Jodera:
Popizaino, Watkins missed a big chance ystdy when they were up 1-0.

Yet they still won the match 2-0 and nobody is talking about Watkins miss. If their defence had stupidly caused goal now, we'll start hearing about how that first half miss by Watkins caused let them draw or lose.


You team can't be scoring 2 goals per match (and you guys led in all occasions) and you'll be blaming Attack. Sorry, I don't buy that.

Why the attack isn't that good, but two goals per match is very enough to take you guys up from the trenches.

You can blame attack all you want but that defence needs to be looked at presently. It's a low down ridiculous!!!

The emboldened are facts

oliverano:
Halaand without service is Alexander Sorloth. Those comparing him to Mbape are just looking for another Ronaldo Vs Messi rivalry. They're not close....Mbape clear.

Meanwhile, A40, you said that we made a mistake by allowing Pep to get his hands on Djokoo. This guy isn't better than Stanley Okoro if you watch him closely. May be it's the first season syndrome under Pep, we're watching.

E better pass that una Mudryk abi Mushryk sha

raumdeuter:

Chelsea conceded 5 goals to City home and away
While Arsenal conceded how much to City home and away? 0

Chelsea scored 5 vs City home and away and got 2 points

Arsenal scored 1 va City home and away and got 4 points

Chelsea seriously need reinforcement in the defensive department.

A40:
E better pass that una Mudryk abi Mushryk sha

After cooking 40 year old Milner, he was labelled the perfect Hazard replacement. Street will never forget the comments made about Mushryk after that game.

raumdeuter:


You shouldn't be conceding vs 10men but your useless defence conceded not 1 but 2

Who else wants to argue that defense is a bigger problem for Chelsea than attack

Caicedobets:
In retrospect city made a big mistake selling palmer
Boy is far better than Doku

I don’t think it’s even in retrospect. Palmer to me was always the bigger talent. I believe Pep just needed another right footed LW in addition to Grealish, and Doku was suitable.
With Foden and Bernardo Silva still available there were not enough minutes on that RW to give to Palmer.

popizaino:



Now we are getting somewhere.


Which of the goals conceded by Chelsea yesterday was caused by any of our defenders?

Not closing down Cullen early enough for the first goal.

While the second goal, that's just pure defence ish. No coordination.

The first one, I can give it a pass because it happens, the strike was good, but No way in hell should that second goal have happened with one Man down

popizaino:



Even if i give you 5,you will still ask for 15. So no need.

You're just running.
5 is a good number and it also goes to show it's not an outlier.

Man City can never be champions by that kinda scoreline frequently. Never!!!

Like Timb.ros says, you guys needs balance and I agree with him.

An attack scoring two goals per match is an okay attack(whereby the goals are always leading goals)

A defence conceding two goals per match is a bad defence. No sugar coating.

You guys are lacking balance.

The difference between Man U and you guys is just coordinated defence with respect to matches. Man u might play nonsense, yet win 1-0 or 2-1 against all these small teams, Una go do the same yet concede two goals per match occasionally. How Una no go dey 11th?

Even present Man city have won matches 1-0 twice abi thrice in a row. They're not waiting to concede just so to outscore their opponents reason they have one of the best defences in the league. If not, we for dey hear how Haaland big chances missed have been affecting them.

Tell me how Barca won their league last season. Na so so 1-0, 2-0


Balance!, balance!! balance!!!

Vischy:


The emboldened are facts

It's just pure facts.

Nobody is saying the attack is good but give someone like Everton Two goals per match frequently and see if they'll not be higher up the table.

Luton for all their attacking verve and goals are stuck in relegation fight because of their defence.
Na so everyone dey clap for Leeds under bielsa that year . We clap sotey we dey clap dem enter relegation

afrodoc2:


I don’t think it’s even in retrospect. Palmer to me was always the bigger talent. I believe Pep just needed another right footed LW in addition to Grealish, and Doku was suitable.
With Foden and Bernardo Silva still available there were not enough minutes on that RW to give to Palmer.

The mistake was selling palmer.
Pep could have moved bernado to Central midfield and allowed Palmer to rotate with foden on the right wing or even moved foden to the left
Doku is a downgrade to that City attack

popizaino:


Lol.


Don't project yourself on me. I will never lie to win an argument. If am not conversant with the topic,i simply look away.

Am I fixated only on defence as you claim?

popizaino:


Not scoring goal will not win you game.


Why is any of our defenders not topping error leading to goal?

Just know when to keep shut.

What is this?

popizaino:


Repeat this for timbros,it seems he doesn't hear at once.

Let me ask you like I asked him, why conceding in the first place against a 10 man Burnley, one of the worst attack in the league?

Wetin concern comeback in that match? Shebi I gave you assignment to go and watch it again before we engage in any discussion? Was there any need of Chelsea comeback in that match?

popizaino:


You can concede under any circumstances against any team,what shows your strength as a big team is the ability to always come back in rare scenarios like this. Don't let agenda get the better of you.

So it is okay for your team to concede twice against the worst attack in the league gone one man down. Very okay. Normal thing.

But it's a sacrilege for your attack to not score 3 or more goals to win that team. Rubbish attack.

Continue.

airmark:


This is exactly what Timbros have sworn not to understand.

Stop mentioning me unnecessarily.

This was you mocking me for calling for balance in the team.

Did you just wake up? I thought its "just fix attack. Period"?

Kimbeast:

This is the reason I said you Arsenal fans are just being defensive for no reason. To us neutrals the Koko is an attacking game of football which we didn't get thanks to Arteta Cowardice. The game was a borefest. No one said you shouldn't be happy with your point so don't tell us not to be disappointed with that eyesore.

As a Chelsea fan who supported Mourinho during our glory days, you shouldn't be saying this.

popizaino:
For those who want to make it seems it hasn't happened before conceding ridiculous number of goals by a big team to a weaker team here is your evidence. Thank God is about the same time.



31st March 2012.

Table topper man city conceded 3goals against Sunderland battling delegations and still won the league in the same season. What do you have to say @timbros

I didn't see very well the Sunderland player that got red card in the first half of that match... Can you please remind me? Or repost the screenshot very well and capture that important part of the game. I'm waiting.

You and airmark is so shameless that you dig all the way back to 2012 for any straw that you can clutch on... I got married in 2012. I have 2 daughters 10 and 5...... Can you see how ridiculous your take is?

Thank God Jodera have seen the light. You are doing well.

Shame on Popizaino that an Arsenal fan will school him on his own team.

Caicedobets:
the magnitude of the mistake will be clear next season
Palmer would have been a suitable deputy for bernado on that right wing

He has everything Doku doesn't from passing to finishing to ball control
Next season will tell all better

Palmer is at your club ,enjoy him

E no fit affect man city ,he is not a kdb Rodri or a Haaland ,dem no send am

Even the great aguero leaving no affect them ,salvinho has already been signed for next season

timbros:
Thank God Jodera have seen the light. You are doing well.

Shame on Popizaino that an Arsenal fan will school him on his own team.

It's so clear.
Even Palmer was disappointed. He talked about consistency, I have a feeling he's talking about the defence cos it's really annoying

oliverano:




After cooking 40 year old Milner, he was labelled the perfect Hazard replacement. Street will never forget the comments made about Mushryk after that game.

He has no football brain. At least with Doku he will cook the Burnleys, Bournemouths and Palaces.

Mushryk is not good against any team

Jodera:

You're just running.
5 is a good number and it also goes to show it's not an outlier.

Man City can never be champions by that kinda scoreline frequently. Never!!!

Like Timb.ros says, you guys needs balance and I agree with him.

An attack scoring two goals per match is an okay attack(whereby the goals are always leading goals)

A defence conceding two goals per match is a bad defence. No sugar coating.

You guys are lacking balance.

The difference between Man U and you guys is just coordinated defence with respect to matches. Man u might play nonsense, yet win 1-0 or 2-1 against all these small teams, Una go do the same yet concede two goals per match occasionally. How Una no go dey 11th?

Even present Man city have won matches 1-0 twice abi thrice in a row. They're not waiting to concede just so to outscore their opponents reason they have one of the best defences in the league. If not, we for dey hear how Haaland big chances missed have been affecting them.

Tell me how Barca won their league last season. Na so so 1-0, 2-0


Balance!, balance!! balance!!!

Tell me the season they conceded 2 against QPR to later win? You know that of Sunderland was an outlier.

timbros:


Just know when to keep shut.

What is this?

Maybe if only you can accept your L,i will learn to keep shut.

timbros:


Let me ask you like I asked him, why conceding in the first place against a 10 man Burnley, one of the worst attack in the league?

Wetin concern comeback in that match? Shebi I gave you assignment to go and watch it again before we engage in any discussion? Was there any need of Chelsea comeback in that match?

Let me also ask you questions why can't Chelsea score more than 2goals against lowly 10men Burnley.

The day you realise that in football sometimes the unthinkable can happen like how we conceded to Burnley, how table topper man city in 2012 suddenly were fighting for their lives on the last day to QPR,like how this same man city will concede 3 goals to Sunderland at the etihad the better for you.

The best player in premier league history

popizaino:



Tell me the season they conceded 2 against QPR to later win? You know that of Sunderland was an outlier.

Shebi we settled that one initially.

I asked you to show me 5 results of such (or equivalent) scoreline that city played a high scoring match against midtable teams that season.

Just 5 out of 38 matches shouldn't be much for you

timbros:


So it is okay for your team to concede twice against the worst attack in the league gone one man down. Very okay. Normal thing.

But it's a sacrilege for your attack to not score 3 or more goals to win that team. Rubbish attack.

Continue.

What you are yet to understand is that it could be Man urinated,shitty or even Assnal against Burnley on Saturday under the same circumstances and also conceding but will later win?


When last did Chelsea win from a 2-0 down before?

timbros:
Thank God Jodera have seen the light. You are doing well.

Shame on Popizaino that an Arsenal fan will school him on his own team.

It's embarrassing at this point. Imagine Palmer scoring in 78 minutes of the game and they equalized two minutes later from their first attack.

The only thing that stopped Burnley from winning us is their lack of bravery and playing safe for a draw. If they were brave enough to go for the win, they could have scored 3 and even in their cautious approach, they almost did.

I honestly expected more from Popi than following airmark's opinion on football matters.

popizaino:



Let me also ask you questions why can't Chelsea score more than 2goals against lowly 10men Burnley.

The day you realise that in football sometimes the unthinkable can happen like how we conceded to Burnley, how table topper man city in 2012 suddenly were fighting for their lives on the last day to QPR,like how this same man city will concede 3 goals to Sunderland at the etihad the better for you.

Even if they score 3 and Burnley equalise, you'll still ask why can't they score 4 or 5.

You're forgetting that it's the job of attackers is to put the ball in the back of the net while that of defence is not to concede. That's the balance Tim.bros is talking about

Your attack is doing their work by putting in at least two goals against a 10 man team. What then are the defence doing?

And you're blaming the attack. Come on na

timbros:


I didn't see very well the Sunderland player that got red card in the first half of that match... Can you please remind me? Or repost the screenshot very well and capture that important part of the game. I'm waiting.

You and airmark is so shameless that you dig all the way back to 2012 for any straw that you can clutch on... I got married in 2012. I have 2 daughters 10 and 5...... Can you see how ridiculous your take is?

I really understand that in 2012,twelve players were allowed on the pitch at once and goalkeepers mounted a single post and the ball wasn't leather then.

timbros:
Thank God Jodera have seen the light. You are doing well.

Shame on Popizaino that an Arsenal fan will school him on his own team.

The bigger shame should be on you for supporting an Arsenal fan whose team can afford to give Burnley a three goal lead and still later win.

popizaino:


What you are yet to understand is that it could be Man urinated,shitty or even Assnal against Burnley on Saturday under the same circumstances and also conceding but will later win?


When last did Chelsea win from a 2-0 down before?

Na lie abeg!!

Pegged back TWICE against Guardiola Man city or this present Arsenal. For over 45min

Abegg na lie.

As for your bolded second question. On Saturday, was that the circumstance?