₦airaland Forum

For those of you using binary.com, if you want a platform with the exact pricing as seen in the dealing page,

Download the mt4 platform from FX OPTIMAX.



The difference in pricing that we see most of the time IS NOT SPREAD.

All mt4 platforms do not get data feed from the same server.

And all servers cannot exactly be the same due to GLOBAL TIME DIFFERENTIAL.

The binary.com spread is actually taken from the percentage given to you when you price a bet.

If your bet was priced at 70%, observe that your NET PROFIT will not be exactly 70% of your investment.

The difference that you observe is actually the SPREAD.



I hope this info benefits us all.

Genesis (Rivers State brand) vs. Domino's Pizza (Global brand)

KFC (Global brand) vs. Tantalizers (Nigerian brand)


Very very wrong comparison.

It is only possible in Nigeria if and only if the following conditions are met:

1, You have the right skill, expertise and knowledge needed to extract such level of profit from whatever online venture you are into.

2, Your capital is large enough to comfortable accommodate monthly running costs which are of high standards.

3, Your work equipments are of top standard. I am talking about a solid broadband network set-up and not some cheap 3G modem bought at computer village. Am also talking about 24/7 power source of nothing less than 5KVA and not some "i pass my neighbor" generator. I am also talking about a standing office with 2014 compliant equipments and not that table in your 1-room apartment.


If you can meet and even exceed the above requirements, then you can be sure of making even more than the said amount.

deleo16:
to read this bookone needs patience too not easy for a novice

That patience is exactly what you are going to need during trading.

So you best grab that patience now and use it in reading up the book.

My 2cents advice.

odimbannamdi:
but u were the sane guy that posted this strategy

Na that year wey random index dey shack everybody.

Men don upgrade now ooooo

willscolf:
dis idea of staking in both direction cud b vry risky,as price may nt touch either side after d duration,hence u loose in both case oo,my hand no dey

yes ooooo. Very Risky.

odimbannamdi:
omakay you obviously know your mathematical onions well enough.

guys who knows of any developer that can help me create an indicator? and like how much will it cost?

There are a lot of them online.

www.truetl.com This is one of them.

The cost of a project starts from $100 and can be more depending on how complex the project will be.

omakay:
$10 = 254%

$10 = 254%

therefore, $20= 154% = $5.4


Your gross profit will be $25.4 and your net will be $5.4.

You did not invest $10, you invested $20.

N.B : That 254% of yours is actually 54%.

This Whole Thing is just REGULAR MATHEMATICS.

Just to clarify how i came about, "therefore, $20= 154% = $5.4"


$20 : $10 + $10


154% : $10 = 254% - 100%(i.e you have to absorb the other $10 into your gross earning)= 154%.

I hope this helps.

odimbannamdi:
sorry guys, its actually 254% and not 400%.

like i said before, we should be looking for the time of the day when it is most volatile so that at least one of the barriers will be touched.

it will be heartbreaking to lose in both trades

$10 = 254%

$10 = 254%

therefore, $20= 154% = $5.4


Your gross profit will be $25.4 and your net will be $5.4.

You did not invest $10, you invested $20.

N.B : That 254% of yours is actually 54%.

This Whole Thing is just REGULAR MATHEMATICS.

dagr8:
It seems you don't understand what I posted...

I do. I was actually referring to the original post by @odimbannamdi

dagr8:
@odimbannamdi and co,Thank God you guys realize you can lose both ways. So,since your profit each time one of them wins is around 25-30%. Then each time you lose both ways, you will have to win like four times to recover your loss .Hope you get what am saying?

In both trades, the profit will be 400%.: This profit analysis is overstated. If you check my break-down calculation, you will see that it is actually 25% to 30% and not 400% as stated before.

Lets say you invest $10 on each bet.

$10 to touch +2 in 10 minutes time for 255% which is $35.60

and

$10 to touch -2 in 10 minutes time for 255% which is $35.60.

I hope you all realize that you cannot win both bets. You will win just one after investing $20 ($10*2) in both bets for a single profit of $35.60.

You will have made 25% on your capital.

Plus this series of bets is the same thing as placing a "GOES-OUT" bet of +2 and -2 going for a duration of 10 minutes.

The above bet is averagely priced at 25%.

cryptography:
WRONG!!! exponential moving average is simply a type of moving average which gives priority to the most recent price. the priority is calculated as (1/period). both EMA and SMA are prone to fake signals, and must be used in conjunction with other indicators

LOL!!!!!!

You are quick to say "Wrong"

Slow to understand my statement and the fact that i am basing my definition on the formulas.

I need you to drop the formula for both MAs and the whole room will see how right i am.

idomalord:
i tink nw i have a question . Pls sma and ema which of dis 2
is beta to use ? And y? Hope smbd ansas. Thank u.

SMA = SIMPLE MOVING AVERAGE

EMA = EXPONENTIAL MOVING AVERAGE.

EMA is more complexly calculated as against SMA.

I prefer using EMA because it's complex calculation helps to give a more defined MA.

Here are some mt4 indicators that will help identify Inside Vertical Bars and Outside Vertical Bars faster.

One still needs to understand PRICE ACTION very well to be able to read off the indicators easily.

odimbannamdi:
Hi guys, have anyone thought of trading any of the random indices (25, 50, 75 and 100)??

Just as the name implies, its a simulated market that moves in a very random and erratic manner. The prices are determined by computer.

Some weeks ago, someone here dropped a strategy of trading Random index 25 that i personally tried out and it made a lot of sense, but it had a clause to it. i will drop the strategy now so that the house can harness and finetune it

For RD 25, you set a touch barrier of +2.000 and an expiry of 10mins. then immediately, you set another touch barrier of -2.000 and an expiry of 10mins. In both trades, the profit will be 400%. so even if you lose on one, you will profit on the other one.

Now the clause is:
What if none of your barriers are touched?? That means you will lose in both trades!

TO PROFIT MAXIMALLY FROM THE STRATEGY, WE HAVE TO LOOK FOR THE TIME OF THE DAY WHEN THE RANDOM INDEX 25 IS MOST VOLATILE!
I love random index because it is not influenced by news at all. and you can trade it anytime.

However, the whole house will be glad if someone drops a potent strategy on any pair at all

WE HAVE TO LOOK FOR THE TIME OF THE DAY WHEN THE RANDOM INDEX 25 IS MOST VOLATILE!. That is another problem. Everything about the random index is RANDOM. There is no set time or period for volatility.

But if anyone has a breakthrough, make the person show himself oooooo.

dein77:
Last year, we advised our OP to consolidate the existing parishes, instead of planting new ones. He agreed.

My parish, after a few months of planting, was almost scrapped because it was "economically viable'...Imagine that. Today, instead of allowing us time to strengthen, they are making efforts to emasculate us again so as to build a new MEGA parish. ...

The administrative irregularities are just too much.

The bitter truth is that until gifted and modern young minds take over from Daddy Adeboye and all his assistants, this problem will continue to persist.

Nowadays, administrative affairs are best run by vibrant young and agile minds. Gone are those days when elders held all the wisdom.

vooks:
You talk about social injustices on NL,right? Is that your best?

We are discussing about the administrative irregularities of R.C.C.G

Please, do not derail this discussion.

dein77:
No sensible person will disagree with you. Everything you have explained is nothing but the truth. I aso have an issue with the mandate thing. God doesn't change in Person, but His modes of operations do change as time progresses.

Whatever isn't working should be changed. For now, the RCCG pattern, at least in my opinion, isn't working.

Church members are almost single handedly saddled with the burden of building a new parish, without tangible assistance from the Province.

We recently resisted a plan to further impoverish our parish. We already have a befitting Zonal HQ, but we were told they are planning to build another MEGA Zonal HQ, hence we all to contribute to that project. Meanwhile we are yet to complete our own parish building project.

We simply politely objected. Period.

You are very much in the system. I commend you for your contribution.

Church members are almost single handedly saddled with the burden of building a new parish, without tangible assistance from the Province.
: God help that parish pastor if he does not have financially buoyant workers and members to share the burden with. He will do anything just to "save face". This is because his in-ability to grow that parish by whatsoever means will be seen by his fellow pastors as a sign of being not serious.

Planting of needless parishes too is one of the major tools the pastor uses to pass the message across that "He is Working". Whoever suffers from this move is none of his business.

vooks:
Negro,
you got a major ax to grind with RCCG
Mother churches maintain a tight grip on the satellite churches. May be the ideal would be to raise men and women to run with sattelite branches and let them be. I strongly suspect the only reason churches control their 'subsidiaries' is money. The subsidiaries are revenue centers

The subsidiaries are revenue centers: This bolded is the bottle-neck. Adjust the bottle-neck and all will be well.

you got a major ax to grind with RCCG: Why won't i. Am not like peeps who see things going wrong and keep quiet due to "religion solidarity"

paulGrundy:
The issue of church planting has little to do with what's on ground and has more to do with the mandate that God gave to them. Remember there are grave consequences of disobedience, one in which they would pay dearly for. Am sure there are other options on the solution to this administrative problem. I suggest that the zonal HQ should be majorly involved: financially and manpower wise in infant parishes (less than 3yrs) under her care.

the mandate that God gave to them : It is now a question of either 2 facts which are "God's mandate to man" or "Man's self-originated goal". The way affairs in the church are being run nowadays,i strongly want to question your above statement. 60% of these parishes being planted after most "Let's Go A Fishing" programs are being used as catalysts for the promotion and upgrading of mother parishes. How else do you think a parish is being promoted to become an area head-quarter.

And the workers and ministers that are being commissioned to manage the new babies have already being trained to accept whatever command they receive from their leaders (whether right or wrong).

N.B : If you want to argue on the points i have stated above, then it clearly shows that you have little or no knowledge of how the system works.

Before a parish can be planted by an already existing one, certain things must be put in place.

1, Accommodation must be adequately provided for: The proposed premises must have being bought and paid for or rent paid for at least 3 years.

2, There has to be a physical structure in place: You cannot tell me that you have not seen containers, wooden structures and shops being used as parish structures. The Almighty God i serve does not have a standard so low as that.

3, Operation Equipment must be in place: Adequate sitting arrangement, sound and acoustic equipments and other secondary equipments must be place.

4, Revenue generated in that parish should be expended on that parish: Do you think the parish does not have running costs to take care of? Plus the fact that the congregation number is still growing.

Lemme stop here first. I need to wear my helmet and body armor.

The Faithful Brethren will come attacking very soon.

paulGrundy:
In my Opinion if church planting stops, the ministry would dimish and fade of the scene because it is the Mission that God gave the ministry, I mean that's the reason why it is existing.

But R.C.C.G needs to take care of the children it already has before thinking of giving birth to more.

My elder cousin who is a bassist in Winners Chapel says that when a new church is being planted, it is planted with standard. All equipment and materials are placed on ground. I cannot say the same for R.C.C.G. A new parish is structurally and financially empty as at it's time of inception and such parish has to struggle from scratch to become fully functional.

If the parish pastor is not financially buoyant to bear the burden, he then passes the burden to the members.


N.B: Must R.C.C.G plant churches everywhere? What happened to other ministries? Are they preaching the wrong gospel?


The church is using this loop hole to enrich itself and the most burden falls on the many scrap parishes hanging around town.

I know it is kind of strange that i keep hammering on the UN-necessary planting of parishes when the topic is the wrong cycle of revenue.

But the bitter and realistic truth is that until there is a great reduction (if possible CESSATION) in the planting of parishes, this issue of revenue cycle will not stop.

NB: I am a member of R.C.C.G since 1999 and also a functioning instrumentalist with my parish so i am very sure of every factor or point that i am dropping on this thread.

nora544:
When the head of the church must have his private jet and for one year it is 600 000 USD and Ifeel with this money they could build some churches but Ifee that it is wrong to make every 5 minutes walk a RCCG church and Ifeel the other problem is the lifestyle and that he has lost how most of the nigerians live.

make every 5 minutes walk a RCCG church

That part of the mission statement is just sooooooo wrong.

And the administrative heads are turning a blind eye to it.

That part of the mission statement is the sole reason behind the littering of sub-standard parishes all over the country.

And the sub-standard parishes are the revenue collecting point for the church.

RCCG should stop planting parishes anyhow. They should update their financial cycle system to match the 21st century. How on earth can a parish submit more than 50% of it's revenue to the head-parish above. What do the Senior Pastors expect these parishes to fend on. At the end, the parish pastor will have to inconvenience his personal savings and family just to save face.

THIS IS JUST SOOOOOOO WRONG.

BTW: Why open so many parishes that turn out to be substandard.

CHRISTIANITY SHOULD HAVE STANDARDS OOOOOOOOOO!!!!!