₦airaland Forum

Beorn:
Was it that bad?

iamL:
The harder they fall 4/10
Dune 2/10

neztar:
sex scenes adds nothing to realism when in reality sex is supposed to be a private affair. Filmmakers only add it to excite audience.

neztar:
sex scenes adds nothing to realism when in reality sex is supposed to be a private affair. Filmmakers only add it to excite audience.

Kaycee7:
I don search tire. If anybody see, make them share abeg

Chibudollar:
It adds nothing if we are being honest. It could just be implied.

Chibudollar:
It adds nothing if we are being honest. It could just be implied.

VerifiedStalin:
Ethan Hawke has had one of the most underappreciated runs of good films of any actor in recent memory. It's amazing to see how talented this man is. He's completely devoted to his craft. To put it in another way, if he's in a movie, there's a good chance it's a good movie.

Kaycee7:
Same with fight scenes. It could just be implied.

Chibudollar:
nahh you can't imply fight scenes it is literally impossible

Nova15:
Count of Monte Cristo - 8.5/10

An eternal classic

oyetpel:
I remember a lot of battles in Game of Thrones were only made known through conversations.
Jamie Lannister was overhyped to be a seasoned warrior but his battles was never shown.

thatthickgurl:
Red Notice : 7.5/10

Ryan Reynolds bodied his role. I had multiple laughs. Then definitely wasn't expecting the end

3RNEST:
7.5 u rate this movie... u try oo

See below.

I don't think it's going to be interesting with FreeGuy as one of the cast..
same shit with FreeGuy.

Chibudollar:
nahh you can't imply fight scenes it is literally impossible

Fuckgodndjesus:
Venom let there be carnage coming out on digital on Tuesday, can't wait to download it.

Karleb:
Personal rating and IMDB's ain't the same.

I could decide to rate it 3/10 if I like.

Nova15:
Count of Monte Cristo - 8.5/10

An eternal classic

VerifiedStalin:
It's a good film in its own right, but I think it falls short of the source material. Some of the motivations and relationships in the film, for instance, were altered. If you're a die-hard fan of the book, the changes might irritate you. I wish it had stayed closer to the book; I thought it had a lot more depth and the revenge was more satisfying.

StPete:
Unfortunately books come out first before the movies, cos it'll be better to watch the movies first before reading the book. This is because most times, the movies don't measure up with the book.

Also, watching the movies first will help give you a clearer pictorial reality while reading the book.

VerifiedStalin:
Novels serve as inspiration for film scripts. Where would a film's content come from if it was released before a novel? We've all seen what happened with Game of Thrones' final season, where the content outpaced the source material; the writers couldn't draw from the source material because it didn't exist at the time, so they ended up making a mess of everything.

Furthermore, it wouldn't feel right to watch a movie before reading the novel it's based on because novels, by design, have much more depth, content, and layers. Watching a film before reading the book is akin to putting the cart before the horse.

StPete:
Nope, I disagree with the bolded. Watching a movie before reading a book is like having a preamble before getting the detailed content. All movies that were made from books didn't do justice and many who read the books and watched the movies, complained about how terrible and less detailed the movies were.

Those who watched Angels and Demons without reading the book enjoyed the movie whilst those who had read the book before watching the movie were disappointed.

StPete:
All movies that were made from books didn't do justice