₦airaland Forum

Arsenal fans just dey explain explain explain

Kimbeast:
This is the reason I said you Arsenal fans are just being defensive for no reason. To us neutrals the Koko is an attacking game of football which we didn't get thanks to Arteta Cowardice. The game was a borefest. No one said you shouldn't be happy with your point so don't tell us not to be disappointed with that eyesore.

Okayy, then I will tell you for free.

Anytime you see arsenal Vs Man City (at least under Guardiola), don't bother watching cos it'll always be a borefest.

Community shield and First leg should give you that hint. Us winning teams 4 and 5 Nils won't change that

Free advice so that next time you won't be disappointed

Amigoss:
Arsenal fans just dey explain explain explain

Just dey explain nonsense. One said they got more shots on target despite creating 0 clear cut chances to City two 😂😂

Realtord43:
That match was one of the most exciting and interesting match you could ever see in the premier League this season


Arsenal today came to steal just ONE point

And steal we did.

Thank youuu

Kimbeast:
This is the reason I said you Arsenal fans are just being defensive for no reason. To us neutrals the Koko is an attacking game of football which we didn't get thanks to Arteta Cowardice. The game was a borefest. No one said you shouldn't be happy with your point so don't tell us not to be disappointed with that eyesore.

Arteta won the 2020 FA cup playing a 5 man defence against cheslea . U clearly don't know Arteta can play ultra defence and ultra defence spending on the quality of players at his disposal , quality of his opponent ,response to his opponent's tactics and the prestige at stake .

For a long time arsenal just won 2 and drew 1 out of 3 consecutive games against city . U may not see the bigger picture from where I stand but Arteta does and that's all that matter . All those cap about cowardice rest and abide with thee

popizaino:
Games like this are bound to happen especially when the season is about to end. It is why we have Aguero moments in the game. It happened to you guys in the last couple of seasons and i can't remember who came to your rescue and no one blamed your defense.

I never remembered any match that happened like this against us last season and I would be too livid if it happens against us either last season or this season

I know this attack and defence argument is heating up but on Ystdy game timbr.os is right.

Burnley have the worst attack in the league, they're down to 10men by 45 mins and you guys led twice. There's no way in hell defence shouldn't be held responsible.

That's just ridiculous!!

Jodera:
Okayy, then I will tell you for free.

Anytime you see arsenal Vs Man City (at least under Guardiola), don't bother watching cos it'll always be a borefest.

Community shield and First leg should give you that hint. Us winning teams 4 and 5 Nils won't change that

Free advice so that next time you won't be disappointed

You don't need to lie just to defend Arteta tactics today.


All your matches last season was interesting. The community shield and the reverse fixture was also good because Arsenal didn't respect city and went for it unlike today.

Community shield: possession was 55% to city and 45% to Arsenal. Passes were 590 to City and 485 to Arsenal.

First leg: Possession was 49% to Arsenal and 51% to City. Passes were 500 to Arsenal and 521 to city.

Today fixture: Possession was 73% to City and 27% to Arsenal. Passes were 700 to City and 265 to Arsenal.

That says it all. Be happy with your point but don't act like Arteta didn't change his whole approach for today fixture.

Bombblacks:
They already have a player who is as talented as Palmer in Oscar bobb but Pep doesn't trust him like he didn't trust Palmer.

Doku is bang average
He lacks the basics and IMO cost city a certain goal today
His signing is pointless

Kimbeast:
You don't need to lie just to defend Arteta tactics today.


All your matches last season was interesting. The community shield and the reverse fixture was also good because Arsenal didn't respect city and went for it unlike today.

Community shield: possession was 55% to city and 45% to Arsenal. Passes were 590 to City and 485 to Arsenal.

First leg: Possession was 49% to Arsenal and 51% to City. Passes were 500 to Arsenal and 521 to city.

Today fixture: Possession was 73% to City and 27% to Arsenal. Passes were 700 to City and 265 to Arsenal.

That says it all.

What is the ish really?
Is it that the game is boring or that arsenal possession was low?

Cos if it's that the game that's boring you're arguing for, I can bring you receipts of posters here who claimed that the first leg was really boring even though we won


And it's only Naivety that will make you think that we'll go to Etihad and take the game to them.
Well, you're neutral, you don't care about the specifics. It's not your fault

Kimbeast:
You don't need to lie just to defend Arteta tactics today.


All your matches last season was interesting. The community shield and the reverse fixture was also good because Arsenal didn't respect city and went for it unlike today.

Community shield: possession was 55% to city and 45% to Arsenal. Passes were 590 to City and 485 to Arsenal.

First leg: Possession was 49% to Arsenal and 51% to City. Passes were 500 to Arsenal and 521 to city.

Today fixture: Possession was 73% to City and 27% to Arsenal. Passes were 700 to City and 265 to Arsenal.

That says it all. Be happy with your point but don't act like Arteta didn't change his whole approach for today fixture.

This is Arsenal vs Man city FA cup 2020

U obviously don't know Arteta enough . U can obviously see the passes and possession Abi ?

Some of u ehn, na only chelsea match una dey watch and one or two star matches .

As far as I'm concerned , Arteta only resorted to a tactic that has earned him a victory against Pep in the past . No more , no less

BlueRayDick:
This is Arsenal vs Man city FA cup 2020

U obviously don't know Arteta enough . U can obviously see the passes and possession Abi ?

Some of u ehn, na only chelsea match una dey watch and one or two star matches

What does a match from Arteta first or 2nd season has do do with anything? How is that related to the discussion.

Jodera:
I never remembered any match that happened like this against us last season and I would be too livid if it happens against us either last season or this season

I know this attack and defence argument is heating up but on Ystdy game timbr.os is right.

Burnley have the worst attack in the league, they're down to 10men by 45 mins and you guys led twice. There's no way in hell defence shouldn't be held responsible.

That's just ridiculous!!

Did Mancini set up man city to concede against QPR in 2012? This is a team with similar or worse attack than this present Burnley but what was the final score?

Van Persie's first hattrick with man united,did SAF set his team to concede first against newly promoted Southampton or so?

I don't want to dig deeper but this is not the first time that weaker teams might surprised the big team to score out of no where until there is a certain moments of brilliant from the big team to take the win.

Jodera:
What is the ish really?
Is it that the game is boring or that arsenal possession was low?

Cos if it's that the game that's boring you're arguing for, I can bring you receipts of posters here who claimed that the first leg was really boring even though we won


And it's only Naivety that will make you think that we'll go to Etihad and take the game to them.
Well, you're neutral, you don't care about the specifics. It's not your fault

You went to Anfield this season and took the game to Liverpool and that's a scarier ground than Etihad.

The first leg was 10 times better than what Arsenal served today. Arteta set up today was cowardly which made the game boring.

Kimbeast:
What does a match from Arteta first or 2nd season has do do with anything? How is that related to the discussion.

So it's no longer cowardice but the number of Eason he's spent as coach Abi ? We are getting somewhere .

Arteta over the years has deployed different strategies to get the better of Pep but he's not been succesful thus far. Today he went back to the drawing board and he's able to hold Pep's free scoring team to a stalemate but u are here weeping on his behalf.

We will gladly take his cowardice that's produce 4 out of possible 6 points for us this season . Stop crying more than the bereaved. If e easy , do am!

popizaino:
Did Mancini set up man city to concede against QPR in 2012? This is a team with similar or worse attack than this present Burnley but what was the final score?

Van Persie's first hattrick with man united,did SAF set his team to concede first against newly promoted Southampton or so?

I don't want to dig deeper but this is not the first time that weaker teams might surprised the big team to score out of no where until there is a certain moments of brilliant from the big team to take the win.

Which of these examples you gave whereby a top team was pegged back TWICE by the smaller club?

Small team can score from nowhere, it happens; it's football. But pegged back TWICE against one of the weakest attack in the league with over 45min of play..??

I will be glad if you show me an example.

BlueRayDick:


So it's no longer cowardice but the number of Eason he's spent as coach Abi ? We are getting somewhere .

Arteta over the years has deployed different strategies to get the better of Pep but he's not been succesful thus far. Today he went back to the drawing board and he's able to hold Pep's free scoring team to a stalemate but u are here weeping on his behalf.

We will gladly take his cowardice that's produce 4 out of possible 6 points for us this season . Stop crying more than the bereaved. If e easy , do am!

What a funny post. Dropping my observation on a match I watched has turned to weeping because it involves your team? You better stop going to other clubs thread if people dropping their observation pains you that much. I am in my club thread not yours.

You have even admitted Arteta changed his approach and set up from the Arsenal we have seen over the last two seasons for today game which was what I said. He didn't trust his team to deliver with their usual attacking set up so decided to go ultra defensive.

Kimbeast:
What a funny post. Dropping my observation on a match I watched has turned to weeping because it involves your team? You better stop going to other clubs thread if people dropping their observation pains you that much. I am in my club thread not yours.

You have even admitted Arteta changed his approach and set up from the Arsenal we have seen over the last two seasons for today game which was what I said. He didn't trust his team to deliver with their usual set up so decided to go ultra defensive.

The joke is on u to think Arteta started playing Pep 2 seasons ago.

Somebody that whipped Pep on the way to win 2020 FA cup against ur team in the final is who u think should play to the whims of an unknown kimbeast just to prove he's a king Kong against a man he knows how intelligent he is tactically?

Just dey play!

Kimbeast:
You went to Anfield this season and took the game to Liverpool and that's a scarier ground than Etihad.

The first leg was 10 times better than what Arsenal served today. Arteta set up today was cowardly which made the game boring.

The first leg was 10x better but it was still boring!!!!!
Man City without Kdb and Rodri and you think we won't take the game to them at our home?
That there would have been the definition of cowardice.


Second leg have Rodri and Kdb in midfield and you want us to play our game at Etihad without watching our backs?

Na you try pass

NB: Anfield or no anfield, a Midfield of endo, Jones and Szobo, while an attack of Gakpo and Diaz, there's no way we won't take the game yi them. Can't compare it to Kdb, Rodri, Silva and Haaland one bit

BlueRayDick:
The joke is on u to think Arteta started playing Pep 2 seasons ago.

Somebody that whipped Pep on the way to win 2020 FA cup against ur team in the final is who u think should play to the whims of an unknown kimbeast just to prove he's a king Kong against a man he knows how intelligent he is tactically?

Just dey play!

When you realize you are typing out of point let me know.

Jodera:
The first leg was 10x better but it was still boring!!!!!
Man City without Kdb and Rodri and you think we won't take the game to them at our home?
That there would have been the definition of cowardice.


Second leg have Rodri and Kdb in midfield and you want us to play our game at Etihad without watching our backs?

Na you try pass

NB: Anfield or no anfield, a Midfield of endo, Jones and Szobo, while an attack of Gakpo and Diaz, there's no way we won't take the game yi them. Can't compare it to Kdb, Rodri, Silva and Haaland one bit

You are even admitting what have been saying. You went ultra defensive because Arteta didn't trust his team to go head to head with City at the Etihad unlike in previous matches last season and earlier this season when Arsenal took the game to them.

Kimbeast:
You are even admitting what have been saying. You went ultra defensive because Arteta didn't trust his team to go head to head with City at the Etihad unlike in previous matches last season and earlier this season when Arsenal took the game to them.

Yeah... I've already admitted since but I was telling you WHY.

You're ignoring the specifics while calling Arteta coward which is what I'm against

Jodera:
Which of these examples you gave whereby a top team was pegged back TWICE by the smaller club?

Small team can score from nowhere, it happens; it's football. But pegged back TWICE against one of the weakest attack in the league with over 45min of play..??

I will be glad if you show me an example.

You are not being honest with yourself asking me this question after all the examples i gave you.

popizaino:
You are not being honest with yourself asking me this question after all the examples i gave you.

Against Qpr : Man City was leading, Equalised.
Got a red card then scored a goal. Man City equalised back and one.
Man City wasn't pegged back TWICE even after a red card

Against Southampton: Man U led twice and didn't lose it. Moreover there's no red card


You don't seem to understand.

A top team been pegged back by a minnow who's one man down twice is just Ridiculous!!!!

There's no painting it. Even top teams with one Man down do win small teams sef how much more if it's the reverse

Jodera:
Against Qpr : Man City was leading, Equalised.
Got a red card then scored a goal. Man City equalised back and one.
Man City wasn't pegged back TWICE even after a red card

Against Southampton: Man U led twice and didn't lose it. Moreover there's no red card


You don't seem to understand.

A top team been pegged back by a minnow who's one man down twice is just Ridiculous!!!!

There's no painting it. Even top teams with one Man down do win small teams sef how much more if it's the reverse

You can spilt hairs the way you want. The matter here is a top team and a weaker team and conceding more than one goal.

Did the top team concede more than a goal? Yes
Where they able to come back and win? Yes.

Did Chelsea concede more than a goal? Yes
Was Chelsea able to win? No.

Your answer lies in the reason why Chelsea was not able to win like other top team.

popizaino:
You can spilt hairs the way you want. The matter here is a top team and a weaker team and conceding more than one goal.

Did the top team concede more than a goal? Yes
Where they able to come back and win? Yes.

Did Chelsea concede more than a goal? Yes
Was Chelsea able to win? No.

Your answer lies in the reason why Chelsea was not able to win like other top team.

I wasn't going this path with you.
The part you quoted which I emphasized on is how ridiculous for Chelsea to be pegged back twice by a 10-men worst attack team in the division.

Any top team would never do that without the defence being criticized and that's to tell you how bad your defence Is ystdy.

For those who want to make it seems it hasn't happened before conceding ridiculous number of goals by a big team to a weaker team here is your evidence. Thank God is about the same time.



31st March 2012.

Table topper man city conceded 3goals against Sunderland battling delegations and still won the league in the same season. What do you have to say @timbros

Popizaino, Watkins missed a big chance ystdy when they were up 1-0.

Yet they still won the match 2-0 and nobody is talking about Watkins miss. If their defence had stupidly caused goal now, we'll start hearing about how that first half miss by Watkins caused let them draw or lose.


You team can't be scoring 2 goals per match (and you guys led in all occasions) and you'll be blaming Attack. Sorry, I don't buy that.

Why the attack isn't that good, but two goals per match is very enough to take you guys up from the trenches.

You can blame attack all you want but that defence needs to be looked at presently. It's a low down ridiculous!!!

popizaino:
For those who want to make it seems it hasn't happened before conceding ridiculous number of goals by a big team to a weaker team here is your evidence. Thank God is about the same time.



31st March 2012.

Table topper man city conceded 3goals against Sunderland battling delegations and still won the league in the same season. What do you have to say @timbros

How many times did it happen frequently to city that season?
This to me is an outlier

Bring me 5 of this (or equivalent scoreline) against Man City that season and you'll have a good point.

City that season was keeping some good clean sheets . Lol

Guess why Man city won the league in 2012 despite finishing on the same point as second place Man urinated and conceding more goals than the red devils?

Guess why Chelsea would still have comfortably won the league 2010 even if the FA decides to dash Man urinated one point even though we conceded more goals than them?


@Timbros can you come and answer and repeat them to your disciples.

Jodera:
Popizaino, Watkins missed a big chance ystdy when they were up 1-0.

Yet they still won the match 2-0 and nobody is talking about Watkins miss. If their defence had stupidly caused goal now, we'll start hearing about how that first half miss by Watkins caused let them draw or lose.


You team can't be scoring 2 goals per match (and you guys led in all occasions) and you'll be blaming Attack. Sorry, I don't buy that.

Why the attack isn't that good, but two goals per match is very enough to take you guys up from the trenches.

You can blame attack all you want but that defence needs to be looked at presently. It's a low down ridiculous!!!

Now we are getting somewhere.


Which of the goals conceded by Chelsea yesterday was caused by any of our defenders?

Jodera:
How many times did it happen frequently to city that season?
This to me is an outlier

Bring me 5 of this (or equivalent scoreline) against Man City that season and you'll have a good point.

City that season was keeping some good clean sheets . Lol

Even if i give you 5,you will still ask for 15. So no need.

it's time Chelsea fans realize that Chelsea is not that much a scoring team but a defensive team like inter Milan in Seria A and that's why most of our trophies and success has been linked to a good defense like ucl 2021.

So a situation whereby we score and let's in goals then coming back to win such games becomes difficult.

This is are facts so jodera is right