₦airaland Forum

ParasiteWest:
Oga, go and read about Ashraf.
No dey disturb me with your ignorance.

answer my question which battle did usa loose in Afghanistan simple question you're mentioning afghani president name...... some of just like behaving like stark illiterate spitting shit online like your brain is missing or something...... all combat and military operations were already ended prior to the fall of Kabul and the rest were just insurgent attract.......... No wonder una dey give una sef zobo say Germany captured England

Segun2222:
answer my question which battle did usa loose in Afghanistan simple question you're mentioning afghani president name...... some of just like behaving like stark illiterate spitting shit online like your brain is missing or something...... all combat and military operations were already ended prior to the fall of Kabul and the rest were just insurgent attract.......... No wonder una dey give una sef zobo say Germany captured England

I answered you, they lost the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan.
They were forced to flee like headless chickens (the West and the puppet govt that they installed).
This is as recent as last year.
How long were they in Afghanistan for? How long can they support Ukraine for?
What was the reason for invading Afganistan?
What was the result?

ParasiteWest:
What's your point exactly.
As far as I'm concerned, the US was unable to defeat Japan.
The US was on the verge of defeat until nuclear weapons were deployed.
The US was able to obtain this nuclear weapon technology as a result of the Soviet/Russian victory over the Germans.
Russia saved the world from Nazism.
The Japs had miscalculated and felt the Germans would prevail over the Russians.

my point is the USA would have beaten japan fair and square, even the Japanese were aware of this, its just that the nuke was a better option and america was not even close to being beaten by any of the axis powers so as far as I'm concerned, you are saying nonsense

Datguy5:
my point is the USA would have beaten japan fair and square, even the Japanese were aware of this, its just that the nuke was a better option and america was not even close to being beaten by any of the axis powers so as far as I'm concerned, you are saying nonsense

That's argumentative given the fact that they were forced to deploy nuclear weapons to save them from the impending disgraceful defeat at the hands of the Japs.
It was purely an act of terrorism by the US to terrorize the professional and courageous Japanese millitary.
The nuclear weapons were not deployed against millitary targets but civilian targets.
That's terrorism no matter how you try to whitewash it.
The bottom line, Russia saved the US as the US was only able to obtain nuclear weapons as a result of the defeat of the Germans by the Russians.

ParasiteWest:
That's argumentative given the fact that they were forced to deploy nuclear weapons to save them from the impending disgraceful defeat at the hands of the Japs.
It was purely an act of terrorism by the US to terrorize the professional and courageous Japanese millitary.
The nuclear weapons were not deployed against millitary targets but civilian targets.
That's terrorism no matter how you try to whitewash it.

all right, where is your proof then?

Datguy5:
all right, where is your proof then?

The fact that the US deployed nuclear weapons is enough proof.
They're extremely weak.

Uprightness100:
Biden promises Ukraine's Zelensky advanced air defense systems after Russian attacks earlier today.

Satanic agents and their promises.

Foolish .elensky will be feeling high now forgetting there are hypersonic missiles that can't be intercepted by western defence systems.

Ukrainians should call for a regime change in Kiev lest .elensky, US and NATO brings total annihilation upon their country with the ongoing proxy war against Russia.

TheFreeOne:
Satanic agents and their promises.

Foolish .elensky will be feeling high now forgetting there are hypersonic missiles that can't be intercepted by western defence systems.

Ukrainians should call for a regime change in Kiev lest .elensky, US and NATO brings total annihilation upon their country with the ongoing proxy war against Russia.

He should go and read about Ashraf of Afghanistan.

ParasiteWest:
The fact that the US deployed nuclear weapons is enough proof.
They're extremely weak.

i have already given you the reason why the USA did it and let me give you my proof and i can you more

https://www.bbc.co.uk/teach/was-it-right-to-bomb-hiroshima/zhq7cqt


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shZBMjzX9iY

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki

now, where is YOUR proof

Datguy5:
i have already given you the reason why the USA did it and let me give you my proof and i can you more

https://www.bbc.co.uk/teach/was-it-right-to-bomb-hiroshima/zhq7cqt


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shZBMjzX9iY

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki

now, where is YOUR proof

The fact that the US had deployed nuclear weapons is enough proof.
Leave it or take it, I don't care as I'm not seeking your validation.
The US used nuclear weapons twice, ignorance is not an excuse.
If Russia hadn't prevailed over Germany, the US would have been unable to obtain nuclear weapons.
The US deployed nuclear weapons against civilian targets and not military targets (twice) that's an act of terrorism.
Russia will be justified to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine.

Dalil8:
In Lviv, Ukraine the lights were turned off to help tackle climate change.

I'm wheezing..

Dem neva see anything

Von der Leyen ‘shocked and appalled' by Russia’s mass strike on Ukraine.

“Putin’s Russia has again shown the world what it stands for: brutality and terror,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said at an appearance in Estonia.

Datguy5:
my point is the USA would have beaten japan fair and square, even the Japanese were aware of this, its just that the nuke was a better option and america was not even close to being beaten by any of the axis powers so as far as I'm concerned, you are saying nonsense

Oga vietnam was bombed x20 times more than the u.s bomb Japan but they still survived,the u.s knew that they can never win japan because of their very stubborn nature

leobergy:
Oga vietnam was bombed x20 times more than the u.s bomb Japan but they still survived,the u.s knew that they can never win japan because of their very stubborn nature

Your head correct
The US would have won in Vietnam with nuclear weapons.

ParasiteWest:
The fact that the US had deployed nuclear weapons is enough proof.
Leave it or take it, I don't care as I'm not seeking your validation.
The US used nuclear weapons twice, ignorance is not an excuse.
If Russia hadn't prevailed over Germany, the US would have been unable to obtain nuclear weapons.
The US deployed nuclear weapons against civilian targets and not military targets (twice) that's an act of terrorism.
Russia will be justified to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine.

so what you saying is that you don't have any proof of what are you talking about and making these things up?

i have given you evidence to back my claim, you haven't done the same

so logically you are an idiot for believing this things without any eveidence

Ibime:
That small island of Japan conquered the whole of Asia and defeated Russia in the Russo-Japan war. Respect Japan.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Japanese_War

But Vietnam is Asian.
If the US 'defeated' Japan why were they unable to defeat Vietnam?
No nuclear weapons?
The US is a big for nothing bully nation that was unable to defeat the small island of Japan without resorting to terrorism and the use of weapons of mass destruction.
Don't believe the hype in Hollywood movies.

Datguy5:
so what you saying is that you don't have any proof of what are you talking about and making these things up?

i have given you evidence to back my claim, you haven't done the same

so logically you are an idiot for believing this things without any eveidence

Someone just provided proof which you withheld.
US vs Japan (US used nuclear weapons, US victory).
US vs Vietnam (no nuclear weapons, US defeated).
In summary, the US were only 'victorious' in Japan due to terrorism and the deployment of nuclear weapons against civilians.
Forking barbarians.

ParasiteWest:
I answered you, they lost the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan.
They were forced to flee like headless chickens (the West and the puppet govt that they installed).
This is as recent as last year.
How long were they in Afghanistan for? How long can they support Ukraine for?
What was the reason for invading Afganistan?
What was the result?

trump started proceeding of withdrawing which saw all combat and military operations ended, Biden saw an opportunity to withdraw their remaining forces with tge fall of kabul, forced to flee yet tbey air lifted over 125,000 thousand people make una dey lie small small all combat and military operations were already over during trumps tenure, i put it to you again and again tell us any battle that was fought and usa lost in afghan, battle of Kiev lost by Russia tell us any the usa lost in Afghanistan, Na me even Bleep up is shouldn't be quote a person that says British was already a German colony

ParasiteWest:
But Vietnam is Asian.
If the US 'defeated' Japan why were they unable to defeat Vietnam?
No nuclear weapons?
The US is a big for nothing bully nation that was unable to defeat the small island of Japan without resorting to terrorism and the use of weapons of mass destruction.
Don't believe the hype in Hollywood movies.

in case you don't know, Vietnam was back by powerful counties like Russia and China so it is not like it was only Vietnam that fought the Us

Datguy5:
in case you don't know, Vietnam was back by powerful counties like Russia and China so it is not like it was only Vietnam that fought the Us

Your comments keep getting bizarre and somewhat disconnected.
Without support from Russia and China, the US would have deployed nuclear weapons and they would have been 'victorious'
But the fear of getting nuked gave the US small sense.

Segun2222:
trump started proceeding of withdrawing which saw all combat and military operations ended, Biden saw an opportunity to withdraw their remaining forces with tge fall of kabul, forced to flee yet tbey air lifted over 125,000 thousand people make una dey lie small small all combat and military operations were already over during trumps tenure, i put it to you again and again tell us any battle that was fought and usa lost in afghan, battle of Kiev lost by Russia tell us any the usa lost in Afghanistan, Na me even Bleep up is shouldn't be quote a person that says British was already a German colony

In summary, the US was defeated in Afghanistan.
This is as recent as last year.
How long were they in Afghanistan for? About 20 years.
How long can they support Ukraine for? 20 years? 30 years?
What was the reason for invading Afghanistan?
What was the result?
If the West crumbled after 20 years with ordinary Afghanistan, how long can the West go with Ukraine? 2 years? 3 years?

leobergy:
So you are justifying the dropping of nuclear bomb on Japan that killed thousands of women and kids,enough with the double standards western shit eaters are mad

I didn't justify nothing. I simply told the guy USA had that war in the bag without nuclear weapons

Ibime:
I didn't justify nothing. I simply told the guy USA had that war in the bag without nuclear weapons

Just like they did in Vietnam?
The US is an overrated big for nothing paper tiger.

ParasiteWest:
Your comments keep getting bizarre and somewhat disconnected.
Without support from Russia and China, the US would have deployed nuclear weapons and they would have been 'victorious'
But the fear of getting nuked gave the US small sense.

what?

do you have proof of what you are saying?

Russia and China not only supplied weapons and fighters to Vietnam, but they also trained the Vietcong and the US had more nukes that Russia and china combined at that point so if they wanted to nuke Vietnam, there was nothing Russia or china could have done

Datguy5:
what?

do you have proof of what you are saying?

Russia and China not only supplied weapons and fighters to Vietnam, but they also trained the Vietcong and the US had more nukes that Russia and china combined at that point so if they wanted to nuke Vietnam, there was nothing Russia or china could have done

The fact that the US was unable to defeat Vietnam without nuclear weapons is enough proof.
The Afghans in Afghanistan were equally supported by the West, nevertheless, they (Afghans and the West collectively) were defeated by the Taliban that received very little international support.

leobergy:
Oga vietnam was bombed x20 times more than the u.s bomb Japan but they still survived,the u.s knew that they can never win japan because of their very stubborn nature

Vietnam was not bombed 20 times anything. You can't compare bombing forests and towns with flattening Tokyo. This is Tokyo during the 2nd world war

ParasiteWest:
The fact that the US was unable to defeat Vietnam without nuclear weapons is enough proof.
The Afghans in Afghanistan were equally supported by the West, nevertheless, they (Afghans and the West collectively) were defeated by the Taliban that received very little international support.

guy are you dumb?

all you are doing is circular reasoning and ignoring nuances/context to justify your bias

Datguy5:
guy are you dumb?

all you are doing is circular reasoning and ignoring nuances/context to justify your bias

I have strong reasons to believe that you are.

ParasiteWest:
I have strong reasons to believe that you are.

then please enlighten me to reasons why i am dumb

Datguy5:
then please enlighten me to reasons why i am dumb

Attempting to impose your misconception of reality on people that do not agree with your ahistorical view of history is dumb.

LordAdam16:
"Hype and Insha Allah" don send Ukrainians to trenches and underground shelters.

Winter na still next month.

-Lord

Guy I get news on Russia and Ukraine war undiluted from you, I just say make I hail oh.