Android22:
If you think so then you have not been watching football. Even though KDB is our best player, we actually play our best football without him. The only miss is Walker because Cancelo is banned from game 1. RM will be no match for City. We are better than Chelsea having outplayed them 2 times this season.

Oga,Madrid will remove you.look at how atletico outplayed you

Crazy game

garfield1:


No one in city can mark benz

Benz can easily be marked because City play a back 4 whereas CFC plays a back 3. Benz is good no doubt but City will have to miss chances to lose to RM. RM cannot outplay City. City are better than Barcelona who outplayed RM at Santiago.

Android22:
Vinicius is worse than him and Sterling is better at positioning than him. We beat this RM team in 2019-20 and Zidane as their coach. RM are not even a great counter attacking team which means they can't control the ball and can't counter City if we lose possession.

Are you ok? Majority of the goals Madrid scored PSG and Chelsea are from counters.Madrid always score at the right time

garfield1:


Oga,Madrid will remove you.look at how atletico outplayed you

You talk like you don't watch football. There were 4 halves in this tie. City should have won 2-0 first leg. Then City should have also scored a goal in the first half of the second leg. ATM played better in the 2nd half of the 2nd leg period. This is considering how tired City already was by the 2nd half.

garfield1:


Are you ok? Majority of the goals Madrid scored PSG and Chelsea are from counters.Madrid always score at the right time

You don't know what counter attack is. RM scored 3 goals against CFC by cross and nod having used 1-2 combination of passes to get to the by line. Then 1 other goal came from Benz forcing Mendy to make a mistake. Rodrygo scored from a brilliant cross by Modric.

In the PSG game Benz scored 2 of his goals by pressing Donaruma into a mistake. That is called counter pressing. Counter attack comes when you revert an attack from an opposing team into a chance or a goal. Go and learn football.

tzars:
Not Man City System.

all athleti needed was 1 goal

I know atletico were planning to score a goal then defend all through the game

garfield1:


I disagree. Madrid will likely remove city.if a solid Chelsea defense cannot contain vinixius,can city do!?

Chelsea undoing was the glaringly avoidable, and unreasonable errors they made.
In the first leg, Rudiger and Mendy mad avoidable mistakes.
In the second leg, Kante also made another avoidable mistakes.
Without those mistakes, madrid would have been knocked out.
Chelsea had more chances to win the match.
And TT failed to defend after the 3:0.
Madrid were so much lucky.
Anything they touched turned to gold.
Even Chelsea goal had to be disqualified.
Real Madrid were so much obviously in luck, but their luck ran out as they met more than their match in city.
And city would knock them out.
It is all English final.
City and Liv for the final.

Android22:
You don't know what counter attack is. RM scored 3 goals against CFC by cross and nod having used 1-2 combination of passes to get to the by line. Then 1 other goal came from Benz forcing Mendy to make a mistake. Rodrygo scored from a brilliant cross by Modric.

In the PSG game Benz scored 2 of his goals by pressing Donaruma into a mistake. That is called counter pressing. Counter attack comes when you revert an attack from an opposing team into a chance or a goal. Go and learn football.

Oga,most of Madrid threat is through counter.their attack is far sharper than that of city.they create more chances compared to city.they will pick city off

StAmbrose1:

Chelsea undoing was the glaringly avoidable, and unreasonable errors they made.
In the first leg, Rudiger and Mendy mad avoidable mistakes.
In the second leg, Kante also made another avoidable mistakes.
Without those mistakes, madrid would have been knocked out.
Chelsea had more chances to win the match.
And TT failed to defend after the 3:0.
Madrid were so much lucky.
Anything they touched turned to gold.
Even Chelsea goal had to be disqualified.
Real Madrid were so much obviously in luck, but their luck ran out as they met more than their match in city.
And city would knock them out.
It is all English final.
City and Liv for the final.

Oga,if you have followed Madrid history esp when the won ucl three times consecutively, then you will know that they are deadly and have luck.they dont dominate matches like city or play sweet football but they will finish you off.do you remember their match against juve?

Android22:
You talk like you don't watch football. There were 4 halves in this tie. City should have won 2-0 first leg. Then City should have also scored a goal in the first half of the second leg. ATM played better in the 2nd half of the 2nd leg period. This is considering how tired City already was by the 2nd half.

Madrid are semi final masters

garfield1:


Oga,most of Madrid threat is through counter.their attack is far sharper than that of city.they create more chances compared to city.they will pick city off

You are now proving you are talking rubbish. City creates more chances than all other teams not named Bayern. Incase you don't know, Sporting that is higher than Benfica in the league lost to City 5-0 in their own ground. You seem to forget that Chelsea outplayed and battered RM and Chelsea is significantly worse than City. Lol.

RM is not better at City at anything. Not scoring. Not defending and certainly not keeping the ball. RM just have a wonderful striker in Benzema to finish off their half chances.

Android22:
You are now proving you are talking rubbish. City creates more chances than all other teams not named Bayern. Incase you don't know, Sporting that is higher than Benfica in the league lost to City 5-0 in their own ground. You seem to forget that Chelsea outplayed and battered RM and Chelsea is significantly worse than City. Lol.

RM is not better at City at anything. Not scoring. Not defending and certainly not keeping the ball. RM just have a wonderful striker in Benzema to finish off their half chances.

)@



How many chances did city create against atletico? They scored 6 goals in r16 and 1 goal in quarters.Madrid has scored 8 goals against PSG and Chelsea.city could only. Score two deflected goals against chelsea...vinicius will have a field day P

garfield1:


De bruyne and Walker are injured.Chelsea is more difficult to beat

ok.. we shall see.. it's not too far 26th of April

But wait o...
Didn't city beat Madrid home and away in 2019/20 UCL? So what's the argument abt?
The last time Madrid beat city was in 2015/16 UCL... But dis city are far improved now

garfield1:




Madrid are semi final masters

Chelsea freaking outplayed and scored 3 goals to this same Madrid. You are waffling.

garfield1:


I disagree. Madrid will likely remove city.if a solid Chelsea defense cannot contain vinixius,can city do!?

Vinicius never did anything special. He was just running here and there without an accurate idea on how to dribble the opponent. And couldn't even pass James.
Thiago was not that good in the match. The attempt vinicius scored, Chelsea had more than 4 of that such attempts. But never had the luck of vinicius to score all the attempts. It would have been more than 7-1 or 7-2 in favour of Chelsea.
Pulisic had such attempts even jorginho all mucked up.
City would be the end of the road for the inordinate luck of Madrid.
Home and away would be won by city. They have the edge, and capacity to advance to the final.
Madrid just had a very random and uncanny luck that was fascinated by the foolish errors of his opponent right from the beginning (no thanks to donnarunma's, Marquinhos', and Mendy's stupid errors.)

garfield1:
)@



How many chances did city create against atletico? They scored 6 goals in r16 and 1 goal in quarters.Madrid has scored 8 goals against PSG and Chelsea.city could only. Score two deflected goals against chelsea...vinicius will have a field day P

hahaha. City should have won ATM 4-1. This ATM that played 5-5-0. RM conceded 2 goals apart from 2 canceled goals against PSG and then suffered defensively over 180 mins to qualify. City thoroughly outplayed PSG not only in the CL home and away last season, they also did same this season again and relegated Neymar, Messi and Mbappe to counter attacks and hopeful defending. City battered PSG.

City already outplayed and beat CFC home and away this season as well so what is the big deal? You keep forgetting that CFC scored 4 goals in the 2nd leg against RM had Alonso's goal not been canceled. RM are no match for City tactically.

garfield1:


Oga,if you have followed Madrid history esp when the won ucl three times consecutively, then you will know that they are deadly and have luck.they dont dominate matches like city or play sweet football but they will finish you off.do you remember their match against juve?

You are basking on history that is no longer relevant. Last season, Chelsea won Madrid overwhelmingly in the seme final. Maybe you never watched last season match. The champions League Madrid won for the past 10 seasons are due to Ronaldo overwhelming support and ability. And no thanks to uefa for their blind and innate support for Madrid.(Ramos deliberate injury of Salah and other many uefa dubious tactics).
[b]Madrid is very poor in terms of tactics and game play. They only capitalized on the lapses and errors of their opponents.
And man city is too organised to dole out avoidable errors like psg and Chelsea did.
Cut out the source of winning(error) and watch a problem die a natural death(Madrid).[\b]
Without errors, you would have forgotten that Madrid even attended this competition because they would have been long defeated/knocked out.

StAmbrose1:

You are basking on history that is no longer relevant. Last season, Chelsea won Madrid overwhelmingly in the seme final. Maybe you never watched last season match. The champions League Madrid won for the past 10 seasons are due to Ronaldo overwhelming support and ability. And no thanks to uefa for their blind and innate support for Madrid.(Ramos deliberate injury of Salah and other many uefa dubious tactics).
[b]Madrid is very poor in terms of tactics and game play. They only capitalized on the lapses and errors of their opponents.
And man city is too organised to dole out avoidable errors like psg and Chelsea did.
Cut out the source of winning(error) and watch a problem die a natural death(Madrid).[\b]
Without errors, you would have forgotten that Madrid even attended this competition because they would have been long defeated/knocked out.

City is too organized and they haven't win any uefa trophy? Ancelotti is a veteran in ucl,a tactician par excellence

Android22:
hahaha. City should have won ATM 4-1. This ATM that played 5-5-0. RM conceded 2 goals apart from 2 canceled goals against PSG and then suffered defensively over 180 mins to qualify. City thoroughly outplayed PSG not only in the CL home and away last season, they also did same this season again and relegated Neymar, Messi and Mbappe to counter attacks and hopeful defending. City battered PSG.

City already outplayed and beat CFC home and away this season as well so what is the big deal? You keep forgetting that CFC scored 4 goals in the 2nd leg against RM had Alonso's goal not been canceled. RM are no match for City tactically.

My brother,what is the point of outplaying someone without winning any trophy or crushing them? Madrid don't outplay teams,they are simply more clinical and efficient goalwise.even Liverpool are gradually adopting that strategy.city outplayed Liverpool yet couldn't win them.my brother,the end point is result,city will play and Madrid will get the result.there is a reason why Madrid has 13 ucl and city none

StAmbrose1:

Vinicius never did anything special. He was just running here and there without an accurate idea on how to dribble the opponent. And couldn't even pass James.
Thiago was not that good in the match. The attempt vinicius scored, Chelsea had more than 4 of that such attempts. But never had the luck of vinicius to score all the attempts. It would have been more than 7-1 or 7-2 in favour of Chelsea.
Pulisic had such attempts even jorginho all mucked up.
City would be the end of the road for the inordinate luck of Madrid.
Home and away would be won by city. They have the edge, and capacity to advance to the final.
Madrid just had a very random and uncanny luck that was fascinated by the foolish errors of his opponent right from the beginning (no thanks to donnarunma's, Marquinhos', and Mendy's stupid errors.)

My brother,it is not about luck,it is efficiency.vinicius gave 2 assists for Benz against chelsea and you say he was running aimlessly? If city has the edge,why haven't they won ucl? Madrid style is not to outplay or dominate anybody or out pass you like EPL sides will do.they will simply bid their moment and finish off foolish clubs.Chelsea ran around childishly but a world class pass from modric humbled them.same. thing will happen to city

Android22:
Chelsea freaking outplayed and scored 3 goals to this same Madrid. You are waffling.

Guy,stop being naive na.the key is not to outplay anyone but to to advance son.seems your a Chelsea fan still in mourning

CSNg:
I don't bet but 0-0 HT correct score is a sure banker for this game!

Why didnt i see dis before the game

kilisi:


Atletico can't go toe to toe against Man City for 180 minutes. They will get battered! The best tactic is to defend deep and be brave with the ball whenever they win it back, the latter part of which they failed to do at the Etihad and that was their undoing.

If he had picked few moments to attack Man City in the first leg, maybe it might have been a different story.

Lyon went toe-to-toe with Man City and knocked out of the UCL , yeah ATM has a far better team than Lyon had. Remember City loses minimum of four matches in EPL every season meaning they're beatable when you attack them , Crystal Palace, Leeds, Leicester, Liverpool, West Ham and even Newcastle and Spurs has proved that over the years. ATM should have attacked them in the first leg while maintaining their defensive discipline, that's what Chelsea played in the Champions League final against City.

Semi final 1st leg
Madrid vs Liverpool 2-3
Man City vs villareal 2-0

Semi final 2nd leg
Villareal vs Man City 1-1
Liverpool vs Villareal 3-1

Final champions league

Liverpool vs Manchester City
First half 1-1
Second half 1-1
Extra time 1-2
2nd Extra 2-2
Penalty shoot 4-5 sallah missed


Manchester City the New champions

I bet my balls on this, let's them go with the cup they deserved it ,this is coming die hard Chelsea fans we are not our noisy haters neighbour MANU United

Bimmarlykay:
It seems like EPL is very soft that's why the likes of Foden they shine every week...ATM no care they attacked Foden and DE Bruyne and Man city melo...after they will say that Laliga is easy EPL is tough.

There are actually more youngsters in Laliga than any other leagues, from Gavi, Pedri, Araujo, Eric Garcia, Pau Torres, Luis Suarez, Dest and many more. Those players will actually struggle in EPL, Werner, Harvartz and Sancho dominated German Bundesliga, Ziyech dominated Dutch football but today they struggle badly in the premiership.

garfield1:


Oga,most of Madrid threat is through counter.their attack is far sharper than that of city.they create more chances compared to city.they will pick city off

they don't create more chances than City

AFONJAPIG:
Semi final 1st leg
Madrid vs Liverpool 2-3
Man City vs villareal 2-0

Semi final 2nd leg
Villareal vs Man City 1-1
Liverpool vs Villareal 3-1

Final champions league

Liverpool vs Manchester City
First half 1-1
Second half 1-1
Extra time 1-2
2nd Extra 2-2
Penalty shoot 4-5 sallah missed


Manchester City the New champions

I bet my balls on this, let's them go with the cup they deserved it ,this is coming die hard Chelsea fans we are not our noisy haters neighbour MANU United

what's this ?

Mancity is meeting Madrid and Liverpool against Villareal