damosky12:


This is a parochial view. It's good for us to be temperate with our arguments as much as possible.

We've seen female murderers and criminals pampered and crowned beauty queens while their male counterparts are tortured. This is obvious and it is not "a pat on the back."

The European societies are, for instance, structured to favour the women. Their laws are tilted to pamper women.

In summary, there are inequalities in the society. Some aspects of it tilt to favour the female gender, while some favour the male.

It's rather parochial and fallacious to pick a gender.

First, I was talking about the African society where women are excluded from inheritance; where a man sleeps around with no judgement and the ladies he sleeps with get shamed; where a man could easily bring in another wife at will; where a man can decide to kick out his wife of 20 years who has invested all her time in raising his kids without giving her a penny; where a man cheats and we look the other way, but scream when a woman does; where a man is good to live alone after the age of 18 but a 28 year old woman living alone is called a hoe; where a lady is not supposed to earn more than her man; where women are expected to follow instructions and respectful wives; where certain high positions are reserved for men; where women are expected to learn how to cook and take care of the man while the men pursue thier dreams home and abroad; where single women are not supposed to be too rich or they won't get a man; where women are judged by their dressing; where married women are expected to cut off thier friends after marriage while the men keep thiers; where boys will always be boys and have thier usual evening out while girls are expected to grow into women and come back home early to cook and clean; the list is endless. Let's not even talk about the fate women in the North. You just see these things as normal because, as humans, we only notice injustice when it's against us.

You keep making reference to prison and criminals, what you failed to realise is that treating women with soft hands in prisons is a man's idea of showing superiority. You don't judge the society with the way men treat female prisoners they're probably sleeping with. You don't deny honest women all privileges men enjoy and turn around to tell them you treat the criminal ones better. They don't care how you treat the criminals. Those criminals don't represent the female gender.

And for the West, there's no part of the law that is written to favour women. None at all. What you guys see as favoring women is the absence of the gender biase you're already used to. You can't hit someone or cheat on them or do whatever you like without consequences and this goes to both genders. That's a step towards equality.

You are not on that side of the divide, so I'm not surprised these things aren't apparent to you.

Scotesam:

what did you mean?[center]
what did you mean?[/center]
what did you mean?
what did you mean?[center]
what did you mean?[/center]
what did you mean?
what did you mean?[center]
what did you mean?[/center]
what did you mean?

I mean, Jesus is not real.

Him dey talk sense

MyExpression:


E be like say you don watch all of them ooo, how you take come to this conclusion

Abi make I send you link to site where you go dey see spontaneous contents?

Send

How

It’s part of life hood sex prolongs lifespan

nony43:





Send

You're on your own ooo, I don't roll like that........anymore

This his love for sex still popping up after marrying one of the hottest?

His girlfriend then when he started getting famous had to call it quits because of his daily abi na hourly craze for sex.

It is good to tame yourself so bad habits doesn't ruin what u have worked so hard for.

Still feel he may be bipolar.

SKIBiNSKI:
I mean, Jesus is not real.

how could that be? Its shows that you are an atheist, which simply mean you don't believe in end of the world, heaven or hell and stuffs like that?.

sofiscatedmoron:

Buy your wife was and is a porn star sir

Probably his addiction was what influenced his choice of life partner.

Scotesam:

how could that be? Its shows that you are an atheist, which simply mean you don't believe in end of the world, heaven or hell and stuffs like that?.

No, i don't believe, that doesn't mean i am an Atheist, Atheist don't mean a damm thang to me it is just a term people like you use to describe who or what they do not undertand.


Do you have any proof that the world will end and when it will end or proof of a place or location where heaven and hell are?

Always complaining about illuminati but finds it hard to leave them..

Even to speak correct english na problem mtcheew

SKIBiNSKI:
Jesus that could not save himself from the cross. that is if that story is true.

yes he could by laying down his own dear life in the cross to prove the he's is really the son of God sent to save mankind

In Christ addiction is eviscerated, crushed, destroyed, annihilated and made extinct. Am a living witness. Get Jesus into your system today and be detoxicated.

Scotesam:

yes he could by laying down his own dear life in the cross to prove the he's is really the son of God sent to save mankind

you believe that fairtytale? Where did God come from? Who made God? How God have a son? This is the story white men told Africans when they came to enslave them 400 years ago, till today Africans still believe in the fairytale.

EvangelistChuks:
In Christ addiction is eviscerated, crushed, destroyed, annihilated and made extinct. Am a living witness. Get Jesus into your system today and be detoxicated.

Jesus doesn't exist, Jesus is only in the imaginations of gullible brainwashed people.

nony43:
So married people do watch porn? What is so interesting in watching porn it is boring to me is it not the same doggy and missionary. Every porn the same content. It is boring abeg.

Omo u haven't seen correct porn o that's why u're reasoning like dz. I've got over 70 terabyte porn videos all tribes I can even send u some video if u're interested

etrange:


First, I was talking about the African society where women are excluded from inheritance; where a man sleeps around with no judgement and the ladies he sleeps with get shamed; where a man could easily bring in another wife at will; where a man can decide to kick out his wife of 20 years who has invested all her time in raising his kids without giving her a penny; where a man cheats and we look the other way, but scream when a woman does; where a man is good to live alone after the age of 18 but a 28 year old woman living alone is called a hoe; where a lady is not supposed to earn more than her man; where women are expected to follow instructions and respectful wives; where certain high positions are reserved for men; where women are expected to learn how to cook and take care of the man while the men pursue thier dreams home and abroad; where single women are not supposed to be too rich or they won't get a man; where women are judged by their dressing; where married women are expected to cut off thier friends after marriage while the men keep thiers; where boys will always be boys and have thier usual evening out while girls are expected to grow into women and come back home early to cook and clean; the list is endless. Let's not even talk about the fate women in the North. You just see these things as normal because, as humans, we only notice injustice when it's against us.

With these long epistles, you are turning this into a debate. Like I said, the society is ridden with different shades of inequalities.

There are unequal treatment of all genders. Virtually everything you reeled out here quite literally have their fare share of cons for both genders

In this same Africa, boys are expected to be the ones to face the toughest and harshest chores. In schools, boys are subjected to the harshest forms of punishments whilst girls are protected.

Boys/men are expected to be the ones who cater for the family financially and materially; he is a failure if he is unable to do that. Whereas, it's fine if the woman can be jobless and does nothing but harvest from the man's hard work. Isn't this why the female folks today can comfortably sham a man for not being rich while they themselves are penniless.

It's a societal tilt. This is obvious. It's not an advantage of any specific gender.

You keep making reference to prison and criminals, what you failed to realise is that treating women with soft hands in prisons is a man's idea of showing superiority. You don't judge the society with the way men treat female prisoners they're probably sleeping with.

You don't deny honest women all privileges men enjoy and turn around to tell them you treat the criminal ones better. They don't care how you treat the criminals. Those criminals don't represent the female gender.

Man's idea of showing superiority is to help the female folks subvert justice? This isn't plausible!

Well, prisons are a microcosm of the society. Criminals are literally humans like you too. It's discriminatory and demeaning of them to say people in correctional facilities don't represent the female gender.

These prisons posit a vivid picture of our society. The female folks are naturally treated more tenderly. It's just a societal fact! It seems like a systemic discrimination against the male gender. This is what we have everywhere.

Isn't this the philosophy behind the "never hit a woman" rule. When a woman hits a man in public, it feels normal. No one really cares. But when a man hits a woman, he is an jerk. Even fellow men would charge at him.

When war breaks out, even the weakest of men are compelled to take up arms. Women, on the other hand, are protected. The strongest of women have a choice.

Lady, these things are obvious. No need to be infantile with some victim mentality. The society is fraught with fare shares of inequalities on both genders.

And for the West, there's no part of the law that is written to favour women. None at all. What you guys see as favoring women is the absence of the gender biase you're already used to. You can't hit someone or cheat on them or do whatever you like without consequences and this goes to both genders. That's a step towards equality.

You are not on that side of the divide, so I'm not surprised these things aren't apparent to you.

Actually, men at the recieving end of Western laws (particularly USA and the UK).

For instance, their court precedents regarding divorce require that both parties equally share of the family's fortunes and properties. Hence, men who have laboured to build a fortune suddenly have to forfeit a reasonable portion of their wealth to a "divorce" mostly initiated by the women in the marriage.

Severally, men have been at the recieving end of the harshness of the law. Read up the story of the Ivorian football, Emmanuel Ebuoe who lost his wealth and career to a divorce...

Society has a fair share of inequalities for both genders. It's rather infantile to pick a side and build victimhood on it.

We can be more humanistic and holistic. Bracket your existential biases and see things for what they are!

SKIBiNSKI:
you believe that fairtytale? Where did God come from? Who made God? How God have a son? This is the story white men told Africans when they came to enslave them 400 years ago, till today Africans still believe in the fairytale.

are you a christian or muslim

Scotesam:

are you a christian or muslim

I am neither. They are just religious cults made up my humans.

Dirtydog:


Omo u haven't seen correct porn o that's why u're reasoning like dz. I've got over 70 terabyte porn videos all tribes I can even send u some video if u're interested

70 what? Jesus what are doing with all that?

SKIBiNSKI:
I am neither. They are just religious cults made up my humans.

but there is one thing i'm very sure of if your life is not controlled by jesus it may likely be controlled by the opposite and a vehicle cannot be controlled by two driver at once and that one of the things that lead kenye west to the situation that he's unable to control himself.

Scotesam:

but there is one thing i'm very sure of if your life is not controlled by jesus it may likely be controlled by the opposite and a vehicle cannot be controlled by two driver at once and that one of the things that lead kenye west to the situation that he's unable to control himself.

Well.. if that is what you believe (believes are not facts) it is fine but you cannot be sure of it, your life maybe controlled by some guy called Jesus that you cannot see or sure he exist, that is your life, but don't say you are sure Jesus or an opposite is controlling other people's lives. You only knows of your life you don't know of other people's life or Kanye's life. That is an ignorant way of thinking. you are not sure of anything! Not even your own life.


Did Mr west tell you what is controlling his life? Or are you just making up things in your head, Mr west may have an addiction to porn but what about the porn actors and actresses who makes the movies? Do you hear them complain? Kanye and these actors who would you say are better Morally? There are millions of people (including you) who are addicted to different things, gambling, food, alchohol, smoking, sex and E.T.C that doesn't mean anything is controlling them, you might be addicted to something yourself without even knowing.


Perhaps your own addiction is believing in Jesus or God, heaven and hell that you have never met or seen, faith as it is called, that can be a life comfort too just like an addiction to porn or alcohol, sex, food, gambling and smoking.


NB people's lives are not nercerssarily controlled by anything. People control their own lives.

Well believe matter most

WITH ALL THAT MONEY U STILL WATCHING PORN MAN THATS SOME SHIT I CANT DO DAWG

damosky12:


With these long epistles, you are turning this into a debate. Like I said, the society is ridden with different shades of inequalities.

There are unequal treatment of all genders. Virtually everything you reeled out here quite literally have their fare share of cons for both genders

In this same Africa, boys are expected to be the ones to face the toughest and harshest chores. In schools, boys are subjected to the harshest forms of punishments whilst girls are protected.

Boys/men are expected to be the ones who cater for the family financially and materially; he is a failure if he is unable to do that. Whereas, it's fine if the woman can be jobless and does nothing but harvest from the man's hard work. Isn't this why the female folks today can comfortably sham a man for not being rich while they themselves are penniless.

It's a societal tilt. This is obvious. It's not an advantage of any specific gender.



Man's idea of showing superiority is to help the female folks subvert justice? This isn't plausible!

Well, prisons are a microcosm of the society. Criminals are literally humans like you too. It's discriminatory and demeaning of them to say people in correctional facilities don't represent the female gender.

These prisons posit a vivid picture of our society. The female folks are naturally treated more tenderly. It's just a societal fact! It seems like a systemic discrimination against the male gender. This is what we have everywhere.

Isn't this the philosophy behind the "never hit a woman" rule. When a woman hits a man in public, it feels normal. No one really cares. But when a man hits a woman, he is an jerk. Even fellow men would charge at him.

When war breaks out, even the weakest of men are compelled to take up arms. Women, on the other hand, are protected. The strongest of women have a choice.

Lady, these things are obvious. No need to be infantile with some victim mentality. The society is fraught with fare shares of inequalities on both genders.




Actually, men at the recieving end of Western laws (particularly USA and the UK).

For instance, their court precedents regarding divorce require that both parties equally share of the family's fortunes and properties. Hence, men who have laboured to build a fortune suddenly have to forfeit a reasonable portion of their wealth to a "divorce" mostly initiated by the women in the marriage.

Severally, men have been at the recieving end of the harshness of the law. Read up the story of the Ivorian football, Emmanuel Ebuoe who lost his wealth and career to a divorce...

Society has a fair share of inequalities for both genders. It's rather infantile to pick a side and build victimhood on it.

We can be more humanistic and holistic. Bracket your existential biases and see things for what they are!

Yes, it is a debate. I'm not turning it into one, we both are already debating and there's absolutely nothing with that. Debating is not fighting. And, for on-readers, I will address every point in a longer epistle even if you don't read it or reply. There's unequal treatment. However, if one party wants it to remain this way and would usually call out anyone that seek quality as "bitter feminist", it because the inequality tips in thier favour. Differences are not necessarily inequality. They're only termed inequality when they don't balance out or when there is no justification for thier existence. I went to a military school where girls and boys were punished alike, and boys got more frequently punished because they had a higher tendency to commit offenses. Did the girls die?

You said boys are expected carter for the family and, therefore, they go through a lot. That absolutely is true. And that is the equality I'm talking about. It doesn't really favour the ladies. Making it the responsibility of men to take care of the family takes away the woman's say in how things should go in the family; after all, she's being taken care of. It undermines her need to seek the highest level of education or go out there to explore and build skills; after all, all she needs is a man to take care of her. It makes her leadership skills questionable; women don't take cater for a home, how can you trust them to take care of your business like a man?

Today, even the men have to come to realise that this isn't working, they now want to change the women without realizing that would imply changing themselves too. You hear men say "what is she bringing to the table?" If the current status quo was great, men wouldn't be asking this. The problem is that they don't know that for women to bring something to the table, men have to come home and take turns to do grocery, cook, bathe the kids, do laundry, etc. The society has configured them to make doing these things look like a taboo, so they're stuck. they really need the women to bring something to the table, but they're not ready to live that lifestyle, and that is why they usually have issues with thier wives when they travel abroad.

Again, the prison yard cannot be used to judge because the women that get fair treatment there don't get that simply because the prisoners are fair. They pay with thier bodies. It disgusts me to use that as a comparison, honestly. It's outrightly insensitive and unfair to any hardworking woman. Violence is bad regardless of the aggressors gender. Yes, people have the tendency to support anyone that is physically weaker (you see that in football, in war, in fight, etc). That is because they believe the stronger one could easily defend themself. This does not mean that when you see a visibly stronger woman hitting a man, they'll look the other way. They say 'do not hit a woman' cause men have a higher tendency of beating up women, so the saying had to be specific. But it doesn't mean hitting me is okay just like "black lives matter" does not mean white lives do not matter. It's all about addressing the current status. When the equality I speak of is in place, everyone is protected, men and women alike.

Both men and women fight wars in the military. This shows that when it comes to fighting wars, both genders are good to go. In extreme cases, civilian men of certain ages are drafted in to fight while the women get to decide if they want to. Here is the reason "If a population loses 90% of males in a war or a catastrophe, theoretically, it can be back to its prewar size within one generation. This is because women give birth to babies and not men. While a single male can help conceive a large number of babies in a short period of time, a woman can carry and give birth to only one baby at a time. So if a population loses 90% of males, it could completely recover within a generation. If a population loses 90% of females it is done for. From a population survival point of view men are expendable, women are not. That’s about it. All the other differences and specificities of men (size, strength etc.) are rather irrelevant after this point".

Now, let's talk about the Western world. The law does not say that the man must share "his wealth" with the woman. Rather, it says that a partner must pay the other for "opportunities lost" in the event of separation. Normally, the working or richer partner pays off the non working partner regardless of gender. The amount paid is dependent on the income difference and the reason for that difference. If you marry a graduate, and all she does is stay at home, cook for you, do laundry, clean the house, raise your kids, etc. instead of going out there to make money, how on earth do you think it's justifiable to just wake up one morning and kick her out of that home without a penny? When she has dedicated her life to building this home and lost all her chances of making money out there? If she was not a graduate, which means she wouldn't have made a lot of money anyway, the money you pay reduces. If she was earning less because she had to be home early to do these chores, the money even goes down more. If both of you were earning the same and did equal house keeping tasks, you don't pay a dime. If she earning more and you had to do things like to school run cause she was always busy, she would pay you. If you guys don't want this law to apply at all regardless of the situation, you sign a prenup, and no one gets paid. I can give you a list of famous women who have had to pay thier husbands including Jennifer Lopez. The law is gender agnostic. If men tend to pay more, it's because of the earning gap and that's why you must support getting rid of gender bias.

Gender inequality is dangerous to the society. It does not allow us harness the best of our best. It has negative effects on the growth mindset of our ladies and inhibits them from aiming higher. Today, our men want to be helped at home, but they don’t want to help at home. The problem is that people see it as "they vs us". That is why you assumed I'm a lady. You're obviously trying to defend men against this lady. The herd mentality is not helping. I'm not a lady. I'm a man and I want the gender bias out cause I've seen what a society could be like in the absence of it.

etrange:


Yes, it is a debate. I'm not turning it into one, we both are already debating and there's absolutely nothing with that. Debating is not fighting. And, for on-readers, I will address every point in a longer epistle even if you don't read it or reply. There's unequal treatment. However, if one party wants it to remain this way and would usually call out anyone that seek quality as "bitter feminist", it because the inequality tips in thier favour. Differences are not necessarily inequality. They're only termed inequality when they don't balance out or when there is no justification for thier existence. I went to a military school where girls and boys were punished alike, and boys got more frequently punished because they had a higher tendency to commit offenses. Did the girls die?

You said boys are expected carter for the family and, therefore, they go through a lot. That absolutely is true. And that is the equality I'm talking about. It doesn't really favour the ladies. Making it the responsibility of men to take care of the family takes away the woman's say in how things should go in the family; after all, she's being taken care of. It undermines her need to seek the highest level of education or go out there to explore and build skills; after all, all she needs is a man to take care of her. It makes her leadership skills questionable; women don't take cater for a home, how can you trust them to take care of your business like a man?

Today, even the men have to come to realise that this isn't working, they now want to change the women without realizing that would imply changing themselves too. You hear men say "what is she bringing to the table?" If the current status quo was great, men wouldn't be asking this. The problem is that they don't know that for women to bring something to the table, men have to come home and take turns to do grocery, cook, bathe the kids, do laundry, etc. The society has configured them to make doing these things look like a taboo, so they're stuck. they really need the women to bring something to the table, but they're not ready to live that lifestyle, and that is why they usually have issues with thier wives when they travel abroad.

Again, the prison yard cannot be used to judge because the women that get fair treatment there don't get that simply because the prisoners are fair. They pay with thier bodies. It disgusts me to use that as a comparison, honestly. It's outrightly insensitive and unfair to any hardworking woman. Violence is bad regardless of the aggressors gender. Yes, people have the tendency to support anyone that is physically weaker (you see that in football, in war, in fight, etc). That is because they believe the stronger one could easily defend themself. This does not mean that when you see a visibly stronger woman hitting a man, they'll look the other way. They say 'do not hit a woman' cause men have a higher tendency of beating up women, so the saying had to be specific. But it doesn't mean hitting me is okay just like "black lives matter" does not mean white lives do not matter. It's all about addressing the current status. When the equality I speak of is in place, everyone is protected, men and women alike.

Both men and women fight wars in the military. This shows that when it comes to fighting wars, both genders are good to go. In extreme cases, civilian men of certain ages are drafted in to fight while the women get to decide if they want to. Here is the reason "If a population loses 90% of males in a war or a catastrophe, theoretically, it can be back to its prewar size within one generation. This is because women give birth to babies and not men. While a single male can help conceive a large number of babies in a short period of time, a woman can carry and give birth to only one baby at a time. So if a population loses 90% of males, it could completely recover within a generation. If a population loses 90% of females it is done for. From a population survival point of view men are expendable, women are not. That’s about it. All the other differences and specificities of men (size, strength etc.) are rather irrelevant after this point".

Now, let's talk about the Western world. The law does not say that the man must share "his wealth" with the woman. Rather, it says that a partner must pay the other for "opportunities lost" in the event of separation. Normally, the working or richer partner pays off the non working partner regardless of gender. The amount paid is dependent on the income difference and the reason for that difference. If you marry a graduate, and all she does is stay at home, cook for you, do laundry, clean the house, raise your kids, etc. instead of going out there to make money, how on earth do you think it's justifiable to just wake up one morning and kick her out of that home without a penny? When she has dedicated her life to building this home and lost all her chances of making money out there? If she was not a graduate, which means she wouldn't have made a lot of money anyway, the money you pay reduces. If she was earning less because she had to be home early to do these chores, the money even goes down more. If both of you were earning the same and did equal house keeping tasks, you don't pay a dime. If she earning more and you had to do things like to school run cause she was always busy, she would pay you. If you guys don't want this law to apply at all regardless of the situation, you sign a prenup, and no one gets paid. I can give you a list of famous women who have had to pay thier husbands including Jennifer Lopez. The law is gender agnostic. If men tend to pay more, it's because of the earning gap and that's why you must support getting rid of gender bias.

Gender inequality is dangerous to the society. It does not allow us harness the best of our best. It has negative effects on the growth mindset of our ladies and inhibits them from aiming higher. Today, our men want to be helped at home, but they don’t want to help at home. The problem is that people see it as "they vs us". That is why you assumed I'm a lady. You're obviously trying to defend men against this lady. The herd mentality is not helping. I'm not a lady. I'm a man and I want the gender bias out cause I've seen what a society could be like in the absence of it.

Wait... It's like you debated in secondary school.

I can't do this with you abeg. I tire.

That aside, your signature says you teach French. I want to learn o.

damosky12:


Wait... It's like you debated in secondary school.

I can't do this with you abeg. I tire.

That aside, your signature says you teach French. I want to learn o.

Yes, I did debate in secondary school. I didn't even think of it till you mentioned it.

Yeah... I used to teach French as a hobby when I was in Nigeria. Now, I just go to Nairaland French threads to assist those learning whenever I'm free. You should learn, it really does open doors of opportunity.

etrange:


Yes, I did debate in secondary school. I didn't even think of it till you mentioned it.

Yeah... I used to teach French as a hobby when I was in Nigeria. Now, I just go to Nairaland French threads to assist those learning whenever I'm free. You should learn, it really does open doors of opportunity.

Oh! There are french threads on nairaland? You mind sending some links?

Btw, how did you learn and for how long?

damosky12:


Oh! There are french threads on nairaland? You mind sending some links?

Btw, how did you learn and for how long?

Sure, there are. Here:

https://www.nairaland.com/5328784/french-language-learners.........get-here

https://www.nairaland.com/4672912/all-tef-candidates-canada-immigration#70227147

qtguru:


I don't think he is insane, The Kardashian families are a terrible one, they don't have the spiritual guidance and parental guidance for the kids, see how easy it was for the kid to stumble upon his mom's sex tap. I blame Kanye for getting mixed with a family who worships fame. I'd go insane too luckily he's a Richman and someone who makes his opinion known.

Free Yeezy

How far with your japa plans? And how have you been coping without her? What are the things you’ve done secretly in her absence? �