₦airaland Forum

Penguin2:
Therefore?🙄

Kukutente23:
The judgement was a forfeiture for proceeds of narcotics. In truth, if you read through the charge sheet which was made public, Kevin Moss established a connection between Tinubu and Agbele the main culprit initially, which Tinubu later denied. It was his denial that saved him from being indicted coupled with the fact that he was already in Nigeria then. So the forfeiture was for money involved in drug trafficking found in his accounts.

Shantyken:
Was forfeiture criminal or civil?

PaellaPaella:
Keep crying, Tinubu is a criminal drug cartel, he will be disgraced out of office, if you like wail from today to millions years to come

favor914:
Conceding but not admitting, even if he was guilty & sentenced in 1993 to 10 years in Federal penitentiary in the United States, and became a free man in 2003.

In 2013 by virtue of the Nigeria constitution 1999 as amended, the statute of limitation which is 10 years from the date of forfeiture would have kicked it, he would be free to contest & run for the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria without prejudice.

So why are you crying over an issue that has no jurisdiction whatsoever?

favor914:
Almijiri it is Bola Tinubu that made you poor? With this kind of lazy mind set of yours, you will most likely remain there for a while.

Kukutente23:
It was not stated in the court records available, which is why the FBI is being asked to release the records with them which they have refused till now

favor914:
Hate filled Obidients, no different from Boko Haram.

INVINCIBLECSP1:
You're not intelligent to know that Obi is tackling him from all angles. Even before the election, sane Nigerians not illiterates knows Ttinubu is not qualified to run for president. Keep fooling yourself you hear. As he has rigged himself in with impunity, na to expose his ugly butt before the world. Hahahahaha

Ekeneegwu:
Am not crying am only trying to edify you in something that may be beneficial to us .. since the suffer have doubled since your Drug lord came into power .

iLoveYouToo:
What’s he challenging it for? There was a forfeiture for fvck sake, he’s not denying that. It wasn’t a criminal matter

Penguin2:
The question is was VIO supposed to charge you a whopping N5million for mere traffic offense?

And this is a wrong analogy because Tinubu’s (not his bank account) offense was clearly written in the charge sheet - he was charged for narcotics. There’s nothing comparable between this and traffic offense.

Now, not only was he charged, he was ordered to forfeit a whopping $460,000 dollars and he never protested against it if he was truly innocent.

No legitimate hustler will allow the court confiscate his $10,000 dollars without threatening fire and brimstone, not to talk of when the money is above $400k.

Is Tinubu a Father Christmas?

Shantyken:
Was he the one doing the drugs business or his bank account was used to deposit the proceeds from drugs business?

seunmsg:
Is there any sense in challenging an order from a civil case?

So, if VIO or FRSC fines me N5k today for traffic offense, is there any sense in wasting time challenging the order?

Since it’s a forfeiture resulting from a civil case, what’s the point fighting it? Tinubu was already a Senator when the forfeiture order was made against his account. So, it makes more sense to simply allow the civil forfeiture order stand than to keep wasting money on appeal. Same way we all pay VIO and FRSC fine for traffic offense without appeal.

Kukutente23:
And I'm educating you that's the final order with no indemnity. Go and read the court records. You're arguing about what you don't know or haven't read and understood. The judgement which Obi and Atiku is referring to is for the$460k while the first one you're referring to was over over 1m.
Go and verify

Alliswell248:
Obj took the case up in 2003 , and the report was they...US doesn't have any criminal record of Tinubu....

Obidients would soon be tired.

Penguin2:
If Tinubu is innocent of the allegations in the forfeiture order of the US Court of the District of Illinois, why has he not appealed that forfeiture order issued since 1993? Isn’t that what innocent people do?

https://saharareporters.com/2023/07/21/tinubu-hasnt-challenged-us-court-order-forfeiture-460000-narcotics-trafficking-any-court

slowice:
Yes oo he gift them over 400 thousand dollars to use and buy bread for their children... Otondo

Kukutente23:
It was not stated in the court records available, which is why the FBI is being asked to release the records with them which they have refused till now

Klington:
When your brain is fixed, nothing will sound "unique" to you.

Eriokanmi:
My 100usd can't be forfeited by any agency and I'd not sue them, if the money is legit. Its over 400k usd (over NGN339,000,000) we're talking, someone's life savings 😆. Millions of individual Nigerians can't see that in a lifetime

Kukutente23:
Stop telling lies. OBJ never took up the case. The FBI attaché in Nigeria replied Tafa not OBJ.
That said, I don't know why the integrity of the holder of the office of president of your country is for obidients alone. Do you mean you don't care if a criminal rules you? What are you teaching your kids?

Poske95:
The electoral law was revised for the elections and the umpire openly told all that the results would be collated in such manner to counter any alleged discrepancy.....so why spend so much and campaign so much when you had a feeling it would fail and not help prove the authenticity of results......?
I know you're a Nigeria....yan

Lotanna2:
There was no judgement,there are four phases
Phase one,us attorney Michael j Shepard filed a complaint motion for for forteiture pending procedures.
Phase two,us internal revenue agent Kevin moss also filed a motion for seizure pending court proceedings based on his investigation.he confirmed that tinubu worked with Mobil and Deloitte
Phase three,judge nordberh clearly identified that it was an exparte motion brought to it by the us attorney and gave the temporary order pending when all parties are served.
Phase four,an out of court settlement supervised by the court or compromise agreement was reached where two accounts were unfrozen and one was forfeited which amounted to 460k via civil forfeiture.the judge merely supervised and formalised it,it was not a judgment or sentence or fine.no guilty charge was found.it was just a court supervised agreement akin to a property or marriage case.obi and atiku as usual wasted their time on this

Kukutente23:
Stop telling lies. OBJ never took up the case. The FBI attaché in Nigeria replied Tafa not OBJ.
That said, I don't know why the integrity of the holder of the office of president of your country is for obidients alone. Do you mean you don't care if a criminal rules you? What are you teaching your kids?

TheOldGods:
oh, drug trafficking and money laundering is not a criminal matter

Penguin2:
The question is was VIO supposed to charge you a whopping N5million for mere traffic offense?

And this is a wrong analogy because Tinubu’s (not his bank account) offense was clearly written in the charge sheet - he was charged for narcotics. There’s nothing comparable between this and traffic offense.

Now, not only was he charged, he was ordered to forfeit a whopping $460,000 dollars and he never protested against it if he was truly innocent.

No legitimate hustler will allow the court confiscate his $10,000 dollars without threatening fire and brimstone, not to talk of when the money is above $400k.

Is Tinubu a Father Christmas?