₦airaland Forum

iamoyindamola:
Portables have taken over

I swear down

DumaEmpire:
Zola was 30(3 years deal), Vialli was 32.(2 years deal) Then Kante is 31(asking for 4 years deal)

DumaEmpire:
if you actually know Chelsea as well as you claim you do. Then you would have been smart enough to know Chelsea over the years hardly gives players above 30 more than a year contract. No matter who that player is. It's always been a year contract. If he does well then it's extended if he doesn't he leaves.

Kante getting more than 2 years contract with an option of a third is the new board being generous and trying to make some changes.

No longer 1 year contract for players above 30 na 2 years contract.

Those aforementioned players were not even Chelsea's legend as at the time they were bought oooo. But Kante who is a Legend on his own right should not be offered.

Abeg, quit already.

Ebukacute:
Funny how portables think and all believe that Chelsea will let kante and jorginho go to Barcelona for free by January. .then, sign midfielders that never gets injured throughout their history of playing football. Which DM will they sign that can cover what kante covers in Chelsea. No patience at all.
I used to think it's for bants sake untill recently. Like, when did this place reduce to this level?

Na d thing wey I still dey reason be that. Which player? Make we see first.

FBS:
How did he come up with those injuries? was it by playing FIFA 44 on PS10?

half fit Kante still better pass all our current midfielders combined.

Nothing emotional here at all.

You dey mind dem. Put Kante with a mobile midfielder and see how he will perform with less injury risk.

Unlimited22:
Lmao this dog pic is so funny


Like.. You be 419, youbn't you?

I dey watch to wait for his reply.

He's been here a minute and cos he sees an unusual moniker like mine he feels he's big enough to school me on football politics. Cos he feels i started supporting Chelsea yesterday and started watching football a day before yesterday. Lol

forgiveness:
Na d thing wey I still dey reason be that. Which player? Make we see first.

I'm waiting too.
Kante and jorginho will both leave Chelsea for free because portables want new players who has iron legs

forgiveness:
No longer 1 year contract for players above 30 na 2 years contract.

Those aforementioned players were not even Chelsea's legend as at the time they were bought oooo. But Kante who is a Legend on his own right should not be offered.

Abeg, quit already.

Kante has been offered a good 3 years deal. Not one, not 2 but 3 good years of good pay.

Why is he insisting on 4 years.

Even Frank Lampard, Drogba, Cech nd Terry never had upto 4 years contract deals in their 30s.

And like i pointed. Zola nd Vialli were signed on the basis of being new players in the club and not already existing players. Koulibaly is over 31 with a 4 year deal strictly as a new player.

Kante is an existing player. I wait for you to bring up a deal of 4 years and above given to a player in his 30s at Chelsea as an already existing player dating as far back as pre-Abramovich era.

DumaEmpire:
Kante has been offered a good 3 years deal. Not one, not 2 but 3 good years of good pay.

Why is he insisting on 4 years.

Even Frank Lampard, Drogba, Cech nd Terry never had upto 4 years contract deals in their 30s.

And like i pointed. Zola nd Vialli were signed on the basis of being new players in the club and not already existing players. Koulibaly is over 31 with a 4 year deal strictly as a new player.

Kante is an existing player. I wait for you to bring up a deal of 4 years and above given to a player in his 30s at Chelsea as an already existing player dating as far back as pre-Abramovich era.

Chelsea always have replacement for any body that feels too big, we aint Manure or LooserPool that will be giving anyhow contract just because of legend status.............Mendy, Jorginho and Kante should leave if they feel they are too big for the club!!! simple, all of una wey dey carry emotion for head ehh, una opinion no pass this thread

64 fuqing games , anybody still supporting Kante contract renewal is sick in the head ,no apologies , please he is a legend but it's time

donstan18:
So why them never sell Modric and Kroos?

All you do is cap!

that's because you're using your cap to understand what you read

funny enough if we renew that contract,same fansbase go insult am for not playing,is not better to leave when the ovation is still high

Ibime:
Lampard and KDB were never in contention for the same spot, rather your faves Oscar and Mata

Don't try to sound smart while missing basic information

then don't be silly to assume I didn't know that "basic" information

Milan interested in loftus cheeks? , please boehly let it happen

forgiveness:
Sell but are we selling Kante?

Why don't you tie him down and sell him afterwards instead of letting him go for nothing?

Keeping Lampard was the best option because he won us our first UEFA Champions league.

Has KDB don that? Duude was still offered 4 years contract at 30. Can you explain?

Why Mancity no offer am 1 year or 3 years contract? Or let him go for free because he is 30 years old?

mentioning Lampard is to show how good and valuable Kante is, even more valuable than Kante with all his injuries. But having KDB fill in as a CM would have been great for the long run. Point is, short term satisfaction, long term headache.

Your point is Kante shouldn't be let go for free, didn't they offer him contract of 3yrs, yet some here want them to give him the 4 he is demanding. History has it that 30+ players that insist on long contracts usually flop. If Kante knows he his injury problems won't affect his career he should accept 2yrs with option of a third, even Koulibaly got three years (plus option) because he was bought.

You want me to support giving a player that hasn't stayed fit to help Chelsea fight through the season, a four year contract with possible increase pay on his almost 300k per week.

When Modric was messing up most Madrid fans wanted him gone but even Modric winner of Balon d'Or didn't demand excessive length for extension.

You think Kante would try this rubbish in Madrid

BlueAngel444:
mentioning Lampard is to show how good and valuable Kante is, even more valuable than Kante with all his injuries. But having KDB fill in as a CM would have been great for the long run. Point is, short term satisfaction, long term headache.

Your point is Kante shouldn't be let go for free, didn't they offer him contract of 3yrs, yet some here want them to give him the 4 he is demanding. History has it that 30+ players that insist on long contracts usually flop. If Kante knows he his injury problems won't affect his career he should accept 2yrs with option of a third, even Koulibaly got three years (plus option) because he was bought.

You want me to support giving a player that hasn't stayed fit to help Chelsea fight through the season, a four year contract with possible increase pay on his almost 300k per week.

When Modric was messing up most Madrid fans wanted him gone but even Modric winner of Balon d'Or didn't demand excessive length for extension.

You think Kante would try this rubbish in Madrid

Perez would have wanted his ass gone lol ,if he insist on staying ,Perez will ask him to take a wage cut , which I don't he will fancy.

Hope u all know the reason Jorginho is still in Chelsea is because of Kante, if Kante had stayed fit would Jorginho be playing, would he become vice captain, wouldn't Abrahimovic's era given him contract extension thereby ending any hope of Jorginho staying.

Now u read news like Chelsea won't renew both of them, why is Jorginho even an option. Your answer? Kante.

You think I want Kante to come and stop RLC development then go injured again and by the time we use RLc again he will start playing like he has forgotten how to play football

Ballzproblemm:
Milan interested in loftus cheeks? , please boehly let it happen

bar his over holding of the ball, Loftus is a good versatile player, dude can play Cb, Dm, RB, Winger and even CF.....he just need some coaching and he will come out good.


Don't write him off so quick

Johnny4you:
bar his over holding of the ball, Loftus is a good versatile player, dude can play Cb, Dm, RB, Winger and even CF.....he just need some coaching and he will come out good.


Don't write him off so quick

his performance is inconsistent , and he takes time to make decisions anytime he wants to start that his nonsense dribbling. ,him+ziyech +75 million will get us Rafael leao

Kante is Chelsea legend and has served us very well.

The most valuable player we’ve ever signed.

Never flopped, gave world class performance in 90% of all his games. Not troublesome, not controversial, never had a fight with managers.

But it’s time for him to go if he’s not taking the 3 years contract. He’s not reliable again because of his bad fitness now.

DumaEmpire:
Lol. Zola was signed on about a 3 year deal in 96(or even less can't really recall but i definitely know it wasn't more than a 3 year deal). Vialli was signed on a 2 year deal nd left the club in 99(as a manager).
None of them were offered a deal worth more than 3 years and they were new players signed into the club for that matter and not already existing players. So how's that an exemption. Lol

Its Just like Silva getting signed in 2020 and still playing at 38 years old. Probably his contract would be extended. And then after 25 years someone starts using him as a reference cos he checked on google and saw him playing for Chelsea at such an age for some amount of years or time. Not knowing it was based on contract extension.

Back to my point as you pointed out Chelsea "Hardly" gives players more than a year or 2 years contract to players. Kante an existing player who's 31 getting up to 3 years is even fairer than Zola nd Vialli you mentioned who were new players signed on 3 nd 2 contract deals respectively.
The real exception should be Koulibaly as he's the first player getting 4years in a very long time as a Chelsea player who's in his 30s. However he's fit enough to play and not romancing injuries every now and then.

There's nothing like existing player policy. The policy is for any player that is more than 30 years. And it's a one year contract. Nothing like 2 years.

Stop trying to play smart.

But there's an exception. The reason Chelsea gave few above 30 more than 1 year.

Zola was 3½ years. So, stop trying to deceive the gullible.


Chelsea last night completed the pounds 4.5m signing of Gianfranco Zola from the Serie A side Parma. The Italian international attacking midfielder will arrive in London next week, and the Stamford Bridge club have not denied reports that he has been offered wages of about pounds 25,000 per week as part his three-and-a-half-year deal.

Savic has 4 goals and 7 assists in 12 games for lazio now. I know it's a weaker league but his money is increasing with each good performance. He could have been our creative answer to man shitty's kdb, dead manyoo's bruno and assnal's ode. Now we left him to chase akpamu ding dong that can't even bench a player that will be writing waec if he was in this country. Tuchel just wasted the point and kill other coaches are looking for.

I love you Jesus! the fraud knows his Time is up and the owners are not thinking of any proposal he is trying to save face lol ,see as people they celebrate ,as for Barca food don land ,FREE , is their keyword now

A001:
Too early for this. By the time, some key players get injured, that's when the real test will start.

This isn't the first time Arsenal is starting the league well until they're hit by injuries and their performance drops.

If they play well till January/February (not necessarily winning all games), they can win the league.

it's too early to hope and pray they win the league when it's not looking like Chelsea would

since the day many people here doubted the first time I Posted jorginho to Barca link,I have posted numerous source saying the same thing , but y'all don't want to give me credit lol.,come January or next summer window, jorginho is heading to Barca wether you like it or not.

forgiveness:
There's nothing like existing player policy. The policy is for any player that is more than 30 years. And it's a one year contract. Nothing like 2 years.

Stop trying to play smart.

But there's an exception. The reason Chelsea gave few above 30 more than 1 year.

Zola was 3½ years. So, stop trying to deceive the gullible.


Chelsea last night completed the pounds 4.5m signing of Gianfranco Zola from the Serie A side Parma. The Italian international attacking midfielder will arrive in London next week, and the Stamford Bridge club have not denied reports that he has been offered wages of about pounds 25,000 per week as part his three-and-a-half-year deal.

Oh. I see you had to do your homework by googling about the Zola deal for your comeback

Even went as far as giving a good and detailed summary of how much he was given. Lol some of us don't have to go into google archives to dig out things. Hence why i neglected adding the half into the 3 But kudos on your articulated project research.

Still on still 3 nd half years for a new signing who was younger than Kante isn't still equivalent to 31 year old injury prone player player asking for a 4 year deal.

The amazing thing is you dwelling on Zola deal of over 26 years ago just to back Kante but still yet it doesn't adequately fit your narrative.

DumaEmpire:
I wait for you to bring up a deal of 4 years and above given to a player in his 30s at Chelsea as an already existing player dating as far back as pre-Abramovich era.

Since you like digging Archives i still await your response to this @Forgiveness

BlueAngel444:
mentioning Lampard is to show how good and valuable Kante is, even more valuable than Kante with all his injuries. But having KDB fill in as a CM would have been great for the long run. Point is, short term satisfaction, long term headache.

Your point is Kante shouldn't be let go for free, didn't they offer him contract of 3yrs, yet some here want them to give him the 4 he is demanding. History has it that 30+ players that insist on long contracts usually flop. If Kante knows he his injury problems won't affect his career he should accept 2yrs with option of a third, even Koulibaly got three years (plus option) because he was bought.

You want me to support giving a player that hasn't stayed fit to help Chelsea fight through the season, a four year contract with possible increase pay on his almost 300k per week.

When Modric was messing up most Madrid fans wanted him gone but even Modric winner of Balon d'Or didn't demand excessive length for extension.

You think Kante would try this rubbish in Madrid

So you after watching kante for years believe that an injury free kante can flop in chelsea?
Guy there are certain players that can't flop as long as they are fit and you should know this.
Kante is not that old . We are talking of kante. As in ngolo kante Who is that midfielder that never gets injured y'all want Chelsea to sign to replace ngolo kante? Mention his name please. Kante shouldn't recieve 300k weekly? The same amount havertz pockets weekly for doing nothing?.Guy kante's football sense is not too far from dem modric's and if he becomes fit he can still guarantee Chelsea a solid 4 years of active gbas gbos. What y'all should be talking about is boely signing another good DM to reduce the load he was carrying.

Ebukacute:
So you after watching kante for years believe that an injury free kante can flop in chelsea?
Guy there are certain players that can't flop as long as they are fit and you should know this.
Kante is not that old . We are talking of kante. As in ngolo kante Who is that midfielder that never gets injured y'all want Chelsea to sign to replace ngolo kante? Mention his name please.

mehn STFU who wrote anything about Kante floping and what rubbish is which midfielder doesn't get injured, is getting injured the subject of conversation or his repeated non match fitness or having to play him at 70% or 60%.

Kante should move to a league with lesser intensity, that's if he really wants a 4 to 5 year contract

Johnny4you:
bar his over holding of the ball, Loftus is a good versatile player, dude can play Cb, Dm, RB, Winger and even CF.....he just need some coaching and he will come out good.


Don't write him off so quick

It is not always about playing CB, DM ,RB,winger and even CF, the question is can he play it well? Among all these positions how many of them can you confidently say that he is in top 10 best in England not to talk of Europe?...

BlueAngel444:
mehn STFU who wrote anything about Kante floping and what rubbish is which midfielder doesn't get injured, is getting injured the subject of conversation or his repeated non match fitness or having to play him at 70% or 60%.

Kante should move to a league with lesser intensity, that's if he really wants a 4 to 5 year contract

Mrs portable, he ain't going no where

Mount should just leave that wing for Sterling and Pulisic to battle it out.