₦airaland Forum

"Nomads Of Yahweh": 3400-Year Old Egyptian Inscription Proves Bible True

Man discovers the oldest inscription yet of "Yahweh", the God of the Israelites, in Egypt.

Watch Video:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwNNiUIYpiA?si=0zbd4TiGy5Skfv6Y

The Bible is by far the most reliable history book in history, believe it or not.

God bless.

jesusjnr2020:
The Bible is by far the most reliable history book in history, believe it or not.

God bless.

Yes it absolutely is, so much so that it contradicts itself at every turn, contradicts its own texts, contradicts its own philosophy and contradicts most of actual history and how we know the world works. What a reliable book, so reliable it spurned out more than 2 religions and 40,000+ denominations of differing interpretations after being divinely inspired. It is indeed the most reliable. Hallelujah!!!

Lucifyre:
Hallelujah!!!

Amen!!!

Lucifyre:
…. contradicts ……. how we know the world works. … .

Forgive my edit by the remnant is the ONLY argument needed for these religious nonsense.

Instead of you to meshionu you will quickly run online to prove your Bible is true with any tiny close discovery!

The archaeology related to the nomadic peoples associated with Yahweh, particularly in the context of the ancient Near East, has sparked significant debate regarding the historical accuracy of Biblical accounts. Here are some key points to consider:

1. The Shasu and Yahweh
Archaeological findings suggest that Yahweh may have originally referred to a place name associated with a nomadic group known as the Shasu. This group inhabited regions in the southern Negev and surrounding areas during the Bronze Age.
The Soleb inscription, discovered in Nubia, is one of the earliest references to Yahweh, indicating that the worship of Yahweh was linked to these nomadic peoples rather than a singular, unified Israelite identity as depicted in the Bible.

2. Lack of Evidence for the Exodus
The Biblical narrative describes the Israelites' 40-year wandering in the desert after their exodus from Egypt. However, archaeological evidence supporting this extensive journey is notably absent. Many scholars argue that there is no clear archaeological record of a large group of people living in the desert during this time.
Excavations in areas traditionally associated with the Israelites, such as Kadesh-Barnea, have not yielded artifacts or settlement patterns that would corroborate the Biblical account of the Exodus.

3.Historical Context of the Israelites
Some archaeological studies suggest that the emergence of the Israelites as a distinct group occurred gradually, rather than through a dramatic conquest as described in the Book of Joshua. This challenges the traditional narrative of a unified Israelite invasion of Canaan.
Evidence indicates that many of the early Israelites may have been Canaanites who adopted new cultural and religious practices over time, rather than a separate group entering the land from outside.

4. Interpretation of Archaeological Findings
The interpretation of archaeological data can vary widely. While some argue that findings disprove specific Biblical events, others contend that archaeology should not be used to definitively prove or disprove religious texts. Instead, it can provide context and insight into the historical and cultural settings of the time.

Conclusion
While archaeological evidence does not outright disprove the existence of Yahweh or the Biblical accounts, it raises questions about the historical accuracy of certain narratives. The findings suggest a more complex relationship between the nomadic peoples, their worship practices, and the development of the Israelite identity than what is presented in the Biblical texts. Abeg next time dey careful when you want to prove your God scientifically as you can't prove Trinity nor Holy Spirit with science!

For example, Jesus said in Mathew 13:32 - Though it (i.e. the mustard seed) is the smallest of all seeds, yet when it grows, it is the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds come and perch in its branches.

Can we prove this scientifically?
Is the mustard seed the smallest of all seeds?
Does it grow to the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree?

KnownUnknown:
Forgive my edit by the remnant is the ONLY argument needed for these religious nonsense.

Carry on bro.

jesusjnr2020:
The Bible is by far the most reliable history book in history, believe it or not.

God bless.

This fact is indisputable. The world would continue to unravel more mysteries as the end draws nearer.

In the hereafter, those who have based their lives on the inconclusive evidences of imperfect science would wish they listened to the warnings of the Believers who have sounded the Gospel to them on earth. Deceived atheists are in serious trouble except they repent.

ABEG, YOU IGNORAMUS SHOULD EDUCATE YOURSELVES INSTEAD OF WRITING YEYE NONSENSSE ONLINE!!!!

all the fables that are written in the bible/qur'an or torah are all collection of spiritual writings (and certainly not facts) written by some men who knew about THE BOOK OF THE DEAD. if you want to follow any historical spiritual writings, then use the oldest of them all aka the Egyptian book of going forth by day aka The book of the Dead, which all your religious books of today descend from.... and who was written 4000years before any bible/Qur'an or torah etc was ever written.

everything written in the bible derives from something that was written 4000 years (in Egypt) before the bible was even written by some xtians with fake story. the bible was invented by men, and they just removed women as gods and made themselves "holy"... in Egyptian mythology men AND women were gods. only women can create life, so they had to take away that power from women and thus why most of these religion look down on women.

here are also some other stories written in the bible that derives from Egyptian mythology written thousands of years before the old testament was remotely written:
- the story of god creating life out of dust is the exact story of Egyptian god Khnum who was known to create life out of clay.
- the 10 commandments story is exactly what is called the NEGATIVE CONFESSION aka 42 rules of life or even the GOLDEN RULES OF MAAT aka the ethical and moral principle that all Egyptian citizens were expected to follow throughout their daily lives. They were expected to act with honor and truth in matters that involve family, the community, the nation, the environment, and the gods.
- the story of jesus and his virgin mother Mary (aka immaculate conception) is also a story that happened in Egypt way before the bible story of mary and jesus.... The god Kneph (Holy Ghost) and the goddess Hathor hold crosses to the head and nostrils of Isis (aka a virgin) and blew in it to mystically impregnate her. Isis (a virgin) gave birth to her son, Horus. Horus is the Egyptian version of Jesus. Horus was a child god born 4000years before jesus, and Horus story is well documented on various pyramids/tombs in Egypt (example Luxor).
- jesus ressurection story is the exact same story as the king Osiris story.... aka he was killed and resurrected.
- the story of the pearly gates of heaven is what is well known as the Spell 125 in the BOOK OF THE DEAD aka the Weighing of the Heart of the deceased standing in a judgment hall while his heart is placed on the scales of justice and balanced against the weight of a feather.
- the story of Moses himself who was born in Egypt and lived all his life in Egypt... you want to tell us that he never heard of the BOOK OF THE DEAD...which was the most famous religious book in Egypt with all these stories?!?! come on now, this make no damn sense! wasnt Moses tried for murder 40yrs before he received the 10commandment? how can they have rules in Egypt against murder then if supposedly it was god who sent the 10 commandment to Moses 40yrs later? thats because these laws were present before the 10commandment, aka you should not kill, you should not steal etc
- the saying "Amen" derives from the name of the supreme Egyptian gods called Amen and Ra, which thereafter were combined and called Amen-Ra (Amunra)

same with stories taken from torah etc... all of them derive from Egyptian stories written 4000years before their jewish/hindus/muslim holybooks were created, and that you can still see in Egyptian pyramids and tombs. the only difference is that the Egyptian had women gods while all these xtianity/judaism etc removed all the women as goddesses when they created their religion to enslave people mentally (instead of better your life).

[code][/code]

FxMasterz:
This fact is indisputable. The world would continue to unravel more mysteries as the end draws nearer.

In the hereafter, those who have based their lives on the inconclusive evidences of imperfect science would wish they listened to the warnings of the Believers who have sounded the Gospel to them on earth. Deceived atheists are in serious trouble except they repent.

😂

Believe it or not, it can never change that fact.

jesusjnr2020:
"Nomads Of Yahweh": 3400-Year Old Egyptian Inscription Proves Bible True

Man discovers the oldest inscription yet of "Yahweh", the God of the Israelites, in Egypt.

Watch Video:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwNNiUIYpiA?si=0zbd4TiGy5Skfv6Y

So I did my little research on this subject and got this….

This video refers to a pair of Egyptian inscriptions, one from Soleb (during the reign of Amenhotep III) and the other from Amarah West (during the reign of Ramses II). Both inscriptions include the word yhwʒ in a list making reference to the land of the “shasu”-people. The “Shasu” (see R. Giveon, Les Bédouins Shosou des documents égyptiens, Leiden 1971) basically occupy the semantic niche of “nomads”.

David Caliban has quoted the relevant line (which appears in both lists), but here is a fuller list from one of the inscriptions to give some sort of idea of the context in which that line stands:

Amarah West, Ll. 93–98:

tʒ šʒśw ś‘rr , i.e. land of the Shasu: Seir
tʒ šʒśw rbn , i.e. land of the Shasu: l/r-b-n
tʒ šʒśw pyspʒys , i.e. land of the Shasu: P-y-s-p-y-s
tʒ šʒśw śmt , i.e. land of the Shasu: S-m-t
tʒ šʒśw yhwʒ , i.e. land of the Shasu: Y-h-w-ʒ
tʒ šʒśw (t)rbr , i.e. land of the Shasu: (T)-l/r-b-l/r

Assuming that ś‘rr is correctly identified as “Seir”, a mountain in Edom to the South of Palestine, then it would be a good working hypothesis that in every line the final word is a toponym. Toponym means a place name, especially one derived from a topographical feature. Some of the other words could be identified as toponyms (e.g. rbn could be the town “Laban” at Dt. I 1), but none of these identifications are truly certain. For that matter, one could challenge the identification of ś‘rr as “Seir”. All the same, it is impossible on current evidence to refute the proposition that yhwʒ is a toponym because there is no certain identification of any of these words as something other than a toponym; and there is absolutely zero evidence in these inscriptions that yhwʒ is a theonym (which is what we really do need to identify yhwʒ as the Tetragrammaton, i.e. YHWH — see below).

Next, while yhwʒ certainly does appear to stand orthographically close to the Tetragrammaton (i.e. YHWH), there can be no certaintly that it really is the same word. The chief problem has to do with the notation of vowels both in ancient Hebrew and in ancient Egyptian — the signs for some consonants could be used to represent vowels, in particular — you guessed it – “y”, “h”, “w” and “ʒ” (this last is the glottal stop, i.e. “aleph” in Hebrew). The use of these signs to indicate vowels both in Hebrew and in Egyptian is irregular and in particular in Egyptian highly inconsistent; and unless the name in question is certainly known, we have no way of telling if we should read any given one of these signs as a consonant (i.e. /y/, /h/, /w/, or /’/) or as a vowel — and given how ludicrously inconsistent the Egyptians are when writing vowels, if they write them at all, almost any vowel could be indicated by any of those signs). I.e. /yahwe/, /’ihu’/, /yewi/, or /yihawe’a/ as well as two dozen other things are equally good resolutions of those four letters. The orthographical resemblance to the Tetragrammaton could just be dumb coïncidence.

Third, there is no semantic link between the two forms: the Tetragrammaton is a theonym, whereas there is a good chance that yhwʒ is a toponym. If there were a semantic link — i.e. if it were clear that yhwʒ was a theonym – then the case for identifying it with the Tetragrammaton would immediately grow much stronger.

Next, the Shasu were nomads on the periphery of Egypt, and the name appears to be a generic one: i.e. the name is used to describe people to the South of Egypt in Nubia, people to the West of Egypt in Libya, people in Syria far to the Northeast of Egypt, and (possibly) people on the Sinai Peninsula to the East of Egypt. If we locate those particular Shasu which are connected with yhwʒ on the Sinai Peninsula (and the only way to do so would be to accept the identification of ś‘rr as “Seir” — and this seriously undercuts any interpretation of yhwʒ as a theonym) so as to get them somehow close to where we might expect the people of Israel to be in the time period in question, then I would suggest that the wish is becoming father to the thought.

For all of these reasons I personally would hold off on identifying yhwʒ with the Tetragrammaton for simple want of evidence beyond orthographical resemblance. First, orthographical resemblance (esp. in this case) need not imply phonological closeness; second, there is no ascertainable semantic connection; third, there is no way certainly to establish a geographical connection.

All that said, the biblical evidence which we have for the worship of YHWH does indicate that the worship of this deity was not limited to the people of Israel. Other tribes on the Sinai Peninsula (e.g. the Qenites) appear to have worshipped this deity, and the reference in the Song of Deborah to YHWH’s having gone forth from Mt. Seir does suggest that at least some people in Edom worshipped this deity as well. So, yes, if these particular Shasu who are connected with yhwʒ really are to be located on the Sinai Peninsula, then they might have worshipped this deity whose name could have been used toponymically or perhaps ethnically… But, once again, I would suggest that the wish is here becoming father to the thought.
So long story short, this discovery is not set in stone(pun intended)