₦airaland Forum

Havertz10:
[s] it's not even the bad first touch, it's the age, his ability to blend with the players we have and his ability to thrive on the shoot at once chances that we create, Chelsea board will be very foolish to buy lukaku, that marauding buffoon, if the board weren't sure about haaland, they should have taken a risk with patson daka, it's as if Chelsea board aren't organized self, we can't just build a functional team not only is mount there making life difficult for other players with his rubbish, we won the champions league and we can't even find a striker to buy, I swear if we buy lukaku, I will be on his head from the get go

Almost all players want to go to Madrid and it's because of their legacy, instead of us to build one now that we have good players, we are fooling around buying brawny players that can't perform in big games that require technical intelligence. [/s]

thorrvik55:
Trash as usual.. No one gives a fvck if u would be on his head or on his feet

thorrvik55:
Trash as usual.. No one gives a fvck if u would be on his head or on his feet

WhoDeyHause:
Maybe he's afraid of havert not going to play as a false 9 anymore. Dortmund said they are not selling Haaland he too isn't giving any positive body language he wants to join. I wonder what he wants abrahimovic to do.

airmark:
Ogbeni, do you believe that Magun exists?

Havertz10:
I swear if we buy lukaku, I will be on his head from the get go

Almost all players want to go to Madrid and it's because of their legacy, instead of us to build one now that we have good players, we are fooling around buying brawny players that can't perform in big games that require technical intelligence.

swiz123:
Do you know him?

I watched that guy replace an injured Busquet in the 18th minute against ATM. I don't think I will ever see a more stupid and unprofessional performance from a supposed footballer in the foreseeable future.

BlueMann:
Apparently, my comparison was flawed because I used fullbacks and Mount is not a fullback.

No wahala. We meuve.

Segedinho:
Lols..

He said £200m is a bargain.


A league where Werner was actually a warrior

WhoDeyHause:
Maybe he's afraid of havert not going to play as a false 9 anymore. Dortmund said they are not selling Haaland he too isn't giving any positive body language he wants to join. I wonder what he wants abrahimovic to do.

Havertz10:
Chelsea board aren't ambitious,

Havertz10:
afraid for havertz how?

Haaland didn't get me afraid for havertz, it's service dependent lukaku that will get me afraid I have always stated it here that I don't want havertz to play as false 9, so I don't understand why you think that whichever striker we buy is a havertz agenda waiting to happen, lukaku isn't good enough, that's my issue here and his age plus his style of play annoys me

WhoDeyHause:
Maybe he's afraid of havert not going to play as a false 9 anymore. Dortmund said they are not selling Haaland he too isn't giving any positive body language he wants to join. I wonder what he wants abrahimovic to do.

Havertz10:
afraid for havertz how?

Haaland didn't get me afraid for havertz, it's service dependent lukaku that will get me afraid I have always stated it here that I don't want havertz to play as false 9, so I don't understand why you think that whichever striker we buy is a havertz agenda waiting to happen, lukaku isn't good enough, that's my issue here and his age plus his style of play annoys me

Exonerate1:
So how many goals should we expect from Lukaku cus 130mil is a lot of money

Segedinho:
I think he has improved on that aspect

swiz123:
... Lukaku isn't someone you can send a long ball to and expect him to display a feather like control and finish... He would mess it up and give defenders chance to make recoveries.

Havertz10:
haaland will go on to be a world class player, even if he is going to cost 200m I don't see the issue there, as long as he guarantees 30 goals a season, he is technical and incisive, he would have thrived and blended well with havertz, pulisic, ziyech and werner, let's not talk about his marketing potential as a brand that will improve our standing in the game, shirts that he would sell and attention that he would bring the club, if he is winning things like champions league and league titles, he wouldn't leave for Madrid, the benefits of haaland makes him worth every kobo, Chelsea board aren't ambitious, we have all the pieces to dominate euro for at least 8 years all these players are young, Dortmund's valuation makes sense, if he stays and they progress far in the champions league with his goals they will make extra 50m, add that to his 75 and it's almost 130m in benefits with haaland but if he is going to leave the club will have to pay them 150m and that's understandable

Segedinho:
You who would you opt in for??

Lewa

Kane

Haaland

Lukaku?

BlueAngel444:
neither are you sure a 130m striker would hit the ground running.

You are talking about moving a big player from a set team, who performed within certain instructions and environment and strived. What's to say, Lukaku, Kane or Haaland don't flop when they come. Nothing, just hope the one we may get doesn't.

Last season is gone, that's how football is, what may happen this season even many jazz men no know.

Replacement for Giroud? That Tuchel barely used?

Inter signed Lukaku and worked on him for months, Kane has been in Tottenham for so long and has his own issues, injuries, bottling some crunch games and trophies. Then Haaland, from a league where scoring 20goals is a piece of cake, who is to say that the hype, transfer fee, change in league and environment doesn't affect him negatively

The rumor of Lukaku and Haaland is likely due to them both having played in a 3-4-3, still it's all a risk

Why can't Ziyech hit 12goals and 15 assists next season in the league or Werner 15+ goals or Havertz 15+ goals. When last was EPL won because of one player? I'm more worried about how the players we have will do than if we do get a new signing.

Left to me I would sign Kounde, Rice/Tchoum... and loan an attacker, Griezmann, Coutinho, Dembele, Odegaard or Dybala if possible.

nathz45:
I thought this thread was the HQ of violence, I wonder what went down @Barcelona thread that led to an entire page being wiped out

Amoto94:
Benzema (33) and Lewandowksi (32) are two of the best strikers in the world currently. Drogba’s best goal-scoring season for Chelsea was at 32 years old.

Romelu Lukaku recently turned 28. He has many years in his prime to come. Age is not an issue, at all.

Havertz10:
why are you guys still putting mount among attacking midfielders at Chelsea

Let me show you something

Assist are the number of assists a player gets, xA are expected assists, meaning the possibility of the chances he creates becoming a goal

If you look at the chart below, you will see that most players outperform their expected assists, only mount underperforms his expected assists with a large percentage, because most of the chances he created last season were poor chances and more than half are freekicks and corner kicks chances

swiz123:
It all boils down to cost. Everything being equal, I will prefer Haaland.

hensben:
I have never wanted lukaku, I don’t like his pattern of play, bulky and brawn.

Vero4u:
Chelsea and bad transfer market are like 5&6. €130m for a 28yrs old player with a bad first touch.

swiz123:
Spending 200m on Haaland is too big a risk... I am sure you weren't watching Dembele when he was dazzling in Germany...

Na person money dem use sign Kepa... Let's put ourselves in Abramovich's shoes

BlueAngel444:
(Werner/Pulisic)SS (Lukaku/Broja)CF

(Chilwell/Alonso)LM (Mount/Kovacic)CM (Kante/Jorginho)DM (Havertz/Ziyech)CM (James/Odoi)RM

(Rudiger/Sarr)LCB (Silva/Christensen)CB (Cesar/Kounde)RCB


(Mendy/Kepa)GK

Make we no hear story say na 3-5-2 and no be 3-4-3 Lukaku fit play