Over-night transformations

According to orthodox science, the first three primates in the pictures above preceded us.

The homo habilis evolved around 2.4 million years ago.
Homo- heidelbergensis walked the earth around 700,000 years to 300,000 years,
while the Homo-rhodesiensis walked the earth around 400,000 - 150,000.

Humans are said to have evolved from either of the later two around 300,000 years.

Now compare those skulls. If you do this comparison carefully, you'll see that the human skull is significantly different from the other skulls:

- It doesn't possess that defined protruding brow ridge and it's jaws aren't pushed out.

- The eyes if examined closely are also different as they aren't built for nocturnal vision like the others.

- A very important difference is the forehead. All the other skulls do not possess protruding foreheads. Only the human skull does.

For over 2.3 million years of evolution the facial morphology of primates stayed similar. But just between 700,000 years and 300,000 years during the evolution of humans, science wants us to believe this facial structure transformed into what we now posses. It's preposterous to believe such changes would occur over a short period of time.

The evidence points only to two possibilities - The acceleration of the evolution of primates through advanced forms of genetic engineering or the creation of humans anew.

Lets explore more

The skull transformation on it's own is unbelievable, but then we also see other overnight changes in morphology that happen within this same short time span.

Remember that a tiny change in the morphology of a species takes millions of years of gradual evolution.

Along with the skull changes, we simultaneously evolved these:

- anatomical necessities that enabled speech, which developed simultaneously with the instinct for speech - This alone is a miracle, given the short period of time.

- The loss of thick hair on the body and the development of the mechanism for perspiration.

- Increase in brain size

- The change in bone size and density.

- Shortening of arm length

- The development of a larger prefrontal cortex.

Amongst others.

Again, bear in mind that all these changes occurred at the same time within that short span of time. This isn't how evolution works.
A single mutation of this sort occurs quite rarely during the process of evolution and even when it does, it develops slowly over a long period of time.

Following

I will repeat this again because it is a very important argument.

For over 300,000 years, humans have remained relatively the same. Not even a single anatomical alteration. Our skulls and bones are still as they were 300,000 years ago.

Yet the controllers of our world want us to believe that within almost the same period of time, prehuman primates evolved a protruded forehead, a larger prefrontal cortex, a depression of the brow ridges that have been present for over 2.3 million years, the loss of eye features that aid nocturnal sight, loss of thick body hair, the evolution of speech and the cognitive instinct for speech, a larger brain, shortening of the arm length, a change in the configuration of the throat, the change in jaw shape, transformation of the nasal structure, the complete change of bone size and density among other changes.

If there has ever been a conspiracy to keep people in the dark about the truth, then this is one of the most evident.

I am very confident that our evolution was artificially accelerated. For a new morphological trait to develop in an organism, mutation has to occur.

Mutations are usually deadly, and only in few extremely rare cases does the mutation produce something useful. We see mutations everyday with kids being born with strange physical deformities. These mutations are not favorable and hence will not get passed down.

A mutation that doesn't immediately kill the human is very rare, and even if it isn't deadly or doesn't lead to livelong health problems, there is little chance the current environmental stressors would select for that trait to be passed down.

How is it that humans developed all these favorable traits simultaneously? Again the answer is staring us in the face. Our genes were artificially modified by technologically advanced beings.

Understanding how science and academia works

Science as we know it today is an institution and one that is regulated by certain interests and some of these interests have a goal and sometimes this goal is to maintain the status quo and suppress dissension.

You might disagree with this, but I've read statements written by a lot of scholars especially in the field of anthropology and archeology who have lost their jobs because they stepped outside the contemporary historical paradigm and challenged it, in spite of warnings not to.

Scientific papers are usually peer reviewed and research is usually funded. If your research isn't adjudged to be worth funding it won't be funded. Most scientists are just people like you and I who have families and just want to survive and provide for their loved ones, so they'd see no point putting their careers at risk to validate some fringe claim that could demolish the historical paradigm that certain high level interests want to maintain.

We live in a world were claims that have been discredited as false were later on confessed to be true by the same institutions that forcibly rejected them as conspiratorial and hoaxes. Don't just gobble up what mainstream science tells you about controversial topics like this. Always try to do your own research.

Zana of Abkhazia

Zana was a hominid who lived in the 19th century, and who was referred to by some locals as a female Abnauayu or Almasty: names for a creature similar to the infamous Yeti of the Himalayas and Bigfoot of North America.

She was originally captured while living outdoors in the forest, and was later enslaved and raped multiple times by a succession of local wealthy individuals, and was finally bought by the Abkhaz nobleman Edgi Genaba who took her to his estate at Tkhina, where she lived until her death around 1890.

The locals described her as being “part human and part animal,”

Pay attention to her physical description:

She was 2 m tall and dark-skinned, covered with thick hair, was able to lift a 50 kg sack of flour with one hand, and outrun a horse in a race.
She also lacked speech.

Zana is also documented to have given birth to two sons and two daughters from local men. Following her death, she was buried in the Genabas' family cemetery, and although the exact location of Zana's burial site was unknown, the grave of her youngest son, Khwit, was identified in 1971. After several attempts to locate Zana's burial site, the remains of an anonymous female were discovered in the Genaba's family cemetery, leading to speculation that they may have belonged to Zana herself.

Below is an illustration of zana that matched what the locals described.

Why Zana's story is important

Zana's story is important because it reveals something interesting: Zana and others like her are the direct decsendants of our so called pre-human ancestors. This is how we should look like if our natural evolution wasn't artificially accelerated.

Notice her features. She still has the thick hair covering her skin. She still has the potruded brow ridge, the long arms, lack of mechanism and morphology for speech, smaller brain, "superhuman" strength, small pre-fontal cortex and all the other morphological features our primate ancestors had over 2 million years ago.

Maybe posting this information on this section was the wise choice. If this was posted in romance section it would have been seriously derailed and people encountering the thread for the first time would have to plow through pages of posts that they aren't interested in just to follow my arguments.

I will advise that it remains this way. You are allowed to post your comments and have discussions concerning what I post, but let it be sparse. When I am done posting I will let you know and then you can have your arguments.

i really appreciate what you building here
especially the point about advanced artificial beings involvement

Ourtruth247
Who were this beings that genetically engineered humans
Were the in physical form or ghost form

Ourtruth247:
I will repeat this again because it is a very important argument.

For over 300,000 years, humans have remained relatively the same. Not even a single anatomical alteration. Our skulls and bones are still as they were 300,000 years ago.

Yet the controllers of our world want us to believe that within almost the same period of time, prehuman primates evolved a protruded forehead, a larger prefrontal cortex, a depression of the brow ridges that have been present for over 2.3 million years, the loss of eye features that aid nocturnal sight, loss of thick body hair, the evolution of speech and the cognitive instinct for speech, a larger brain, shortening of the arm length, a change in the configuration of the throat, the change in jaw shape, transformation of the nasal structure, the complete change of bone size and density among other changes.

If there has ever been a conspiracy to keep people in the dark about the truth, then this is one of the most evident.

Bro, this your research is skewed.
Humans have undergone several changes in the 300k years you talked about.
We are now generally shorter, lighter and smaller boned than our ancestors were 100,000 years ago. The decrease has been gradual but has been most noticeable in the last 10,000 years. However, there has been some slight reversal to this trend in the last few centuries as the average height has started to increase.
The factors that affect body size are complex. They involve interactions between genetics, environment and lifestyle practices such as diet and technology.
So do your work well. We aint all idiots

Ourtruth247:
Understanding how science and academia works

Science as we know it today is an institution and one that is regulated by certain interests and some of these interests have a goal and sometimes this goal is to maintain the status quo and suppress dissension.

You might disagree with this, but I've read statements written by a lot of scholars especially in the field of anthropology and archeology who have lost their jobs because they stepped outside the contemporary historical paradigm and challenged it, in spite of warnings not to.

Scientific papers are usually peer reviewed and research is usually funded. If your research isn't adjudged to be worth funding it won't be funded. Most scientists are just people like you and I who have families and just want to survive and provide for their loved ones, so they'd see no point putting their careers at risk to validate some fringe claim that could demolish the historical paradigm that certain high level interests want to maintain.

We live in a world were claims that have been discredited as false were later on confessed to be true by the same institutions that forcibly rejected them as conspiratorial and hoaxes. Don't just gobble up what mainstream science tells you about controversial topics like this. Always try to do your own research.

True to an extent, but it always gets found out

jaephoenix:
True to an extent, but it always gets found out

True talk sha... But let him continue

@OurTruth could you please continue.... I really wanna know more

Ourtruth247:
Why Zana's story is important

Zana's story is important because it reveals something interesting: Zana and others like her are the direct decsendants of our so called pre-human ancestors. This is how we should look like if our natural evolution wasn't artificially accelerated.

Notice her features. She still has the thick hair covering her skin. She still has the potruded brow ridge, the long arms, lack of mechanism and morphology for speech, smaller brain, "superhuman" strength, small pre-fontal cortex and all the other morphological features our primate ancestors had over 2 million years ago.

Obviously you are not a geneticist or biologist. Your ignorance glows.
If that was how we were supposed to look like, how come her children didn’t carry her genes? Not even her height, hair etc were carried as a recessive gene.
Listen, Zana's case is a case of genetic mutation. Our ancestors had tails but due to evolution, we lost ours, and what we have is a vestigial tail. You can Google coccyx, if you wanna learn. Now, some babies still grow full fledged tails which are surgically excised.
Please do your research properly. We aren't all ignorant here

jaephoenix:

Bro, this your research is skewed.
Humans have undergone several changes in the 300k years you talked about.
We are now generally shorter, lighter and smaller boned than our ancestors were 100,000 years ago. The decrease has been gradual but has been most noticeable in the last 10,000 years. However, there has been some slight reversal to this trend in the last few centuries as the average height has started to increase.
The factors that affect body size are complex. They involve interactions between genetics, environment and lifestyle practices such as diet and technology.
So do your work well. We aint all idiots

I'll only reply you this once and then continue posting because you seem intent on derailing the thread.

For someone quick to call me ignorant, you don't seem knowledgeable yourself. Quite an irony.

All those "changes" you mentioned are nothing compared to the drastic overnight changes in morphology that science tells us happened through natural evolution in just 300,000 years.

I don't want to keep repeating myself. Please reread my post. You can't compare lighter skin color and small change in height with all the simultaneous transformations I listed.

The funny thing is that actual knowledgeable geneticists won't doubt this. When you point this out to a geneticist they will say that there has to have been missing links, i.e fossils of other species that haven't been found that would show the natural progression of these features. Problem is we haven't found even one of those fossils.

jaephoenix:

Bro, this your research is skewed.
Humans have undergone several changes in the 300k years you talked about.
We are now generally shorter, lighter and smaller boned than our ancestors were 100,000 years ago. The decrease has been gradual but has been most noticeable in the last 10,000 years. However, there has been some slight reversal to this trend in the last few centuries as the average height has started to increase.
The factors that affect body size are complex. They involve interactions between genetics, environment and lifestyle practices such as diet and technology.
So do your work well. We aint all idiots

This is why arguing with certain people can be really annoying. People like this guy above don't know anything about the topic that they are arguing about. Some of them probably just encountered the topic for the first time, and yet they are quick to call me ignorant.

Take a look at the bolded in the quoted post. This guy just went online and copied and pasted his reply without even changing anything. And he has the guts to tell me to "do my work well", something I have been researching for many years. It's really funny.

Attached is a screenshot of the post he copied and pasted his reply verbatim from.

Ourtruth247:


I'll only reply you this once and then continue posting because you seem intent on derailing the thread.

For someone quick to call me ignorant, you don't seem knowledgeable yourself. Quite an irony.

All those "changes" you mentioned are nothing compared to the drastic overnight changes in morphology that science tells us happened through natural evolution in just 300,000 years.

I don't want to keep repeating myself. Please reread my post. You can't compare lighter skin color and small change in height with all the simultaneous transformations I listed.

The funny thing is that actual knowledgeable geneticists won't doubt this. When you point this out to a geneticist they will say that there has to have been missing links, i.e fossils of other species that haven't been found that would show the natural progression of these features. Problem is we haven't found even one of those fossils.

So why do you think the scientists lied? How did you come up with your theory?

Ourtruth247:


This is why arguing with certain people can be really annoying. People like this guy above don't know anything about the topic that they are arguing about. Some of them probably just encountered the topic for the first time, and yet they are quick to call me ignorant.

Take a look at the bolded in the quoted post. This guy just went online and copied and pasted his reply without even changing anything. And he has the guts to tell me to "do my work well", something I have been researching for many years. It's really funny.

Attached is a screenshot of the post he copied and pasted his reply verbatim from.

Bro, can you tell me everything you posted here was typed by you and none copied?
Stop grasping at straws and face the facts. Copying stuff doesn't make them false

Following. Pls Ourtruth247 continue

Drrnie:
@OurTruth could you please continue....
I really wanna know more

Moshybear:
Following. Pls Ourtruth247 continue

I'll continue. I have a lot to share.

Ourtruth247:



I'll continue. I have a lot to share.

Just do so

Unmnhnm!

jaephoenix:

Bro, can you tell me everything you posted here was typed by you and none copied?
Stop grasping at straws and face the facts. Copying stuff doesn't make them false

Your attack on him only made you sound intelligent. He was able to proof you are intelligent by 0.01 with that your copy and paste text. You posted that and made it look like your own words. If you want to tackle people, then do it wisely and hounorably.

Same man didnt say he wrote all what he posted by himself neither did he say he copied it. He already told us he will notify us when he is done posting all his RESEARCH work.

I advise you to read, assimilate and learn. Then make your contribution. If you have different view from what he posted, then table yours without trying to discredit his research work. To think you threw you first jab by saying "We are not all an idiot" gave a very negative aura to the scene.

So bros calm down and lets have a good session on this topic. Savvy?

Have you heard of the Lulu Emilu?

The dilution of knowledge

Imagine I told you a story, and then you had to tell that story to your son 20 years later. And then your son tells it to his son. And then a traveler from India visits Nigeria and your son's child tells the traveler the same story, and then that traveler takes the story with him back to India and tells his son the same story and his son tells his daughter 15 years later and the daughter tells the story to her friends and then they tell it to their children. Now imagine this happens for thousands of years.

What is going to happen in this scenario is that the original story will be retold, based on the culture and time it was told, a lot of the original parts will be lost, and new stuff added, but it will still retain its main theme. I refer to this whole process as the " dilution of knowledge"

A lot of the stories we have today came down to us through this process and then when forms of writing were invented, the stories were etched in carvings or heliographics and preserved.

Now let's examine one of these stories.

The Sumerian story

The Sumerian story is one of the oldest stories about creation. It is called the Eridu Genesis and was discovered on a single fragmented tablet by a historian.

What a lot of Christians don't know is that a lot of the creation story in the bible derives from the Eridu Genesis as well as the Epic of Gilgamesh which is another old story, passed down and adopted by different cultures.

I don't want to dwell on the particulars of the stories, as they have obviously been diluted, and no one actually knows exactly when the original story was told, so I will focus of general theme of the story and the drawings depicted by the Sumerians.

The Sumerians claim to have been created by gods from the sky who came to earth to create a slave species to help them do their work. In the Enuma Elish and some other writings they go into more detail like describing how one of the gods was put to death and his body mixed with clay and the material from this was used to create humans.

However what is very striking is the drawings they depicted of the information these beings gave them.

In the drawings below, you can see a sort of shining object with other smaller objects circling around it. Some people think this is an illustration of the solar system with the planets circling around the sun. It is all open to interpretation and you should come to your own conclusion on what you see.

Even more interesting is the theory that the drawing in the carving is actually a representation of saturn passing the Pleiades cluster. I'm not going to lie, the resemblance is striking. But again, it's all open to interpretation

This isn't the only time ancient artifacts have depicted parts of our Galaxy. Another good example happened here in West Africa and it still baffles astronomers till this day.

Ourtruth247:
Even more interesting is the theory that the drawing in the carving is actually a representation of saturn passing the Pleiades cluster. I'm not going to lie, the resemblance is striking. But again, it's all open to interpretation

This is what it is...

It is not the solar system.....

The solar system you know is fake...