₦airaland Forum

BlueRayDick:
U are just analyzing what u have no full picture of.

People like Asisat Oshoala who are Close to the player spoke about how ridiculous Chelsea's offer was.

I don't know if it's the disappointment of him not joining Chelsea that is making some of u guys trolling him or what exactly.

Most of u guys are not Seeing Napoli for what they are ; a poorly run club that always end up selling their top talents after initial shakara. That was the same they did With Koulibaily

Like I said when I quoted you days back.. Most of them on this board are looking at this deal with a blue tinted glass.

Osimhen a 25 yr old striker in his prime, an age where most footballers sign the biggest contract of their career and they want him to reduce his salary.

This is not even the Chelsea of old that guarantees him trophy or competes at the highest level, so what does he gets in return for agreeing to a pay cut?

Even scrubs that moves from Italian seria a to PL gets a pay raise but they want the African footballer of the year and balon dor number 8 to take a pay cut, pay cut to come and play in the conference league.

This same player had a contract agreed with PSG, if not for Napoli's uselessness Chelsea will not even be in the running for him.

BlueRayDick:
U are just analyzing what u have no full picture of.

People like Asisat Oshoala who are Close to the player spoke about how ridiculous Chelsea's offer was.

I don't know if it's the disappointment of him not joining Chelsea that is making some of u guys troll him or what exactly.

Most of u guys are not Seeing Napoli for what they are ; a poorly run club that always end up selling their top talents for crumbs after initial shakara. That was the same they did With Koulibaily

Oga sterling dey your club, are you guys not paying half of his salary?

Osimhen agent said "no loan", and now he's accepting a loan.

Galatasaray that want to sign him on loan now, Napoli will pay some of Osimhen wages.

The paycut salary Chelsea offered is because Chelsea second offer included a loan and obligation to buy which is left for Chelsea to discuss his wages with him and Napoli won't any hand in his wages anymore.

Osiii his friend oshoala, if e sure oshoala that she's saying the truth, make she drop the conversation with Osimhen.

Ridiculous offer, why don't she disclose that ridiculous offer, make I believe her pass Fab.

So since the offer Chelsea offered no suit him, why didn't he accept Saudi offer.

BlueRayDick:
U are just analyzing what u have no full picture of.

People like Asisat Oshoala who are Close to the player spoke about how ridiculous Chelsea's offer was.

I don't know if it's the disappointment of him not joining Chelsea that is making some of u guys troll him or what exactly.

Most of u guys are not Seeing Napoli for what they are ; a poorly run club that always end up selling their top talents for crumbs after initial shakara. That was the same they did With Koulibaily

Oga sterling dey your club, are you guys not paying half of his salary?

Osimhen agent said "no loan", and now he's accepting a loan.

Galatasaray that want to sign him on loan now, Napoli will pay some of Osimhen wages.

The paycut salary Chelsea offered is because Chelsea second offer included a loan and obligation to buy which is left for Chelsea to discuss his wages with him and Napoli won't any hand in his wages anymore.

Osiii his friend oshoala, if e sure oshoala that she's saying the truth, make she drop the conversation with Osimhen.

Ridiculous offer, why don't she disclose that ridiculous offer, make I believe her pass Fab.

So since the offer Chelsea offered no suit him, why didn't he accept Saudi offer.

The twitter he later deleted, which shows she don't know what she waffling about.

WhoDeyHause:
In my opinion he should have taken the Saudi deal with a maximum three years, as much as wacko Jocko dey give us wahala for here, I don't support him reducing his salary to join us on a likely 7 year deal, he's a proven striker though overrated but he's still proven, and we also have don't have the premier league or champions league contending clout that we might say he would take the salary and join us, if he knew he wouldn't accept our offer he should have just gone to Saudi to cash out, in this time of flops even earning high, he can't slack, I just saw he asked Napoli to reduce his release clause to 75m before agreeing to move on loan, I still believe he'll get suitors if he cooks in turkey and ulokpa.

[color=royalblue]I am hearing the Gala deal is a rumour.

Let him train alone for the next 5 months, and let me see who will sign him in January and pay 285k per week.

I have been convincing myself that Benin juju no dey active, but this case has cleared my doubt.

This one no ordinary[/color]

Make Una free Osimhen. Someone I heard we were offering £60k per week, a crash from his €200+ earnings at Napoli.

If na you, you go take such slavery paycut?

Thazard:
You still didn't answer the question.

Lewandoski took paycut to play for Barcelona, so what are you even saying.

Griffon:
Make Una free Osimhen. Someone I heard we were offering £60k per week, a crash from his €200+ earnings at Napoli.

If na you, you go take such slavery paycut?

[color=royalblue]It was 150k and a loan deal.

Why can't Napoli pay the rest?

Sterling wey go Arsenal, Chelsea is still paying part.

Maybe his agent should have insisted on no loan, and watch Sterling collect 350 and rot on the bench.
[/color]

izzou:
[color=royalblue]It was 150k and a loan deal.

Why can't Napoli pay the rest?

Sterling wey go Arsenal, Chelsea is still paying part.

Maybe his agent should have insisted on no loan, and watch Sterling collect 350 and rot on the bench.
[/color]

If that’s really the case, then Napoli crash the deal.

izzou:
[color=royalblue]I am hearing the Gala deal is a rumour.

Let him train alone for the next 5 months, and let me see who will sign him in January and pay 285k per week.

I have been convincing myself that Benin juju no dey active, but this case has cleared my doubt.

This one no ordinary[/color]

No be rumour o, Osimhen has even agreed to join them a while ago, he'll heading to gala confirm, well this one might not be village people but listening to online advisers who don't really have his interest at heart except maybe whatsoever they think they'll get from him, some of them still follow to drag him, hopefully this episode teaches him and his agent a lesson, good luck to him.

EmmanuelScott1:
Oga sterling dey your club, are you guys not paying half of his salary?

Osimhen agent said "no loan", and now he's accepting a loan.

Galatasaray that want to sign him on loan now, Napoli will pay some of Osimhen wages.

The paycut salary Chelsea offered is because Chelsea second offer included a loan and obligation to buy which is left for Chelsea to discuss his wages with him and Napoli won't any hand in his wages anymore.

Osiii his friend oshoala, if e sure oshoala that she's saying the truth, make she drop the conversation with Osimhen.

Ridiculous offer, why don't she disclose that ridiculous offer, make I believe her pass Fab.

So since the offer Chelsea offered no suit him, why didn't he accept Saudi offer.

Summary of everything u've written here is Emotions, Emotions and Emotions.

No two loans/deals are one and same. The fact that u are I are jumping into conclusions based on Sterling's situation is enough to show I are discussing a topic u don't have a full details about.

The real question is " who runs a club like Napoli owners do?" You give ur star player an improves contract in December 2023 and by August 2024 u want to bundle him out at all cost? Why? Because u feel u need to sell him to buy more players even if he's not interested in his suitors. Smh

It's funny how it's Nigerians that should be having his back that are his own antagonists

BlueRayDick:
Summary of everything u've written here is Emotions, Emotions and Emotions.

No two loans/deals are one and same. The fact that u are I are jumping into conclusions based on Sterling's situation is enough to show I are discussing a topic u don't have a full details about.

The real question is " who runs a club like Napoli owners do?" You give ur star player an improves contract in December 2023 and by August 2024 u want to bundle him out at all cost? Why? Because u feel u need to sell him to buy more players even if he's not interested in his suitors. Smh

It's funny how it's Nigerians that should.having his back that are his own antagonists

Bro go and follow the story well, Osimhen and his agent fumbled themselves.

You're the one making a mistake. Osimhen signed a deal with Napoli so that they can allow him to leave next summer transfer.

OSIMHEN CLEARLY STATED "I DON'T WANT TO PLAY FOR YOU NEXT SEASON".

why are you blaming Napoli, the player made his choice and you're blaming the club for honouring his choice. Lol

EmmanuelScott1:
Lewandoski took paycut to play for Barcelona, so what are you even saying.

They are both different scenarios, lewadowski took a paycut only for his salary to increase season by season, go and see barka fans shouting he should be sold cause of his salary on their thread wella, a world class striker coming to a dead club like that can't be that stupid. Osimhen would not just take a paycut but would have likely be signed to a 6 or 7 years deal.

WhoDeyHause:
They are both different scenarios, lewadowski took a paycut only for his salary to increase season by season, go and see barka fans shouting he should be sold cause of his salary on their thread wella, a world class striker coming to a dead club like that can't be that stupid. Osimhen would not just take a paycut but would have likely be signed to a 6 or 7 years deal.

It's not different, bro

Chelsea increased palmer wages and about to increase Jackson own based on performances. Chelsea offered Osimhen several bonuses to convince him but he refused.

See ridiculous offer below 👇

kingBolton:
Like I said in when I quoted you days back.. Most of them on this board are looking at this deal with a blue tinted glass.

Osimhen a 25 yr old striker in his prime, an age where most footballers sign the biggest contract of their career and they want him to reduce his salary.

This is not even the Chelsea of old that guarantees him trophy or competes at the highest level, so what does he gets in return for agreeing to a pay cut?

Even scrubs that moves from Italian seria a to PL gets a pay raise but they want the African footballer of the year and balon dor number 8 to take a pay cut, pay cut to come and play in the conference league.

This same player had a contract agreed with PSG, if not for Napoli's uselessness Chelsea will not even be in the running for him.

The funny thing is it's not just Chelsea fans alone sef; there are Nigerians who don't like Osimehn's guts, there are Nigerians who are disappointed with his performance at AFCON and then there are those who don't like how he handled his spat with Finidi George.

All these people form econet on top this Osimehn transfer saga begin troll am as if he's the first player to have a botched transfer saga.

I'm sure if the player involved was not named Osimehn, most people would've been objective enough to see that Napoli sef na one kind yeye club. A club that can't really pint out to one reasonable reason why they are hell-bent on driving their best player away less than a year after giving him a bumper contract in reward for his service to them.

EmmanuelScott1:
Bro go and follow the story well, Osimhen and his agent fumbled themselves.

You're the one making a mistake. Osimhen signed a deal with Napoli so that they can allow him to leave next summer transfer.

OSIMHEN CLEARLY STATED "I DON'T WANT TO PLAY FOR YOU NEXT SEASON".

why are you blaming Napoli, the player made his choice and you're blaming the club for honouring his choice. Lol

Please post a link to the bold let me read and learn. We learn everyday

BlueRayDick:
Summary of everything u've written here is Emotions, Emotions and Emotions.

No two loans/deals are one and same. The fact that u are I are jumping into conclusions based on Sterling's situation is enough to show I are discussing a topic u don't have a full details about.

The real question is " who runs a club like Napoli owners do?" You give ur star player an improves contract in December 2023 and by August 2024 u want to bundle him out at all cost? Why? Because u feel u need to sell him to buy more players even if he's not interested in his suitors. Smh

It's funny how it's Nigerians that should.having his back that are his own antagonists

[color=royalblue]Osimhen said he does not want to play for Napoli.

It is even in the screenshot you posted.

He expressed his desire to leave, so why are you shocked with how they are treating him?

My issue with him is that he saw this coming, and kept on acting like he had many options.[/color]

BlueRayDick:
Please post a link to the bold let me read and learn. We learn everyday

Dey play.

If you no see the hand writing on the wall, no be my fault

Person tell you he want leave before season start, you still dey demand explanation. 😆

kingBolton:
You are letting your chelsea bias show in this osimhen situation.

What Chelsea bias? I never asked for him to be signed, even though I acknowledged the possibility of him joining.

I have no horse in this race, so I am clear-headed to make informed choices.

izzou:
[color=royalblue]I don't think that if Haaland wanted to leave City, only one European club would be asking for his signature

Osimhen is in his prime, blah blah blah, and yet, na only one Conference league bound team dey find am. Is he really worth the hype we are giving him?

After them, na Saudi.

As at now, na Galatasaaray dey find loan wey dem no go pay salary.

Hmmmmm[/color]

Ask blueraydick why arsenal and psg backed out

nateevs:
Alhaji we don't care about the difference. Nobody mentioned that if we got Dovbyk or Guirassy, we should excuse them for the first 7 seven games, whilst they found their feet.

The narrative was that they will hit the ground running, because they are immediately better than Jackson seeing as Jackson is the worst choice there can be.

He who giveth must taketh. You want us to jolly with you, as you rain abuses on Jackson every week, stretching the truth sometimes as you post many gifs, but you want us to cut Dovbyk some slack?

Me wey I mention to you many times that that there's no knowing that the guys you are mentioning can actually cut it in the PL with the faster pace, bigger defenders and tighter spaces.

But y'all want to be petty yet apply for exemptions at the same time. Nobody has monopoly of pettiness. There will be Dovbyk watch on this thread, until he shuts us up. God help him and he does a 007, then there will be dragging.

Egbon, you are obviously desperate to score a cheap point where none exists. Simply because your highly rated Jackson has started to cost us points with his cluelessness in front of goal and you know the impending L.

Baba, you are showing your hand too early o.

nateevs:
What Chelsea bias? I never asked for him to be signed, even though I acknowledged the possibility of him joining.

I have no horse in this race, so I am clear-headed to make informed choices.

What will you have done if you were his agent?

kingBolton:
What will you have done if you were his agent?

Have you seen how much Galatasaray are purpotedly offering?

His agent is just a goat.

Griffon:
Make Una free Osimhen. Someone I heard we were offering £60k per week, a crash from his €200+ earnings at Napoli.

If na you, you go take such slavery paycut?

And you believe it
Haba

BlueRayDick:
The funny thing is it's not just Chelsea fans alone sef; there are Nigerians who don't like Osimehn's guts, there are Nigerians who are disappointed with his performance at AFCON and then there are those who don't like how he handled his spat with Finidi George.

All these people form econet on top this Osimehn transfer saga begin troll am as if he's the first player to have a botched transfer saga.

I'm sure if the player involved was not named Osimehn, most people would've been objective enough to see that Napoli sef na one kind yeye club. A club that can't really pint out to one reasonable reason why they are hell-bent on driving their best player away less than a year after giving him a bumper contract in reward for his service to them.

Some are even attributing his transfer issues to the Instagram video forgetting that no Napoli big star has left the club in good terms.
Koulibaly was only allowed to leave when there was possibility of losing him for free.

This summer alone, PSG and the Saudi club has seen how difficult it is negotiating with Napoli.

iamoyindamola:
Ask blueraydick why arsenal and psg backed out

Did Arsenal sign a number 9 eventually?

Isn't it obvious Arteta was not interested in signing or playing a number 9?

As for PSG, I didn't follow them and don't know anything about their transfer decisions; so I'm not in the best place to give u answers on that

Nawa

I never knew Galatasaray had the ability to pay Osimhen €9 million in a year!

Unlimited22:
Have you seen how much Galatasaray are purpotedly offering?

His agent is just a goat.

According to Fabrizio, he will be on €9/€10m a year, same with what he is currently earning at Napoli.

His agent has many Bleep ups sha, making an agreement with someone like ADL should be the last thing you consider as an agent, someone that can wake up and change terms of agreement.
Secondly, he shouldn't have let the whole situation drag on till the ending of August. His players future should have been settled before pre-season.

Jodera:
Boss, as for the bolded, I can't say.

When Havertz was playing at Chelsea, he was one of the players I normally troll here— from his style of play to his finishing— it was so worst cos I knew how many chances this guy misses on per basis. The only thing I knew he was good at was heading balls.
I knew how I wailed endless when we bought him. He's someone I wouldn't touch with a 6 foot pole normally even if given for free

I'm shocked he started giving returns in terms of goalscoring (for us). If Havertz can do it for us and I can calm down a bit, I don't think I would really say no to Jackson.

Tbh, with a straight swap between Havertz and Jackson, I won't outrightly say no

I was expecting an emphatic Yes, so that I can ask Roland17 and other Arsenal fans to come and pass a vote of confidence.

Havertz was lazy but he has goal sense more than Jackson. Both are not Chelsea's standard though.

raumdeuter:
If Chelsea had bought them won't Chelsea be a new club to them too?

And what new club did Sesko join

I won't rate them based on their first 4 matches in a new league. Sound analysts don't do that especially for players we know their stats last season.

You should be paying for all these blunders some of you are making and getting corrected for.

EmmanuelScott1:
So after all the gra gra, Osimhen later accept Loan offer

His agent don hawk am go Galatasaray 😆

Wishing him the best, he don learn now.

Don't blame the agent for hyping his client.

Loan offer with drastic reduction in wages wasn't good for a striker getting to his prime.

EmmanuelScott1:
Lewandoski took paycut to play for Barcelona, so what are you even saying.

In his prime?

airmark:
Don't blame the agent for hyping his client.

Loan offer with drastic reduction in wages wasn't good for a striker getting to his prime.

The blame is on his agent, who said his client wouldn't go on a dry loan, yet at the end of the day, he still went on loan.

There's something you guys don't understand.

A dry loan means the player continues to earn his current salary, and it's up to the buying and selling clubs to decide who pays it. Galatasaray agreed with Napoli to cover his wages, not with Osimhen.

Chelsea came with a dry loan offer, but his agent rejected it.

A loan with an obligation to buy involves the buying club and the player negotiating the salary, as the club is obligated to buy him at the end of the season. It's better for both parties to agree on a fixed salary in advance.

Chelsea made this offer, and that's when they were negotiating with Osimhen to reduce his salary to fit their structure.


Chelsea gave him many offers (150k was the last offer), including bonuses, but he refused.

In the end, he still went with the first offer. I'm only mocking the agent who was adamant about "no loan," but later chose a loan. 😆