Griffon:


Attached to this post are the words of your gaffer yesterday.

Key words “clinical and to not concede”. The theory to outscore your opponent is more of a fantasy football approach.

You only need one goal to win. Of which we’ve been returning more than that per game (1.83) - literally two goals scored per game, despite our profligacy. Prior to the City’s game, we’ve been doing a regular Over 1.5 goals per game, so how is the attack the MAJOR problem?

It can’t possibly be yet only six teams have outscored us in the league.

What I don’t understand about una camp is how you all fail to see that conceding 1.73 goals per game for a top side is a disaster. Like, you’re certain these guys are going to concede two or more goals in a game. Have we done up to six clean sheets this season sef?

How that useless defense keeps undoing the little work done on the final third is beyond me. Our defense is the first of the myriad of issues to address at the Club even before that ‘useless’ attack.

If we’re handed a transfer embargo right now, I’ll be very concerned, not because of the attack but because, I’ll be losing a 39-year-old Thiago Silva whilst entering the next season with Disasi and Badiashile. That is high BP loading and waiting.

Having an injury prone defenders is the same as having a very bad defense. We need to clear out James, Fofana, Chillwell and obviously Silva.

Just this alone makes defense a major issue to address.

airmark:


Palmer created about 3 big chances for Jackson alone today and he missed them. But some people are expecting our defenders to stop City from burying their chances or not see any in 90 minutes.

The goal we conceded was mudryk switching off. I will insist that our defensive issue is not just the work of defenders.

Chelsea need to sell this 4 players if they want to achieve anything next season.

(1) Jackson
(2)Madueke
(3)Disasi
(4)Mudyrk.

Is very urgent Chelsea sell this useless set of players.

Mudryk can't even cross a good ball. The last chance we get against city. Mudryk carry the ball throwy far. What kind of player is that.

That guy is a big flop!!!

swiz123:


Having an injury prone defenders is the same as having a very bad defense. We need to clear out James, Fofana, Chillwell and obviously Silva.

Just this alone makes defense a major issue to address.

airmark just dey do agidi dey post number of big misses per game up and down

Everybody knows if Chelsea fix their defensive issues they will be in a better position on the league table than where they presently are.

Like Griffon rightly puts it, outscoring ur oppnent is a fantasy in modern football that is not practicable.

I checked Chlesea's last 10 games on Sky sports and I discovered Chelsea has conceded in 9 out of those 10(Bar the 6-0 Everton Trashing). Guess what? Chelsea only failed to score in 2 out of those 10 matches i.e vs Loserpool & Man city.

How will anybody see this and claim the attack is the culprit for Chelsea's woes when the defence can't keep opponents from scoring?

Trevor012:

You lack football knowledge. Anyone with high football knowledge can see that when it comes to talent level Palmer >>>>>>> Messi.

What is high football knowledge mister man?
Or you just combining words together to make some BS claim

I repeat again, them suppose crucify you for this statement

BlueRayDick:


airmark just dey do agidi dey post number of big misses pay game up and down

Everybody knows if Chelsea fix their defensive issues they will be in a beter position on the league than where they presently are.

Like Griffon rightly puts it, outscoring ur oppnent is a fantasy in modern football that is not practicable.

I checked Chlesea's last 10 games on Sky sports and I discovered Chelsea has conceded in 9 out of those 10(Bar the 6-0 Everton Trashing). Guess what? Chelsea on failed to score in 2 out of those 10 matches i.e vs Loserpool & Man city.

How will anybody see this and claim the attack is the culprit for Chelsea's woes when the defence can't keep opponents from scoring?

Not even a rocket science.

I’ve told them to check the numbers, stats don’t lie. I’m not so much of a back and forth niggi, I check well before taking a position in any discourse.

We aren’t clinical in front of goal no doubt but that’s a minimal issue compared to the disaster-class we’re currently facing at that backline.

How my gees go leave house wey dey burn, begin chase rats is what I can’t really comprehend.

Griffon:


Not even a rocket science.

I’ve told them to check the numbers, stats don’t lie. I’m not so much of a back and forth niggi, I check well before taking a position in any discourse.

We aren’t clinical in front of goal no doubt but that’s a minimal issue compared to the disaster-class we’re currently facing at that backline.

How my gees go leave house wey dey burn, begin chase rats is what I can’t really comprehend.

It's just agenda and nothing more .

Khayceeofficial:


This boy suppose dhe top goal chart RN if he had learned how to hit a football before going pro

I'm so livid rn
This game na draw or loss

If only these boy knew how to hit a football, it would have been us in the FA Cup final yesterday. If I was poch, I would have fined that bloke for thag trash dye on his hair when he's this shitty as a player

Some dudes in here go still blame poch for the 3 big chances wey these dude miss yesterday

BlueRayDick:


airmark just dey do agidi dey post number of big misses per game up and down

Everybody knows if Chelsea fix their defensive issues they will be in a better position on the league table than where they presently are.

Like Griffon rightly puts it, outscoring ur oppnent is a fantasy in modern football that is not practicable.

I checked Chlesea's last 10 games on Sky sports and I discovered Chelsea has conceded in 9 out of those 10(Bar the 6-0 Everton Trashing). Guess what? Chelsea only failed to score in 2 out of those 10 matches i.e vs Loserpool & Man city.

How will anybody see this and claim the attack is the culprit for Chelsea's woes when the defence can't keep opponents from scoring?

Simply not conceeding in the last 10 minutes against 10 man Burnley could have kept us above scummies and in Europa league position.

There's a lot of foolishness going on here.

swiz123:


Simply not conceeding in the last 10 minutes against 10 man Burnley could have kept us above scummies and in Europa league position.

There's a lot of foolishness going on here.

A defense that can't keep 10-man Burnley at bay does not need to be overhauled. Just buy strikers and outscore ur opponents

Khayceeofficial:


What is high football knowledge mister man?
Or you just combining words together to make some BS claim

I repeat again, them suppose crucify you for this statement

You have low football knowledge that's why you can't see Palmer is more talented than Messi. Go and watch yesterday game and see how Palmer singlehandedly destroyed City. Messi was never that good at his age. Palmer is a generational talent better than Messi. Bookmark this post 💪

swiz123:


Heard he is on 20k per week wages and on 8 years contract. I doubt he will have anything meaningful to himself after paying taxes and bills.

He is simply a foolish boy with no ambition, just wants to be in the spotlight, hence his selfish plays.

20k per week is a lot of money even in the UK
The guy is fraud minded so he is okay with it.

Caicedobets:
Those guys don't play for passion
They just want the money
Nothing else bothers them

Passion ko passion ni

At the end of the day football is a job to them. Your club won't hesitate to cut him lose when he becomes useless. He should start crying and not greet a friend because they lost an fa cup semi 😂.

airmark:


You see Chelsea leading others in number of through passes in Epl. But we don't have great finishers at the end of most of them, that's why we failed to win matches.

This Jackson guy can’t even speed up and put the ball in the back of the net, he is always touching the ball many times before striking that’s why his short is always weak.

BlueRayDick:




A defense that can't keep 10-man Burnley at bay does not need to be overhauled. Just buy strikers and outscore ur opponents

The irony of this your post is that your team with stingy defence went to Munich and conceded a goal but your fans didn't blame the defence for conceding but angry at the attackers for not turning up.

The sit -deep crooner who you just quoted was all over the place mentioning me about Saka for firing blank and not your useless defence that allowed an unlikely header from an unlikely player.


But continue to mislead those who think they must be on the side of those who are against airmark.

popizaino:



The irony of this your post is that your team with stingy defence went to Munich and conceded a goal but your fans didn't blame the defence for conceding but angry at the attackers for not turning up.

The sit -deep crooner who you just quoted was all over the place mentioning me about Saka for firing blank and not your useless defence that allowed an unlikely header from an unlikely player.


But continue to mislead those who think they must be on the side of those who are against airmark.

Nonsense post without substance .

Arsenal once had clowns like David Luiz , Mustafi , Kolasinac , Lietchsteiner, Papastapopulous etc in defence . Arteta came and cleared all of them and replaced them with Gabriel, Saliba , Ben white , Tomiyasu , Kiwior , etc.

Today arsenal has conceded the least goal in the EPL ( 26). That's what sorting ur defensive issues does to a team.

Make una keep trying to outscore una opponents in modern football. U will learn the hard way.

You CANNOT win ANY match if you don't OUTSCORE your opponent. It's not rocket science.

We definitely had chances to finish City but somehow y'all picking ONLY on the defence?

Anyway, agenda must agend

Very disappointing to be honest.

Whether modern, old school or stone age football- GOALS na still the baba gbogbo won in this game called football.

You can take that to the bank.

airmark:


You see Chelsea leading others in number of through passes in Epl. But we don't have great finishers at the end of most of them, that's why we failed to win matches.

Me kinda struggling to understand why some can't see the obvious. Mi o get e rara.

BlueRayDick:


airmark just dey do agidi dey post number of big misses per game up and down

Everybody knows if Chelsea fix their defensive issues they will be in a better position on the league table than where they presently are.

Like Griffon rightly puts it, outscoring ur oppnent is a fantasy in modern football that is not practicable.

I checked Chlesea's last 10 games on Sky sports and I discovered Chelsea has conceded in 9 out of those 10(Bar the 6-0 Everton Trashing). Guess what? Chelsea only failed to score in 2 out of those 10 matches i.e vs Loserpool & Man city.

How will anybody see this and claim the attack is the culprit for Chelsea's woes when the defence can't keep opponents from scoring?

Neither is coming into a game and thinking of not conceding not an outdated false belief that need to be erased from the mind of a modern day footballer.

I'm sure Pochettino did not set up his Tottenham side to concede to Liverpool in the 2019 UCL finals but they did and did it early which changed the outcome of his plans.

That is what happens when you don't plan to concede.

When we suggested that we needed to improve our attack as a team was at a period were we usually concede the unlikiest of goal after missing several chances upfront.

How will a genuine fan ask his team to balance the defence for conceding just a goal among the many chances his attacking his missing upfront?

BlueRayDick:


airmark just dey do agidi dey post number of big misses per game up and down

Everybody knows if Chelsea fix their defensive issues they will be in a better position on the league table than where they presently are.

Like Griffon rightly puts it, outscoring ur oppnent is a fantasy in modern football that is not practicable.

I checked Chlesea's last 10 games on Sky sports and I discovered Chelsea has conceded in 9 out of those 10(Bar the 6-0 Everton Trashing). Guess what? Chelsea only failed to score in 2 out of those 10 matches i.e vs Loserpool & Man city.

How will anybody see this and claim the attack is the culprit for Chelsea's woes when the defence can't keep opponents from scoring?

not just conceding in 9 out of 10 games.

The conceding majorly comes in 2 goals or more

popizaino:



Neither is coming into a game and thinking of not conceding not an outdated false belief that need to be erased from the mind of a modern day footballer.

I'm sure Pochettino did not set up his Tottenham side to concede to Liverpool in the 2019 UCL finals but they did and did it early which changed the outcome of his plans.

That is what happens when you don't plan to concede.

When we suggested that we needed to improve our attack as a team was at a period were we usually concede the unlikiest of goal after missing several chances upfront.

How will a genuine fan ask his team to balance the defence for conceding just a goal among the many chances his attacking his missing upfront?

So it's okay if u play 10 games and I conceded in 9 out of those 10 games Abi ? Yet u managed to score 1 or more in those 10 games o.

Do u know what 9 out of 10 is ? It Means there's 90% chance u will concede in each game u play .🤦‍♂️

Wo make una do wetin pay una . Una for buy 10 strikers sef join the ones una get them keep managing dem Disaster and co as defenders .

Even one of the biggest Chelsea haters had this to say about our attack but the one who wear the shoes doesn't know were it hurt.

Griffon:


Attached to this post are the words of your gaffer yesterday.

Key words “clinical and to not concede”. The theory to outscore your opponent is more of a fantasy football approach.

You only need one goal to win. Of which we’ve been returning more than that per game (1.83) - literally two goals scored per game, despite our profligacy. Prior to the City’s game, we’ve been doing a regular Over 1.5 goals per game, so how is the attack the MAJOR problem?

It can’t possibly be yet only six teams have outscored us in the league.

What I don’t understand about una camp is how you all fail to see that conceding 1.73 goals per game for a top side is a disaster. Like, you’re certain these guys are going to concede two or more goals in a game. Have we done up to six clean sheets this season sef?

How that useless defense keeps undoing the little work done on the final third is beyond me. Our defense is the first of the myriad of issues to address at the Club even before that ‘useless’ attack.

If we’re handed a transfer embargo right now, I’ll be very concerned, not because of the attack but because, I’ll be losing a 39-year-old Thiago Silva whilst entering the next season with Disasi and Badiashile. That is high BP loading and waiting.

As a footballer, you will understand that going ahead in a match, and especially two goals ahead gives you control and deflates the opposition spirit

When you are two goals ahead, it becomes about game management and time management. Your defence would just be passing ball amongst themselves while opposition will be disheartened

But if you keep missing chances, opposition ginger will be growing that today is their day and they are fated to win

So our missing of chances also affects defence.

Both areas need improvement, but our attack is not making games comfortable for our weak defence

BlueRayDick:


So it's okay if u play 10 games and I conceded in 9 out of those 10 games Abi ? Yet u managed to score 1 or more in those 10 games o.

Do u know what 9 out of 10 is ? It Means there's 90% chance u will concede in each game u play .🤦‍♂️

Wo make una do wetin pay una . Una for buy 10 strikers sef join the ones una get them keep managing dem Disaster and co as defenders .

You cannot be conceding a goal per game and be furious about your defence while patting your attackers at the back after missing about 7 glorious chances in this same game.

popizaino:


You cannot be conceding a goal per game and be furious about your defence while patting your attackers at the back after missing about 7 glorious chances in this same game.

And who told its one goal per game u concede ?

U don't even watch Chelsea matches sef

lordfalcao:
not just conceding in 9 out of 10 games.

The conceding majorly comes in 2 goals or more

Don't mind them .

They always troll guardiola for spending the budget of Comoros and Central African Republic on buying defenders ; they thought he didn't know what he was doing before he added a goal machine like Halaand .

--

popizaino:


You cannot be conceding a goal per game and be furious about your defence while patting your attackers at the back after missing about 7 glorious chances in this same game.

LoL we were leading in seven games,we could have won Seven games that's 21 points until the defense started conceding loads of goals

popizaino:


Hope is not the one that plays for Bayer Leverkusen?

Yes Jeremie Frimpong of Leverkusen.

Is there a problem?

Vischy:


LoL we were leading in seven games,we could have won Seven games that's 21 points until the defense started conceding loads of goals

That actually puts us mid table for this

Spurs, Newcastle and West Ham have dropped more from winning positions

https://www.football365.com/news/ranking-all-20-premier-league-clubs-points-lost-from-winning-positions

FBS:
You CANNOT win ANY match if you don't OUTSCORE your opponent. It's not rocket science.

We definitely had chances to finish City but somehow y'all picking ONLY on the defence?

Anyway, agenda must agend

Very disappointing to be honest.

Who's picking ONLY on the defence?