₦airaland Forum

The questions are not unreasonable.

HypocriticalObi:
Oseni missed the position he thought he would get under Peter girigory Obi, so he is embittered and grieving

You are 100% correct.

EmmyNorse:
With the present state of the country, a coastal highway shouldn't be on the scale of preference of the federal government, if only insecurity and lack of electricity can be fought to stand still. There is hope.

And who told you the government is not focusing on those areas.

Have you and the Pandora criminal ever heard of multitasking

emkz:
Rufai claims there were 57 active businesses that were impacted. Since he is now the mouthpiece of those businesses, can he list them?

As far as September 2023, talks began with HiTech on the project, where was Rufai Oseni? Why didn't he raise the alarm then, WHY NOW?

While raising the question about Landmark properties and alignment, Rufai Oseni refused to admit whether Landmark violated the right of way. He also did not state whether Landmark illegally utilized the asset in question. He also did not address the fact that only a marginal portion of Landmark was affected.

When the initial propaganda failed, they shifted to EIA and EISA. The Ministry of Environment already said they issued a waiver. But Rufai Oseni, who requested access to the audited books of someone's private enterprise, is not satisfied.

He also claims the owner of HiTech is Tinubu's personal friend. Does he want us to discuss his boss' personal friends and associates? Did they not give media protection to Emefiele, Okowa, PDP and Atiku? If they didn't, why were they hell bent on humiliating Tinubu with their boss even writing to accuse Tinubu of Noriega moment. If there was no personal or business interest for them, why did they take it so personal?

Then they accused the minister of staying in Eko Hotel and Suites; what has that got to do with anything?

On the surface, Rufai Oseni and Arise News have serious questions; but the questions are not balanced, because they have not asked Landmark questions. They have clearly taken a side and they are fighting for either personal or business interests. Yesterday, it became clear when they interviewed a former Commissioner of Police. The conversation was accusatory and not intermediatory. Answers provided by the government are never acceptable to them, but they believe everything the Landmark CEO says.

Rufai Oseni, you claim to fact check everything. Please fact-check whether Landmark rightfully owned that land and whether he was cleared to build there.

One more point to make: you claim there was no stakeholder engagement before demolition. David Umahi sat down in your studio to say that he met with the CEO of Landmark and that they adjusted their plans to spare his properties. You also asked why properties not previously marked for demolition and outside the right
of way were demolished. As a journalist, you ought to be aware that notices of demolition were sent to all affected parties and they complied.

How come only Landmark is complaining?

What is Arise News/Rufai Oseni's personal/business interest here?

PS: When a former editor and a firmer executive director of PUNCH newspapers had a fight over one of them allegedly collecting millions of naira from corrupt politicians and businessmen to give them positive press coverage and kill negative stories, both of them were forced out of the media house. It became clear that some journalists used the media to promote personal and business interests. So if you see any media house seemingly pursuing or protecting someone's business interest, even at the expense of the public good, money is involved.

How come Channels TV, NTA, TVC or AIT are not fighting or protecting any interests? Why certain journalists from certain media houses?

Rufai Oseni asked to see the acvohnt statements of someone's private business. Can Rufai Oseni publish his own accpunt statements so we are convinced he did not receive a PR contract to use his platform to demarket the coastal road project

your points are well taken but a journalist is within his right if he asks to see the audit book of a private business involved in public business to balance out a story in public domain.

shugamummy:
Yes, see how you dodged the real issue again and started blabbing what Awolowo and Tinubu has been feeding you people since time immemorial. I did not blame you because, after reading There was a country I concluded that Yorubas are terrible bigots. They won't change so soon and their Masters Fulani has strong control over their thinking. Let me even make something clear to you, I don't know if you are more than 30yrs now but I bet you, you will clock 60yrs and won't even see this project pass Edo coastal waters not to talk of reaching Rivers State. I promise you, if by your 60yrs you can drive from Lagos to Calabar on this coastal road. Just name any country you want to visit and I will sponsor it.

I hope the guy you are telling all of these to will quote you and tell you to leave Nigeria for good
Stop telling us all these radio biafla stories

This was how IP0B were going about talking about how Dangote refinery would not work untill after 25 years but God put them to shame

emkz:
Rufai claims there were 57 active businesses that were impacted. Since he is now the mouthpiece of those businesses, can he list them?

As far as September 2023, talks began with HiTech on the project, where was Rufai Oseni? Why didn't he raise the alarm then, WHY NOW?

While raising the question about Landmark properties and alignment, Rufai Oseni refused to admit whether Landmark violated the right of way. He also did not state whether Landmark illegally utilized the asset in question. He also did not address the fact that only a marginal portion of Landmark was affected.

When the initial propaganda failed, they shifted to EIA and EISA. The Ministry of Environment already said they issued a waiver. But Rufai Oseni, who requested access to the audited books of someone's private enterprise, is not satisfied.

He also claims the owner of HiTech is Tinubu's personal friend. Does he want us to discuss his boss' personal friends and associates? Did they not give media protection to Emefiele, Okowa, PDP and Atiku? If they didn't, why were they hell bent on humiliating Tinubu with their boss even writing to accuse Tinubu of Noriega moment. If there was no personal or business interest for them, why did they take it so personal?

Then they accused the minister of staying in Eko Hotel and Suites; what has that got to do with anything?

On the surface, Rufai Oseni and Arise News have serious questions; but the questions are not balanced, because they have not asked Landmark questions. They have clearly taken a side and they are fighting for either personal or business interests. Yesterday, it became clear when they interviewed a former Commissioner of Police. The conversation was accusatory and not intermediatory. Answers provided by the government are never acceptable to them, but they believe everything the Landmark CEO says.

Rufai Oseni, you claim to fact check everything. Please fact-check whether Landmark rightfully owned that land and whether he was cleared to build there.

One more point to make: you claim there was no stakeholder engagement before demolition. David Umahi sat down in your studio to say that he met with the CEO of Landmark and that they adjusted their plans to spare his properties. You also asked why properties not previously marked for demolition and outside the right
of way were demolished. As a journalist, you ought to be aware that notices of demolition were sent to all affected parties and they complied.

How come only Landmark is complaining?

What is Arise News/Rufai Oseni's personal/business interest here?

PS: When a former editor and a firmer executive director of PUNCH newspapers had a fight over one of them allegedly collecting millions of naira from corrupt politicians and businessmen to give them positive press coverage and kill negative stories, both of them were forced out of the media house. It became clear that some journalists used the media to promote personal and business interests. So if you see any media house seemingly pursuing or protecting someone's business interest, even at the expense of the public good, money is involved.

How come Channels TV, NTA, TVC or AIT are not fighting or protecting any interests? Why certain journalists from certain media houses?

Rufai Oseni asked to see the acvohnt statements of someone's private business. Can Rufai Oseni publish his own accpunt statements so we are convinced he did not receive a PR contract to use his platform to demarket the coastal road project

Same thing was asked Fela, Gani and co.......

... he's at his job.....

BadBradley:
your points are well taken but a journalist is within his right of he asks to see the audit book of a private business involved in public business to balance out s story in public domain.

I only asked for balance.

His questioning was accusatory. I didn't see objectivity therein.

Be our mouthpiece and you'll never be forgotten......
What does.the oppressed do......?
Lose all.and still lose hope.....
As hard as this is, it takes the stupid, yet fearless action dogs battle grizzly bears to keep that latent hope going.......
As.longb as it makes people rattle and on the other side people cling......
It's all good.
Noticed also that all Rufais... even Hellruf ....have the thing about them

emkz:
One of the presenters of the Morning Show on Arise News, Mr Rufai Oseni, took to his twitter handle to continue to question the Lagos-Calabar coastal road project.



Source: Oseni Rufai

That small boy rufai will cry for 8 years bro. Don't over rate him as been intelligent. The coastal road is what we called infrastructural development and it's one of its kinds in Africa.

Validated:
Gilbert Chagoury and Tinubu are friends. Why would the FG headed by Tinubu award a 700 km road, bridges and rail to a single company?
Shorter roads are award about 4 to 5 contractors, why is this one special

There are more questions that Tinubu will answer on the ChagouryGate

Some you go just dey blah like say una use head hit ground as a baby

Naa enemy/foe Tinubu suppose give the contract to, everytime people just love to argue nonsense very few Nigerians think ... before asking more dumb question why not list out the laws the costal road contract as violated

i have no issue whether FG continues with the road or even cancel it .. but Nigerians should stop being a push around ... lets focus on where our shoe hurts

oseni don pocket money, he talks more on costal road than fuel scarcity or Naira fall affecting nigerians badly

Papayaayasager:
They want to cash out that's why Umahi and FG are in a hurry to start the project

Is oseni rufai not cashing out already or tou think he doing PR for landmark for free, dey play

emkz:
Rufai claims there were 57 active businesses that were impacted. Since he is now the mouthpiece of those businesses, can he list them?

As far as September 2023, talks began with HiTech on the project, where was Rufai Oseni? Why didn't he raise the alarm then, WHY NOW?

While raising the question about Landmark properties and alignment, Rufai Oseni refused to admit whether Landmark violated the right of way. He also did not state whether Landmark illegally utilized the asset in question. He also did not address the fact that only a marginal portion of Landmark was affected.

When the initial propaganda failed, they shifted to EIA and EISA. The Ministry of Environment already said they issued a waiver. But Rufai Oseni, who requested access to the audited books of someone's private enterprise, is not satisfied.

He also claims the owner of HiTech is Tinubu's personal friend. Does he want us to discuss his boss' personal friends and associates? Did they not give media protection to Emefiele, Okowa, PDP and Atiku? If they didn't, why were they hell bent on humiliating Tinubu with their boss even writing to accuse Tinubu of Noriega moment. If there was no personal or business interest for them, why did they take it so personal?

Then they accused the minister of staying in Eko Hotel and Suites; what has that got to do with anything?

On the surface, Rufai Oseni and Arise News have serious questions; but the questions are not balanced, because they have not asked Landmark questions. They have clearly taken a side and they are fighting for either personal or business interests. Yesterday, it became clear when they interviewed a former Commissioner of Police. The conversation was accusatory and not intermediatory. Answers provided by the government are never acceptable to them, but they believe everything the Landmark CEO says.

Rufai Oseni, you claim to fact check everything. Please fact-check whether Landmark rightfully owned that land and whether he was cleared to build there.

One more point to make: you claim there was no stakeholder engagement before demolition. David Umahi sat down in your studio to say that he met with the CEO of Landmark and that they adjusted their plans to spare his properties. You also asked why properties not previously marked for demolition and outside the right
of way were demolished. As a journalist, you ought to be aware that notices of demolition were sent to all affected parties and they complied.

How come only Landmark is complaining?

What is Arise News/Rufai Oseni's personal/business interest here?

PS: When a former editor and a firmer executive director of PUNCH newspapers had a fight over one of them allegedly collecting millions of naira from corrupt politicians and businessmen to give them positive press coverage and kill negative stories, both of them were forced out of the media house. It became clear that some journalists used the media to promote personal and business interests. So if you see any media house seemingly pursuing or protecting someone's business interest, even at the expense of the public good, money is involved.

How come Channels TV, NTA, TVC or AIT are not fighting or protecting any interests? Why certain journalists from certain media houses?

Rufai Oseni asked to see the account statements of someone's private business. Can Rufai Oseni publish his own account statements so we are convinced he did not receive a PR contract to use his platform to demarket the coastal road project

God Abeg o! Wetin wrong with the questions? Na for the Person to debunk all the questions with what you have said and make Rufai look stewpid. Na Journalist Rufai be o!

HypocriticalObi:
Oseni missed the position he thought he would get under Peter girigory Obi, so he is embittered and grieving

So make he no ask question? I have come to realise that a lot of Nigerians that have become middle aged parents grew up under corruption. They don't know any other way other than corruption.

Rufai the town crier.

emkz:
Rufai claims there were 57 active businesses that were impacted. Since he is now the mouthpiece of those businesses, can he list them?

As far as September 2023, talks began with HiTech on the project, where was Rufai Oseni? Why didn't he raise the alarm then, WHY NOW?

While raising the question about Landmark properties and alignment, Rufai Oseni refused to admit whether Landmark violated the right of way. He also did not state whether Landmark illegally utilized the asset in question. He also did not address the fact that only a marginal portion of Landmark was affected.

When the initial propaganda failed, they shifted to EIA and EISA. The Ministry of Environment already said they issued a waiver. But Rufai Oseni, who requested access to the audited books of someone's private enterprise, is not satisfied.

He also claims the owner of HiTech is Tinubu's personal friend. Does he want us to discuss his boss' personal friends and associates? Did they not give media protection to Emefiele, Okowa, PDP and Atiku? If they didn't, why were they hell bent on humiliating Tinubu with their boss even writing to accuse Tinubu of Noriega moment. If there was no personal or business interest for them, why did they take it so personal?

Then they accused the minister of staying in Eko Hotel and Suites; what has that got to do with anything?

On the surface, Rufai Oseni and Arise News have serious questions; but the questions are not balanced, because they have not asked Landmark questions. They have clearly taken a side and they are fighting for either personal or business interests. Yesterday, it became clear when they interviewed a former Commissioner of Police. The conversation was accusatory and not intermediatory. Answers provided by the government are never acceptable to them, but they believe everything the Landmark CEO says.

Rufai Oseni, you claim to fact check everything. Please fact-check whether Landmark rightfully owned that land and whether he was cleared to build there.

One more point to make: you claim there was no stakeholder engagement before demolition. David Umahi sat down in your studio to say that he met with the CEO of Landmark and that they adjusted their plans to spare his properties. You also asked why properties not previously marked for demolition and outside the right
of way were demolished. As a journalist, you ought to be aware that notices of demolition were sent to all affected parties and they complied.

How come only Landmark is complaining?

What is Arise News/Rufai Oseni's personal/business interest here?

PS: When a former editor and a firmer executive director of PUNCH newspapers had a fight over one of them allegedly collecting millions of naira from corrupt politicians and businessmen to give them positive press coverage and kill negative stories, both of them were forced out of the media house. It became clear that some journalists used the media to promote personal and business interests. So if you see any media house seemingly pursuing or protecting someone's business interest, even at the expense of the public good, money is involved.

How come Channels TV, NTA, TVC or AIT are not fighting or protecting any interests? Why certain journalists from certain media houses?

Rufai Oseni asked to see the account statements of someone's private business. Can Rufai Oseni publish his own account statements so we are convinced he did not receive a PR contract to use his platform to demarket the coastal road project

👌

I love the way you avoided ACTUALLY ANSWERING the questions and went on a personal attack against Rufai himself.

Perhaps now you have gotten that out of your system.

You can now answer some if not all of the questions.

Especially as you responded as a govt mouthpiece - pls enlighten us.

Questions are requests for information. That you behave like nobody has a right to ask questions against the govt's policies tells us all we need to know about you

emkz:
Rufai claims there were 57 active businesses that were impacted. Since he is now the mouthpiece of those businesses, can he list them?

As far as September 2023, talks began with HiTech on the project, where was Rufai Oseni? Why didn't he raise the alarm then, WHY NOW?

While raising the question about Landmark properties and alignment, Rufai Oseni refused to admit whether Landmark violated the right of way. He also did not state whether Landmark illegally utilized the asset in question. He also did not address the fact that only a marginal portion of Landmark was affected.

When the initial propaganda failed, they shifted to EIA and EISA. The Ministry of Environment already said they issued a waiver. But Rufai Oseni, who requested access to the audited books of someone's private enterprise, is not satisfied.

He also claims the owner of HiTech is Tinubu's personal friend. Does he want us to discuss his boss' personal friends and associates? Did they not give media protection to Emefiele, Okowa, PDP and Atiku? If they didn't, why were they hell bent on humiliating Tinubu with their boss even writing to accuse Tinubu of Noriega moment. If there was no personal or business interest for them, why did they take it so personal?

Then they accused the minister of staying in Eko Hotel and Suites; what has that got to do with anything?

On the surface, Rufai Oseni and Arise News have serious questions; but the questions are not balanced, because they have not asked Landmark questions. They have clearly taken a side and they are fighting for either personal or business interests. Yesterday, it became clear when they interviewed a former Commissioner of Police. The conversation was accusatory and not intermediatory. Answers provided by the government are never acceptable to them, but they believe everything the Landmark CEO says.

Rufai Oseni, you claim to fact check everything. Please fact-check whether Landmark rightfully owned that land and whether he was cleared to build there.

One more point to make: you claim there was no stakeholder engagement before demolition. David Umahi sat down in your studio to say that he met with the CEO of Landmark and that they adjusted their plans to spare his properties. You also asked why properties not previously marked for demolition and outside the right
of way were demolished. As a journalist, you ought to be aware that notices of demolition were sent to all affected parties and they complied.

How come only Landmark is complaining?

What is Arise News/Rufai Oseni's personal/business interest here?

PS: When a former editor and a firmer executive director of PUNCH newspapers had a fight over one of them allegedly collecting millions of naira from corrupt politicians and businessmen to give them positive press coverage and kill negative stories, both of them were forced out of the media house. It became clear that some journalists used the media to promote personal and business interests. So if you see any media house seemingly pursuing or protecting someone's business interest, even at the expense of the public good, money is involved.

How come Channels TV, NTA, TVC or AIT are not fighting or protecting any interests? Why certain journalists from certain media houses?

Rufai Oseni asked to see the account statements of someone's private business. Can Rufai Oseni publish his own account statements so we are convinced he did not receive a PR contract to use his platform to demarket the coastal road project

Hammylawali:
The loser of the election is not a futuristic politician. He never plans for the future. Because if he did anambra will be better industrialized, rather he claimed to save money for the states when he can actually invest in infrastructure and business he use to say up and down. Singapore 🇸🇬, Malaysia 🇲🇾 and Ukraine 🇺🇦 statistics is what he keeps telling people, but when he was there he couldn’t invest and attract such ideas to his states.
That coastal road is a great blessing to Nigerian southern states. Watch how investment will spread around that corridor easily, because distances to cover will reduce drastically. Companies that hardly leaves Lagos will easily start spreading along that terrain. We need to build futuristic infrastructure and not stuck to repairing roads of 1970’s.

Obi and his Arise news agents are failures and don’t have good plans for this country.

Well said bro.
Well said.

emkz:
Rufai claims there were 57 active businesses that were impacted. Since he is now the mouthpiece of those businesses, can he list them?

As far as September 2023, talks began with HiTech on the project, where was Rufai Oseni? Why didn't he raise the alarm then, WHY NOW?

While raising the question about Landmark properties and alignment, Rufai Oseni refused to admit whether Landmark violated the right of way. He also did not state whether Landmark illegally utilized the asset in question. He also did not address the fact that only a marginal portion of Landmark was affected.

When the initial propaganda failed, they shifted to EIA and EISA. The Ministry of Environment already said they issued a waiver. But Rufai Oseni, who requested access to the audited books of someone's private enterprise, is not satisfied.

He also claims the owner of HiTech is Tinubu's personal friend. Does he want us to discuss his boss' personal friends and associates? Did they not give media protection to Emefiele, Okowa, PDP and Atiku? If they didn't, why were they hell bent on humiliating Tinubu with their boss even writing to accuse Tinubu of Noriega moment. If there was no personal or business interest for them, why did they take it so personal?

Then they accused the minister of staying in Eko Hotel and Suites; what has that got to do with anything?

On the surface, Rufai Oseni and Arise News have serious questions; but the questions are not balanced, because they have not asked Landmark questions. They have clearly taken a side and they are fighting for either personal or business interests. Yesterday, it became clear when they interviewed a former Commissioner of Police. The conversation was accusatory and not intermediatory. Answers provided by the government are never acceptable to them, but they believe everything the Landmark CEO says.

Rufai Oseni, you claim to fact check everything. Please fact-check whether Landmark rightfully owned that land and whether he was cleared to build there.

One more point to make: you claim there was no stakeholder engagement before demolition. David Umahi sat down in your studio to say that he met with the CEO of Landmark and that they adjusted their plans to spare his properties. You also asked why properties not previously marked for demolition and outside the right
of way were demolished. As a journalist, you ought to be aware that notices of demolition were sent to all affected parties and they complied.

How come only Landmark is complaining?

What is Arise News/Rufai Oseni's personal/business interest here?

PS: When a former editor and a firmer executive director of PUNCH newspapers had a fight over one of them allegedly collecting millions of naira from corrupt politicians and businessmen to give them positive press coverage and kill negative stories, both of them were forced out of the media house. It became clear that some journalists used the media to promote personal and business interests. So if you see any media house seemingly pursuing or protecting someone's business interest, even at the expense of the public good, money is involved.

How come Channels TV, NTA, TVC or AIT are not fighting or protecting any interests? Why certain journalists from certain media houses?

Rufai Oseni asked to see the account statements of someone's private business. Can Rufai Oseni publish his own account statements so we are convinced he did not receive a PR contract to use his platform to demarket the coastal road project

As usual, ignoring the message to attack the messenger.
Hypocrisy is preaching without practicing

Hammylawali:
The loser of the election is not a futuristic politician. He never plans for the future. Because if he did anambra will be better industrialized, rather he claimed to save money for the states when he can actually invest in infrastructure and business he use to say up and down. Singapore 🇸🇬, Malaysia 🇲🇾 and Ukraine 🇺🇦 statistics is what he keeps telling people, but when he was there he couldn’t invest and attract such ideas to his states.
That coastal road is a great blessing to Nigerian southern states. Watch how investment will spread around that corridor easily, because distances to cover will reduce drastically. Companies that hardly leaves Lagos will easily start spreading along that terrain. We need to build futuristic infrastructure and not stuck to repairing roads of 1970’s.

Obi and his Arise news agents are failures and don’t have good plans for this country.

I'm just reading your comment.

You nailed the hit on the head.

There is no developed nation or near developed nation that is not building structures in anticipation of the future.

From Tinubu's plans in Lagos, he was already planning for the future. Infact, Ibori's piece showed that Tinubu had called them together to talk about starting off that road.

With Tinubu's launch of LAMATA, revamp of LAWMA, LASAA, light rail, BRT corridor, you could see he planned for the future. I have confidence that this coastal road would open up the rural spaces to urbanization.

See what I saw on Linkedin:

Top 4 Countries Leading the Future of Construction: Building New Cities and Transforming Landscapes

The global construction industry is on an upward trajectory, driven by rapid urbanization and a surge in infrastructure projects worldwide. As we look to the future, certain countries are taking the lead in constructing new cities, expanding existing ones, and investing significantly in transformative construction endeavors. In this article, we will explore the top 4 countries that are set to change the face of construction and revolutionize the world's infrastructure landscape. From impressive growth numbers to innovative approaches, these nations are positioning themselves as major players in the global construction arena.

#1 Saudi Arabia (KSA): Building New Cities and Pioneering Urban Development

Saudi Arabia, commonly referred to as KSA, is emerging as a transformative force in construction with its ambitious projects and investments. The country's vision for the future is exemplified by the megacity of NEOM, a bold initiative to build a smart and sustainable metropolis. KSA's Vision 2030 aims to reduce dependency on oil and foster economic diversification, putting construction at the forefront of its development agenda. With major investments in infrastructure and urban development, KSA showcases its dedication to becoming a global construction leader.

#2 China: Pioneering Mega Projects and Technological Advancements

China has firmly established itself as a construction powerhouse, with an array of ambitious mega projects and technological advancements. The country's commitment to transforming its urban landscape and infrastructure is unparalleled. From the massive Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to futuristic smart cities like Xiong'an and Shenzhen, China is redefining the way we build and live. With over 1,175 infrastructure projects in development or execution valued at over $25 million as of May 2022, China leads the pack in construction activity worldwide. The Chinese construction workforce management emphasizes efficiency and innovation, making it a key player in shaping the future of the global construction industry.

#3 India: Driving Sustainable Development and Resilient Cities

India stands at the forefront of sustainable construction and the creation of resilient cities. With over 1,944 infrastructure projects in development or execution valued at over $25 million as of May 2022, India is a rising star in the construction arena. The country's commitment to green buildings, renewable energy, and eco-friendly urban planning is driving a wave of positive change. India's construction industry is undergoing a paradigm shift, aligning itself with global sustainability goals and emphasizing construction workforce management for long-term prosperity.

#4 United States: Focusing on Modernization and Infrastructure Revamp

The United States, with its powerful economy, is steering its construction efforts towards modernization and infrastructure revamp. Boasting 1,866 infrastructure projects in development or execution valued at over $25 million as of May 2022, the nation is actively investing in reviving its transportation networks, energy systems, and urban hubs. The construction industry in the U.S. is experiencing a surge in technologies like wearable construction devices, drones for site monitoring, and cutting-edge equipment. This focus on innovation positions the U.S. as a leader in construction workforce management.

Disclaimer: The rankings of these countries are based on the number of infrastructure projects in development or execution valued at over $25 million as of May 2022. Other factors, such as innovation, sustainability, and investment, may influence their positions in the future. The construction industry is dynamic, and these rankings are subject to change as new projects and initiatives emerge.

Conclusion

The global construction industry is witnessing an unprecedented surge, with several countries at the forefront of shaping its future. Saudi Arabia's visionary mega projects, China's focus on sustainability, the U.S.'s technological advancements, and India's ambitious city-building are setting the stage for a construction revolution. Construction workforce management is a critical factor in each nation's success, driving efficiency, safety, and productivity. As these countries invest heavily in their construction landscapes, they are poised to reshape the world's infrastructure and create a lasting impact on generations to come.

[url] https://www./top-4-countries-leading-future-construction-building-new-cities[/url]

Someone once foolishly argued that infrastructure cannot be used to stimulate the economy.

People applauded him.

Mindlog:
I don't live in Nigeria but feedback from those back home, is not indicating improvement...some have not had light for days. I believe if a survey is done in Nigeria, those with at least 10hrs of electricity a day no go dey in the majority.

4days without light in my area... Areas around me are counting 3weeks now... Where I work, its 3days now

Although, few areas claim theirs have increased

Yampotatocarrot:
4days without light in my area... Areas around me are counting 3weeks now... Where I work, its 3days now

Although, few areas claim theirs have increased

Really sad....can't live that life!

When world bank came, Buhari directed them to North.
During Buhari, they constructed train track to Niger Republic. Rufai did not ask one million questions.

It get to south, they were making noise. He should keep the question to himself.

They take oil from south and south must have rail. If they start to analyze or bypass coastal area, the next you will hear is that they have stop the project.

I beg Umai should continue to do whatever will benefit south.

SoNature:
Typically, I consider people who link people's views to their tribes as inferior humans that are not worthy of my reply. However, I am replying to this message for people who have working brains (not necessarily your type) to think about this.

First, we have a country of over 200 million people and we are considered the world's poorest people, despite the fact that there are countries whose populations are more than one billion human beings each. How did we get here? Simple: Apart from stealing limited resources, we don't know how to prioritise.

You see, for a country of over 200 million people, we distribute less than 4000 megawatts of power. Nearly entire Nigerian economy runs on generators, making Nigerians the world's highest importers of generators.

Every now and then, SMEs are closing shops because they cannot afford to run on generators. If Tinubu was actually as smart as people have made us believe that he is, he would have invested a significant fraction of the money alloted to that needless road to building power assets across the country. Invest in all three segments of power. Before the end of his first tenure, we will see the impact it will make on the Nigerian economy.

Also, inflation has reached its all time high for the first time in the history of this country. As a result, something as basic as food has become so exorbitant that many people cannot even boast of eating three-square meals. Yet, we have a government that goes about sharing food in palliatives with no long-term investment in agriculture.

A sane mind would expect Tinubu to declare a state of emergency on agriculture. Invite all the 36 governors and get them to liaise with the federal ministry of agriculture to turn hectares of free arable lands into farms, give inputs to farmers, and build agroallied plantations across the country to reverse that trend. He would rather waste trillions on a road that will serve as an alternative to an existing road.

I can go on and on and on. Honestly, it's terribly exhausting living in the midst of a people who cannot think outside the box and always limit their thought process to tribes. It is even worse being led by thoughtless people and having dregs of society defend them. That's why no race takes black people seriously! The black man is totally brainless and cannot think beyond his tribe and environment. Oh, God! I am tired of these humans!


PS: if you ever reply to this message, be sure that I won't respond.

I am a northerner and I can tell you that the poster you quoted is 100% correct. Peter Obi shot himself in the foot by attacking the road construction through south-south region. Pete Obi and his horde of IIGB0 OBIDIENTS do not truly love people from south-south and are only using south-south people. Peter Obi and his IIGB0 OBIDIENTS would never have condemned the Lagos Calabar road if it had gone through the south-east region.


I pity any South-South OBIDIENTS that still follows Peter Obi after this cruel and mean attack on any developmental project that is meant for South-South.

C: RecentHistory

phemray:
These are no questions at all, rufai is doing what he was paid for as his kind of journalist. Can you see that Landmark can not go to court for junction to stop the demolition? Why, because he will explain tire, nothing is permanent, when you are building you shld know the Law, like people building now under the high tension, when Thier time comes the y will go and tell rufai to help them shout abi? Loosing properties or businesses for Legal actions is never a big deal. Did rufai know that people loose jobs when banks merged? Or when a contract on projects were terminated? So what is landmark. Come to seme badagry axis we all aware that we should not fix and substantial structures 15M minimum to the sea. Na only him do business along the corridor or he never paid complete the borrowed money? That was how past governments refused to take on any bigger projects but they pocket the money via SPVs.

Rufai Oseni is just filled with hatred for Nigeria after his principal Peter Obi lost the elections.

If it were former governor of Kaduna Nasir El-Rufai, he would demolish any unauthorized structure and still send the bill for demolition to the company because the caterpillar, fuel and driver's payment all come from government. If the company refuses to pay, they will be prosecuted and heavier sanctions will be imposed on them.

emkz:
Rufai claims there were 57 active businesses that were impacted. Since he is now the mouthpiece of those businesses, can he list them?

As far as September 2023, talks began with HiTech on the project, where was Rufai Oseni? Why didn't he raise the alarm then, WHY NOW?

While raising the question about Landmark properties and alignment, Rufai Oseni refused to admit whether Landmark violated the right of way. He also did not state whether Landmark illegally utilized the asset in question. He also did not address the fact that only a marginal portion of Landmark was affected.

When the initial propaganda failed, they shifted to EIA and EISA. The Ministry of Environment already said they issued a waiver. But Rufai Oseni, who requested access to the audited books of someone's private enterprise, is not satisfied.

He also claims the owner of HiTech is Tinubu's personal friend. Does he want us to discuss his boss' personal friends and associates? Did they not give media protection to Emefiele, Okowa, PDP and Atiku? If they didn't, why were they hell bent on humiliating Tinubu with their boss even writing to accuse Tinubu of Noriega moment. If there was no personal or business interest for them, why did they take it so personal?

Then they accused the minister of staying in Eko Hotel and Suites; what has that got to do with anything?

On the surface, Rufai Oseni and Arise News have serious questions; but the questions are not balanced, because they have not asked Landmark questions. They have clearly taken a side and they are fighting for either personal or business interests. Yesterday, it became clear when they interviewed a former Commissioner of Police. The conversation was accusatory and not intermediatory. Answers provided by the government are never acceptable to them, but they believe everything the Landmark CEO says.

Rufai Oseni, you claim to fact check everything. Please fact-check whether Landmark rightfully owned that land and whether he was cleared to build there.

One more point to make: you claim there was no stakeholder engagement before demolition. David Umahi sat down in your studio to say that he met with the CEO of Landmark and that they adjusted their plans to spare his properties. You also asked why properties not previously marked for demolition and outside the right
of way were demolished. As a journalist, you ought to be aware that notices of demolition were sent to all affected parties and they complied.

How come only Landmark is complaining?

What is Arise News/Rufai Oseni's personal/business interest here?

PS: When a former editor and a firmer executive director of PUNCH newspapers had a fight over one of them allegedly collecting millions of naira from corrupt politicians and businessmen to give them positive press coverage and kill negative stories, both of them were forced out of the media house. It became clear that some journalists used the media to promote personal and business interests. So if you see any media house seemingly pursuing or protecting someone's business interest, even at the expense of the public good, money is involved.

How come Channels TV, NTA, TVC or AIT are not fighting or protecting any interests? Why certain journalists from certain media houses?

Rufai Oseni asked to see the account statements of someone's private business. Can Rufai Oseni publish his own account statements so we are convinced he did not receive a PR contract to use his platform to demarket the coastal road project

Gibberish this one has been surviving on Tinubu's urine

Mumu man, are you beyond redemption. Dangote refinery is working and am sure you have gone severally to fuel stations looking for fuel and even begging to buy a litre for 1000 Naira. Was it not ₦140/litre that Tinubu fought against when he dragged you and other buffoons without any thinking cap to go for protest to occupy Nigeria. Today, you are buying fuel at 1k, dollar @ 1440 and no job and no food with rising insecurity yet you have the mind to keep loving your slavemaster. Stockholm syndrome indeed

stuffs2002:
I hope the guy you are telling all of these to will quote you and tell you to leave Nigeria for good
Stop telling us all these radio biafla stories

This was how IP0B were going about talking about how Dangote refinery would not work untill after 25 years but God put them to shame

emkz:
Rufai claims there were 57 active businesses that were impacted. Since he is now the mouthpiece of those businesses, can he list them?

As far as September 2023, talks began with HiTech on the project, where was Rufai Oseni? Why didn't he raise the alarm then, WHY NOW?

While raising the question about Landmark properties and alignment, Rufai Oseni refused to admit whether Landmark violated the right of way. He also did not state whether Landmark illegally utilized the asset in question. He also did not address the fact that only a marginal portion of Landmark was affected.

When the initial propaganda failed, they shifted to EIA and EISA. The Ministry of Environment already said they issued a waiver. But Rufai Oseni, who requested access to the audited books of someone's private enterprise, is not satisfied.

He also claims the owner of HiTech is Tinubu's personal friend. Does he want us to discuss his boss' personal friends and associates? Did they not give media protection to Emefiele, Okowa, PDP and Atiku? If they didn't, why were they hell bent on humiliating Tinubu with their boss even writing to accuse Tinubu of Noriega moment. If there was no personal or business interest for them, why did they take it so personal?

Then they accused the minister of staying in Eko Hotel and Suites; what has that got to do with anything?

On the surface, Rufai Oseni and Arise News have serious questions; but the questions are not balanced, because they have not asked Landmark questions. They have clearly taken a side and they are fighting for either personal or business interests. Yesterday, it became clear when they interviewed a former Commissioner of Police. The conversation was accusatory and not intermediatory. Answers provided by the government are never acceptable to them, but they believe everything the Landmark CEO says.

Rufai Oseni, you claim to fact check everything. Please fact-check whether Landmark rightfully owned that land and whether he was cleared to build there.

One more point to make: you claim there was no stakeholder engagement before demolition. David Umahi sat down in your studio to say that he met with the CEO of Landmark and that they adjusted their plans to spare his properties. You also asked why properties not previously marked for demolition and outside the right
of way were demolished. As a journalist, you ought to be aware that notices of demolition were sent to all affected parties and they complied.

How come only Landmark is complaining?

What is Arise News/Rufai Oseni's personal/business interest here?

PS: When a former editor and a firmer executive director of PUNCH newspapers had a fight over one of them allegedly collecting millions of naira from corrupt politicians and businessmen to give them positive press coverage and kill negative stories, both of them were forced out of the media house. It became clear that some journalists used the media to promote personal and business interests. So if you see any media house seemingly pursuing or protecting someone's business interest, even at the expense of the public good, money is involved.

How come Channels TV, NTA, TVC or AIT are not fighting or protecting any interests? Why certain journalists from certain media houses?

Rufai Oseni asked to see the account statements of someone's private business. Can Rufai Oseni publish his own account statements so we are convinced he did not receive a PR contract to use his platform to demarket the coastal road project

You talked about Channels TV, AIT, TVC, NTA. You and i knows very well these are APC television. Mouth piece of TINUBU.

Only ARISE Television stands tall especially for the masses. There are questions Channels or NTA dare not ask some government appointees but ARISE will do it

Is difficult to stand alone but ARISE Television right now is the best Television in Nigeria atleast they speak for majority of Nigerians.

Most Nigerian hate the truth thats why this country will never develop despite the enormous resources.

Bitter TRUTH......

shugamummy:
Mumu man, are you beyond redemption. Dangote refinery is working and am sure you have gone severally to fuel stations looking for fuel and even begging to buy a litre for 1000 Naira. Was it not ₦140/litre that Tinubu fought against when he dragged you and other buffoons without any thinking cap to go for protest to occupy Nigeria. Today, you are buying fuel at 1k, dollar @ 1440 and no job and no food with rising insecurity yet you have the mind to keep loving your slavemaster. Stockholm syndrome indeed

1) Peter Obi will never be president of Nigeria
2) No IIGB0 will ever smell the presidency of Nigeria
3) We will never give IIGB0 BIAFLA
4) IIGB0S will forever be bitter about Nigeria

Know the above and know peace

Minister Umahi was in their studio some weeks ago & he answered all these questions, why is he hell bent on criticizing this road project, rufai should tell us how much landmark paid him to be doing this stupid PR work for them. Useless & hungry journalist!

emkz:
One of the presenters of the Morning Show on Arise News, Mr Rufai Oseni, took to his twitter handle to continue to question the Lagos-Calabar coastal road project.



Source: Oseni Rufai

emkz:
One of the presenters of the Morning Show on Arise News, Mr Rufai Oseni, took to his twitter handle to continue to question the Lagos-Calabar coastal road project.



Source: Oseni Rufai

If you take rufai serious i am sorry for you.