobojunkie:
1. Laws that apply to other people do not apply to Mohammedans. That is what Surah Al-Maidah 5 vs 32 points to. 🥱🥱

2. Wrong! Surah Al-Maidah 5 vs 33 does not say any of what you claim. Rather, it insists that all those who are against Allah and Mohammed should be killed or maimed and exiled, which constitutes disgrace in this world and the next. Allah declares death on those who want nothing to do with Allah and Mohammed, aka those who are against or speak out against them. 🥱🥱

3. Wrong! Mohammedans, those whom you regard as extremists, in fact, uphold Allah's words as expressed there in Surah Al-Maidah 5 vs 33. 🥱🥱

4. These leaps of yours are clearly against the content of Surah Al-Maidah. Allah calls for the death, crucifixion, maiming, and/or exiling of those who are against Allah and Mohammed, as is written. 🥱🥱
Seun

Your interpretation ignores the context of the verses.

First, regarding Qur’an 5:32: Yes, the verse says that the rule was written for the Children of Israel. But the Qur’an frequently reminds Muslims about laws given to previous prophets to emphasize universal moral principles. The point of the verse is to show how serious the crime of killing an innocent person is in the sight of God.

Second, your interpretation of Qur’an 5:33 is incorrect. The verse does not say that anyone who simply disagrees with Islam should be killed. The verse clearly says: “those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and spread corruption in the land.”

Classical Islamic scholars explain that this refers to violent criminals such as bandits, rebels, or people who terrorize society — not ordinary people who simply hold different beliefs.

In fact, the Qur’an itself clearly states: “There is no compulsion in religion” (Qur’an 2:256). If Islam commanded killing people just for being against Islam, this verse would not exist.

Historically, Muslims lived alongside Jews and Christians for centuries under Muslim rule. If Islam commanded the killing of anyone who disagreed with it, those communities would not have survived.

So Qur’an 5:33 is about punishment for violent criminals who wage war and spread chaos in society — not a command to kill people simply for disagreeing with Islam.

Kobojunkie:
hassinho7071. This claim of yours regarding the Quran is false. 🥱

When you closely examine Surah Al-Maidah (Chapter 5) verse 32, you will find that it instead points to a command that was supposedly handed down by Allah to the Muslims(according to the text) only to the children of Israel, as shown in the image below. I believe this is Mohammed's attempt at referencing one of the Ten Commandments handed down by Moses to the children of Israel. 🥱🥱

2. This only verse you referenced cannot be used in reference to Mohammedans. Therefore, it is false to claim that Islam teaches any of what you claim, as there are numerous verses and passages from both the Quran and Haddiths which instead insist that Allah's commandments to Mohammedans held no regard for life, even that of Mohammedans. If you are open, we can contextually review as many of the Sunahs on this.🥱🥱

You are correct that Qur’an 5:32 mentions that the rule was written for the Children of Israel. However, your conclusion is not accurate.

In the Qur’an, Allah often mentions laws given to previous nations in order to teach moral lessons to Muslims and humanity in general. The Qur’an repeatedly reminds Muslims of the teachings given to earlier prophets such as Moses and Jesus.

The verse does not mean that the sanctity of life applies only to the Children of Israel. In fact, the very next verse (Qur’an 5:33) condemns those who spread violence and corruption in the land.

Furthermore, the Prophet Muhammad also clearly prohibited killing innocent people. In authentic hadith, he forbade the killing of women, children, monks, and civilians even during war.

So when extremist groups kill innocent people, they are violating both the Qur’an and the teachings of the Prophet.

The Qur’an frequently refers to previous scriptures to show that the moral principles of God are consistent across time. The message is clear: human life is sacred, and unjust killing is a grave sin.

Therefore, the verse still demonstrates the Islamic principle that innocent life must be protected.

If Islam allowed killing innocent people, why did the Prophet forbid killing women, children, monks, and farmers during war?

Many people associate Islam with terrorism because some violent groups claim to act in the name of Islam. But it is important to separate the actions of criminals from the teachings of the religion itself.

In Islam, the killing of innocent human beings is strictly forbidden. The Qur’an clearly states that killing one innocent person is like killing all of humanity, and saving one life is like saving all of humanity (Qur’an 5:32).

Islam teaches that human life is sacred, regardless of religion, race, or nationality. Even during war, Islam prohibits harming civilians, women, children, and religious people such as monks.

Groups that carry out terrorism are violating Islamic teachings. Their actions are political or extremist interpretations, not the true message of Islam.

Just as crimes committed by individuals do not represent all Christians or all people of any religion, violent extremists do not represent Islam or the more than 1.8 billion Muslims worldwide.

Islam literally comes from the root word “Salam,” which means peace. The core message of the religion is submission to God and living peacefully and justly with others.

So when terrorists kill innocent people, they are not following Islam — they are breaking its teachings.

Bittersweetnig:
its a shame the world will be talking about Isreal and will not praise them for thier strength, IRAN has population of 90milions with Isreal 10milions, that means only IRAN Revolutionary Guards army are more than entire isreal population, yet IRAN don't want their existence. So did they expect Isreal not to fight for its survival? or they expect US to watch isreal destroy? Technology around you today is Isreal invention even most of what IRAN uses, can the world or even US. Afford loosing such great people of Isreal, you are able to express your opīnion because Isreal invented it, do you want to tell me IRAN was joking when they keep promising to wipe Israel off the surface of the world and you expect Isreal not to act?

it's not possible, they can't wipe anyone out.

What did Israel do that they want to wipe them out. Maybe you should read more about the history of their fight. When I have time, I will do same

Exousiang01:
It's interesting how the core Muslim countries value the girl child education to the extent of having an all girls school.
While we that borrowed the religion call education for both male and female an abomination.

Yet they use guns and explosives made from science and they ride on bikes made from science.
Shouldn't they be using horses, catapults and stones since they believe education is haram, the by product of education should be Haram....

Bro I am a Muslim, leave that thing and try to understand the reality that those people are being sponsored to scatter things....

Education is not haram. Even Prophet Muhammed said we should seek knowledge from the day we were born till the day we would die. Education is good everywhere.

You should try and read things about Islam yourself.

Many northern states have all girls or all boys secondary schools, I don't know of primary schools.

Many Islamic leaders in different countries have good education and can speak different languages including English language

Even this Iran and Israel fight is political and a fight for regional dominance not because of Terrorism.

Israel dragged USA into this war because of regional dominance. Israel can't fight Iran alone, they always want USA to accompany them to war, because they know that the USA is very powerful and with USA with bases all over the middle east, Victory is assured.

bigpicture001:
Quietly jamb has changes some of its most standing rules without them even hitting the news..

My sister got applied to study medicine but ended up getting parasitology... Because sh is crazy about leaving home, we all did her registration and sh packed to her new location ...

We have a plan as it has always been in Nigeria that sh will write a new jamb ND this time try out for medical lab science and sh is now find of this course.. but after purchasing the jamb E-pin and getting to register her biodata... The system brought out her profile with a yes or no questions about her making a very strange decision..


The site asked her to press YES if sh agrees that sh will forfeit her already gotten admission into her school where sh studies parasitology or press NO if sh is to discontinue this registration and safe guard her already gotten admission...


I didn't believe her when I was told and we tried it again in my presence before I can believe...

Omoh, jamb has got alot of our kids stuck in courses they dnt prefer all cus education system does not know how to assimilate the army of students seeking admission earnestly...


Have u experience this ? Add you're say

Why can’t you write properly so people can read and understand easily?
The way you keep shortening words as if you are being charged to write correctly doesn’t make sense.
I lost interest while reading, and I’m sure many other people also lost interest.
Please don’t scatter my brain.

Gadaffi9ja:
Truth of the matter is build yourself, in a way that no one can mess with you. This is not just about North Korean leader, but about life entirely. Make u dey avoid see finish

I totally agree with you