₦airaland Forum

DoctorOlasDesk:
Good. Then was Chris Rock's nasty comments against Will Smith not worthy of same treatment being in the same category? Any information used maliciously is tantamount of ridiculing the victim, hence an offense. So, why is the academy awards banning will smith for ten years and letting Chris Rock, the one who incited everything walk away freely like he's the victim. This world ehn

Yeah because will took the wrong approach.
He could have simply protested by taking a walk out of the event with and see how the academy will come apologising to them

mustmust:
Yeah because will took the wrong approach.
He could have simply protested by taking a walk out of the event with and see how the academy will come apologising to them

Like i tell people, I won't choose how i react when i'm provoked, the aggressor should choose their actions wisely. When provoke, it is unwise to tell a victim how to react

DoctorOlasDesk:
Good. Then was Chris Rock's nasty comments against Will Smith not worthy of same treatment being in the same category? Any information used maliciously is tantamount of ridiculing the victim, hence an offense. So, why is the academy awards banning will smith for ten years and letting Chris Rock, the one who incited everything walk away freely like he's the victim. This world ehn

You be mumu.

Solid mumu.

Afrobasic:
You be mumu.

Solid mumu.

Your wife/babe will be beaten in your presence and to your shame. On that day, you go remember my comment. Good day. Fold your hands when that day comes

Shellsploit:


E remain seun osewaa and mynd54

Hian, mynd59, mydnd60, mydn buhari the criminal 69

Super1759:
Funny enough
Linda is still roaring...
What money cannot do does not exist

Well she had the money to pay

You do know that that insta account is fake

DoctorOlasDesk:
Good. Then was Chris Rock's nasty comments against Will Smith not worthy of same treatment being in the same category? Any information used maliciously is tantamount of ridiculing the victim, hence an offense. So, why is the academy awards banning will smith for ten years and letting Chris Rock, the one who incited everything walk away freely like he's the victim. This world ehn

What did Chris Rock say ?

Very good.
Hope linda can rest small. She's fond of peddling fake news.
Same thing she tried with wizkid but I guess that didn't teach her a lesson.

tydi:
I support the finer one

Lmao����
You're not serious!!

DoctorOlasDesk:
Your wife/babe will be beaten in your presence and to your shame. On that day, you go remember my comment. Good day. Fold your hands when that day comes

Not surprised by this response

Like I said. You be solid mumu. Can't expect anything better *spits*

DryMouth:
I hate replying ignorant pple and this will be my last reply to you.

Linda is a wealthy woman with lots of exotic assets and the court knows this.
The law firm knows she would be able to provide 25m without sweating that was why they stood at a "meagre" sum of 25m. If it was 100m, she can easily appeal for a lower sum

And because she's rich she should just take the Judgment like that without any appeal..

DoctorOlasDesk:
Good. Then was Chris Rock's nasty comments against Will Smith not worthy of same treatment being in the same category? Any information used maliciously is tantamount of ridiculing the victim, hence an offense. So, why is the academy awards banning will smith for ten years and letting Chris Rock, the one who incited everything walk away freely like he's the victim. This world ehn

free speech is different from malicious statement. Jokes are covered under freedom of expression, it is not falsehood, it is not disguised, the listeners know it is a joke

Super1759:
Funny enough
Linda is still roaring...
What money cannot do does not exist

Well she had the money to pay

Na small money. But she go show them.

DoctorOlasDesk:
Your wife/babe will be beaten in your presence and to your shame. On that day, you go remember my comment. Good day. Fold your hands when that day comes

you think what will Smith did is defending his wife? Hahahaha.... bro you are wrong on this one.

Afrobasic:
Not surprised by this response

Like I said. You be solid mumu. Can't expect anything better *spits*

Nae. I don't mud sling. Busy. Good day

dammyBoxes:
free speech is different from malicious statement. Jokes are covered under freedom of expression, it is not falsehood, it is not disguised, the listeners know it is a joke

There's limitation to free speech. The whole world knew Will Smith was in crises mode before the incident, why carry a match to a place filled with fuel spillage everywhere?

DoctorOlasDesk:
There's limitation to free speech. The whole world knew Will Smith was in crises mode before the incident, why carry a match to a place filled with fuel spillage everywhere?

lol. Bro abeg dont say what you dont know. Go on you tube and search " lawyers respond to will smith and chris rock. " listen to what they have to say. Unlike you I have listened to 2 lawyers address the boundaries crossed and not crossed in this case. Will smith is very luck chris rock did not press charges

DoctorOlasDesk:
Good. Then was Chris Rock's nasty comments against Will Smith not worthy of same treatment being in the same category? Any information used maliciously is tantamount of ridiculing the victim, hence an offense. So, why is the academy awards banning will smith for ten years and letting Chris Rock, the one who incited everything walk away freely like he's the victim. This world ehn

sense is far from u

DoctorOlasDesk:
Good. Then was Chris Rock's nasty comments against Will Smith not worthy of same treatment being in the same category? Any information used maliciously is tantamount of ridiculing the victim, hence an offense. So, why is the academy awards banning will smith for ten years and letting Chris Rock, the one who incited everything walk away freely like he's the victim. This world ehn

Good luck winning the case.

DoctorOlasDesk:
Good. Then was Chris Rock's nasty comments against Will Smith not worthy of same treatment being in the same category? Any information used maliciously is tantamount of ridiculing the victim, hence an offense. So, why is the academy awards banning will smith for ten years and letting Chris Rock, the one who incited everything walk away freely like he's the victim. This world ehn

Will Smith's ban and punishment is well deserved!

You don't just walk up the podium during a stand-up comedy and slap the comedian because you feel he insulted your bald-headed wife who even cheated on you with a mosquito-look-alike.

He (Will Smith) was once my fan but after that incident, I have decided to boycott watching his movies.

Abbeyme:
Hope she gets the judgment sum without Linda approaching the higher courts

Of course she will appeal the judgement.

N25m for what could have been a forgiveable error...

Attempt to kill an ant with a sledgehammer...

DoctorOlasDesk:
Like i tell people, I won't choose how i react when i'm provoked, the aggressor should choose their actions wisely. When provoke, it is unwise to tell a victim how to react

Oga, you will end up in jail very Okay. Use that in court and see how it holds up.

DryMouth:
I hate replying ignorant pple and this will be my last reply to you.

Linda is a wealthy woman with lots of exotic assets and the court knows this.
The law firm knows she would be able to provide 25m without sweating that was why they stood at a "meagre" sum of 25m. If it was 100m, she can easily appeal for a lower sum

You are the ignorant dude here with the added spice of being senselessly arrogant.

So because according to you the blogger is as rich as Oprah so a certain court can now award a disproportionate charge against her?

Who is teaching you this?

I can wager that this verdict will be thrown out for frivolity in a higher court since the matter being canvassed is more or less mundane.

All the defendant needs is to get a competent lawyer and the case will be delayed ad infinitum via legal technicalities...

skales67:
Will Smith's ban and punishment is well deserved!

You don't just walk up the podium during a stand-up comedy and slap the comedian because you feel he insulted your bald-headed wife who even cheated on you with a mosquito-look-alike.

He (Will Smith) was once my fan but after that incident, I have decided to boycott watching his movies.

It's the same thing

DoctorOlasDesk:
Good. Then was Chris Rock's nasty comments against Will Smith not worthy of same treatment being in the same category? Any information used maliciously is tantamount of ridiculing the victim, hence an offense. So, why is the academy awards banning will smith for ten years and letting Chris Rock, the one who incited everything walk away freely like he's the victim. This world ehn

What are you on about??

What nasty comment did Chris Rock make about Will Smith?

DoctorOlasDesk:
Good. Then was Chris Rock's nasty comments against Will Smith not worthy of same treatment being in the same category? Any information used maliciously is tantamount of ridiculing the victim, hence an offense. So, why is the academy awards banning will smith for ten years and letting Chris Rock, the one who incited everything walk away freely like he's the victim. This world ehn

Go school una no go hear, pay attention for class and learn comprehension, una no go hear. See as you just display your ignorance here with boldness sef.

maestroferddi:
You are the ignorant dude here with the added spice of being senselessly arrogant.

So because according to you the blogger is as rich as Oprah so a certain court can now award a disproportionate charge against her?

Who is teaching you this?

I can wager that this verdict will be thrown out for frivolity in a higher court since the matter being canvassed is more or less mundane.

All the defendant needs is to get a competent lawyer and the case will be delayed ad infinitum via legal technicalities...

You are a child in law in trust me and very very ignorant.

You dnt know defamation of character is a serious crime that can make linda pay more even if appeals to a higher court.
You want to delay ad infinitum with one of the biggest law firms in Nigeria with over 100 legal practitioner who have more than enough evidence against you? You are a learner.

Read the case of Wole Soyinka vs Alhaji Olufemi Okunnu who was an ex commissioner during Nigerian military regime. Read it extensively and also mind the fact that soyinka was not as wealthy as linda ikeji.

After reading the case extensively, jst go and argue with your mates.

Dead case! You can't bring down Ms Linda. Linda kindly appeal. I can assist you.

.

Shellsploit:


E remain seun osewaa and mynd54

You go soon Chop Ban....

thatigboman1:
he's referring to Linda ikeji. When she had issues with wizkid.

OkoroBufo:
Linda is the one with smelly pussy.

That means WizKid have tasted or smelt the pussy for him to know that Linda's pussy Stinks like stockfish....

Hmmm Na wa.... Bad Guy sucking pussy everywhere.

If he has sucked the smelling pussy before, then WizKid mouth go also dey smell like stockfish...

inoki247:
lol na Magistrate Court go run diz kain Judgement.....

controversial gossip merchant in suit number FCT/CV/667/2018: Mrs Ajibola Ajayi v. Linda Ikeji before an FCT Abuja High court.

What is she appealing? On what grounds?

She can't afford 25M or she did not lie.