₦airaland Forum

Dream25:
Ukraine is not looking for a favourable position, they're looking for cheap PR...

It's senselessness that'll make you invade a country as big as Russia with just few thousands troop..

What can they negotiate with those small land?...
Russia is busy advancing in Donbass while Ukraine is deceiving itself in Kursk.. Misplaced priority..

Look at the map below and tell me the favourable position they're looking for..

Another armchair General

frankadrian:
The confidence una get for Russia ehn, even the Russian soldiers sef no get am.

No, you're totally missing the point. The conflict is doing more harm than good to the Ukrainians. Almost all of their able bodied men are gone, while Russia still has a normal life all over the country.

No amount of support from the west will make. Zelensky defeat Russia. Russia has the highest number of nuclear weapons on earth, the world will rather end than Russia losing a war.

And in the evening of the same day, he made media appearance from Kremlin!
Are you sure Nigeria-coated hunger is not befriending you?
And where is 'progozhin' now?

Paper tiger? The whole of west thought otherwise! Do you noticed sometimes, the US official unknowningly praising Russia military and the economy resistance!

Over 50 countries pooling resources together to face a country and the country is still standing! Tell which country can do that if not Russia

Whobedatte:
Ordinary Progozhin almost invaded Moscow and Putin fled to Belarus 🇧🇾. Imagine!
Russia is just a paper tiger and if Ukraine starts using US F16s deep into Russia , Russia will be gone .

Flame333:
Whatever, those bridges keep playing important role for Russia..

If you've been following the news of this war, you will see the importance to the Russians especially when Creamia bridge was destroyed at first, Putin sent massive missiles into Ukraine in retaliation..
When you're talking of military mobile bridge, you need to understand that Russia has a set goal and that goal is not a full scale war but for a short time which has however gone beyond the planned period without achieving the short term goal..

Bro, I don't know what MSM has been feeding you. Go on X and see what's happening to that handful of Ukrainian soldiers than infiltrated Kursk.

FYI, Germany just stopped funding Ukraine after they confirmed the Ukrainians blew up the nord stream.

frankadrian:
I think we have too many kids on NL. Sometimes if I just read their praise for Russia and continued defending of Putin's obvious blunder in Ukraine, I go just weak.

I've just chosen to just assume it's really kids we talk with here. Russia is clearly at wits end here, but NL Putin boys will just keep twisting the obvious.

I perfectly agree with the bolded.

Tealcrestmedia:
No, you're totally missing the point. The conflict is doing more harm than good to the Ukrainians. Almost all of their able bodied men are gone, while Russia still has a normal life all over the country.

No amount of support from the west will make. Zelensky defeat Russia. Russia has the highest number of nuclear weapons on earth, the world will rather end than Russia losing a war.

This is valid. Yet, remember who invaded who. Ukraine had no option than to defend their sovereignity, and for 3 years, with fewer weaponry, lesser military strength, smaller economy, severe restrictions on usage of allies weapons, they have not only succeeded in keeping Russia's efforts thwarted, they have now started an incursion into Russia, going strong for 2 weeks now, damaging hundreds of Russian infrastructures. Bro, be frank, Zelensky and Ukraine are the champs here.

hammerT:
WASTE OF TIME AND TERRORISM, THEY LEFT THE SOUTH TO TRY AND DRAG RUSSIA TO THE NORTH.


LOL



RUSSIA WILL JUST KEEP DESTROYING THEM IN THE SOUTH AND LURE THEM INTO A TRAP IN THE NORTH.




ONCE THEY FINISH IN SOUTH THEY WILL WIPE THEM OUT IN THE NORTH.

So Russia would manufacture troops from the air,use poorly trained ones or even civilians to regain territories captured by Ukraine?
Once Ukraine goes as far as it feel it can go into Russia and starts building trenches,even the entire Russia army would be bloodied before they can take it back,assuming they succeed.
Trenches are like bomb shelters,you can be bombing the area while the soldiers heavily fortified in them are playing cards,drinking and smoking cigarettes.
You need tanks,relatively larger and well equipped troops to take them back.But in this age of UAVs that Ukraine has lots of,that task becomes extra herculean.
So Russia's best bet is to keep on trying to push in the East because they know for all practical purposes Kursk is now Ukraine's,till they decide to voluntarily withdraw

ubest1:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/8/19/ukraine-hits-second-key-bridge-as-continues-incursion-into-russias-kursk

More reason why Russia should colonize all the Eastern Europe countries all over again, including Germany.
All of them have forgotten how they ALL FAILED in WW2 fighting Russia along side the Nazis. They will learn again, the hard way. Meanwhile, the front in Donbas is expanding everyday and Russia is ever close to the Dniper river. Kiev is just a stone’s throw afterwards, while NATO is wasting TIME and resources in Kurst

MT:
For those always having an exaggerated opinion about Russia military strength, this is when you should know you are clawing at straw.

US warns Russia not to use low yield tactical nuclear weapon and US communicate exactly what they will do to Russia in response if Russia crosses the red line.

Russia says many times that their nuclear doctrine dictates the use of nuclear weapon if their sovereignty is under threat.

Now, Ukraine is threatening the sovereignty of Russia and according to Russia nuclear doctrine, Russia needs to use nuclear weapon against Ukraine.

But they won’t , they can’t, they dare not simply because of the fear of the United States

If Russia use nuclear weapons, America won't do jack. No body send Washington message

Tealcrestmedia:
No, you're totally missing the point. The conflict is doing more harm than good to the Ukrainians. Almost all of their able bodied men are gone, while Russia still has a normal life all over the country.

No amount of support from the west will make. Zelensky defeat Russia. Russia has the highest number of nuclear weapons on earth, the world will rather end than Russia losing a war.

The bolded always deceive you.

How many of these nuclear weapons in Russia are functional ?. How many delivery mechanism does Russia have?

The United States has the highest delivery mechanisms for nuclear warhead than any nation, and when you combine the nukes of France, UK and US, it has outnumbered that of Russia.

Do you guys even understand the strength of the United States military. They have been honed to fight multiple wars at the same time in a devastating manner. They are the best military fighting force for a reason. Which other countries have bases scattered all over the world? Do you know the importance of military bases. Have you seen the United States doing military parades before?.

I feared when one US General states that "do NOT fear a weapon that you know, as you can build a defence against it. Fear a weapon that is unknown, which has not come into the mind of man". United States is a beast!.

seborrhic:
So Russia would manufacture troops from the air,use poorly trained ones or even civilians to regain territories captured by Ukraine?
Once Ukraine goes as far as it feel it can go into Russia and starts building trenches,even the entire Russia army would be bloodied before they can take it back,assuming they succeed.
Trenches are like bomb shelters,you can be bombing the area while the soldiers heavily fortified in them are playing cards,drinking and smoking cigarettes.
You need tanks,relatively larger and well equipped troops to take them back.But in this age of UAVs that Ukraine has lots of,that task becomes extra herculean.
So Russia's best bet is to keep on trying to push in the East because they know for all practical purposes Kursk is now Ukraine's,till they decide to voluntarily withdraw

But Russia took over well defended lines in muripol, bakhmut, adividika part of zaripoza, now whole of donbas. Despite it took Ukraine a decade to prepare fortifications.

seborrhic:
So Russia would manufacture troops from the air,use poorly trained ones or even civilians to regain territories captured by Ukraine?
Once Ukraine goes as far as it feel it can go into Russia and starts building trenches,even the entire Russia army would be bloodied before they can take it back,assuming they succeed.
Trenches are like bomb shelters,you can be bombing the area while the soldiers heavily fortified in them are playing cards,drinking and smoking cigarettes.
You need tanks,relatively larger and well equipped troops to take them back.But in this age of UAVs that Ukraine has lots of,that task becomes extra herculean.
So Russia's best bet is to keep on trying to push in the East because they know for all practical purposes Kursk is now Ukraine's,till they decide to voluntarily withdraw

LOL
Do u know it took Ukraine 10yrs to build trenches in Donbas? Which Russia has now uprooted in just 2yrs? Men! NL guys are truly wack. Abeg make una concentrate on olosho pages and Hoe matter, cos una no know anything else.

nedu666:
If Russia use nuclear weapons, America won't do jack. No body send Washington message

Russia will not dare it. They know it. Yes, NATO will be hesitant to take on Russia. Na only fool and terrorist Muslims dey rush into fight without thinking of the costs, but if Russia try use nuclear weapon, all bets are off. Nobody will stand by and watch you try and destroy the world. Even China will nuke Russia if Russia try am.

nedu666:
If Russia use nuclear weapons, America won't do jack. No body send Washington message

So what is stopping Russia from using nuclear weapon ?. Tell your comedian (Putin), who always sabre rattling about using nuclear weapon that it is time to use it.

Then sit down, with popcorn in your hands and watch the disaster that is about to unveil before you

MT:
The bolded always deceive you.

How many of these nuclear weapons in Russia are functional ?. How many delivery mechanism does Russia have?

The United States has the highest delivery mechanisms for nuclear warhead than any nation, and when you combine the nukes of France, UK and US, it has outnumbered that of Russia.

Do you guys even understand the strength of the United States military. They have been honed to fight multiple wars at the same time in a devastating manner. They are the best military fighting force for a reason. Which other countries have bases scattered all over the world? Do you know the importance of military bases. Have you seen the United States doing military parades.

I fear the day one US General states that "do NOT fear a weapon that you know, as you can build a defence against it. Fear a weapon that is unknown, which has not come into the mind of man". United States is a beast!.

So Russia submarines, icmb are for decorations. That is how you people said Russia was fighting with shovel, Russia has run out of missile, 1 million Russian soldiers have died. But na Ukraine dey put their men in headlock under forceful mobilisation

MT:
The bolded always deceive you.

How many of these nuclear weapons in Russia are functional ?. How many delivery mechanism does Russia have?

The United States has the highest delivery mechanisms for nuclear warhead than any nation, and when you combine the nukes of France, UK and US, it has outnumbered that of Russia.

Do you guys even understand the strength of the United States military. They have been honed to fight multiple wars at the same time in a devastating manner. They are the best military fighting force for a reason. Which other countries have bases scattered all over the world? Do you know the importance of military bases. Have you seen the United States doing military parades before?.

I feared when one US General states that "do NOT fear a weapon that you know, as you can build a defence against it. Fear a weapon that is unknown, which has not come into the mind of man". United States is a beast!.

Apt. But I fear the effort is wasted on these guys. They don't really know anything beyond what they care to support.

MT:
So what is stopping Russia from using nuclear weapon ?. Tell your comedian of a Putin, who always sabre rattling about using nuclear weapon that it is time to use it.

Then sit down, with popcorn in your hands and watch the disaster that is about to unveil before you

America won't do jack. No European nation will back them in retaliation for fear of being nuked. Between Russia and Europeans who dey enjoy life pass. Russia are used to suffering nit Europeans

MT:
The bolded always deceive you.

How many of these nuclear weapons in Russia are functional ?. How many delivery mechanism does Russia have?

The United States has the highest delivery mechanisms for nuclear warhead than any nation, and when you combine the nukes of France, UK and US, it has outnumbered that of Russia.

Do you guys even understand the strength of the United States military. They have been honed to fight multiple wars at the same time in a devastating manner. They are the best military fighting force for a reason. Which other countries have bases scattered all over the world? Do you know the importance of military bases. Have you seen the United States doing military parades before?.

I feared when one US General states that "do NOT fear a weapon that you know, as you can build a defence against it. Fear a weapon that is unknown, which has not come into the mind of man". United States is a beast!.

Okay chief. Ukraine all the way.

nedu666:
So Russia submarines, icmb are for decorations. That is how you people said Russia was fighting with shovel, Russia has run out of missile, 1 million Russian soldiers have died. But na Ukraine dey put their men in headlock under forceful mobilisation

Leave them na. Satan 2 and MAD is a joke to them. There's a reason US will forever avoid a direct conflict with Russia or China. Both of them won't survive it.

Another Obidient lamentation
Anyone or thing they support always in tears. They will always Labour in Vain

nedu666:
So Russia submarines, icmb are for decorations. That is how you people said Russia was fighting with shovel, Russia has run out of missile, 1 million Russian soldiers have died. But na Ukraine dey put their men in headlock under forceful mobilisation

You are empty head.

How many submarines do Russia has compared to the United States?

Russia has only 1,584 deployable nukes while US has 1,744 deployable nukes (these are nukes that could be launched immediately).

Do you think nukes are just like "akara" which you will grab and use. They involve a lot of overhead costs and with high corruption in Russia military, how many of their nukes could even be deployed.

America has the MOST delivery mechanisms in the world.

Let me give you a quote from an article, you can go and read the rest from the source:

"The destructive capabilities of US weapons range widely. The most powerful weapon—the B83 gravity bomb—is more than 80 times stronger than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. The smallest weapon has an explosive yield of only 2 percent of that. Such “low-yield” weapons are specifically designed to be more usable, increasing the likelihood they may actually be used.


Fear the United States military!

Source: https://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/worldwide

frankadrian:
Russia will not dare it. They know it. Yes, NATO will be hesitant to take on Russia. Na only fool and terrorist Muslims dey rush into fight without thinking of the costs, but if Russia try use nuclear weapon, all bets are off. Nobody will stand by and watch you try and destroy the world. Even China will nuke Russia if Russia try am.

Russia has more nukes than America, Britain France and China combined.
China will never nuke Russia, for wot? China is more likely to nuke America. Russia almost nuked America recently sef. NATO should continue playing with Russia, cos soon, THERE WILL BE NATO NO MORE

Russia taking Ukrainian territories and Ukraine taking Russian territories. Which kind war be this?

Tealcrestmedia:
Leave them na. Satan 2 and MAD is a joke to them. There's a reason US will forever avoid a direct conflict with Russia or China. Both of them won't survive it.

If it comes to nuclear weapon use, all the countries would be affected but Russia will be completely turned into a nuclear dust with range of strikes coming from different directions from the triad of France, UK and the US.

godofuck231:
so you blast the bridge when you wan take escape abi? Kai Russia bloody o, them make Ukraine think say them be commandos now , meanwhile na slaughter sample them be so

Escape into Russia? You reason am well?

Krismas:
Russia has more nukes than America, Britain France and China combined.
China will never nuke Russia, for wot? China is more likely to nuke America. Russia almost nuked America recently sef. NATO should continue playing with Russia, cos soon, THERE WILL BE NATO NO MORE

Do you think it is just the number of nukes that counts? Someone's educated you a little bit about a few factors that come into consideration in a nuclear warfare, yet you just dey shout Russia has more nuclear stockpile. Oga, you feel say if na by number, America wey get way more resources than Russia no go build more?

MT:
You are empty head.

How many submarines do Russia has compared to the United States?

Russia has only 1,584 deployable nukes while US has 1,744 deployable nukes (these are nukes that could be launched immediately).

Do you think nukes are just like "akara" which you will grab and use. They involve a lot of overhead costs and with high corruption in Russia military, how many of their nukes could even be deployed.

America has the MOST delivery mechanisms in the world.

Let me give you a quote from an article, you can go and read the rest from the source:

"The destructive capabilities of US weapons range widely. The most powerful weapon—the B83 gravity bomb—is more than 80 times stronger than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. The smallest weapon has an explosive yield of only 2 percent of that. Such “low-yield” weapons are specifically designed to be more usable, increasing the likelihood they may actually be used.


Fear the United States military!

Source: https://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/worldwide

U quoting America? LOL
Wot where u expecting America to say about America?
Why should Russia worry about subs, wen they are ahead in hypersonic missile technology? There is no single target Russia cannot nuke in America with precision.
And Russia HAS THE MOST MODERNIZED nuke arsenal in the world. Dey play

nedu666:
America won't do jack. No European nation will back them in retaliation for fear of being nuked. Between Russia and Europeans who dey enjoy life pass. Russia are used to suffering nit Europeans

Just tell me - what is stopping Putin from using nuclear weapon according to Russia's nuclear doctrine? No better time to launch nuclear weapon than now.

I will tell you what President Biden telegraphs to Putin if he uses, even tactical nuclear weapon :

"President Joe Biden has staked out the U.S. position on the issue, noting, “Any use of nuclear weapons in this conflict on any scale would be completely unacceptable to us as well as the rest of the world and would entail severe consequences.” This vagueness is intentional and consistent with a long-standing U.S. policy of “strategic ambiguity” aimed at giving U.S. policymakers flexibility in deciding how to respond to nuclear events."

source: https://www.cfr.org/article/if-russia-goes-nuclear-three-scenarios-ukraine-war

MT:
You are empty head.

How many submarines do Russia has compared to the United States?

Russia has only 1,584 deployable nukes while US has 1,744 deployable nukes (these are nukes that could be launched immediately).

Do you think nukes are just like "akara" which you will grab and use. They involve a lot of overhead costs and with high corruption in Russia military, how many of their nukes could even be deployed.

America has the MOST delivery mechanisms in the world.

Let me give you a quote from an article, you can go and read the rest from the source:

"The destructive capabilities of US weapons range widely. The most powerful weapon—the B83 gravity bomb—is more than 80 times stronger than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. The smallest weapon has an explosive yield of only 2 percent of that. Such “low-yield” weapons are specifically designed to be more usable, increasing the likelihood they may actually be used.


Fear the United States military!

Source: https://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/worldwide

Shebi Russia nukes don't work. No wahala, remember your people said Russia are fighting with shovel. Imagine someone fighting with shovel taking over 20% of your country while you are fighting with guns

frankadrian:
Do you think it is just the number of nukes that count? Someone's educated you a little bit about a few factors that come into consideration in a nuclear warfare, yet you just dey shout Russia has more nuclear stockpile. Oga, you feel say if na by number, America wey get way more resources than Russia no go build more?

America no get any resources pass Russia. If u go Sheraton, they can sell Coca Cola for u at N2000, which for go-slow, it’s not more than N400. America weapons are foolishly overpriced. One missile na $2million for America which Houthi go use 2thousand USD make. Private arms company are just fleecing the American taxpayers. Finish.

Krismas:
America no get any resources pass Russia. If u go Sheraton, they can sell Coca Cola for u at N2000, which for go-slow, it’s not more than N400. America weapons are foolishly overpriced. One missile na $2million for America which Houthi go use 2thousand USD make. Private arms company are just fleecing the American taxpayers. Finish.

I be no know say na play you dey play since. Oya, bye bye.