Ibime: ^^^Ninja, you are the fool here!!!

The RDM you are talking about is already a legend after taking over from your beloved flop AVB and achieving the unfeasible!

Just like RDM told Torres he is not taking a penalty in UCL final, RDM will do the inevitable and ditch Torres after proving to the club heirarchy that the WEAKLING experiment has failed and shekpe keeper is irredeemable. If the weakling likes, he can storm down the tunnel. A lot more of that to come.

RDM's status at Chelsea is not under question even by a mental lilliput like yourself.

The question is why is Torres still flopping 3 seasons in, and you are deflecting issues with nonsense yarns about RDM.

We were fooled into these arguments when Shevchenko was here. . . until he went to AC Milan and failed to score a single goal in one full season!

I thought these guys would have run out of excuses by now but they keep inventing new ones. Now some are even blaming Hazard.

I was right few months ago when I labelled Torres "the man of unending excuses"!

Ibime: Torres watch 2012/13: 1 good game in 5

nateevs:



Empty talk. If we continue to turn out abysmal play against teams, RDM will follow his predecessors.
Roman will not spend #90m in one season, #225m over 2 seasons and a half for RDM to be playing defenders against QPR.

Siddon dere dey blame Torres.

dayokanu:

Without Torres in the lineup Chelsea won the FA cup and CL 4months ago

WHat has changed now? The cluelessness of Torres has been promoted to the first team

Babamide: I think Chelsea's problem is ramirez and bertrand. How do we expect only mata, hazard and torres to do all the attacking.
RDM needs to be reminded that the best for of defence is to attack. Our defenders are nothing to write home about when they meet top opposition. The best we can do is to throw in all attacking options so as to possess the ball more and score more goals can we can concede.

A-40:
A man that cannot even control simple passes by his teammates or beat his markers is complaining that he is not getting enough touches! This the same person that has shown us that even without a goalie manning the post there is no guarantee he would score! Its fun tho watching excuse after excuse being generated for Torres


If RDM had gone gung-ho at QPR the same people that where lambasting him for not attacking woulda lambasted him for not defending! Y'all forget that Chelsea and Arsenal lost at this same ground last season

dayokanu: ^^ How many 90mins game has Ramires and Bertrand got this season?

Meanwhile we conveniently sidestep the DUD who has been a monumental flop ever since he stepped into CHelsea

Initially the excuse was that he wasnt getting regular minutes this season in 6 games he has played 530min. an average of 88mins per game and he has continued to be horrible.

Earlier we were told his teammates like Drogba, Kalou, Anelka, Lukaku were the reason he flopped those ones have left and he is still DUD.

We have been told that its the coaches in Chelsea that were his problems. Torres has played under 3 different coaches he still continues to be a flop.

We were told its the lack of creative players. This season he has played with some of the most creative set of players in Hazard and Mata in attack yet they still dont understand him.

He complained that the noise level in London was one of his reason for poor performance, They have reduced the noise in London and even started admitting Deaf and dumb ppl to Stamford bridge yet he continues to be DUD

So what is the new excuse? Approach games defensively? Dude are you serious? You mean because Ronaldo didnt start as CB means the team is defensive?

GTFOH jare

FALLS FROM IROKO!!

A-40:
A man that cannot even control simple passes by his teammates or beat his markers is complaining that he is not getting enough touches! This the same person that has shown us that even without a goalie manning the post there is no guarantee he would score! Its fun tho watching excuse after excuse being generated for Torres

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAA!!!


I DON DIEE!!!

dayokanu: Torres predecessors won the FA cup and CL barely 4months ago yet the sun and moon must align for Torres to score Spain is too slow for him Drogba was too physical Hazard is too skillful

I have told you several times that Torres lacks the sense to play, if he doesn't make good runs how wld they find him? A 33 year old Drogba was able to win the FA and CL but our useless shekpe keeper can't even hit water if thrown off a boat
He can't make runs he can't hold up play he can't do anything right

Better get Mercy Akide

hahahahaha!!!

dayokanu - MARRY ME!!

Babamide: I think Chelsea's problem is defensive. RDM does not trust his full backs to do a good job so he plays Bertrand and Ramirez as support on the flanks. It worked for him last season cos we had a striker who needed only one chance to score goals. So they just sat back to defend and wait for Drogba's miracle moment. It is virtually impossible for torres or any other striker on the radar now to fill Drogba's shoes, well maybe with the exception of Ibrahimovic. In any case, the 4-2-3-1 system is suppose to allow 2 defensive midfielders cover for the defense but that is impossible to achieve with a 34years old Lampard and a slow (maybe even older) Mikel. So in essence we are playing 4 defenders helped by 2 defensive midfielders and another 2 artificial full backs in ramirez and bertrand. How do we expect only mata, hazard and torres to do all the attacking.
RDM needs to be reminded that the best for of defence is to attack. Our defenders are nothing to write home about when they meet top opposition. The best we can do is to throw in all attacking options so as to possess the ball more and score more goals can we can concede.

A-40:
A man that cannot even control simple passes by his teammates or beat his markers is complaining that he is not getting enough touches!
If RDM had gone gung-ho at QPR the same people that where lambasting him for not attacking woulda lambasted him for not defending! Y'all forget that Chelsea and Arsenal lost at this same ground last season

nateevs:


Ogebni A40, go siddon. There should be no such thing as a gung ho in a 4-2-3-1 if deployed effectively. That's why it's a 4-2-3-1. For two defensive mid-fielders to fall back into a flat four if full backs are attacking or creating a solid six-player defensive shield when full backs are not.

Play Romeu and Mikel in the 2 in front the back four. If Romeu and Mikel will be too immobile, play Luiz and Mikel. (One very quick and strong in tackles, the other strong and shields well - both very good passers of the ball). Then Ivanovic, Cahill, Terry, Cole in defence. That's as rock solid as it can be. No gung ho shiiit!

That way, you have all the freedom for your attacking players. A mobile player in the hole that has the pace to transition play between defence and attack - Hazard and then unleash the pace and unpredictable dribbling ability of Marin, Sturridge and Moses on the flanks and the attacking full backs in Azpilicueta and Cole in turns. We may not win the league but we'll be pissy scary to play against. Torres or not.

However, it's not going to happen. The moment the 34-year old has to play. The balance of the team is altered and everything else has to be adjusted to cope with the frailties.

nateevs:
Respect the past, embrace the future.

Ibime:

When Chamhakh wasnt scoring, Arsenal finished fourth and struggled. Chamhakh was ditched half a season into his experiment. How come Torres is still here in his third season?

Babamide: U make it sound like QPR is some team. They've got 2points this season. One from Chelsea and the other from Norwich. We lost to QPR last season due to Bosingwa's foolishness. The 2nd leg was much better. Amidst all the Terry-Ferdinand issue, we thumped them 6-1. RDM was coach and torres got a hattrick. Let us not forget, Torres is still a wuse.

nateevs:


Ogebni A40, go siddon. There should be no such thing as a gung ho in a 4-2-3-1 if deployed effectively. That's why it's a 4-2-3-1. For two defensive mid-fielders to fall back into a flat four if full backs are attacking or creating a solid six-player defensive shield when full backs are not.

Play Romeu and Mikel in the 2 in front the back four. If Romeu and Mikel will be too immobile, play Luiz and Mikel. (One very quick and strong in tackles, the other strong and shields well - both very good passers of the ball). Then Ivanovic, Cahill, Terry, Cole in defence. That's as rock solid as it can be. No gung ho shiiit!

That way, you have all the freedom for your attacking players. A mobile player in the hole that has the pace to transition play between defence and attack - Hazard and then unleash the pace and unpredictable dribbling ability of Marin, Sturridge and Moses on the flanks and the attacking full backs in Azpilicueta and Cole in turns. We may not win the league but we'll be pissy scary to play against. Torres or not.

However, it's not going to happen. The moment the 34-year old has to play. The balance of the team is altered and everything else has to be adjusted to cope with the frailties.

debosky:

Chamakh wasn't ditched - he took his rightful place on the bench behind RVP who is clearly a better striker. His slump actually started after he was 'intimidated' by RVP's return.

Ibime:

Chamhakhs complete loss of form is more down to the exclusive that newspapers were going to print on his homosexuality at that time.

If the whole world is about to find out that your are gay debosky, you will lose form immediately.

This is inside gist from my guy at Talksport. Chamhakh was going to be outed, thats why he lost "heart".

debosky:

Interesting. . . .so why did the papers refrain from outing him? Because he lost form?

debosky:

Interesting. . . .so why did the papers refrain from outing him? Because he lost form?

Ibime:

There is no point to out him. When was the last time media outed someone? There's no public interest in such, not even when Colin Jacksons boyfriend was trying to out him. Outing is your personal business unless you out yourself George Michael style. Anyways, the gist is that the matter was settled just like Jermaine Jenas' matter never saw light of day.

Ibime: Whats this about Chelsea paying 30mll for Fellini when the far superior dembele was available for half that

Ibime: See how anichebe just used his body to turn that fella. If it's Torres they would tell us he was never one on one against any defender. That's what you call one on one, a situation that occurs zillion times in a match for Torres but he doesn't have strength or quickness to capitalise

dayokanu:
The extinct ones like Owen, Torres who are always looking for the 100% chances laid for them to get one on one. Can barely survive in todays game. As they are not strong/skilled enough to go head to head nor have the instinct to ghost around. The defensive formations of nowadays are too hard for them. These are luxury strikers and mostly a liability to any formation