₦airaland Forum

just telling you..... all people are not fools

Najdorf:
I suggest you take your own advice

HITdemUP:
Saying that to make you feel happy I guess . Why hasn't their economy crumble despite all the sanction ?

There’s nothing to make me happy in what I just said. Those countries are 3rd world countries that have nothing special to offer

And back to your flimsy question, the right question should be “can the Russian economy withstand a full blown war in this era?” Unlike the Americans that can fight many wars at same time and still have their economy waxing strong.

Wildkat02:
There’s nothing to make me happy in what I just said. Those countries are 3rd world countries that have nothing special to offer

And back to your flimsy question, the right question should be “can the Russian economy withstand a full blown war in this era?” Unlike the Americans that can fight many wars at same time and still have their economy waxing strong.

No Country will engage Russia in a full blown war just like USA . Russia is a nuclear power for a reason.

HITdemUP:
No Country will engage Russia in a full blown war just like USA . Russia is a nuclear power for a reason.

In a conventional war, there are countries that can engage Russia well. And that’s why Russia prefers to go nuclear when they feel threatened. That’s a big sign of weakness.

To whom much I should given, much is expected

[quote author=Wildkat02 post=131274426]In a conventional war, there are countries that can engage Russia well. And that’s why Russia prefers to go nuclear when they feel threatened. That’s a big sign of weakness.

To whom much I should given, much is expected [/quote
I'm sorry for mentioning you sir, how many wars has USA fought alone and won? can the USA fight Russia alone and not go back to stone age along with Russia? ask US these questions and you will shocked?

[quote author=babyboy4every1 post=131274757][/quote]Both countries will go back to Stone Age when it comes to a nuclear war. In a conventional war, the US will decimate Russia. A good economy can sustain a war for long and Russia hasn’t got such a stable economy for a prolonged conventional war. That’s why they’ll always opt for a nuclear war, which will in turn boomerang on them

Wildkat02:
In a conventional war, there are countries that can engage Russia well. And that’s why Russia prefers to go nuclear when they feel threatened. That’s a big sign of weakness.

To whom much I should given, much is expected

USA was weak to have nuke Japan judging from your own excuses

HITdemUP:
USA was weak to have nuke Japan judging from your own excuses

The USA were simply looking for an avenue to test a newly discovered bomb.

How many countries have they nuked after then? It’s good to be logical when making comments

Wildkat02:
The USA were simply looking for an avenue to test a newly discovered bomb.

How many countries have they nuked after then? It’s good to be logical when making comments

You are the one not being logical bro . Only adapting to your own conviction . The US was being subdued by air strike from Japan before they go Nuclear . That simply imply they felt they couldn't win the war conventionally hence the Nuclear attack to bring the war to an abrupt end. US hasn't nuke any country since then because no other country has cross their redline.

Let's argue without emotions... US is feared today because of that nuclear attack on Japan as it serves as deterrent to other Countries trying to undermine or defeat its military . Same way other Nations are reluctant to help Ukraine to attack the heart of Russia with a conventional weapons because of Russia nuclear capability.
The truth is that Russia won't lose the Ukraine war, they rather go nuclear than lose.. You can't defeat a nuclear power.

Wildkat02:
The USA were simply looking for an avenue to test a newly discovered bomb.

How many countries have they nuked after then? It’s good to be logical when making comments

And You think Russia won't test his nukes too when the opportunity arise ?
Nukes aren't supposed to be used. They are deterrent . It's only when you go against such deterrence that they are deployed .

How you have read about the Russia recent nuclear doctrine ? I don't argue based on sentiment or get news from a single source.