₦airaland Forum

Bombblacks:
Most defense lawyers are not coming to court to prove their client is innocent, nah. They are coming to rubbish every evidence provided by the prosecution in a bid to have it thrown out of the case. That was the trick O.j Simpson lawyers executed perfectly.

People do not know why it is said "the one who makes the accusation, has the burden of proof". If you accuse someone, you have to be able to prove that only 1 conclusion can be drawn from the evidence. Meanwhile, the defense just need to look for one loophole in your case to win. That is why I was laughing at those giving emotional opinions.

airmark:
He gave you the amount spent by your Fraudiola since 2016, do same for Chelsea abi you no get calculator?

Chelsea since 2016 have spent 804.87 M Pounds on incoming transfers. If they spend 170M on Haaland and 60M on Kounde where will they be?

raumdeuter:
If Dortmund accept Chelseas 170M bid and Sevilla accept Koundes 50M, How much would Chelsea have spent since 2016

They are talking £920,000,000 for one manager, not a president, I repeat not a president, within 4years plus

Android17:
The highlighted is not true. The prosecution's duty is actually to prove that the accused is guilty "beyond" reasonable doubt. In other words, all the defendant needs to do is show reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case.

When there are no eye witness and the defendant denies killing, So what other indisputable evidence is left that cannot be argued even till the point of conviction?

Android17:
George Floyd's case was political. In fact, I do believe the autopsies linked his death to asphyxiation precipitated by drug overdose. Derek's defence was not weak. He was never going to win because of activist judges and woke culture pervading even the judicial atmosphere.

Actually, both autopsies implied that the pressure to his back and neck deprived him of oxygen. It wasn't ascertained if the drug overdose could kill if wasn't surpressed in that manner.

The judgement to me was fair enough. Derek had no intention of killing Floyd but out of ignorance he did

BlueAngel444:
They are talking £920,000,000 for one manager, not a president, I repeat not a president, within 4years plus

So is it Guardiolas fault that Chelsea has changed managers 4 times because they were failing?

Pep started spending in 2016 and its only fair to compare what Chelsea has spent in that time

raumdeuter:
Chelsea since 2016 have spent 804.87 M Pounds on incoming transfers. If they spend 170M on Haaland and 60M on Kounde where will they be?

liar, you have return with your lies and deception

Why add pounds to one figure and leave it put of the others?
Why not write the actually rumoured amounted?

And don't compare "If" to what is actually happening Fraudeuter.

raumdeuter:
So is it Guardiolas fault that Chelsea has changed managers 4 times because they were failing?

Pep started spending in 2016 and its only fair to compare what Chelsea has spent in that time

then try hard to at least post the truth. It will not kill you, though you would probably feel like dying while typing the truth

this is updated net spend of clubs over the last FIVE years: #MUFC - £622.5m #MCFC - £518.9m #AFC - £331.1m #CFC - £230.6m #THFC - £201.3m #LFC - £159.7m Villa, West Ham, Brighton and Fulham all ahead of Liverpool.

Raumdeuter is this the truth, yes or no?

Bombblacks:
Most defense lawyers are not coming to court to prove their client is innocent, nah. They are coming to rubbish every evidence provided by the prosecution in a bid to have it thrown out of the case. That was the trick O.j Simpson lawyers executed perfectly.

But Oj Simpson's lawyer did not even really attempt to refute the evidence though did he?

OJ Simpson trial happened in 1994 in LA, only 2 years after the LA riots that were triggered by the racist beating of Rodney King, a black man, by white police officers.

OJ a famous black man, was on trial for killing a white woman who was perceived as a gold digger in public. The Jury consisted of 12 people, 9 of whom were black. Even before Jury selection, the prosecutor had already publicly announced that potential jurors were lying to get on the panel to support OJ. Infact the jurors were beefing with the prosecutor and judge

Johnie Cochrane summed up his argument by saying the LAPD was racist, the prosecutors were just like Hitler, and the cop who arrested OJ likes to use the word Nigger

OJ case was nothing to do with reasonable doubt. Even if Jesus Christ himself came down with 4K video evidence from heavek implicating OJ, that Jury was never going to convict him.

The OJ case was a fück you to the system, dazall.

BlueAngel444:
this is updated net spend of clubs over the last FIVE years: #MUFC - £622.5m #MCFC - £518.9m #AFC - £331.1m #CFC - £230.6m #THFC - £201.3m #LFC - £159.7m Villa, West Ham, Brighton and Fulham all ahead of Liverpool.

Rumdeuter is this the truth, yes or no?

Nobody asked for net spend the original post did not post about net spend. Give us total spend

BlueAngel444:
then try hard to at least post the truth. It will not kill you, though you would probably feel like dying while typing the truth

What is the truth? Is Guardiola spending his personal money? Is it not Chelsea and City spending money?

Show us the amount spent by City and Chelsea since 2016 when Guardiola joined City

That is the truth

BlueAngel444:
liar, you have return with your lies and deception

Why add pounds to one figure and leave it put of the others?
Why not write the actually rumoured amounted?

And don't compare "If" to what is actually happening Fraudeuter.

Have you bought anyone and has Guardiola bought anyone?

You are backing a post that started with IF and still complaining about IF

https://www.nairaland.com/920248/official-chelsea-fan-thread-champions/12136#104252049

To floor you logically can be done by any solid primary 3 student

nihilistjnr:
But Oj Simpson's lawyer did not even really attempt to refute the evidence though did he?

OJ Simpson trial happened in 1994 in LA, only 2 years after the LA riots that were triggered by the racist beating of Rodney King, a black man, by white police officers.

OJ a famous black man, was on trial for killing a white woman who was perceived as a gold digger in public. The Jury consisted of 12 people, 9 of whom were black. Even before Jury selection, the prosecutor had already publicly announced that potential jurors were lying to get on the panel to support OJ. Infact the jurors were beefing with the prosecutor and judge

Robbie Cochrane summed up his argument by saying the LAPD was racist, the prosecutors were just like Hitler, and the cop who arrested OJ likes to use the word Nigger

OJ case was nothing to do with reasonable doubt. Even if Jesus Christ himself came down with 4K video evidence from heavek implicating OJ, that Jury was never going to convict him.

The OJ case was a fück you to the system, dazall.

Am not interested in Conspiracy theory here.

swiz123:
Actually, both autopsies implied that the pressure to his back and neck deprived him of oxygen. It wasn't ascertained if the drug overdose could kill if wasn't surpressed in that manner.

The judgement to me was fair enough. Derek had no intention of killing Floyd but out of ignorance he did

It is completely untrue. The prosecution's argument in this case was actually very weak. Emotion and politics carried the day. Let me be clear: Chauvin was wrong as well as the other police officers but, they followed the guidelines given to them for such cases. Notwithstanding, you know that George Floyd was at the backseat of the police car complaining that he could not breathe, which was why they brought him out of the car? Further, the autopsy revealed a potentially lethal concoction of drugs — not just a potentially lethal dose of fentanyl, but also methamphetamine. Together with his history of drug abuse and two serious heart conditions, Floyd’s condition was exceptionally and unusually fragile. No need to go further.

raumdeuter:
When there are no eye witness and the defendant denies killing, So what other indisputable evidence is left that cannot be argued even till the point of conviction?

That is why some cases go cold even if the prosecutors have circumstantial evidence.

raumdeuter:
Have you bought anyone and has Guardiola bought anyone?

You are backing a post that started with IF and still complaining about IF

https://www.nairaland.com/920248/official-chelsea-fan-thread-champions/12136#104252049

To floor you logically can be done by any solid primary 3 student

How about this Pep has spent €932.41m won 3 local EPL titles, to a team that had spent €210m buying KDB, Sterling, Otamendi and had top EPL players Kompany, Aguero, D.Silva, Fernando, Fernandinho, Yaya, Nasri, Navas

Chelsea has spent €894.3m for 1 local EPL title and 1 international European Champions league trophy by a club Pep suggested didn't have a quality squad nor XI

raumdeuter:
What is the truth? Is Guardiola spending his personal money? Is it not Chelsea and City spending money?

Show us the amount spent by City and Chelsea since 2016 when Guardiola joined City

That is the truth

you want to play a game and you left Kane out of the equation, can't you see your own deceit

BlueAngel444:
you want to play a game and you left Kane out of the equation, can't you see your own deceit

You can take out 100M Grealish and talk about Peps spending vs Chelsea spending

You can talk about Grealish Kane when you are ready to talk about Haaland and Kounde

BlueAngel444:
How about this Pep has spent €932.41m won 3 local EPL titles, to a team that had spent €210m buying KDB, Sterling, Otamendi and had top EPL players Kompany, Aguero, D.Silva, Fernando, Fernandinho, Yaya, Nasri, Navas

Chelsea has spent €894.3m for 1 local EPL title and 1 international European Champions league trophy by a club Pep suggested didn't have a quality squad nor XI

So Chelsea was empty and didnt have Courtois, Azpi, Hazard Pedro Costa, Fabregas, Cahill, Luiz at the time Pep joined City?

Bombblacks:
Am not interested in Conspiracy theory here.

It isn't a conspiracy theory....The jury was never gonna convict O.J....
Everyone still thinks O.J did it...

raumdeuter:
Chelsea since 2016 have spent 804.87 M Pounds on incoming transfers. If they spend 170M on Haaland and 60M on Kounde where will they be?

They will be looking at winning another UCL that Fraudiola hasn't won since he left Messi and spending money on players like a bastardd.

airmark:
That's a product of a league system that showed how Leicester subsequently fell off and some other strong teams lost the steam towards the end of the season and doesn't have anything to do with VVD.

With VVD starting the season, Liverpool finished 1st or 2nd while without him last season they dropped to 3rd with highest number of matches lost and goals conceded. Your guess is as good as mine.

It is more important to check the number of losses Liverpool had in the league with him and without him.

With VVD 1 loss in 5 matches.

Without VVD - 8 losses in 37 matches

Coupled with the fact that Liverpool never lost up to 9 matches in a league season since VVD joined and only happened when he injured.

I don't need to beg a Professor of Mathematics to conclude for you. So, Lilbros.

Resist the urge...

Na simple question I ask. I expect simple answer. Where was Liverpool when VVD got injured and where did they finished the league?

Again, resist the urge....

Bombblacks:
Am not interested in Conspiracy theory here.

This is one of the jurors that sat on the case and declared OJ not guilty.

Even Rob Kardashian who was OJ's own defence lawyer was so disgusted by his own actions that he testified against OJ in the civil case.

The Prosecutor presented over 100 pieces of DNA evidence. They had OJ's blood in the woman's house. They had the victims blood in OJ's car. The jurors were not interested in convicting OJ - that's a fact.

raumdeuter:
You can take out 100M Grealish and talk about Peps spending vs Chelsea spending

You can talk about Grealish Kane when you are ready to talk about Haaland and Kounde

you were the one you brought in Haaland and Kounde, so when you wanna dance just let me know. I will tango with your flat nursery ass as Pep spends €1,200,000,000 with no UCL title in sight

timbros:
Resist the urge...

Na simple question I ask. I expect simple answer. Where was Liverpool when VVD got injured and where did they finished the league?

Again, resist the urge....

The question was inconsequential that's why i had to explain why, how and spell out what were consequential.

With VVD, Liverpool never conceded up to 42 in a season, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost a league match at Anfield, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost 4 league matches consecutively, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost up to 9 league matches, they did without him last season.

These are the important things not league positioning that could be influenced by many other factors in which VVD is not central to. Even in league positioning, Liverpool never finished a season below 2nd position in seasons VVD started and completed with them. They failed last season and it even approves my stand.

So LiLbros, take your L and rest jejeLy.

BlueAngel444:
you were the one you brought in Haaland and Kounde, so when you wanna dance just let me know. I will tango with your flat nursery ass as Pep spends €1,200,000,000 with no UCL title in sight

Why wont I bring Haaland and Kounde when you were discussing Peps spending that included Grealish

How is Grealish different than Haaland or Kounde

airmark:
The question was inconsequential that's why i had to explain why, how and spell out what were consequential.

With VVD, Liverpool never conceded up to 42 in a season, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost a league match at Anfield, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost 4 league matches consecutively, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost up to 9 league matches, they did without him last season.

These are the important things not league positioning that could be influenced by many other factors in which VVD is not central to. Even in league positioning, Liverpool never finished a season below 2nd position in seasons VVD started and completed with them. They failed last season and it even approves my stand.

So LiLbros, take your L and rest jejeLy.

With VVD Liverpool conceeded 7 goals in a game

raumdeuter:
Why wont I bring Haaland and Kounde when you were discussing Peps spending that included Grealish

How is Grealish different than Haaland or Kounde

didn't say you shouldn't, like I said €300m for both Kane and Grealish, brings it to €1,240,000,000

Kounde for €30m, Haaland for €170m, €200m, brings it to €1,090,000,000

Not my money, not my business, but Pep should be bringing in UCLs don't you agree

airmark:
The question was inconsequential that's why i had to explain why, how and spell out what were consequential.

With VVD, Liverpool never conceded up to 42 in a season, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost a league match at Anfield, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost 4 league matches consecutively, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost up to 9 league matches, they did without him last season.

These are the important things not league positioning that could be influenced by many other factors in which VVD is not central to. Even in league positioning, Liverpool never finished a season below 2nd position in seasons VVD started and completed with them. They failed last season and it even approves my stand.

So LiLbros, take your L and rest jejeLy.

Where was Liverpool when VVD got injured and where did they finished the league?

If VVD was that important to Liverpool, it will show glaringly in the final league standing.

@ the bolded....... When Liverpool won UCL, it was VVD that made it possible. But now, you remember the bolded abi

raumdeuter:
With VVD Liverpool conceeded 7 goals in a game

You no get shame at all.

With VVD, Liverpool never conceded up to 42 in a season, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost a league match at Anfield, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost 4 league matches consecutively, they did without him last season.

With VVD, Liverpool never lost up to 9 league matches, they did without him last season.