₦airaland Forum

How Obidients Could Be The Downfall Of Peter Obi.
In Naija politics, every candidate eventually has to answer for the army they raised.



Not for the enemies who oppose them. Not for the institutions that challenge them. Not even for the running mates who complicate their messaging.



For the loyalists. The true believers. The ones who marched in the rain, donated their data, screamed down journalists on Twitter, and decided that their candidate was not just a politician but a cause worth dismantling every other political structure in Nigeria to protect.



Peter Obi raised the most passionate army in Nigerian electoral politics since the NADECO era. He called them by their own name. He inspired them with his frugality. He gave them a tagline that became a philosophy. "We no dey give shishi." And they gave him something no Nigerian presidential candidate had received in a long time.



Genuine mass ideological loyalty.



But armies, in Naija politics as in every theatre of human conflict, are only assets when they follow strategic command. When they start commanding the general, they become something else entirely.



And right now, in June 2026, the Obidients are becoming something else entirely.







How The Movement Was Born: The Phenomenon That Shocked Nigeria



Let us trace the origin properly before delivering the warning.



In 2022, Peter Obi left the PDP. He cited what he described as irregularities and transactional conduct in the presidential primary. He chose the Labour Party, a party that most Nigerian political analysts described as a vehicle with four flat tires and no engine.



What followed was one of the most extraordinary political mobilisations in Nigerian history.



Young Nigerians, urban professionals, first-time voters, diaspora Nigerians registering from abroad, students, market traders who had never voted before, all united around a single message: this man is different. He kept Anambra's money. He lived simply. He did not buy votes. He did not spray naira notes at parties. He said "we no dey give shishi" and an entire generation of Nigerians who were tired of seeing their leaders steal with both hands adopted that phrase as their manifesto.



The Ooni of Ife, the Ooni of Ife, called him a Tsunami. Not a politician. A natural phenomenon.



In the 2023 general election, Obi came third. On a Labour Party platform with no governors, no federal structure, no collation agents in large portions of the country, and no traditional party machinery. He got 6.1 million votes. He won Lagos, the commercial capital, in ways that defied every established political prediction. He won the FCT. He performed strongly in states the opposition had written off.



That was the movement at its peak. Passionate. Organised through social media in ways Nigerian politics had never seen. Genuinely threatening to the establishment.







How The Movement Became An Entitlement Machine



The problem with movements built on purity is what happens when the purity meets the impurity of real political processes.



In the ADC, the Obidients decided that Atiku Abubakar was the enemy. Not Tinubu. Atiku. The man in the same opposition coalition. The man who had pledged to support whoever won the ADC primary. The man whose northern structure and delegate numbers were the coalition's strongest structural asset.



They began insulting Atiku and his camp on social media with the same energy they had used against the APC in 2023. They demanded Obi-Kwankwaso as non-negotiable. They called Atiku a bluff. They said the primary would be rigged if Atiku emerged. They made the ADC coalition's internal management a daily social media crisis.



Dele Momodu, Atiku's most eloquent defender, eventually came out publicly and said what needed to be said directly.



He declared: "Atiku will not be bullied into stepping down. Elections don't run on emotion. It is a shame that people don't read. We just go on the internet and shout: once we have Obi and Kwankwaso, it is over. Nothing is over."





Nothing is over.



That sentence was aimed at Twitter, at Instagram, at the WhatsApp groups where Obidients held court and voted on whether Atiku was worthy of consideration. It was a reminder that the primary system does not run on trending hashtags. It runs on registered delegates in accredited halls.



The Obidients could not organise enough delegates to give Obi the ADC ticket. They could organise enough noise to make Atiku's primary management more difficult. And they maximised that noise until Obi himself decided the environment was too toxic and left for NDC.



The movement's aggression contributed to the fragmentation that set Obi back.







Now In NDC: The Pattern Is Repeating Itself



If the ADC experience was a warning, the NDC experience is a full diagnosis.



Aisha Yesufu, the co-founder of the BringBackOurGirls and EndSARS movements, is one of the most recognisable faces of the Obidient activism. She declared her intention to contest the FCT senatorial seat on the NDC platform. She toured area councils. She shared legislative blueprints. She mobilised supporters on social media.



Then reports emerged that the NDC had a preferred candidate for the FCT senatorial seat. A woman named Barrister Amanda Pam. A party chieftain who had been with NDC before Yesufu arrived. A woman with actual grassroots network, delegate relationships, and party loyalty built over years rather than months.



Yesufu revealed that NDC cancelled the primary election for the FCT Senate seat. She called it a breach of the Electoral Act. She said the process was structured to frustrate challengers and subverted. She deliberately chose not to litigate, saying the grievance process was designed to wear people down.



The primary was eventually held and Amanda Pam won. Yesufu lost. The woman who defeated her had deep grassroots networks and long-standing party loyalty that Yesufu's social media following could not replace at the delegate level.



The verdict from social media was immediate and merciless



Click on the link below to read more and get more stories about Ourpalaver 👇🏾

https://www.ourpalaver.com/terminal/naija-politics/post/MNMsmssV

In Naija politics, the most entertaining character in any political drama is not the winner.

It is the man who told everyone he would never lose. Who said it loudly. Who said it repeatedly. Who said it with such conviction and such theatrical force that journalists started scheduling follow-up interviews just to watch what would happen when reality arrived.

That man is Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi. Former speaker. Former governor. Former minister. Former campaign director-general. Former APC presidential aspirant. Former ADC presidential aspirant. Current sitting occupant of Atiku Abubakar's living room couch.

And the question that Naija politics is now asking with barely concealed delight is this.

Will the man who said nobody has ever told him to be vice president because they know his worth and what will be his reaction, become the vice president of the man he said had never won an election despite winning every primary?

The irony writes itself. But let us write it properly anyway.

A Career Built on Two Things: Competence and Brass

Let us acknowledge the resume before we mock the contradiction. Because in Naija politics, you earn the right to be satirised by first building something worth talking about.

Rotimi Amaechi was elected to the Rivers State House of Assembly and became its Speaker at an age when most Nigerian politicians were still drafting letters to party secretaries. He became Chairman of the Nigerian Conference of Speakers when that body still carried institutional weight.

He governed Rivers State for eight years. Two terms. Built roads. Expanded the monorail. Fought Wike before fighting Wike became fashionable. And survived a Supreme Court battle over his governorship that most men would not have survived politically.

He then did something that required genuine political courage in 2014. He looked at the PDP, an incumbent president, and the full weight of federal power, and decided to leave and fight.

He became the Director-General of Buhari's 2015 presidential campaign, the most consequential opposition campaign in Nigerian democratic history. He was the operational brain behind the machinery that ended sixteen years of PDP federal rule.

He served as Transport Minister and commissioned infrastructure projects that Nigerian commentators usually only see in photographs from other countries.

Then he resigned from the Buhari cabinet to run for president. He came second to Tinubu at the APC primary. He did not support Tinubu's candidacy. He defected to the ADC. He ran for the ADC presidential ticket.

This is a man of genuine accomplishment. The satirical target is not his record. The satirical target is what his mouth has been saying about his record in comparison to everyone else's.

The Buhari Claim: The Boast That Waited Seven Years For An Audience

Let us start with the one that set the tone for everything that followed.

During the ADC primary campaign period, Amaechi finally said publicly what he had apparently been holding inside for seven years.

He claimed that it was he, not Tinubu, who was the real architect of Buhari's 2015 election victory. That without his operational DG work, the APC merger and the 2015 campaign would not have produced a Buhari presidency.

A completely reasonable argument. Possibly even accurate in significant parts.

But here is the satirical observation.

He waited until Buhari was dead to say it loudly. He held that declaration inside for seven years of active Buhari administration, seven years of sitting in cabinet, seven years of attending Federal Executive Council meetings with the man he now claims he installed, and did not say it clearly once.

In his own defence, he explained that he did not want to get fired.

Let us sit with that sentence.

The man who made the president did not want to tell the president he made him in case the president he made fired the man who made him.

In Naija politics, that is not political wisdom. That is the political biography of a man who has spent his entire career telling everyone how powerful he is while calculating very carefully when it is safe to say so.


Click on the link below to read more 👇🏾

https://www.ourpalaver.com/terminal/naija-
politics/post/Ta4kbpL3

Join Ourpalaver now to get the latest stories trending around Nigeria now

Humpty Dumpty in Abuja: How Three Court Rulings in Ten Days Began Dismantling Nyesom Wike's Untouchable Rivers State Empire
Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,

Humpty Dumpty had a great fall;

All the king's horses and all the king's men

Couldn't put Humpty together again.



That nursery rhyme was not written about Nigerian politics.



But if it had been, it would have been written about Nyesom Wike. In June 2026. After three court rulings in ten days dismantled the most impressive political empire any Nigerian minister has assembled in recent memory.



The wall was high. The empire looked unshakeable. The man sitting on it was so confident he held Rainbow Coalition luncheons, forgave political enemies publicly, and told ADC and NDC that they were too new to win a single vote in his state.



And then the courts said: actually, no.



And all of Wike's lawyers and all of Wike's political networks cannot put Humpty together again.



Welcome to Naija politics. Where the most powerful men always believe the rules apply to everyone except them. Until a judgment is delivered. And then suddenly the wall is not as tall as it looked from the bottom.







How The Empire Was Built



Let us give Wike his credit before we give him his verdict. Because in Naija politics, accurate mockery must begin with accurate description.



Nyesom Wike built something in Rivers State that Nigerian political science had never seen.



He took a PDP national secretaryship and installed Samuel Anyanwu in it. He backed a caretaker committee that INEC eventually recognised. He used his FCT minister position to access Aso Rock. He made himself indispensable to Tinubu by delivering federal compliance from the South-South. He destroyed a sitting governor's second term ambition. He drafted a PDP opposition member into an APC governorship primary and had him cleared in under a month. He convened a Rainbow Coalition luncheon where PDP, APC, LP and AA sat together under his authority. He told ADC and NDC to their faces that they were strangers in his land.



He did all of this without holding a single elected office. Without being a card-carrying member of the party whose primaries he controlled.



It was extraordinary. It was ruthless. It was the most audacious exercise of political control from an appointed position in Nigerian history.



And then the courts started reading.







The First Crack: Rivers APC Implodes on May 29



On May 29, 2026, Justice Elfreida Oluwayemisi Williams-Dawodu of the Court of Appeal Port Harcourt Division delivered a unanimous judgment.



The court upheld the Rivers State High Court's decision nullifying the congresses that produced Tony Okocha as chairman of the APC in Rivers State.



Tony Okocha. The man who ran the APC structure in Rivers State. The man whose loyalty to Wike was acknowledged by every political observer in Port Harcourt. The man whose screening committees cleared Wike's loyalists and disqualified Fubara's allies at every level of the primaries exercise.



Gone. As if he never had a mandate.



And then the Emeka Beke-led reinstated faction of the Rivers APC dropped the statement that made Wike's entire Rivers political architecture collapse like wet paper.



Spokesman Darlington Nwauju declared: "All nominations, representations, communications, documentations including decisions reached on behalf of the Rivers State Chapter of the All Progressives Congress between December 20, 2024 and May 29, 2026, have no effect on the party."



December 20, 2024 to May 29, 2026.



Every single decision. Every screening. Every disqualification. Every clearance. Every result from every primary at every level. State Assembly. House of Representatives. Senate. Governorship.



All of it.



Null. Void. Of no effect.



That means Kingsley Chinda, the man Wike installed as the APC governorship candidate, the man for whom Fubara was politically executed, the man who defected from the PDP Minority Leadership to become the APC's Rivers State gubernatorial flag bearer, did not register with the legitimate APC in Rivers State.



Lawyers at ALDRAP immediately pointed this out: "By virtue of the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 29th May 2026, the Emeka Beke-led faction of the APC is the recognised APC in Rivers State, whereas Hon. Kingsley Ogundu Chinda registered with the Tony Okocha-led faction. Therefore Chinda's registration, primary participation, and emergence as governorship candidate are all legally questionable."



Chinda's defection letter was dated April 23. His formal emergence as Minority Leader in the House was only announced at plenary on June 2, nearly two weeks after the governorship primary. Questions remain over whether he can continue to occupy the position of Minority Leader while flying the APC governorship flag, with lawyers arguing that one political party cannot simultaneously produce both the Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the House of Representatives.



The man Wike spent three years preparing is now standing on a legal foundation that has just been declared to not exist.







Wike's Response: Wait For INEC



How did the Emperor respond to the collapse of his APC structure?



He told everyone to calm down and wait for INEC.



When asked about the sacking of Chinda and other Wike candidates by the reinstated Beke faction, Wike said Emeka Beke lacked proper understanding of the issues at hand and advised him to wait patiently for INEC to publish its list of nominated party candidates before making assumptions.



Wait for INEC.



This is the same man who stood at a Rainbow Coalition luncheon last week and told ADC and NDC they were too new for Rivers State and would not get any votes. The same man who mocked Fubara with "is he not the 001 anymore?" after engineering his political humiliation. The same man whose aide Lere Olayinka published a video of Fubara calling Wike a barking dog as a victory dance after Fubara's withdrawal.



That man is now telling his critics to wait for INEC.



In Naija politics, when the most dominant man in the room switches from triumphalism to proceduralism within the same week, the room has already changed.







The Second Blow: PDP Caretaker Committee Nullified on June 3



If May 29 was the beginning of the fall, June 3 was the confirmation.



The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja delivered judgment on June 3, 2026, setting aside key aspects of the Federal High Court judgment that had recognised the Abdulrahman Mohammed and Samuel Anyanwu-led caretaker committee as the legitimate PDP leadership. Justice Uchechukwu Onyemenam held that the trial court in Ibadan granted reliefs that were never sought by any of the parties to the suit, meaning the judge went beyond what either side asked for in producing the ruling that recognised Wike's faction.



The Federal High Court in Ibadan gave Wike's PDP faction its legal foundation in January 2026. The Court of Appeal removed that foundation on June 3.



The Turaki-led faction immediately demanded INEC derecognise the Wike-backed caretaker committee. Their spokesman Ini Ememobong said: "The Court also affirmed the suspension of A.K. Ajibade, and by extension Samuel Anyanwu and co., and held that they had no power to act on behalf of the party. The Independent National Electoral Commission, which used the Federal High Court judgment as its basis for recognising the illegal Caretaker Committee, is expected to immediately derecognise them and now recognise the duly constituted Interim National Working Committee led by Kabiru Tanimu Turaki."


Click on the link below to read more and join Ourpalaver to get more stories happening around Nigeria 👇🏾

https://www.ourpalaver.com/terminal/naija-politics/post/rQ7UFi7c

Chelsea Ready to Cut Ties With Alejandro Garnacho After Just One Season?

Less than a year after signing Alejandro Garnacho from Manchester United for £40 million, Chelsea are reportedly willing to listen to offers for the Argentine winger at the same price they paid for him. The development comes after a difficult debut season at Stamford Bridge that has failed to meet expectations.

When Chelsea completed the £40 million move in August 2025, many fans believed the club had secured one of the Premier League's most exciting young talents. Garnacho had shown flashes of brilliance at Manchester United, making over 90 league appearances and establishing himself as one of the brightest prospects in English football.

However, his first season in blue has been far from convincing. Reports indicate that Garnacho struggled for consistency, found it difficult to nail down a regular starting spot, and failed to make the expected impact in the Premier League. While he managed goals and assists across all competitions, many of his contributions came in domestic cup matches rather than in the league, where Chelsea needed him most.

Statistics from the 2025/26 campaign show a modest return in league action, with limited goals and assists despite numerous appearances.

Despite the criticism, there have been moments that showed why Chelsea invested in him. Club analysis pieces have highlighted his pace, creativity, movement, and ability to create chances for teammates. But those flashes of quality have not been enough to convince everyone that he should remain a key part of Chelsea's long-term project.

Now, with reports suggesting Chelsea are open to selling him for £40 million, questions are being asked about whether the move was a mistake for both player and club. At just 21 years old, Garnacho still has plenty of time to revive his career, but another transfer so soon after leaving Manchester United would raise serious questions about his development and future.

Should Chelsea be patient and give Garnacho another season to prove himself, or should they cash in now and move on?

Join the conversation on OurPalaver and share your thoughts.

Chelsea Ready to Cut Ties With Alejandro Garnacho After Just One Season?

Less than a year after signing Alejandro Garnacho from Manchester United for £40 million, Chelsea are reportedly willing to listen to offers for the Argentine winger at the same price they paid for him. The development comes after a difficult debut season at Stamford Bridge that has failed to meet expectations.

When Chelsea completed the £40 million move in August 2025, many fans believed the club had secured one of the Premier League's most exciting young talents. Garnacho had shown flashes of brilliance at Manchester United, making over 90 league appearances and establishing himself as one of the brightest prospects in English football.

However, his first season in blue has been far from convincing. Reports indicate that Garnacho struggled for consistency, found it difficult to nail down a regular starting spot, and failed to make the expected impact in the Premier League. While he managed goals and assists across all competitions, many of his contributions came in domestic cup matches rather than in the league, where Chelsea needed him most.

Statistics from the 2025/26 campaign show a modest return in league action, with limited goals and assists despite numerous appearances.

Despite the criticism, there have been moments that showed why Chelsea invested in him. Club analysis pieces have highlighted his pace, creativity, movement, and ability to create chances for teammates. But those flashes of quality have not been enough to convince everyone that he should remain a key part of Chelsea's long-term project.

Now, with reports suggesting Chelsea are open to selling him for £40 million, questions are being asked about whether the move was a mistake for both player and club. At just 21 years old, Garnacho still has plenty of time to revive his career, but another transfer so soon after leaving Manchester United would raise serious questions about his development and future.

Should Chelsea be patient and give Garnacho another season to prove himself, or should they cash in now and move on?



Click on the link below to read more 👇🏾

https://www.ourpalaver.com/terminal/premier-league/post/D3h6JzKH
Join the conversation on OurPalaver and share your thoughts.

The Ticket That Could Change Everything: What Happens If Tinubu Drops Shettima For A Northern Christian
In Naija politics, the most powerful decision a presidential candidate ever makes is not the manifesto.



It is the running mate.



Because a running mate is not just a person. It is a message. It is a calculation translated into a human being and placed on a ticket for 220 million Nigerians to read. It tells them who you trust. It tells them whose votes you think you still need. It tells them what you are afraid of losing and what you believe is still available to win.



Tinubu made that calculation in 2022 and picked Kashim Shettima. A Muslim from Borno. A Muslim-Muslim ticket in a country where the Muslim-North and Christian-South divide is the most reliable fault line in electoral history.



That choice produced a backlash that consumed months of campaign energy. It produced the CAN rejection. The Babachir Lawal resistance. The northern Christian exodus. And still, because the opposition was fragmented and the southern Christian vote was split between Obi and Atiku, Tinubu won with 8.79 million votes.



Now the question sitting in Aso Rock is whether the man who won despite the Muslim-Muslim controversy can win even bigger by removing the controversy entirely.



Whether dropping Shettima and picking a northern Christian is the strategic masterstroke that turns Tinubu's 10.9 million party primary votes into an election-day figure no opposition candidate can touch.



Let us examine this honestly.







THE EVIDENCE THAT THE PRESSURE IS REAL AND BUILDING



The Shettima replacement conversation is not a social media fantasy. It is a documented, multi-source political pressure campaign that has been running since the middle of 2025.



In May 2025, the Concerned Northern Muslim Ummah, a group representing northern Muslims, issued a formal statement calling on Tinubu to drop Shettima and pick a northern Christian. Their convener Bala Duguri said: "After extensive consultations across religious, ethnic, and political lines in the North, we believe the most appropriate step forward is for a Northern Christian to be selected as the Vice Presidential candidate in 2027."



Note that. Northern Muslims asking for a northern Christian VP. That is not a political accident. That is a community reading the electoral map and telling the president what it thinks he needs.



Then in June 2025, the APC's North-East zonal meeting in Gombe descended into chaos. APC National Vice Chairman Mustapha Salihu endorsed Tinubu for 2027 without mentioning Shettima's name. National Chairman Ganduje gave a ten-minute speech that also failed to acknowledge the Vice President. Boos erupted from delegates. The meeting was cut short. Ganduje was escorted out under tight security.



A ruling party zonal meeting. Where the vice president's name produced boos. In his own geopolitical zone.



In August 2025, the Northern Ethnic Nationality Forum, representing over 200 ethnic communities in northern Nigeria, went further. Its president Dr Dominic Alancha declared: "Over 80 percent of Northern Christians rejected the APC in 2023. Retaining the same strategy in 2027 could cost the party more states across the Middle Belt and parts of the North where Christians hold significant voting power."



80 percent of northern Christians. Against the Muslim-Muslim ticket in 2023.



That is not a marginal voter bloc. The Middle Belt states, including Benue, Plateau, Taraba, Nasarawa, and parts of Kaduna, are predominantly Christian northern territories with combined registered voter populations numbering in the millions. In 2023, those votes went largely to Obi and Atiku. They did not go to Tinubu.



And in December 2025, Reverend Ezekiel Dachomo, regional leader of the Church of Christ in Nations, went on national television and described the Muslim-Muslim ticket as equivalent to Christian genocide. That statement, inflammatory as it is, did not come from a fringe voice. It came from a major northern Christian institution with congregations across the Middle Belt.



The pressure is real. It is organised. And it comes from enough of the electoral landscape to give any serious strategist pause.







WHAT A NORTHERN CHRISTIAN VP ACTUALLY ADDS TO THE TICKET



Let us do the electoral arithmetic carefully because this is where the argument either holds or falls apart.



In 2023, Tinubu won with 8.79 million votes. In his 2026 party primary, 10.99 million APC members voted for him. The party has 12.6 million registered members.



Now add a northern Christian to the ticket and ask what changes.



Political observers have identified four possible VP directions: a northern Christian to placate the Muslim-Muslim grievance, a North-West governor to consolidate a region where Kwankwaso's NNPP previously wounded APC, a different North-East candidate to maintain that zone but replace Shettima specifically, or Kwankwaso himself being lured into the APC with the VP slot.



The northern Christian option produces the most theoretically transformative arithmetic.



Consider the Middle Belt alone. Benue, Plateau, Taraba, Nasarawa, and southern Kaduna represent millions of voters. In 2023, Benue gave Obi 453,080 votes and Tinubu only 147,465. Plateau gave Obi 243,215 and Tinubu 159,531. Taraba gave Atiku 319,929 and Tinubu 193,499.



These are states where Tinubu came second or third despite APC governors. The Muslim-Muslim ticket was a ceiling that depressed his numbers in these states regardless of gubernatorial machinery.



A northern Christian running mate removes that ceiling. Specifically, it removes the single clearest argument that the CAN, the northern Christian community, and the Middle Belt voting blocs have been making against Tinubu since 2022.



If even a fraction of those millions of Middle Belt Christian votes that went to Obi in 2023 come home to a Tinubu-Christian ticket in 2027, the result is not just a larger victory. It is a potential 15 million vote landslide that makes legal challenges, rigging allegations, and opposition protests essentially inaudible.



The South-East argument runs similarly. Obi got 3.1 million votes from the South-East in 2023. He is running on an NDC platform in 2027. If Tinubu puts an Igbo Christian on the ticket, the South-East calculation changes dramatically. Not entirely. But enough to make the contested states winnable for the first time.



The South-South argument is the most speculative but not the most unreasonable. South-South Christian voters, already alienated by the Muslim-Muslim ticket in 2023, have no natural home in 2027's opposition. Atiku is a northern Muslim. Obi's NDC may appeal more. But a Tinubu-Christian ticket with specific South-South commitments, including the Port Harcourt refinery running, the gas pipeline delivered, and the Rivers State settlement under Wike's Rainbow Coalition, has a real conversation to begin with South-South Christian voters.



Add it all together and the Tinubu-northern Christian ticket could produce something the 2023 ticket never could. A genuine cross-section vote that combines the South-West base, the APC northern Muslim structure, the northern Christian community, and portions of the South-East and South-South Christian vote.



That combination, on paper, is not just a winning majority. It is a democratic mandate of a scale Nigerian presidential history has not seen.







THE SHETTIMA PROBLEM: WHY DROPPING HIM IS HARDER THAN IT SOUNDS



Here is where the calculation runs into resistance.



Shettima is not a passive vice president waiting to be replaced. He is one of the most politically capable men in the APC and one of the architects of Tinubu's 2023 victory. A senior APC source told Vanguard: "President Tinubu will not risk dropping Shettima in 2027. The vice president is an asset to him. He was the first to support Tinubu before others. He has a formidable structure in the North-East. He commands huge loyalty from Borno and beyond."



Shettima delivered Borno for Tinubu in 2023. Borno gave Tinubu 543,523 votes. Dropping Shettima risks that entire bloc becoming hostile or at minimum lukewarm in 2027.



Then there is the north-east anger argument. The chaos at the Gombe meeting shows that Shettima's supporters in the North-East are not passive. They booed the National Chairman off the stage. Dropping Shettima could cost Tinubu five North-East states that he needs to maintain his northern majority.



And the Islamic establishment argument. Sheikh Sani Yahaya Jingir, the powerful JIBWIS National Chairman, warned Tinubu directly: "I supported Tinubu and Shettima, and we are backing your joint ticket. Any attempt to drop Shettima, I wouldn't support that move."



JIBWIS is not a marginal religious organisation. It is one of the most influential Sunni Muslim bodies in northern Nigeria with networks in virtually every northern state. Its endorsement is electoral weight. Its opposition is equally weighty.



Tinubu's calculation is therefore not between keeping Shettima and gaining Christian votes. It is between keeping Shettima and keeping North-East votes versus dropping Shettima and gaining Middle Belt and Christian votes.



That is not a simple arithmetic upgrade. That is a trade with as many risks as rewards.


Click on the link to read more about this 👇🏾

https://www.ourpalaver.com/terminal/naija-politics/post/grEjFw8v

Get the best news from Ourpalaver now,join and enjoy

The Battle For The North: Can Atiku Crack Tinubu's Northern Wall or Is The North Already Decided?
In Naija politics, there is no throne without the North.



Not because the North is more Nigerian than the South. Not because northern votes are heavier than southern votes. But because of a mathematical reality that every serious presidential campaign in Nigeria has understood since 1999.



The North has more states. More local governments. More registered voters in the INEC database. And whoever wins the North convincingly, even partially, has a structural advantage that the South alone cannot overcome.



Tinubu knew this in 2023. That is why sixty-one percent of his 8.79 million winning votes came from northern states. Not from Lagos. Not from Osun. Not from the South-West he calls home. From the North that his critics said would never back a southern Yoruba Muslim with a Muslim running mate.



They were wrong. He won.



Now in 2027, the same calculation applies. And this time, the battle for the North is not abstract. It is personal, it is theological, it is ethnic, and it is exploding in real time.



On one side: Tinubu, the sitting president, who just gave the North's most sensitive security position to a Yoruba retired general while the North is still burying its soldiers and running from bandits.



On the other side: Atiku, the northern candidate, who just won his own party's presidential primary only to watch his most vocal northern Christian ally call him a warlord, a religious hegemonist, and a near-senile octogenarian who is handing Tinubu the presidency.



Welcome to the most consequential northern political battle since 2015.







TINUBU'S NORTHERN PROBLEM: THE HOMELAND SECURITY APPOINTMENT THAT SAID THE QUIET PART LOUD



On May 8, 2026, a circular signed by SGF George Akume announced that retired Major General Adeyinka Famadewa had been appointed Special Adviser to the President on Homeland Security.



The announcement set off an earthquake inside Nigeria's security and political establishment. And the epicentre was in the North.



The appointment marked the first time a Nigerian president had formally established a dedicated homeland security advisory office within the presidency at the federal level.



The problem is not the office itself. The problem is what the office implies about the man whose role it shadows.



Nuhu Ribadu, the National Security Adviser, is a northerner. A Fulani Muslim from Adamawa State. A man who, at the very moment this appointment was announced, was in Washington DC representing Nigeria at high-level meetings with US Vice President JD Vance and Acting National Security Adviser Marco Rubio.



Multiple presidency and security sources told Sunday Punch that the move was triggered by a combination of professional friction between Ribadu and the heads of the armed forces, and intelligence community concerns about the quality of analysis reaching the President. A senior presidency source said: "The truth of the matter is that the service chiefs and the intelligence community are not happy with Ribadu."



Read the subtext carefully.



A president whose sixty percent of 2023 northern votes came partly because of Buhari's northern legacy and the goodwill of northern APC structures has now appointed a southern, Yoruba, retired general to oversee homeland security functions that have historically belonged to a northern-controlled NSA office.



Atiku's media aide Paul Ibe alleged directly: "The NSA's office has been quietly sidelined. Ribadu, who was away on an official trip and simultaneously managing sensitive US-Nigeria security discussions, returned to find a new security structure had been erected around his mandate."



The ADC's National Publicity Secretary Bolaji Abdullahi was blunter: "President Tinubu has just appointed a Major General as Special Adviser on Homeland Security. If he lacks confidence in the ability of NSA Nuhu Ribadu to tackle security issues, why not just replace him?"



Replace him. That sentence contains the political charge the North is processing.



If Tinubu lacked confidence in his NSA, the northern interpretation is: he hired a Yoruba general to supervise a northern man rather than empower or replace him. He chose parallel authority over direct trust.



That is the template many northerners recognise from the Buhari years, when federal appointments systematically favoured northern Muslim structures at the expense of southern ones. The current version, running in the opposite direction and favouring southern Yoruba structures, produces the same grievance from a different compass bearing.



Professor Femi Otunbanjo of the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs said the military would only most reluctantly accept a police officer or any other paramilitary official as NSA, suggesting that Ribadu's appointment in 2023 was itself a structural error that the Famadewa appointment may be attempting to correct.



Whether or not that structural argument is valid, the political perception in the North has already formed. The conversation in Kano, Kaduna, Sokoto, Maiduguri, and Yola is the same.



The man handling Nigeria's security in the North is now a Yoruba general, while a northern man representing Nigeria on the world stage in Washington was being managed around.







ATIKU'S NORTHERN PROBLEM: THE MAN WHO CALLED HIM A WARLORD IS FROM HIS OWN STATE



And then there is Babachir Lawal.



On June 1, 2026, the former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, who joined the ADC from the APC in August 2025, resigned from the party and published one of the most explosive exit statements in Nigerian political history.



He stated: "I am exiting the ADC because its just concluded primaries were at all levels massively rigged in favour of Kachalla Abubakar Atiku. Results were just written or rewritten to favour him and his coven. Even where they allowed some semblance of an election to hold, the winners were simply replaced with members of his syndicate."



Kachalla. The word is not a neutral political critique. In Hausa, kachalla carries the connotation of a warlord, a gang leader, a man who rules by fear and force rather than law. Babachir applied it to Atiku repeatedly and deliberately.

Click on the link below to read more 👇🏾

https://www.ourpalaver.com/terminal/naija-politics/post/FLW8FJUF

Join Ourpalaver and get more stories about what's happening around the world

VDM's Statement Sparks Debate: Is Removing Tinubu the Key to a Better Nigeria?

Popular social commentator VeryDarkMan (VDM) has ignited fresh political conversations after stating that if Nigerians can collectively vote President Bola Tinubu out of power, the country could become "70% better."

According to VDM, democracy works best when leaders understand that power belongs to the people. He argued that removing any government that fails to meet citizens' expectations would send a strong message that public office holders are accountable to the electorate.

His comments have already divided opinions. While some Nigerians agree that leaders should face consequences for poor performance, others believe the solution lies beyond simply changing governments.

What do you think? Is VDM right? Can Nigeria truly improve if citizens become more active in holding leaders accountable, or is there more to the country's challenges?

🔥 Join the conversation now on OURPALAVAER and share your opinion with Nigerians from across the country. Your voice matters!

Click on the link below to join the conversation 👇🏾
https://www.ourpalaver.com?ref=ajayi

Luis Enrique Just Put Manchester United on Notice

Luis Enrique was asked about Arsenal. He ended up talking about Manchester United.

Before PSG faced Arsenal in the Champions League, the PSG manager and his staff went back to study Manchester United's 3-2 win against the Gunners. Not because it was a famous result — but because United solved a problem most teams in Europe couldn't. They broke Arsenal's low block.

Enrique saw a team brave enough to attack available spaces and players with the quality to punish mistakes. Dorgu and Cunha were his examples. One moment of quality. Game changed. That was the lesson he took into the PSG dressing room.

And it worked.

But here is the part that should make everyone sit up. After breaking down one of the most organised defences in Europe, the PSG manager's conclusion was simple — Manchester United will be very dangerous next season. His words, not ours.

That is not a compliment thrown around casually. That is a Champions League manager publicly filing United away as a threat.

Michael Carrick's side are still a work in progress. The league table makes that clear. But when elite coaches are using your matches as tactical homework, something is changing at Old Trafford — quietly, but unmistakably.

Arsenal will be worried. The rest of Europe should be paying attention.

Drop your take on OurPalaver 👇

Click on the link below to read more

https://www.ourpalaver.com/terminal/uefa-champions-league/post/kMCvtLPY

Let's be honest.

One of the most talked-about topics every NYSC season is relocation.

The moment call-up letters are released, many prospective corps members immediately start calculating their next move. Some are excited about their state of deployment, while others begin searching for relocation information before even stepping into camp.

But here's an interesting question:

If NYSC gave you one free relocation today with guaranteed approval, which state would you choose?

Would it be Lagos because of the opportunities and city life?

Abuja because of the peaceful environment and networking opportunities?

Oyo because of the balance between affordability and development?

Or maybe Rivers, Enugu, Ogun, or even your home state?

The funny thing is that everybody has a reason.

Some people want a state closer to family.

Some are thinking about job opportunities after service.

Others simply want good roads, stable electricity, and better accommodation options. 😅

Interestingly, many corps members who initially fought hard for relocation later admitted that the state they wanted to leave eventually gave them some of their best NYSC memories.

So maybe the perfect state doesn't always guarantee the perfect experience.

Now let's hear from you.

👇 If NYSC approved your relocation request right now, which state would you choose and why?

Drop your answer in the comments and let's see which state wins the popularity contest among PCMs and corps members.

For more NYSC updates, relocation gist, camp stories, and PCM guides, visit:

Our Palaver — https://www.ourpalaver.com?ref=areola

The Rainbow King: What Wike Is Really Building in Rivers State and Why It Should Terrify Everyone
In Naija politics, the most dangerous man in any room is never the one making the loudest noise.



It is the one who has already decided how the room ends while everyone else is still arguing about where to sit.



On Saturday May 30, 2026, at a luncheon in Port Harcourt aired on the Nigerian Television Authority, Nyesom Wike stood before members of the Peoples Democratic Party, the All Progressives Congress, the Labour Party, and the Action Alliance, all in the same hall, all on the same side, all answering to one convener.



A PDP minister. Hosting APC, LP, AA, and PDP candidates together. In the same room. In the same state. On the same evening.



He called it the Rainbow Coalition.



In Naija politics, that is not a coalition. That is a kingdom. And the man wearing the crown is not the governor. He is not even in elected office. He is the minister who just finished dismantling a governor's career and is now building the architecture for whatever comes next.



Let us talk about what that architecture actually looks like. And what it is really designed for.







How The Rainbow Was Built: From Two Chairmen to Four Parties



This did not start on May 30. It started months earlier with a move so audacious that most political observers dismissed it as theatre.



Earlier this year, Wike hosted both the PDP state chairman and the APC state chairman in Rivers State at the same event. He challenged any politician in Nigeria to replicate what he had done. Bring your party's chairman and your main opponent's party chairman to the same stage. At the same time. Without any of them fighting.



Nobody took the challenge. Because nobody else had the political weight, the financial resources, and the personal relationships required to make that happen.



Then the experiment expanded.



Two chairmen became four parties. PDP, APC, LP, AA, all brought under the Rainbow Coalition umbrella, all attending a luncheon, all eating at the same table, all agreeing to the same basic proposition: we will collectively choose one governorship candidate for Rivers State in 2027.



Wike declared at the luncheon: "The Rainbow Coalition, we have not chosen who will be the governor of Rivers State. But we have party candidates who have emerged under the Rainbow Coalition. The only decision we have taken is that we are going to support President Bola Ahmed Tinubu."



One decision confirmed. Tinubu support. Everything else, meaning who becomes governor, remains in Wike's hand to dispense at the appropriate moment.



He said: "You must come here. Everybody here, whether you are APC, whether you are PDP, whether you are in Labour, whether you are AA, you are all okay for the state."



You are all okay for the state. Translation: nobody has been chosen yet. Which means everyone still needs to remain loyal to the man holding the selection authority. Which means the queue is still open. Which means Wike's leverage over every single aspirant in that room is intact.



That is not diplomacy. That is management. And it is brilliant.







The Olive Branch to Fubara's Camp: Forgiveness as a Power Move



One of the most revealing moments of the May 30 luncheon was what Wike said about his defeated political godson.



He extended what he described as forgiveness to the Fubara camp and stated that anyone seeking a political future in Rivers State must join the Rainbow Coalition.



Read that sentence twice.



Not that Fubara's supporters are welcome if they choose to come. Not that the door is open should they want to reconcile.



Anyone seeking a political post in Rivers State must join the Rainbow team.



Must. Not should. Not can. Must.


Click the Link below to read more about this 👇🏾

https://www.ourpalaver.com/terminal/naija-politics/post/L8M5XjWC

Satellite images show Iran's efforts to excavate ...

Iran is poised to fire far more long-range missiles at Israel and other Middle Eastern nations after rapidly digging out its buried arsenals – an effort that highlights the limits to US bombing strategy, experts said.

For weeks, strikes by the United States and Israel restricted Iran’s access to its underground missile sites by destroying roads and burying tunnel entrances.

But satellite images reviewed by CNN show how Iran has used simple equipment such as bulldozers and dump trucks to counter those costly campaigns — suggesting that Tehran’s missile capabilities can’t be destroyed just by targeting tunnel entrances, experts said.

While Iran and the US have reached a tentative agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, months of work remain to hammer out details.

Click on the link to read more about this

https://www.ourpalaver.com/terminal/foreign-news/post/sF7G7hNy