₦airaland Forum

DumaEmpire:
You're talking asif this Lukaku didn't play for us before. We were the club that got him from Belgium remember... The 2011/12season dude ofcos was never going to bench the stars but however was blank when called upon. Before being sent on loan to WestBrom where he started shining again and we got him back 2013 where he was still crap before shipping him off to Everton where he picked up again then Man U got him in 2016 but didn't think twice before selling to Inter where another Deja vu is on.
Even at the intertional stage dude was banging goals but at 2014 WC was a mute as a snail. 2018 WC dude after tge group stage man was blank and if not for likes of Hazard and De bruyne they probably wouldn't have gottwn past the R16 knockouts.
I don't really get what all the hype is about. We need a striker that can perform at the grandest stage not to score hat trick at Fulham and be blank at major finals.

Did Kevin De Bruyne and Mohammed Salah not play for us before? If you have the chance to get them now will you say no? Which kind yarns be this?

swiz123:
I already told you why Havertz didn't make the cut..

Now you didn't tell me why Mount scored only two goals despite having one of the best minutes of UCL football.

Was he too good not to score Krasnodar, Sevilla and Lille?

And please, don't embarrass yourself with da Madrid goal. That goal was purely Kante. He did all the work and passed it to Pulisic who then dropped it for Mount on a platter of gold. All these happened when the game was almost over

If you have some spare time, you can as well enlighten me on why our Lord was subbed off in the most important game of his carrer

Football bodies, pundits and organizations are recognizing, nominating and awarding Mount.

Nairaland low budget pundits are discrediting him.

Show me 75m+ Fraudvertz in any of these nominations and award.

nihilistjnr:
I hate it when Ibime says it, but it seems like it's true.

You must be young so you clearly dont remember the 2011 - 2014/15 era. What year did Torres join Chelsea? What happened in 2013 that led to Jose sending Lukaku away and instead signing old man Etoo Fils who then gave us a grand total of 9 league goals. How many minutes did Lukaku play for Chelsea gan gan?

That was the same era KDB, Salah joined and left the club. Bros if you don't know what was happening at Chelsea that time, just relax. But Lukaku leaving the club was definitely not for footballing reasons.

Oga your tall no hold breeze. I have been watching Chelsea matches since 2006. Altho not being around cable tv at that time limited my games but since 2008 i follow the team.

We're talking about signing a former player who like i said doesn't step up to the plate at most big important matches and you're asking me something irrelevant.

If you don't have a concrete counter to what i said no be by force to reply.
Lukaku this Lukaku that... He's so good but everyone is selling him.
You're mentioning KDB nd Salah. Why didn't their clubs sell them like Man Utd did Lukaku. Lukaku is so good but Inter have failed to make it past the Ucl group stage twice. Lukaku was great that Mou still went ahead to sign Ibrahimovich after signing him. Lukaku is great Man Utd sold him.

Signing Lukaku is like going back to an Ex.

Balon D'or for his poverty stats. 18 G/A in all comps

User09:
Aguero has a low center of gravity and better close control. Not a fair comparison

Honestly that pass was not really the best of passes; Could Werner do better, Yes. Infact, he should have left it to Kante or passed to Kai seeing he didnt have the right balance but as always, he's ever eager

I think you should look for the aerial view or video with a better angle of that pass. That gif shows it from a poor angle. Werner has poor footwork and that is why he can't even play well as winger despite his blistering pace. Any good attacker scores that goal there. His lack of composure makes things worse for him.

Unlimited22:
Did Kevin De Bruyne and Mohammed Salah not play for us before? If you have the chance to get them now will you say no? Which kind yarns be this?

This is just an off the topic talk.

What i said is Lukaku doesn't step up to the plate in important matches. Thats why i highlighted those things down there.

KDB nd Salah na another topic entirely.

Lukaku has been less imoressive to those guys you mentioned. If he was that good how come Chelsea is the only big club right now looking at his direction.
Make una dey try understand person first before typing

donstan18:
Football bodies, pundits and organizations are recognizing, nominating and awarding Mount.

Nairaland low budget pundits are discrediting him.

Show me 75m+ Fraudvertz in any of these nominations and award.

nominations that is fueled by propaganda

Mention a top player that plays in mount's position with the same number of minutes at a top team with his stats

I dey wait

Unlimited22:
To be honest, if they aren't buying Lukaku or Kane make them leave. We will manage Werner and Havertz.

Get another quality CB in Botman or Marquinhos, Adama Traore who can play both RWB and on the wings, and a DM like Tchouameni or Rice. Loan Gilmour.

Let both Alonso and Emerson leave and bring back Ian Maatsen. Let one of CHO or Ziyech or Pulisic leave. Let go of both Tammy and Giroud. Clear out the deadwood or loan them for extra cash from loan fees. I hear we want Hakimi too but that guy go too cost.

But if no be Kane or Lukaku make them no buy another attacker abeg

I read say na Abrahimovic wan sign Lukaku

With Lukaku we fit finish top 2 or win EPL within two seasons

As for CB, as long as we don't revert back to a 4 at the back, we are good but if na to buy another CB, they should sell two out of Christensen, Zouma and Rudiger, especially Rudiger

Exonerate1:
Balon D'or for his poverty stats. 18 G/A in all comps

euro will start in a few days, southgate and Lampard na the same thing, they will bottle the competition and I trust British fans to pick on mount, cause he is the least creative person in their attack

DumaEmpire:
Lukaku was great that Mou still went ahead to sign Ibrahimovich after signing him.

This just encapsulates the nonsense you've been saying all day

They gave Ibrahimovic a hold-body contract to reward him for his good performance the year before, which was cut short by a season ending injury.

The season you're referring to is the one where Lukaku scored 27 goals in 51 appearances for Manyoo. Ibrahimovic that Mou went to sign after Lukaku only played in 7 games for the whole season, scoring 1 goal in carling cup against the mighty Bristol City

Chairman rest!

BlueAngel444:
I read say na Abrahimovic wan sign Lukaku

With Lukaku we fit finish top 2 or win EPL within two seasons

lies, Chelsea haven't bought a player above 27 years for a long time, they wouldn't start with lukaku, if lukaku is good why did united sell him? They don't like better thing?

DumaEmpire:
This is just an off the topic talk.

What i said is Lukaku doesn't step up to the plate in important matches. Thats why i highlighted those things down there.

KDB nd Salah na another topic entirely.

Lukaku has been less imoressive to those guys you mentioned. If he was that good how come Chelsea is the only big club right now looking at his direction.
Make una dey try understand person first before typing

Lukaku doesn't step up to the plate in important matches but Haaland does. OK mate. OK.

That point notwithstanding, actually watch the way your team plays and the way both strikers play before throwing your lot in with any one. Consider which one will best fit the team and the players currently available.

Go and watch the way Haaland plays. And don't forget that the style of defending in Austria and Germany is vastly different from that in England and Italy.

You can make the point that Haaland has goals in the CL, but against which teams? How did he perform in the said games or was he accumulating tap ins? Can he create something with size or speed or dribble in tight games?
Don't focus on shine alone abeg.

Havertz10:
nominations that is fueled by propaganda

Mention a top player that plays in mount's position with the same number of minutes at a top team with his stats

I dey wait

Do you know football more than Uefa, Chelseafc and EPl?

I dey wait!

Unlimited22:
Lukaku doesn't step up to the plate in important matches but Haaland does. OK mate. OK.

That point notwithstanding, actually watch the way your team plays and the way both strikers play before throwing your lot in with any one. Consider which one will best fit the team and the players currently available.

Go and watch the way Haaland plays. And don't forget that the style of defending in Austria and Germany is vastly different from that in England and Italy.

You can make the point that Haaland has goals in the CL, but against which teams? How did he perform in the said games or was he accumulating tap ins? Can he create something with size or speed or dribble in tight games?
Don't focus on shine alone abeg.

haaland being discussed along side mbappe

Haaland scored in big games against Bayern and psg


I can't believe that people are considering lukaku, no top team looks at lukaku and says that's a top player, it's really sad honestly

When arguing about Mount, it's most times about Uefa nomination, EPl best player nomination, best youngster, Chelsea best player.

What do we talk about when arguing about Fraudvertz?

There are levels to this shiit!!!

Havertz10:
haaland being discussed along side mbappe

Haaland scored in big games against Bayern and psg


I can't believe that people are considering lukaku, no top team looks at lukaku and says that's a top player, it's really sad honestly

Haaland is being discussed alongside Mbappe because he is scoring goals. Which I admit is his primary duty.

But look at the way we play and the players we have. Kane and Lukaku will score goals but play better. Create more chances. Lay off more assists. Are better suited to playing in England.

No allow media hype cover your eyes o. Make out time and watch Haaland closely. We need a striker who can play outside the box as well as inside it.. Someone who we can go long to and beat the opposition press but who won't be counting leg like Werner

donstan18:
Do you know football more than Uefa, Chelseafc and EPl?

I dey wait!

we won the champions league, our players dominated defense and midfield nominations, among our attackers mount played the most games, who would they give before?


mention a single game and that you can confidently say in this game without doubt mount preformed exceptionally

I dey wait, just one game this season

Havertz10:
lies, Chelsea haven't bought a player above 27 years for a long time, they wouldn't start with lukaku, if lukaku is good why did united sell him? They don't like better thing?

That's a question United Fans are asking on their thread whilst cursing their manager

Ole Gunnar sold Lukaku, kept Martial, and then signed Ighalo from China. If that doesn't tell you that a madman is running things over there, then nothing will.

From 2019/2020 season till date in all competitions
Martial has scored 30 goals
Cavani has scored 17
Ighalo has scored 5

Lukaku has scored 64

No surprise that there's an ongoing civil war on that thread

Unlimited22:
Lukaku doesn't step up to the plate in important matches but Haaland does. OK mate. OK.

That point notwithstanding, actually watch the way your team plays and the way both strikers play before throwing your lot in with any one. Consider which one will best fit the team and the players currently available.

Go and watch the way Haaland plays. And don't forget that the style of defending in Austria and Germany is vastly different from that in England and Italy.

You can make the point that Haaland has goals in the CL, but against which teams? How did he perform in the said games or was he accumulating tap ins? Can he create something with size or speed or dribble in tight games?
Don't focus on shine alone abeg.

Well i didn't want to say this but everyone who follows Dortmund nd Bundesliga knows that Haaland is the main reason they even qualified for Ucl this last season. Not to talk of getting them through the Ucl group stages. Infact Dortmund are even holding him down. If he wasn't in that team they probably wouldn't have made top4 this season. He's not a god tho so he can't always carry them on his shoulders.

If Tuchel signs Lukaku i will be back here to remind y'all all what i've been saying if he ends up proving me right. And Haaland happens to be the one he signs i'd still remind plenty y'all what "i told you so" when he steps up to the challenge

I haven't watched Lukaku in a long time so I am not sure if he has overcome his poor hold up due to his loose touch. For now haaland is my no 1.

Havertz10:
we won the champions league, our players dominated defense and midfield nominations, among our attackers mount played the most games, who would they give before?


mention a single game and that you can confidently say in this game without doubt mount preformed exceptionally

I dey wait, just one game this season

Why did he play most games for us under two managers when we had Fraudvertz that cost us 75m+??

Havertz10:
lies, Chelsea haven't bought a player above 27 years for a long time, they wouldn't start with lukaku, if lukaku is good why did united sell him? They don't like better thing?

long time, you mean Pedro well Ziyech is 27... What's your point


Person way get the money wan buy lukaku, una way no get the money dry here dey argue

BlueAngel444:
long time, you mean Pedro well Ziyech is 27... What's your point

you really believe that Chelsea will pay 100m for lukaku

donstan18:
Why did he play most games for us under two managers when we had Fraudvertz that cost us 75m+??

you can't mention one game that mount performed well

Havertz10:
you really believe that Chelsea will pay 100m for lukaku you can't mention one game that mount performed well

at no point in my mentions did I ever say Chelsea was buying lukaku for 100m we are not naga united, though he is worth it. The amount I wrote was about 65m.. You now add the cheaper salary and lesser injuries than Kane, plus he isn't white.

Havertz10:
we won the champions league, our players dominated defense and midfield nominations, among our attackers mount played the most games, who would they give before?


mention a single game and that you can confidently say in this game without doubt mount preformed exceptionally

I dey wait, just one game this season

that goes well to show how useless our attackers are that an 8 is rated above them in their position. Maybe na due to adjusting.

Havertz10:
you really believe that Chelsea will pay 100m for lukaku you can't mention one game that mount performed well

You can’t give reasons why Mount got more playing time than Fraudvertz.

A flop can’t make these nomination lists or be awarded, so why will I start mentioning games he performed well?

donstan18:
When arguing about Mount, it's most times about Uefa nomination, EPl best player nomination, best youngster, Chelsea best player.

What do we talk about when arguing about Fraudvertz?

There are levels to this shiit!!!

you calling him "fraudvertz" is highly childish for a Chelsea fan, it Havertz10 has given Mount a weird name I would understand. What do you gain by typing that crap repeatedly?

BlueAngel444:
you calling him "fraudvertz" is highly childish for a Chelsea fan, it Havertz10 has given Mount a weird name I would understand. What do you gain by typing that crap repeatedly?

Fraudiola....

Fraudvertz....

All Frauds

donstan18:
Fraudiola....

Fraudvertz....

All Frauds

one plays for your team


It's like telling a madman nooo this is your own food, don't scatter it.
Well done, it doesn't make your point any clearer.

nihilistjnr:
This just encapsulates the nonsense you've been saying all day

They gave Ibrahimovic a hold-body contract to reward him for his good performance the year before, which was cut short by a season ending injury.

The season you're referring to is the one where Lukaku scored 27 goals in 51 appearances for Manyoo. Ibrahimovic that Mou went to sign after Lukaku only played in 7 games for the whole season, scoring 1 goal in carling cup against the mighty Bristol City

Chairman rest!

Below is his stats at Man U... Go see the clubs he scored against.

Even the Everton you have been blabbering about his goals were against relegation bound teams and bottom half clubs.. Scoring 4 against Middlesbrough and totally blank against most of the top clubs both at Man U nd Everton.
What's the difference between him and Abraham. Na this one you wan use EPL or Ucl again

Una funny abeg

DumaEmpire:
Below is his stats at Man U... Go see the clubs he scored against.

Even the Everton you have been blabbering about his goals were against relegation bound teams and bottom half clubs.. Scoring 4 against Middlesbrough and totally blank against most of the top clubs both at Man U nd Everton.
What's the difference between him and Abraham. Na this one you wan use EPL or Ucl again

Una funny abeg

Are you aware we struggle against small teams in epl due to lack of strength and pace because those teams play low block against us. Since we already dominated Europe it will be wise to sign players for domestic trophies, aside top 6 epl is about power and pace so signing lukaku, rice and maybe traore will help against those teams. Not that I’m a fan of lukaku tho.

As at today 2nd of June 2021,Lukaku is a top player, I dont know of tomorrow but for moe he is a top player.