₦airaland Forum

MorataFC:
Baba long time, how una dey?

Everywhere good. Na season all man dey wait for make we dey active dey drag people for blokos.

hensben:
Humphreys has higher ceiling than Colwill. Colwill should be sold next season while Humphreys take his place.

Why should Colwill be sold? Which of your criteria does he not meet?

Is he not mentally strong with cold face?

Or is he not technical and tactical enough?

swiz123:
Everywhere good. Na season all man dey wait for make we dey active dey drag people for blokos.

[center][/center]

Ibime:
You always talk nonsense

and you were born foolish n dropped on ur head as a baby

Can anything sensible come out from Elruditor...

Jodera:
I asked a question

A goal that determines one's team to [b]participate in penalties, how is it inconsequential?[/b]

When you answer that, we can now go to the next stage whether city won it or not.

I had to make sure it was you many times before responding.

Just read what you wrote again then think deeply.

I highlighted the part that shows you are rushing to respond without understanding what is being discussed.

MorataFC:
🤣🤣🤣
Android17 Oya answer the question
Is Mbappe hat trick also inconsequential?

What was the consequence of Mbappé's goals to France's objective?

FakeNEWSevryday:
I think his position was that @ the end of the day, Arsenal won the trophy🏆
Look at Kane he has scored hundreds of goals without winning any trophy but Foden has not scored half of his goals but had trophies, so Kane's goals is inconsequential (less important) to the trophies foden had won.

I am surprised at Jodera tbh. Some other people less so but Jodera has always been someone who thinks logically.

He asked that I did not "drag" KdB and Rodri - I dragged Palmer?

Haba. How can I be dragging the team I support?

They think I am saying the player did not play well or what?

You don't play to participate in penalties. You play to WIN.

If your goals don't win you the game in a final, they were INCONSEQUENTIAL. Period.

OVA200:
Person go dey yarn rubbish with full chest.

How can a goal that push the team to penalty be inconsequential?

Without palmer's goal arsenal win in the 90 minutes.

Penalty is different reality.

Without Palmer's goal why will Arsenal not win if they would have scored the only goal of the game?

Victor Oladimeji. If you were not a Chelsea fan I would have been surprised.

So Boehly has started creating companies out of thin air to sponsor Chelsea

Infinite Athlete name change was registered less than a week ago and they already signed £50m sponsorship deal within few days

The day UEFA will hold Boehly on his blockos ehn

I done talk am say na Saudis dey behind Boehly in disguise

Ibime:
So Boehly has started creating companies out of thin air to sponsor Chelsea

Infinite Athlete name change was registered less than a week ago and they already signed £50m sponsorship deal within few days

The day UEFA will hold Boehly on his blockos ehn

I done talk am say na Saudis dey behind Boehly in disguise

I am beginning to believe this

Android17:
I had to make sure it was you many times before responding.

Just read what you wrote again then think deeply.

I highlighted the part that shows you are rushing to respond without understanding what is being discussed.

Lol... You're just evading the question sha. You're so smart with that and it was expected

A goal gave you a platform to win a game through Penalties.

Whether the team uses that platform judiciously or not is another discourse entirely.

As long as that goal provides that platform, It's never ever inconsequential.

Maybe the word "inconsequential" have a new meaning that I'm oblivious to

new sponsor ain't pad £10m more than 3 partnership, hopefully they continue

Android17:
I am surprised at Jod.era tbh. Some other people less so but Jo.dera has always been someone who thinks logically.

He asked that I did not "drag" KdB and Rodri - I dragged Palmer?

Haba. How can I be dragging the team I support?

They think I am saying the player did not play well or what?

I did not say you dragged Palmer and I never insinuated so

Palmer have created the platform for Man city to win through penalty shootout (since it wasn't enough through normal time).

It's up to the penalty takers to do their job which fortunately for us, Kdb and Rodri didn't do theirs.

How then does that make Palmer's goal inconsequential?

Android17:
You don't play to participate in penalties. You play to WIN.

If your goals don't win you the game in a final, they were INCONSEQUENTIAL. Period.

Lol, and who told you this misconception again??

When Arteta was bringing in Trossard, Nketiah and Smith Rowe, what do you think the plan was especially as time was running out, knowing fully well there's no extra time?

What do you think the average arsenal fan was praying for to happen in that few minutes?

You think I and my friends was seated that day hoping and praying for us to score Man city two goals just so that we'll win the match?


Abeg no make me laugh with this your funny takes this night. You're more than that biko


NB: There are many examples of Matches teams play just to participate in penalties.

Example, England Vs Nigeria just ystdy is a very very good example. Everyone who watched that ball knows fully well that the England team was just playing to participate in penalties in order for them to win that game.

Stop thinking football in black and white. In fact, football is the last thing to think it such!

Jodera:
Lol... You're just evading the question sha. You're so smart with that and it was expected

A goal gave you a platform to win a game through Penalties.

Whether the team uses that platform judiciously or not is another discourse entirely.

As long as that goal provides that platform, It's never ever inconsequential.

Maybe the word "inconsequential" have a new meaning that I'm oblivious to

So City were playing to get to penalties?

Jodera:
Lol, and who told you this misconception again??

When Arteta was bringing in Trossard, Nketiah and Smith Rowe, what do you think the plan was especially as time was running out, knowing fully well there's no extra time?

What do you think the average arsenal fan was praying for to happen in that few minutes?

You think I and my friends was seated that day hoping and praying for us to score Man city two goals just so that we'll win the match?


Abeg no make me laugh with this your funny takes this night. You're more than that biko

Ok, Arteta was making subs so that he could get to penalties to lose? Trossard's goal was consequential because Arsenal won. So his goal helped Arsenal achieve her objective. If you got to the penalties and still lost to City, the goal would have been inconsequential.

It is not that hard.

How don't you get it?

Jodera:
I did not say you dragged Palmer and I never insinuated so

Palmer have created the platform for Man city to win through penalty shootout (since it wasn't enough through normal time).

It's up to the penalty takers to do their job which fortunately for us, Kdb and Rodri didn't do theirs.

How then does that make Palmer's goal inconsequential?

Palmer's goal would have been the DECIDER had we won 1-0. It would have been consequential if we won the PK shootout.

As long as City did not win the game, we did not achieve our objective thus the goal Palmer scored was inconsequential.

Jodera:
Lol, and who told you this misconception again??

When Arteta was bringing in Trossard, Nketiah and Smith Rowe, what do you think the plan was especially as time was running out, knowing fully well there's no extra time?

What do you think the average arsenal fan was praying for to happen in that few minutes?

You think I and my friends was seated that day hoping and praying for us to score Man city two goals just so that we'll win the match?


Abeg no make me laugh with this your funny takes this night. You're more than that biko


NB: There are many examples of Matches teams play just to participate in penalties.

Example, England Vs Nigeria just ystdy is a very very good example. Everyone who watched that ball knows fully well that the England team was just playing to participate in penalties in order for them to win that game.

Stop thinking football in black and white. In fact, football is the last thing to think it such!

England played to win.

Android17:
So City were playing to get to penalties?

City wasn't playing to get to penalties but getting to penalties is not the worst result if you can't win in match in normal time.

And that's what Palmer's goal ensured it did

Android17:
England played to win.

Just say you did not watch the ball, especially after the red card

Jodera:
City wasn't playing to get to penalties but getting to penalties is not the worst result if you can't win in match in normal time.

And that's what Palmer's goal ensured it did

No it did not ensure it. Trossard's goal ensured it.

Nobody is talking about worst result. City played to win.

Android17:
Ok, Arteta was making subs so that he could get to penalties to lose? Trossard's goal was consequential because Arsenal won. So his goal helped Arsenal achieve her objective. If you got to the penalties and still lost to City, the goal would have been inconsequential.

It is not that hard.

How don't you get it?

when he made those subs in the dying minutes

Did Arteta play to get to penalties or not? Yes or No

Did Trossard goal get us to penalties? Yes or No

You can keep beating around the bush when the answer is staring at you

Jodera:
Just say you did not watch the ball, especially after the red card

England played to win. If they did not, they could have walked off the pitch as soon as it was time for the shoot outs. LOL.

Android17:
No it did not ensure it. Trossard's goal ensured it.

Nobody is talking about worst result. City played to win.

So City can't win through penalty?

Is penalty not another platform for winning?

Jodera:
when he made those subs in the dying minutes

Did Arteta play to get to penalties or not? Yes or No

Did Trossard goal get us to penalties? Yes or No

You can keep beating around the bush when the answer is staring at you

Sorry but your argument is just getting silly at this point.

So Arteta wanted to get to penalties just to get to penalties?

Jodera:
So City can't win through penalty?

Is penalty not another platform for winning?

Since it is a means to an end but not an end itself can you see that you have been arguing for nothing?

Android17:
England played to win. If they did not, they could have walked off the pitch as soon as it was time for the shoot outs. LOL.

Lol... This is childish talk na


So one can't win through penalty or what?


England knows it'll be difficult to win Nigeria through regulation time. Why would they walk out when the best bet to win Nigeria is through Penalties?

Jodera:
Lol... This is childish talk na


So one can't win through penalty or what?


England knows it'll be difficult to win Nigeria through regulation time. Why would they walk out when the best bet to win Nigeria is through Penalties?

You have answered yourself.

Ibime off mic 🎤 sir

Jodera:
So City can't win through penalty?

Is penalty not another platform for winning?

See it again. Just incase it walked by you.