₦airaland Forum

what kind of crime the yacht owner commit? no be only nigeria get corrupt judges

Oh

CheapHomes1:
now that they have seized the yatch, what will they do with it? just wondring

Selling it to Cater for Displaced Ukrainian refugees is not a Bad idea...

SlavaUkraini:
Selling it to Carter for Displaced Ukrainian refugees is not a Bad idea...

Can Carter afford it? Is that the same way they sold Chelsea to Carter and used the proceeds for displaced Ukrainian refugees?

USA the greatest criminals the end of USA is getting close

CheapHomes1:
Can Carter afford it? Is that the same way they sold Chelsea to Carter and used the proceeds for displaced Ukrainian refugees?

Pardon my spelling error...

I meant it can be sold to CATER for Ukrainian refugees...

As for the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Fc, they are still debating on what to do with it.

Baba Abrahamovic had made it clear that he wanted to give the proceeds to charity. He made this known even before the club was Sold.

I am aware of an apartment building in the UK that belongs to a Russian Oligarch that was seized and is now used to house Ukrainian refugees.

It is a massive building that can house nothing less than 100 people.

It is surely a bad season to be a Russian Oligarch that is connected to the Kremlin.

This is a bad business for yacht building companies, loss of jobs. the funny thing is that those companies are based in EU.

Now, Russians won't buy yachts anymore. who is losing?

SlavaUkraini:
Pardon my spelling error...

I meant it can be sold to CATER for Ukrainian refugees...

As for the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Fc, they are still debating on what to do with it.

Baba Abrahamovic had made it clear that he wanted to give the proceeds to charity. He made this known even before the club was Sold.

I am aware of an apartment building in the UK that belongs to a Russian Oligarch that was seized and is now used to house Ukrainian refugees.

It is a massive building that can house nothing less than 100 people.

It is surely a bad season to be a Russian Oligarch that is connected to the Kremlin.

no problem about the spelling. abramovich didnt sell the club. the british govt did. so what abramovich feels the £4.2b should be used for, doesnt count. its what he said he wanted. the british gov isnt under any obligation to do what he said. and if you say that 3months after seizing the club, the british govt are still debating on what to do with the £4.2b proceeds, then what makes you think they will use for ukranian refugees?

They stole it.

CheapHomes1:
no problem about the spelling. abramovich didnt sell the club. the british govt did. so what abramovich feels the £4.2b should be used for, doesnt count. its what he said he wanted. the british gov isnt under any obligation to do what he said. and if you say that 3months after seizing the club, the british govt are still debating on what to do with the £4.2b proceeds, then what makes you think they will use for ukranian refugees?

If they don't use the money for the Ukrainian Citizens or Ukrainian society would they use the money to build Bridges in London ?

Las Las,

Ukraine (People or the state) would cash out from the proceeds of the sale of Chelsea Fc.

SlavaUkraini:
If they don't use the money for the Ukrainian Citizens or Ukrainian society would they use the money to build Bridges in London ?

Las Las,

Ukraine (People or the state) would cash out from the proceeds of the sale of Chelsea Fc.

you didnt answer the question i asked: you say that 3months after seizing the club, the british govt are still debating on what to do with the £4.2b proceeds, then what makes you think they will use for ukranian refugees?

why wouldnt the british govt use the £4.2b to build bridges in the UK? are they under any legal obligation to use it for the ukranians? are you the one that will share the proceeds of the chelsea sale for the ukranian state?

CheapHomes1:
you didnt answer the question i asked: you say that 3months after seizing the club, the british govt are still debating on what to do with the £4.2b proceeds, then what makes you think they will use for ukranian refugees?

why wouldnt the british govt use the £4.2b to build bridges in the UK? are they under any legal obligation to use it for the ukranians? are you the one that will share the proceeds of the chelsea sale for the ukranian state?

Show me where I said "that the UK Government is debating on what to do with the proceeds"...

If you can show me : then I give up on this discussion.

You win

SlavaUkraini:
Show me where I said "that the UK Government is debating on what to do with the proceeds"...

If you can show me : then I give up on this discussion.

You win

I am not trying to win anything. Are you trying to win something? Are these your words below?

SlavaUkraini:
As for the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Fc, they are still debating on what to do with it.

you didnt answer the question i asked: you say that 3months after seizing the club, the british govt are still debating on what to do with the £4.2b proceeds, then what makes you think they will use it for ukranian refugees?

why wouldnt the british govt use the £4.2b to build bridges in the UK? are they under any legal obligation to use it for the ukranians? are you the one that will share the proceeds of the chelsea sale for the ukranian state?

CheapHomes1:
I am not trying to win anything. Are you trying to win something? Are these your words below?



you didnt answer the question i asked: you say that 3months after seizing the club, the british govt are still debating on what to do with the £4.2b proceeds, then what makes you think they will use it for ukranian refugees?

why wouldnt the british govt use the £4.2b to build bridges in the UK? are they under any legal obligation to use it for the ukranians? are you the one that will share the proceeds of the chelsea sale for the ukranian state?

You Win....

If you have any further questions, direct it to No 10 downing street.

SlavaUkraini:
You Win....

If you have any further questions, direct it to No 10 downing street.

What did I win? Is it 10 Downing street that told you that "As for the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Fc, they are still debating on what to do with it."? Is it 10 Downing street that you that the "Ukraine (People or the state) would cash out from the proceeds of the sale of Chelsea Fc"?

CheapHomes1:
What did I win? Is it 10 Downing street that told you that "As for the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Fc, they are still debating on what to do with it."? Is it 10 Downing street that you that the "Ukraine (People or the state) would cash out from the proceeds of the sale of Chelsea Fc"?

You Won a Free Ticket to the United kingdom.

The Press Secretary at No 10 downing street is now ready to answer all questions.

Kindly forward all inquiries to the desk of the Press Secretary.

SlavaUkraini:
You Won a Free Ticket to the United kingdom.

The Press Secretary at No 10 downing street is now ready to answer all questions.

Kindly forward all inquiries to the desk of the Press Secretary.

You haven't answered my questions. Is it 10 Downing street that told you that "As for the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Fc, they are still debating on what to do with it."? Is it 10 Downing street that you that the "Ukraine (People or the state) would cash out from the proceeds of the sale of Chelsea Fc"? are you the one giving out free tickets to the UK?