₦airaland Forum

Certified True Copy of the Judgement of yesterday.

Hmmmm. Judiciary is part of the Government

Wike boys were busy celebrating in ignorance

SenatorCharles1:
Wike boys were busy celebrating in ignorance

Are you sure you are not the one celebrating in ignorance. It is clearly stated that the suit is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, which means the appropriate court where the case was supposed to be filed is not the court before whom it was filed

Wike and Fubara are fighting for their stomach. They are not fighting for anyone

SadiqBabaSani:
Are you sure you are not the one celebrating in ignorance. It is clearly stated that the suit is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, which means the appropriate court where the case was supposed to be filed is not the court before whom it was filed

It can mean anything you wish to interpret.
A lower court had already decided the matter, the other party had appealled, the matter is before the appeal court who is about to rule on the matter, you approach another lower court which now lacks jurisdiction to entertain such matter before a higher court.

BERNIMOORE:
Illiterate man Does this look like a Judgement?

ask those who were rejoicing yesterday na... 😂..
Na appeal court go decide the matter.

Fubara keep going, nothing do you. 4 is greater than 21

The judiciary is a haven of corrupt under Ariwoola and Tinubu.

Want of jurisdiction simply means that the Judge is saying that the persons who filed shouldn't have and he doesn't have the powers to rule on anything associated therewith.

What the Judge was saying is that he had no authority to hear the case

Once a Court doesn't have any jurisdiction on any matter, any judgement no matter how beautifully written is null and void.
What it simply means is that, the Court made no pronouncement whatsoever on whether Amaewhule & Ors are members of the PDP or not.

1. Amadi & Ors did not show in their affidavit that they were either members of the RSHA, PDP or APC.

2. As Registered voters, they didn't show how the 'defection or otherwise' of the now 'famous 27' will affect them.

3. As Registered voters, they didn't show how the 'defection' will cause an injury to them, quite more than other registered voters in the state.

It is not controversial..... the judgement is trite and sordid.

fergie001:
It is not controversial..... the judgement is trite and sordid.

Want of jurisdiction simply means that the Judge is saying is that the persons who filed shouldn't have and he doesn't have the powers to rule on anything associated there with.

What the Judge was saying is that he had no authority to hear the case

thanks for much clarification here @barrister fergie001. God bless your wisdom always. What you are saying here is different from what pro Wike lawmakers are posting on the media pages

SenatorCharles1:
Certified True Copy of the Judgement of yesterday.

thanks for posting this copies here. God bless your wisdom always. Fubara is winning the war well

Fibula is not serious

fergie001:
Want of jurisdiction simply means that the Judge is saying that the persons who filed shouldn't have and he doesn't have the powers to rule on anything associated therewith.

What the Judge was saying is that he had no authority to hear the case

Once a Court doesn't have any jurisdiction on any matter, any judgement no matter how beautifully written is null and void.
What it simply means is that, the Court made no pronouncement whatsoever on whether Amaewhule & Ors are members of the PDP or not.

1. Amadi & Ors did not show in their affidavit that they were either members of the RSHA, PDP or APC.

2. As Registered voters, they didn't show how the 'defection or otherwise' of the now 'famous 27' will affect them.

3. As Registered voters, they didn't show how the 'defection' will cause an injury to them, quite more than other registered voters in the state.

It is not controversial..... the judgement is trite and sordid.

It simply means the judgment given by Gbasam yesterday still subsists....the appeal court was supposed to rule today

senatordave1:
I do not understand.yesterday,justice Gbasam gave judgment against Fubara camp na

That was the information flying around, but this was the exact judgement order.....

fergie001:
That was the information flying around, but this was the exact judgement order.....

I just edited it.it is the same thing

senatordave1:
It simply means the judgment given by Gbasam yesterday still subsists....the appeal court was supposed to rule today

Yes, it does.....

"Want of Jurisdiction" meaning he cannot hear the case.... In local parlance, there is nothing to rule. He simply said nothing and struck out the case. From the order, there was 'technically' no judgement.

The Appeal Court adjourned to June 20, 3 days after the LG Chairmen must have vacated office.

They are treating 5 related suits.

fergie001:
Yes, it does.....

"Want of Jurisdiction" meaning he cannot hear the case.... In lock parlance, there is nothing to rule.

The Appeal Court adjourned to June 20, 3 days after the LG Chairmen must have vacated office.

They are treating 5 related suits.

It also means all the orders and injunctions gotten by fubara is invalid...
No,the judge has indirectly given expo on how the defection case will end....
I am not interested in the LGA chairmen aspect,me and you know anything beyond 3 years is unconstitutional except the constitution gives states room to amend tenure limit.

senatordave1:
It also means all the orders and injunctions gotten by fubara is invalid...
No,the judge has indirectly given expo on how the defection case will end....
I am not interested in the LGA chairmen aspect,me and you know anything beyond 3 years is unconstitutional except the constitution gives states room to amend tenure limit.

He didn’t even need the injunction to uphold what the Supreme Court has already been specific about on the case of defection of members . They blatantly told everyone they defected and submitted an affidavit to that effect and since that day , each of them cease to be a law maker . They are the ones that actually need to get an injunction restraining the governor from pushing them out.

phemmyjohnson:
He didn’t even need the injunction to uphold what the Supreme Court has already been specific about on the case of defection of members . They blatantly told everyone they defected and submitted an affidavit to that effect and since that day , each of them cease to be a law maker . They are the ones that actually need to get an injunction restraining the governor from pushing them out.

Lol,what the supreme court ruled is different from this.in that supreme court ruling,there was clear and unanimous proof that they defected.everyone agreed,the lawmakers at them were saying they defected because their parties was fragmented but this is not the case here.cant you spot the damn difference

phemmyjohnson:
He didn’t even need the injunction to uphold what the Supreme Court has already been specific about on the case of defection of members . They blatantly told everyone they defected and submitted an affidavit to that effect and since that day , each of them cease to be a law maker . They are the ones that actually need to get an injunction restraining the governor from pushing them out.

Very true



Very infantile decision by the law makers
Wike believes in rule of might overrule of law

The law has strenght and will remain

senatordave1:
It also means all the orders and injunctions gotten by fubara is invalid...
No,the judge has indirectly given expo on how the defection case will end....

The Court didn't go into those issues..... Even if it did, it is null and void ab initio.

it is settled law that jurisdiction is a radical and crucial question of competence because if a court has no jurisdiction to hear and determines a case, the proceedings are and remain a nullity ab inito however well conducted and brilliantly decided they might be since a defect in competence is not intrinsic, but extrinsic, to the entire process of adjudication. Jurisdiction is therefore considered to be the nerve center of adjudication, the blood that gives life to the survival of an action in a court of law in the very same way that blood gives life to the human being in particular and the animal in general

See Michael Dapianlong. V . Chief (Dr.) Joshua Chibi Dariye(2007) per Onnoghen JSC (as he then was)

fergie001:
The Court didn't go into those issues..... Even if it did, it is null and void ab initio.

it is settled law that jurisdiction is a radical and crucial question of competence because if a court has no jurisdiction to hear and determines a case, the proceedings are and remain a nullity ab inito however well conducted and brilliantly decided they might be since a defect in competence is not intrinsic, but extrinsic, to the entire process of adjudication. Jurisdiction is therefore considered to be the nerve center of adjudication, the blood that gives life to the survival of an action in a court of law in the very same way that blood gives life to the human being in particular and the animal in general

See Michael Dapianlong. V . Chief (Dr.) Joshua Chibi Dariye(2007) per Onnoghen JSC (as he then was)

You are missing the point.all judgments given by the rivers high court is void meaning the amaewhule faction subsists...
Secondly,even though judgment of yesterday is null,this is how the fhc and appeal will rule that is why fubara is buying time with frivolous high court orders

SenatorCharles1:
Certified True Copy of the Judgement of yesterday.

this you will not take to front page, because it not of evil, if its bad news you will quickly sent to front page

senatordave1:
You are missing the point.all judgments given by the rivers high court is void meaning the amaewhule faction subsists...

How can a decision of the Court be null?
The Appeal Court said so?

Secondly,even though judgment of yesterday is null,this is how the fhc and appeal will rule that is why fubara is buying time with frivolous high court orders

See, you forgot that Amaewhule and others have refused to pursue their case before Justice Donatus Okorowo of the FHC, Abuja they filed in December last year, because they deposed in an affidavit evidence there that they indeed defected because of the internal wranglings in the PDP.....

Before that same Court, PDP also stated that the members were no longer in the PDP.... All this in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1681/2023.

Now the Amaewhule-led lawmakers have now surreptitiously and chameleonically changed their tunes in another Court in Suit No: FHC/PH/CS/90/2024. In this particular suit, PDP was not even a party to the suit however, they nicodemously pushed themselves there and began to sing a new song.

So how can they approbate and reprobate?
How can you tell the Court you indeed defected, then go to another court and say you didn't defect..... Hope you know the implication of that?

SadiqBabaSani:
Are you sure you are not the one celebrating in ignorance. It is clearly stated that the suit is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, which means the appropriate court where the case was supposed to be filed is not the court before whom it was filed

You lack jurisdiction yet you make orders to join a party.

You dismiss an action and or strike it out!

What is the effect of the strike?

Then you dismiss the claimants case for lacking in merit.

Dah!

fergie001:
How can a decision of the Court be null?
The Appeal Court said so?


See, you forgot that Amaewhule and others have refused to pursue their case before Justice Donatus Okorowo of the FHC, Abuja filed in December last year, because they deposed in an affidavit evidence there that they indeed defected because of the internal wranglings in the PDP.....

Before that same Court, PDP also stated that the members were no longer in the PDP.... All this in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1681/2023.

Now both the PDP and Amaewhule-led lawmakers have now nicodemously and chameleonically changed their tunes in another Court in Suit No: FHC/PH/CS/90/2024.

So how can they approbate and reprobate?
How can you tell the Court you indeed defected, then go to another court and say you didn't defect..... Hope you know the implication of that?

Lol you are right! They are all goners . I’m waiting for them to say it was a skit in the first court they approached and declared they indeed defected 😂 .

I kept saying it they made an affidavit and submitted it .
That was one of their errors which might deny them their entry back to the assembly

fergie001:
How can a decision of the Court be null?
The Appeal Court said so?


See, you forgot that Amaewhule and others have refused to pursue their case before Justice Donatus Okorowo of the FHC, Abuja filed in December last year, because they deposed in an affidavit evidence there that they indeed defected because of the internal wranglings in the PDP.....

Before that same Court, PDP also stated that the members were no longer in the PDP.... All this in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1681/2023.

Now both the PDP and Amaewhule-led lawmakers have now nicodemously and chameleonically changed their tunes in another Court in Suit No: FHC/PH/CS/90/2024.

So how can they approbate and reprobate?
How can you tell the Court you indeed defected, then go to another court and say you didn't defect..... Hope you know the implication of that?

Are you a practicing lawyer? You seem to know so much about Nigerian law and judgement of past cases. It would be a waste if you are simply a pundit, when, in fact, you could be so much more.

BadMaster:
Are you a practicing lawyer? You seem to know so much about Nigerian law and judgement of past cases. It would be a waste if you are simply a pundit, when, in fact, you could be so much more.

I wish I were one....

Noted