₦airaland Forum

Starboytwo:
I heard teachers reward are in heaven.

Unfortunately, some are getting rewards here on earth...just not the good kind!

einsteine:
Lol. Nope. Chris Brown does this meet and greets for 20-30 people before the start of his shows. Easy 40k.

This is with a special request to remove her panties so different

It's actually a trap. That 2k dollz is a means to an end. Her hope is that once Chris Brown sees down there while removing her panties he'd definitely want to hit. From hitting to paying big time. Maybe even baby-trap him into paying child support for years. So win for her. Lol, don't for once think she's tripping for the fame. She just tryna secure the bag. These specie hella calculative! Thirst-trapping at its highest.

jackie111:
It is not out of place that when women fight they pull on each others hair. As you have claimed that they intended to humiliate her(comfort) by removing her wig, so I guess the wig of the air hostess coming off was also to humiliate her?

That aside, I am sure this whole issue would not have taken this turn if that one video did not make it out into the public. Therefore shifting the focus from the real problem (aviation safety and protocols) to the case of "an unclad passenger". I am not saying this that this particular evidence be buried but rather if it has been censored or unreleased, we would all focus on the main issues.

That been said, at no point was she ( Comfort) going scot free, the security was contacted already. She probably guessed they would keep her in holding that was the reason why she wanted to leave the plane but the air hostess prevented her from alighting. Hence the continuing assault and by the time the security came, she had to be forcefully evicted. That is to say, she wanted to leave but definitely not with the people from security. So are you saying if someone resists arrest, the person cannot be forcefully arrested?

Alright, it is nice that you are playing detective but your emotions are selectively high on particular issues within the case. If I may ask, will your opinions remain the same if this case was involving a passenger who is not physically blessed as you have described Comfort?

The two hostesses wore no wigs so it couldn't possibly have been removed if it was never there. Also, I'm not emotionally invested in the least way. I see the point you're making though.

Agreed. The girl breached airline safety protocols and should be punished. What is not right is that an air hostess, a staff of Ibom Air, intentionally pulled her top just as she was being forcefully dragged into the open airport space for everyone to fully see her unclothed. While she did that, another staff recorded it all, then proceeded to share on the internet.

Now you tell me their intention from exposing her unclothedness, recording while doing so, then proceeding to share without editing.

Stop getting emotional bruh. Both parties did wrong. It's like catching a lady steal and then justifying her rape by her captors.

True. It wouldn't be an issue if the video of her nude never made it out into the public net space. You're right about that. Yet it did and we can't unsee it. The net will always remember. Her children will be teased by their peers about their mom's full and bouncy titties 10, 15 years from now.

Not just right

BlakKluKluxKlan:
My sister will never slap someone in public once not to talk of repeatedly because she is not wayward, unruly and mannerless.

I believe you

callmeDDD:
You are just analysing breast not the lady jor. It's people like you the priest was talking to , to make your self available for confessions.
Besides, it was the lady in glasses that pulled her top. Not the one you thought.

We're all guilty, including the priest.

erad:
I'm reading what you wrote and it's difficult to believe it wasn't written by a boy in primary school.

I'll always say this, Nigerians deserve the leaders they get. How will a grown man reason this way? Damn!

Noted. Your opinion of my writing is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.

jackie111:
Since you have been looking closely, let me tell you what you did not see.

The lady who you claimed pulled comforts shirt did not do so with malicious intent.

Now look closely enough

She was trying to remove the curtains from obstructing the movement. Someone did from the top and was successful.

However, when she tried to do the same from comforts mid region, she grabbed the curtains alongside her cloth.

I am not defending her, just been objective. We become so emotional and even if all the facts are placed right in front of us, we would not see it.

To add,

The person who assaults many people within some minutes is the normal one but the person who made a mistake in 1 second is the mental one.

Because I am yet to understand how someone would mentally shift from let me help with the curtains to let me remove her shirt and then back. All within a second

Haba

I have tried to refrain from commenting on the matter but I still see people online pushing for her to sue the airline after the concerted efforts by the Aviation ministry and the NCAA.

I'm glad you watched it as closely as I did and saw almost the same things I saw. What I wonder is how you saw their intents and concluded as you did.

My intention in making this post is to play detective for the fun of it. Don't mind if Comfort sues or not. That's for intents. Glad we both agree the fair lady did the pulling of the girl's clothe.

As for her intention, I'm sure the lady in glasses must've been trying to remove another curtain hanging over Comfort's head when she "mistakenly" pulled her wig off.

You saw clear motives to shame someone and you're talking unintentional mistakes.

First, they removed the girl's wig, and, women dread having their wigs removed, in case you didn't know. The motive was to humiliate her but it didn't work as the girl looked good (if not better) even without it.

Mind you, she (Comfort) had been assaulting these people and they were obviously pained and would've dealt with her in kind if they weren't at work. Unfortunately for them, they were at work and couldn't hit her back.

These ladies were obviously still pained and here was this girl about to be bundled out without them retaliating. She was about to go scot-free after doing all that to them. One of them had to do something by taking an action that would definitely pain her. Hence, the fair lady exposing her bewbs.

And guess what? I don't think it was successful in hurting the girl's dignity having such a body that covered or uncovered looked great.

Now do I condone Comfort's unruly behaviour? NO. She deserved to be prosecuted or whatever punishement was due dealt to her. That kind of behaviour is highly unacceptable. The girl was full of herself. Talk of beauty without class. A more classy lady would've found a way to make sure she didn't get into that kind of messy situation. Clearly a trenches babe climbing out of the gutters, can afford good skincare products, brazillian wigs, but lacks character. Disgraceful public show.

That said, those women ought not to have tried to erase her dignity. If Comfort sues, she'd be in the right. Even if they argue it was unintentional, still her clothe didn't come undone by itself. They were manhaandling her for that to happen.

ARISHEM:
You don’t have work to do. What is your motive towards this post. You just think her action was intentional. She would have thought she was wearing a bra. If comfort have been civilized these would have been avoided

"She would have thought she was wearing a bra?" Really? And this is the brain you're using to call me jobless? SMH.

Vinnie2000:
OP,
Talk true, u just love her Breasts.😒😒

If it was an Old woman, you would not make this post.

You be As.ha.wo Boy.

I swear I don't hate them. The girl is very clean, her face card easy on the eyes, and she has prominent feminine features. So you can be sure I do... as do you too and so many other straight Nigerian men and lesbians.

I believe the girl acting as she did was due to being drunk on her belief of being beautiful. She probably thought the world revolved around her bewbs, bumbums, or her beauty.

All the same, they weren't supposed to expose her unclothedness like that. Not proper at all.

tinsel:
His sister can never behave like a lunatic in public.

Noted

KillahPriest:
Women tend to generally be more wicked to their more beautiful and younger counterparts especially if the older lady is still a spinster with limited booty calls. Argue with a pepper grinder

Ps, Comfort is gonna be very rich out of this mess

I have no doubt. Even how swiftly she was released shows some very serious persons are already interested. And who's to blame them? Every straight man is interested in that body of hers so fine, without even needing filter.

CoronaVirusPro:
No will gang rape her in a public place.

She behave like a tout and got the dividends.

Did you mention her disembarking from the aircraft, meeting the operations manager or customer service to table her complaints? No! She fought like a tout and reaped the dividends. If you ready to fight, don’t complain when you undressed.

Common sense should have told her how to address issues if she had a brain.

Bruh, she still didn't have to have unclothedness exposed that way. It was unnecessary.

brain54:
If she was my sister...

I will have handed the matter to the relevant authority to find out. Not some random stranger on the Internet.

I don't understand your motive of taking the case up and reviewing the images over and over on slow motion. Where you contracted to do so?

Am just curious your taking over the job nobody sent you to. Is that how you carry other national issues on your head too like gala?

Noted

Natbrowny:
She's not.

But if u insist she is d one. She was jealous of that breast. omo, i would too. That breast large n plumpy

She's the one. Comfort slapped her seconds before then when she tried to enter the plane. It's very common among women to tear clothes when they fight. Women to women, she slapped them declaring a fight, like women always do, she slapped her back and harder in exposing her pride.

ShobayoEmma:
Tor.

Women wickedness to their fellow women.

Thank God the victim has been released anyways.



Tinubu, a bad man with good intentions.

Aswear

brain54:
Don't you have work to do boss...



Why nah?



xxxxxxxxxx

Would you ask the same question if Comfort was your sister, Boss?

I don't care what happened or how the Ibom Air saga started, but one thing sure is that unclothing and humiliating the girl that way is totally wrong and was done on purpose. And I bring proof.

I slowed the video and played at it 0.25 speed to see everything clearly. And below are the facts:

1. Two Ibom Air hostesses (one fair, one dark) stood at the left side of the plane's exit where someone pulled and ripped the top.

2. There's nothing at that left point of the plane's exit that could possibly have done the hooking and tearing of Comfort's top.

3. When slowed, it's obvious the hand that pulled and tore the white top belongs to the fairer lady of the two standing at the left of the exit as shown in the pictures below.

4. Just before exposing Comfort's chest, the darker hand was towards her belly while the fairer hand was on the top side of the same blue curtain that Comfort held on to its lower ends.

5. Immediately they successfully got Comfort past the curtain, that fair hand quickly returned, pulled and held the top left neck of the white top she wore causing the exposure of her private body all over the internet.

6. I identified the lady that did it in the picture. She was the one that wore trousers, who received one slap and quickly retreated to safety towards the entrance. There she stood to the left with the other lady wearing a skirt who had been restraining Comfort earlier.

Let me know when the Chinese financial services finally kill Nigerian banks and they're dead and buried.

Dexlomo:
Here is my advice to you. Let him know you understand his sexuality and you are not judging him based on that. You appreciate his friendship and are willing to remain friends with him and he needs understand you are not into same sex. Not because you think it is right or wrong but because you just don't feel that way. I am sure he will appreciate it. I am bi and I am not sure any of my friends are aware of this part of me. They could have their suspicions but it is not my business and if you ask me, I might tell you depending on how mature I think you are to understand that we all are different. However, if it is my "holier than thou friends", I will never mention it.

Don't be greedy man. Just choose one already. How can you be wanting it all.

By the way, gayism disgusts me. Can't just make sense of how people find it doable. A fellow man? With blockos like mine? Probably peepee bigger and longer than mine. Hell nuh! Nigga nuh! And I mean it.

Has nothing to do with religion or morality with me but pure off-putting-ness.

Dtruthspeaker:
Did verse 10 of 2 Thessalonians 2: not tell you the cause?

"because they received not the love of the truth,

Which clearly means that they were given like this guy 👇🏾


but they exercised their will of rejection and therefore we see God course as He did to Pharoah, King Saul, Isreal etc

Or do you pretend not to know that whenever you reject God, you get coursed?

Nice one. Love the technicality. Agree 💯 %

MeetDx:
Exactly why

1 Corinthians 2:14

But the natural man receiveth not the things of the[b] Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them,[/b] because they are spiritually discerned.

Because they are spiritually dead, the things of the spirit of God sounds foolish to them. That's why they don't study the WORD with an open mind to understand it but to criticize, point out errors where there none and make mockery of it. So why do you think God will not keep them in delusion that would eventually lead to damnation (Their own rewards)?

Lol, chill my jigga. God didn't make zombies. He made man to be intelligent beings and the only way he reaches us is via our intelligence. Mind and will must be engaged for salvation to happen.

It's presumptuous of you to think you're more spiritual because someone disagrees with your point of view. Zeal without knowledge will still lead to error. You'd be surprised at how much you don't know and that you're a lightweight on the scale of spirituality.

Paul spoke of people in this class in Romans as shown below

Romans 10:1-2 KJV
[1] Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. [2] For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.

Shalom

MeetDx:
Exactly why

1 Corinthians 2:14

But the natural man receiveth not the things of the[b] Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them,[/b] because they are spiritually discerned.

Because they are spiritually dead, the things of the spirit of God sounds foolish to them. That's why they don't study the WORD with an open mind to understand it but to criticize, point out errors where there none and make mockery of it. So why do you think God will not keep them in delusion that would eventually lead to damnation (Their own rewards)?

Lol, chill my jigga. God didn't make zombies. He made man to be intelligent beings and the only way he reaches us is via our intelligence. Mind and will must be engaged for salvation to happen.

It's presumptuous of you to think you're more spiritual. Zeal without knowledge will still lead to error.

Paul spoke of people in this class in Romans 10 below

Romans 10:1-2 KJV
[1] Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. [2] For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.

MeetDx:
Stop clutching at straws bruh, where in my post did I mentioned that God is unjust and bad? I gave a scripture and you are here telling me that they are my words. 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12 pointed this clearly, written by Paul the Apostle (New T).

And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Are those my words?

Salvation is not for all bruh, some people are just fulfilling the will of God in being bad because God knows they love unrighteousness and would never repent for any reason, no matter how you preach to them, they will never understand it because the WORD in itself is SPIRIT and cannot make any sense to a carnal mind..

So some are preordained to not be saved? And since that's the case, it's only natural to think they're programmed never to repent, to love unrighteousness, and to never understand the word of God so that the purpose of God to their damning be accomplished.

Only speaking from your position

I'm not sure what to make of what you're talking about here but that you're observing patterns

Dtruthspeaker:
Thank you. But you are the one who knows what things interest you.

https://www.nairaland.com/8281391/god-thing-first-there-always

https://www.nairaland.com/7790701/judaism-not-what-moses-gave
Thanks

https://www.nairaland.com/7947204/truly-forbidden-fruit-sex

https://www.nairaland.com/7929942/math-7-16-shows-us

https://www.nairaland.com/8238054/polygamy-jews-stopped-polygaming-after

https://www.nairaland.com/8305216/see-why-god-hates-women

https://www.nairaland.com/6319053/when-eve-charged-court-charges#97161190

Truth, now I understand why you had to warn me ahead. I'm not offended at all at your threads. Just see it as you having fun cos you can't really mean those things.

MeetDx:
So it's safe to say the Bible is erroneous in saying what it says in Isaiah 45:7 and also Proverbs 16 4 right? And I never mentioned anywhere in my post that God is unjust or evil. He is a righteous God, His judgement goes for the Just and Unjust alike. How do you expect a righteous God to reward you with good when you practice evil?

What a man soweth that he shall reap. So let the wicked be wicked still and the righteous continue in their righteousness in the end every will reap what he sows. So what's wrong with my explanation?

The Bible is a product of a partnership between God and man. The authors were 💯 men and therefore brought their human-ness to bear on whatever message they were inspired to communicate. Sometimes it's their biases, at other times, misrepresentations. It's even possible some moulded divine communication to align with their ideals...and not what God said.

Take the great prophet, Moses, for instance. He saw the origin of creation and set the foundations of godliness. Yet this man missed it in many places.

Jesus had a field day trying to undo the mess Moses made. Divorce was never in God's will but Moses gave it as a law. The law of an eye for an eye blood for blood as well. Likewise the laws on slavery which thing has never been morally right were given and passed as the laws of God. And so many other things.

Look at the texts below to understand what I'm saying:

Matthew 19:8 KJV
[8] He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.

Mark 7:7-8 KJV
[7] Howbeit in vain do they worship me, Teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. [8] For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.

Men bend the laws of God to conform with the traditions of men (e.g slavery, divorce, capital punishment, etc). Even God accommodates the ways of men (and sort of adopts them) and give laws concerning them to help manage a community of peoples.

Mind you, that God, through his prophets legislate on these things don't necessarily mean they're right. It reveals the accommodations of God and his understanding of humanity and human society.

He knows it takes time to change cultures and traditions so he accommodates them initially, legislates on them, but at the same time initiates a long-term plan of teaching the people and gradually phasing out and replacing those ungodly ways.

So that something is in the Bible or written by a prophet doesn't automatically mean it's morally right or righteous, it's just what was said for that time, people, their cultures and traditions.

As Paul puts it, the law was their guardian until the maturation of things

Galatians 3:23-24 KJV
[23] But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. [24] Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.

The authors of scriptures were men living in the world and engaging with the world around them. When God came to Israel, he met them set in their ways already. So what he did was work with what was already available. And what was available wasn't necessarily morally right or just but God worked with them all the same towards an end.

That it's in the Bible doesn't mean it's right

Dtruthspeaker:
This might be because we are on the same page here. But, maybe if you go through my threads you might get angry.

Well, I forgive you ahead of time. Just glad about your understanding of fundamentals.

Recommend any of your threads I should start from

Dtruthspeaker:
Wrong. The old and the new are the same. If you think otherwise, then raise any law you think that is not anywhere

Man I like you already!

MeetDx:
It's just to serve as a witness that you were told to choose life but God already knows the end from the beginning. Why do you think God hardened Pharaoh's heart to do his will? Exodus 7:3-4 and 9:13? Even the new testament teaches the same thing... Read 2 Thessalonians 2:11

He will send them a strong delusion to believe a lie.

The version of God you're trying to build here sounds very evil and villainous. Sort of like a wicked entity that booby-traps people into error so he can derive pleasure from punishing them for it.

I make bold to say, that the Lord God Almighty, the father of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, is a good God. No unrighteousness or evil with him.

Dtruthspeaker:
Ok.

I see some destiny/preordained people talking here. Let me go and put them in order

What they don't understand is that their line of argument (predeterminism) tells badly on God. He isn't so much God anymore and he's effectively made unfair and his judgements unjust.