Havertz10:
iniesta and xavi fed of eachother, busquet excelled being the link for their movements but he wasn't a strong defensive midfielder, his job was to recycle possession

Individually iniesta and xavi were good, ozil had his moments and enjoyed feeding the appetite of ronaldo, he was a good player but one on one iniesta was better

Pele was good but he will never be called a maestro like johan cruyff

donstan18:

All the things you know that makes up a good midfielder.

Ibime:


I always wonder how Ozil will feed Ronaldos appetite yet Messi was scoring 90 goals in a calendar year and Iniesta could not feed his appetite.

Godx:

List them out then

Havertz10:
positional play can be fluid, iniesta usually dropped deeper to receive the ball because he had better ball retention than busquet, most people were fixated on messi but some of us looked at Barca's midfield

His position was fluid, he wasn't playing for goals, he was playing to maintain domination over the opposition

Ibime:


I always wonder how Ozil will feed Ronaldos appetite yet Messi was scoring 90 goals in a calendar year and Iniesta could not feed his appetite.

donstan18:

Good ball handling, reflex and service.

Ebukacute:
35 goals in 16 years?
Spanish iwobi

Havertz10:
only Suarez has provided more assist for messi than iniesta

If we track the back and check assist self that other players gave to messi, ineista hand will still be there coordinating play

Debroslink:


Coild you put your money where your mouth is?

Let's do a quick one $100

donstan18:

Ozil vs Inesta in La Liga

Trevor012:

But you a Big fool o . Comparing a centre midfielder Iniesta to an attacking midfielder ozil. AgberoFc o

donstan18:

Call your dad that.

If atall maggots will allow you see some part of him again.

swiz123:
Now Iniesta who is a very influential player on the pitch who posses almost no weakness to his team is dragged for not being as productive as his peers. A player who broke press with his dribbling is maligned for not scoring or giving the final pass..

swiz123:
Arguements here are mostly funny. I see it as cruise though. If I front Fabregas as a great player due to his goals and assists, our own special pundit will drop a thousand reasons why Fab is a nonsense player. Now Iniesta who is a very influential player on the pitch who posses almost no weakness to his team is dragged for not being as productive as his peers. A player who broke press with his dribbling is maligned for not scoring or giving the final pass.

Now this same pundit doesn't let us rest on how Fab became a bench warmer at 27 but conviniently excused Xavi for cheerleading for 10 years of his early career. Fab at 24 had at least 150 g/a to his name but this doesn't concern him.

When arguements are laced with sentiments, double standard becomes inevitable.

swiz123:
Mathematicians here should study this image and tell us who has a better g/a ratio

airmark:


''Busquets at his prime'' gang in the mud.

donstan18:

Shut up! Fencist.

Mount scored twice in Chelsea’s Ucl win, how many goals did Inesta score in 2015 they won it?

A fvxkin overrated shiit!!

swiz123:
Mathematicians here should study this image and tell us who has a better g/a ratio

swiz123:
Mathematicians here should study this image and tell us who has a better g/a ratio

Havertz10:
iniesta and xavi fed of eachother, busquet excelled being the link for their movements but he wasn't a strong defensive midfielder, his job was to recycle possession

Individually iniesta and xavi were good, ozil had his moments and enjoyed feeding the appetite of ronaldo, he was a good player but one on one iniesta was better

Pele was good but he will never be called a maestro like johan cruyff

Ibime:


This sounds like Kovacic or Alexander Hleb

Ibime:


Please give us his passes per game stats, let's expose this lie.

Iniesta was never central to the possession game. His passes per game was around the 60 passes per game mark. Xavi was the one controlling the midfield and dropping the 100 passes per game and still handsomely outscored and outassisted him from a deep position.

Iniesta is the greatest lie in modern football, and the luckiest carryalong in the history of the sport.

He only hides under midfield possession work that Xavi did alone to absolve his pitiful attacking productivity which is on par with Kovacic and Iwobi. He was an activity former who contributed nothing while his teammates put him in positions to claim glory

donstan18:

Ozil vs Inesta in La Liga

swiz123:


Chai!! ... I know you still think Mount is playing mildfield since TT. Let's compare him to Ney who he plays the same position with. Shall we?

NinjaMetahuman:
Ozil is underrated sha.


Those are big consecutive numbers.

swiz123:


Kovacic that gives sideways pass after breaking press .... Is Iniesta lacking in the final pass department? .

NinjaMetahuman:
Ozil is underrated sha.


Those are big consecutive numbers.