Omakay's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Omakay's Profile › Omakay's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 (of 43 pages)
It is only possible in Nigeria if and only if the following conditions are met: 1, You have the right skill, expertise and knowledge needed to extract such level of profit from whatever online venture you are into. 2, Your capital is large enough to comfortable accommodate monthly running costs which are of high standards. 3, Your work equipments are of top standard. I am talking about a solid broadband network set-up and not some cheap 3G modem bought at computer village. Am also talking about 24/7 power source of nothing less than 5KVA and not some "i pass my neighbor" generator. I am also talking about a standing office with 2014 compliant equipments and not that table in your 1-room apartment. If you can meet and even exceed the above requirements, then you can be sure of making even more than the said amount. |
deleo16:That patience is exactly what you are going to need during trading. So you best grab that patience now and use it in reading up the book. My 2cents advice. |
odimbannamdi: ![]() Na that year wey random index dey shack everybody. Men don upgrade now ooooo |
willscolf:yes ooooo. Very Risky. |
odimbannamdi:There are a lot of them online. www.truetl.com This is one of them. The cost of a project starts from $100 and can be more depending on how complex the project will be. |
omakay:Just to clarify how i came about, "therefore, $20= 154% = $5.4" $20 : $10 + $10 154% : $10 = 254% - 100%(i.e you have to absorb the other $10 into your gross earning)= 154%. I hope this helps. |
odimbannamdi:$10 = 254% $10 = 254% therefore, $20= 154% = $5.4 Your gross profit will be $25.4 and your net will be $5.4. You did not invest $10, you invested $20. N.B : That 254% of yours is actually 54%. This Whole Thing is just REGULAR MATHEMATICS. |
dagr8:I do. I was actually referring to the original post by @odimbannamdi |
dagr8:In both trades, the profit will be 400%.: This profit analysis is overstated. If you check my break-down calculation, you will see that it is actually 25% to 30% and not 400% as stated before. |
Lets say you invest $10 on each bet. $10 to touch +2 in 10 minutes time for 255% which is $35.60 and $10 to touch -2 in 10 minutes time for 255% which is $35.60. I hope you all realize that you cannot win both bets. You will win just one after investing $20 ($10*2) in both bets for a single profit of $35.60. You will have made 25% on your capital. Plus this series of bets is the same thing as placing a "GOES-OUT" bet of +2 and -2 going for a duration of 10 minutes. The above bet is averagely priced at 25%. |
cryptography:LOL!!!!!! You are quick to say "Wrong" Slow to understand my statement and the fact that i am basing my definition on the formulas. I need you to drop the formula for both MAs and the whole room will see how right i am. |
idomalord:SMA = SIMPLE MOVING AVERAGE EMA = EXPONENTIAL MOVING AVERAGE. EMA is more complexly calculated as against SMA. I prefer using EMA because it's complex calculation helps to give a more defined MA. |
Here are some mt4 indicators that will help identify Inside Vertical Bars and Outside Vertical Bars faster. One still needs to understand PRICE ACTION very well to be able to read off the indicators easily. |
odimbannamdi:WE HAVE TO LOOK FOR THE TIME OF THE DAY WHEN THE RANDOM INDEX 25 IS MOST VOLATILE!. That is another problem. Everything about the random index is RANDOM. There is no set time or period for volatility. But if anyone has a breakthrough, make the person show himself oooooo. |
dein77:The bitter truth is that until gifted and modern young minds take over from Daddy Adeboye and all his assistants, this problem will continue to persist. Nowadays, administrative affairs are best run by vibrant young and agile minds. Gone are those days when elders held all the wisdom. |
vooks:We are discussing about the administrative irregularities of R.C.C.G Please, do not derail this discussion. |
dein77:You are very much in the system. I commend you for your contribution. Church members are almost single handedly saddled with the burden of building a new parish, without tangible assistance from the Province. : God help that parish pastor if he does not have financially buoyant workers and members to share the burden with. He will do anything just to "save face". This is because his in-ability to grow that parish by whatsoever means will be seen by his fellow pastors as a sign of being not serious. Planting of needless parishes too is one of the major tools the pastor uses to pass the message across that "He is Working". Whoever suffers from this move is none of his business. |
vooks:The subsidiaries are revenue centers: This bolded is the bottle-neck. Adjust the bottle-neck and all will be well. you got a major ax to grind with RCCG: Why won't i. Am not like peeps who see things going wrong and keep quiet due to "religion solidarity" |
paulGrundy:the mandate that God gave to them : It is now a question of either 2 facts which are "God's mandate to man" or "Man's self-originated goal". The way affairs in the church are being run nowadays,i strongly want to question your above statement. 60% of these parishes being planted after most "Let's Go A Fishing" programs are being used as catalysts for the promotion and upgrading of mother parishes. How else do you think a parish is being promoted to become an area head-quarter. And the workers and ministers that are being commissioned to manage the new babies have already being trained to accept whatever command they receive from their leaders (whether right or wrong). N.B : If you want to argue on the points i have stated above, then it clearly shows that you have little or no knowledge of how the system works. Before a parish can be planted by an already existing one, certain things must be put in place. 1, Accommodation must be adequately provided for: The proposed premises must have being bought and paid for or rent paid for at least 3 years. 2, There has to be a physical structure in place: You cannot tell me that you have not seen containers, wooden structures and shops being used as parish structures. The Almighty God i serve does not have a standard so low as that. 3, Operation Equipment must be in place: Adequate sitting arrangement, sound and acoustic equipments and other secondary equipments must be place. 4, Revenue generated in that parish should be expended on that parish: Do you think the parish does not have running costs to take care of? Plus the fact that the congregation number is still growing. Lemme stop here first. I need to wear my helmet and body armor. ![]() The Faithful Brethren will come attacking very soon. |
paulGrundy:But R.C.C.G needs to take care of the children it already has before thinking of giving birth to more. My elder cousin who is a bassist in Winners Chapel says that when a new church is being planted, it is planted with standard. All equipment and materials are placed on ground. I cannot say the same for R.C.C.G. A new parish is structurally and financially empty as at it's time of inception and such parish has to struggle from scratch to become fully functional. If the parish pastor is not financially buoyant to bear the burden, he then passes the burden to the members. N.B: Must R.C.C.G plant churches everywhere? What happened to other ministries? Are they preaching the wrong gospel? The church is using this loop hole to enrich itself and the most burden falls on the many scrap parishes hanging around town. |
I know it is kind of strange that i keep hammering on the UN-necessary planting of parishes when the topic is the wrong cycle of revenue. But the bitter and realistic truth is that until there is a great reduction (if possible CESSATION) in the planting of parishes, this issue of revenue cycle will not stop. NB: I am a member of R.C.C.G since 1999 and also a functioning instrumentalist with my parish so i am very sure of every factor or point that i am dropping on this thread. |
nora544:make every 5 minutes walk a RCCG church That part of the mission statement is just sooooooo wrong. And the administrative heads are turning a blind eye to it. That part of the mission statement is the sole reason behind the littering of sub-standard parishes all over the country. And the sub-standard parishes are the revenue collecting point for the church. |
RCCG should stop planting parishes anyhow. They should update their financial cycle system to match the 21st century. How on earth can a parish submit more than 50% of it's revenue to the head-parish above. What do the Senior Pastors expect these parishes to fend on. At the end, the parish pastor will have to inconvenience his personal savings and family just to save face. THIS IS JUST SOOOOOOO WRONG. BTW: Why open so many parishes that turn out to be substandard. CHRISTIANITY SHOULD HAVE STANDARDS OOOOOOOOOO!!!!! |
What's the fuss about sef? People have done worse for lesser amounts. Religion does not guarantee paradise. omo, carry the money come jooorrrr!!! ![]() |
spacebaba:Hahaaaaaaaa!!!! I knew it. ![]() |
[quote author=mywealth1 post=27116194][/quote]One thing is still certain: YOU STILL HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE. HIS FUNDS ARE A VERY OPEN RISK. Look, if you want this to work, it just will take a very simple procedure. 1, Meet with him physically. 2,Issue him a post-dated cheque of what ever amount you hope to make for him. 3, You both should confirm with your account officer that the present value of the post-dated cheque actually exists in your bank account. 4, Ask your account officer to raise the minimum balance in your account such that it will cover the value of the cheque. 5, Issue a Standing Order for the cheque to be honored as at when due. This way, your investor is sure that he has nothing to lose too. |
mywealth1:This will go in either of 2 ways: 1, You will increase the equity in the account. We will all hail you and subscribe to your ability and give you more accounts to trade. 2, You will blow his account equity away and we will all blame him for giving you the account in the first place. EITHER WAYS, YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO LOSE. @KennyFancy, NO EVEN TRY AM AT ALL. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 (of 43 pages)