₦airaland Forum

Judges can't rule against direct cases.
No matter how close or friendly judges are to you, they can't rule against direct cases. They're 2 type of cases in court, which are cases of technicality and direct cases.
Technicality cases are cases where a judge will have an option to decide on who he or she wants to win the case, but in direct cases, the judges in court will have no option but to judgement from the way they've seen the case.
If BAT APC like, he can change most of the judges and replace with new set of judges, but then, if those judges are presented with direct cases, they will have to pass judgement on what they have seen in the case.
Example of technicality cases LP and PDP have presented in court are:
(1) the 25% of votes requirement in the FCT
(2) evidence to show that BAT VP was not qualified to be his VP
(3) evidence of election rigging in polling units
Example of direct cases presented by LP and PDP in court:
(1) a video evidence to show inec chairman guidelines on how the 2023 election is to be done
(2) evidence to show that BAT was not qualified to run for the presidential election
(3) evidence of election results from the irev portal and from inec server

Exactly

Are we talking about the petition that's not substantial?

The petition without how the petitioners won the election and how they came about their results.

Their major emphasis in the petition are issues that have been quashed severally..

Do not expect any miracle from SC, the presidential election petition na dust bin materials

helinues:
Are we talking about the petition that's not substantial?

The petition without how the petitioners won the election and how they came about their results.

Their major emphasis in the petition are issues that have been quashed severally..

Do not expect any miracle from SC, the presidential election petition na dust bin materials

Helinues Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a cocaine sniffing vagabond

It has been proven by ronu terrorists

And on ya mandate animals

helinues:
Are we talking about the petition that's not substantial?

The petition without how the petitioners won the election and how they came about their results.

Their major emphasis in the petition are issues that have been quashed severally..

Do not expect any miracle from SC, the presidential election petition na dust bin materials

I have told you to stop making comments here because your comments are not making sense

Proof of evidence where the the major emphasis in the petition of which the 25% FCT requirements is one of them have been quashed

Ofunaofu:
I have told you to stop making comments here because your comments are not making sense

Proof of evidence where the the major emphasis in the petition of which the 25% FCT requirements is one of them have been quashed

Which of your comments ever make any single sense on this forum? Which of your supports ever get close to reality on this forum?

If you don't have any record of winning argument on this forum, why not KS and learn from those who sabi

helinues:
Which of your comments ever make any single sense on this forum? Which of your supports ever get close to reality on this forum?

If you don't have any record of winning argument on this forum, why not KS and learn from those who sabi

Sharap

helinues:
Which of your comments ever make any single sense on this forum? Which of your supports ever get close to reality on this forum?

If you don't have any record of winning argument on this forum, why not KS and learn from those who sabi

Who are those wey sabi, helinues


You are funny 😂😆😆😆😆😆