₦airaland Forum

Ibime:
Yeah, we know how Iniesta won after Xavi left, going a full calendar year with zero goal and zero assist.

We should credit the Spanish Kovacic for MSN work

You people should fear God.

donstan18:
I like the fact that you placed Mount and Neymar together for the comparison.

Generational talent

Havertz10:
when Fabregas was asked to pick one between xavi and iniesta, he described the choice as being similar to picking one between his mum or dad

They both needed each other to excel, they made barca great, messi gets all the praise but his supply chain came from their factory

Havertz10:
when Fabregas was asked to pick one between xavi and iniesta, he described the choice as being similar to picking one between his mum or dad

They both needed each other to excel, they made barca great, messi gets all the praise but his supply chain came from their factory

thorrvik55:
How can u mention "individually", Iniesta and Ozil in thesame sentence??

Individually, how many attacking midfielders were better than Ozil in his prime?

swiz123:
You nearly made him a Mushin talent by comparing him to a CM. Not that I think otherwise though

thorrvik55:
That's the tin.. One is a deep lying playmaker while the other is supposed to be an attacking midfielder!!

Ibime:
I'm not concerned with narrative, stories or a player playing politics being asked to pick between friends

Havertz10:
iniesta was better, lets look at clutch moments, when it mattered, when a player is playing at the peak of their powers, ozil never stood out but ineista was dominating teams and never staying in one place, always making himself available for a pass, ozil is a specialty merchant, very good at certain things but he wasn't a maestro

Havertz10:
iniesta was better, lets look at clutch moments, when it mattered, when a player is playing at the peak of their powers, ozil never stood out but ineista was dominating teams and never staying in one place, always making himself available for a pass, ozil is a specialty merchant, very good at certain things but he wasn't a maestro

Havertz10:
iniesta was better, lets look at clutch moments, when it mattered

swiz123:
Iniesta was never the traditional AM we know.

thorrvik55:
I swear!! Mesut Ozil is one very very underated player..

Leaving Madrid and moving to Arsenal in his prime did him no favours at all.

airmark:
Lordfalcao will slap you for this lie.

Ibime:
Iniesta - 270/867 = 0.31

Xavi - 357/988 = 0.36

Nigga I can't divide.

Let's not forget one is the deeplying midfielder (Xavi) who controls the possession game with 100 passes while the other is the advanced midfielder (Iniesta) who contributes little to the possession game with 60 passes per game.

I bake cake for you, you are supposed to put the icing on the cake, yet I still put more icing on the cake than you.

Amoto94:
I remember Ozil Humiliating Brazil, Argentina and England in two World Cup Finals in the knockout rounds and almost assisting Arsenal to league title if not for the uselessness of the club.

airmark:
You can only deceive yourself by feigning ignorance of the reasons behind what knocked his value down.

You heard Mou wanted to buy him for 15m from Aparisports sports news at 7, right?

donstan18:
We were arguing about Inesta, you brought in Mount. I did the needed and here you are, talking about Mushin.

thorrvik55:
Traditional ko, spiritual ni?

What's the job of an AM?

Iniesta was lucky to play in teams that did not rely on him for creativity despite the fact that he was an AM!!

hensben:
He was luck to have a player like messi who is a play maker and also a goal scorer. Imagine iniesta in Madrid and he is to feed cr7 like ozil.

Havertz10:
you can't compare both abeg, there are certain players that are greater than G/A iniesta, xavi, pirlo and a very select few are like that

They wouldn't get many goals and assists but they are creating plays that leads to goals for their team

thorrvik55:
Traditional ko, spiritual ni?

What's the job of an AM?

Iniesta was lucky to play in teams that did not rely on him for creativity despite the fact that he was an AM!!

thorrvik55:
I swear!! Mesut Ozil is one very very underated player..

Leaving Madrid and moving to Arsenal in his prime did him no favours at all.

thorrvik55:
Traditional ko, spiritual ni?

What's the job of an AM?

Iniesta was lucky to play in teams that did not rely on him for creativity despite the fact that he was an AM!!.

hensben:
See this highlight and watch Bousquet escort service https://www.instagram.com/p/CQWi38Bizof/?utm_medium=copy_link.

thorrvik55:
Lol.. That'll be like playing Kovacic in AM and expecting him to feed Ronaldo

Activity forming with no output!!
True definition of a carry-along.

Trevor012:
Who even started this lie of Iniesta being an attacking Midfielder

Trevor012:
Who even started this lie of Iniesta being an attacking Midfielder

Ibime:
Transfermarkt only put you as an AM if you play in a 4-2-3-1. Their positioning is arbitrary.

Lampard is also positioned as a CM in transfermarkt, same as Iniesta. Let's compare like for like na.

When you are useless at your primary role, you will start denying your position like Simon Peter the son of Jonah.

Ibime:
When it mattered, Mount > KDB.

You cannot be useless the whole season, make an assist in the final and claim you were there when it mattered.

Who brought you to the final?

If you take an unproductive player to 3 finals a year, he will also be there when it mattered. Even Marcos Asensio, Lars Ricken and co scored when they took them to final.