The most likely scenario about this war is that it will end due to negotiations when Ukraine has finally gotten to a breaking point. With the complete liberation of the Donbass and southern Ukraine, the war would move towards Kyiv and Ukraine would be forced to seek a negotiated settlement.

What is in it? Crimean status, Donbass status, EU ascension, NATO ascension, Trade, gas, sanctions and counter sanctions.

To get Russia out of Ukraine, the Ukrainians and their co conspirators would have to offer more for less, or risk further destruction. They would have to agree to most of the Russian demands, seek amendments for more difficult ones. For the west to have the assets of their cooperations unfrozen, they would likewise have to unfreeze Russian reserves. It will never be an easy walk for Ukraine.

The west will help rebuild Ukraine while it will take 200 for Russia to be able to build back the shattered economy.

WoundedLamb:


Lol... It's not seized, it's frozen. This is supposed to affect my post in what way? Sir, the difference is in semantics and even within the legal framework, the plausible difference does not have any bearing on the premise of my submission. The assets are not available to Russia at the moment and there's not telling when they'll be or what becomes of them. The West wouldn't go freezing assets with the mantra "we want to use them to aid Ukraine". But how and when Russia gets these assets will be determined by how and when this war ends. It wouldn't be very smart to think that Russia will invade Ukraine, take the two regions under consideration and peacefully walk away with all thier assets. That's not how negotiations work. That's not wars work. Compromises must be made and while none of us know for sure what those compromises would be, one thing is clear, these assets are on the table. Every other thing is speculations.

Just keep quite already your ignorant is awful, I can't have a meaningful conversation with u obviously. Plus u form too much English for someone who doesn't know d different between frozen and siezed

Alamkir:


Just keep quite already your ignorant is awful, I can't have a meaningful conversation with u obviously. Plus u form too much English for someone who doesn't know d different between frozen and siezed

Oh Sorry... In plain English, the difference between seized and frozen does not in any way affect the gist of the post you quoted. So making that the bone of contention instead of addressing the message is nothing but a strawman's argument. Russia has been denied control of thier assets and the fate of these assets heavily depends on the outcome of the war. So if you have any logical thing to say to that, bring it forward. However, if you're going keep dishing out insults and running around the subject like y'all do on Nairaland, you're welcome to entertain to me.

And it's "ignorance" not "ignorant".

_{I form English? Does that expression even make sense? Does the anti-West sentiment also imply anti-English language? Lol...}