₦airaland Forum

onyeomaonyeoma:
CHELSEA this week defines the meaning of transportation.

When WOLVES Scored their first GOAL against TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR, CHELSEA moved from 10th to 11th.

TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR equalise.... CHELSEA moved from 11th to 10th.

WOLVES Scored their second GOAL.... CHELSEA moved from 10th to 11th.

When MANCHESTER CITY Vs CHELSEA started.... CHELSEA moved from 11th back to 10th position.

First half, STERLING Scored..... CHELSEA moved from 10th to 8th position.

Second half, RODRI Scored for MANCHESTER CITY, CHELSEA moved from 8th back to 10th position.

CHELSEA become the first Club to change position 6 times in a day.... Unreal record 🔥.

⛳ After moving from one place to another they still ended in their normal position which is 10😂😂😂.

drisham:
Popizaino and all other please I'd really appreciate your help 🙏🙏

patrickmuf:
E no go tey before una resume the attack vs defence argument.

timbros:
All this jargon you type would have made a tiny little bit of sense if Conte didn't use 3CB to win the league or if Tuchel didn't use 3CB to win UCL, conceding just 4 goals all campaign.

A40:

The gulf in Trent's offensive abilities is wider than what Reece James has over him on defense. Just good old homerism

Trevor012:
Left strikeback 😂😂

timbros:
Both of you are very foolish if you don't accept that both attack and defence have specific role to play in the football pitch. Balancing those roles form a perfect team.

If both play their roles correctly, the team win matches consistently. A balanced team score goals and is water tight in defence.

You guys are shameless to even think of mentioning me in a match where we are on course to win (attack played their role) but a porous defence conceded late in the game to deny us all 3 points. Even more shameless is the fact that both of you forgot that Timbros is existing when we were scoring 6 goals in 2 matches. Where were you guys when we were conceding 8 goals in 2 matches?

I can forgive Popizaino if he doesn't understand what a balanced team in football term means because he is a French speaking Ivorien, but Airmark? It is a big shame that through all your years of sojourn in the white man's country, you still find it hard to understand the term balance in football dictionary... Oh damn, I forgot, Canada is a French speaking country too.

Make both of una getat.

timbros:
The point is, MOTM is an individual award which is different from the entire team result. Disasi winning MOTM doesn't cancel the fact that Chelsea defence conceded the goal that denied us the 3 points.

A 'keeper conceded 10 goals and still won MOTM. What are you on about?

Why did you mention me?

Greatihex:
You used to be sensible with your posts before. What happened? Is it agenda?

Khayceeofficial:
Haaland roasted colwill yesterday
If he had his firing boots on, we probably would have been talking bout how trash of a defender colwill really is

Jackson needs to learn to hit a football still. If I was poch I would make this his primary learning since he joined.
Hit a ball well so even if trash goalkeeper manage save your 1v1's, make them carry wound for body at least

This guy really could have been at the top of the goal charts if he hadn't miscued so many chances.

With those misses yesterday, that draw really felt like a loss

onyeomaonyeoma:
CHELSEA this week defines the meaning of transportation.

When WOLVES Scored their first GOAL against TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR, CHELSEA moved from 10th to 11th.

TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR equalise.... CHELSEA moved from 11th to 10th.

WOLVES Scored their second GOAL.... CHELSEA moved from 10th to 11th.

When MANCHESTER CITY Vs CHELSEA started.... CHELSEA moved from 11th back to 10th position.

First half, STERLING Scored..... CHELSEA moved from 10th to 8th position.

Second half, RODRI Scored for MANCHESTER CITY, CHELSEA moved from 8th back to 10th position.

CHELSEA become the first Club to change position 6 times in a day.... Unreal record 🔥.

⛳ After moving from one place to another they still ended in their normal position which is 10😂😂😂.

FBS:
Citeh wey we suppose pummel like say them owe boli money.

10th yesterday, 10th today, 10th tomorrow.

True definition of a mid table team.

nonsense.

Anyway na the final dey sup now. Not sure what the excuse will be not to win it.

timbros:
Which agenda exactly?

Do you also agree that Chelsea's defence is very okay, that we shouldn't work on it and focus only on improving attack?

Airmark feels that Disasi winning MOTM is an indication that our defence did okay. Forgetting that MOTM award is a personal thing. Disasi had a great game and he was duly recognised for that. However Chelsea as a team failed to win the game because the defence conceded a late goal. Where is the agenda there?

It is this same Man City that we scored only one goal against and won UCL. Was our attack of Werner, Havertz and Mount the best attack in Europe then? Why did we win the match? Water tight defence. Simple.

Individual award is very different from team result. That is why I made reference to the 'keeper who conceded 10 goals but won MOTM award. If you are a fan of that club, will you be happy that your' keeper won MOTM award or will you be angry that your team lost 10-1?

I was on my own jejely when Airmark, with his scratching fingers, mentioned me. And now you are insinuating that I carry agenda.

If you guys think that attack is our only issue, then do well to advice Poch to field 11 attackers and bench all our defenders. Playing 11 attackers will increase our chances of scoring more goals.

A001:
I don't know how a Chelsea fan go watch yesterday's match and say that we need more defenders when it's so glaring we lack quality in our attack. The attack is what needs to be improved urgently with a proven striker like Osimhen.

Lack of clinical attackers is our pressing problem this season, is why Chelsea is currently a mid-table team.

Leyqute:
.

timbros:
Which agenda exactly?

Do you also agree that Chelsea's defence is very okay, that we shouldn't work on it and focus only on improving attack?

Airmark feels that Disasi winning MOTM is an indication that our defence did okay. Forgetting that MOTM award is a personal thing. Disasi had a great game and he was duly recognised for that. However Chelsea as a team failed to win the game because the defence conceded a late goal. Where is the agenda there?

It is this same Man City that we scored only one goal against and won UCL. Was our attack of Werner, Havertz and Mount the best attack in Europe then? Why did we win the match? Water tight defence. Simple.

Individual award is very different from team result. That is why I made reference to the 'keeper who conceded 10 goals but won MOTM award. If you are a fan of that club, will you be happy that your' keeper won MOTM award or will you be angry that your team lost 10-1?

I was on my own jejely when Airmark, with his scratching fingers, mentioned me. And now you are insinuating that I carry agenda.

If you guys think that attack is our only issue, then do well to advice Poch to field 11 attackers and bench all our defenders. Playing 11 attackers will increase our chances of scoring more goals.

AdisaOwala:
The bolded reeks of agenda because it appears you are deliberately ignoring all those golden opportunities your forwards missed yesterday...

It's an open secret that most sides would almost always be on the backdoor vs a typical Guardiola team playing at home - Possession, goal scoring opportunities etc would always be few and far in between. Bearing this in mind, profligacy in front of goal is literally an unforgivable offence - you simply cannot afford to be missing chances like we saw yesterday.

For the records, the Chelsea defence did well last night.

Leyqute:
To be fair to Timbros, he wasn't harping on defensive improvements alone. He advocated for a balanced team.
Good defense PLUS good attack wins games.

Yesterday, your attackers did you in. Against Wolves, the defense was crap because you scored 2 and conceded 4. If you called for defensive reinforcements after yesterday's game, you'd look like a fool. And if you harped on more attacking in the Wolves game or any other game where you scored more than 3 goals but still drew or lost, you'd be wrong too.

Personally, I think the argument isn't really about logic, reality, sense or even Chelsea. It's mostly about bruised egos and the offended demanding their own pound of flesh.

AdisaOwala:
The bolded reeks of agenda because it appears you are deliberately ignoring all those golden opportunities your forwards missed yesterday...

It's an open secret that most sides would almost always be on the backdoor vs a typical Guardiola team playing at home - Possession, goal scoring opportunities etc would always be few and far in between. Bearing this in mind, profligacy in front of goal is literally an unforgivable offence - you simply cannot afford to be missing chances like we saw yesterday.

For the records, the Chelsea defence did well last night.

Ballzproblem2:
last good James performance was against vini the first time they met,vini cooked him in our last champions league campaign

airmark:
Sorry to ask, are you blind in real life?

Did you mean Haaland and Debruyne played full 90 minutes against us in that Ucl final?

Stop embarrassing yourself Mr. Man. Rest.

airmark:
Timbros didn't watch the match, don't stress yourself.

Leyqute:
To be fair to Timbros, he wasn't harping on defensive improvements alone. He advocated for a balanced team.

Good defense PLUS good attack wins games.

Yesterday, your attackers did you in. Against Wolves, the defense was crap because you scored 2 and conceded 4. If you called for defensive reinforcements after yesterday's game, you'd look like a fool. And if you harped on more attacking in the Wolves game or any other game where you scored more than 3 goals but still drew or lost, you'd be wrong too.

Personally, I think the argument isn't really about logic, reality, sense or even Chelsea. It's mostly about bruised egos and the offended demanding their own pound of flesh.

timbros:
I should be asking you if you are blind in real life too...

Did you mean Thiago Silva, our best defender, played full 90 minutes against Man City in that UCL final?

Continue embarrassing yourself.

timbros:
It is possible to have won the game 1-0?

timbros:
Where were you when this same set of defenders was drinking 4 goals per match back to back few weeks ago?

Shebi you will remember my moniker exist when Disasi play well and win MOTM but you will melt away when the same defence concede 4 goals per match.