Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine - Christianity Etc (2) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Christianity Etc › Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine (2598 Views)
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 8:24pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Barristter07:I've already explained the verse, stop going back in circle! Nothing like HALF OR FULL HUMAN! |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 8:27pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Emusan:Partakers makes you what you partake. Partakers of flesh and blood are Flesh and blood , yes? The point is clear, |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 8:28pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Emusan:But trinitarians can use terms like " Fully human" for Jesus , until this evening . ![]() |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 8:37pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Barristter07:Nothing like FULLY HUMAN Understanding is the key. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 8:39pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Barristter07:So, you agreed that they will BE GOD. That's nice! |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 8:40pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Emusan:You are exactly what you partake. Simple! Anyone that share the divine nature is God's nature. Anyone that share flesh and blood is flesh and blood. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 8:41pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Emusan:Yeah. Since Godship is by Nature according to your logic. Cancel trinity and we should have something like Thousandnity or Millionity. Since there are many with God's Nature ![]() |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 8:42pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Barristter07:If that is the case, you agreed that the believers will be GOD ALMIGHTY. I'm loving this ![]() |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 8:44pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Barristter07:So WE BOTH AGREED. Cancel trinity and we should have something like Thousandnity or Millionity. Since there are many with God's NatureRather canceled ONE GOD. since TO PARTAKE MAKES YOU WHAT YPU PARTAKE which is your OWN WORD. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 8:50pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Emusan:Exactly the implication of such barbaric idea like Godship by Nature. They are all God Almighty Unfortunately for you, I don't ascribe Godship by virtue of Nature. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 9:04pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Barristter07:You are the one who know where you get GODSHIP BY NATURE from. The fact, that Jesus HAS THE VERY NATURE OF GOD and we know what that means. Unfortunately for you, I don't ascribe Godship by virtue of Nature.It's not about what you subscribe to but YOUR INTERPRETATION OF PARTAKE with this you have put galow in your own neck. To PARTAKE means THE BE VERY THING YOU PARTAKE since believers will be PARTAKER OF GOD'S NATURE means they will be GOD as well. This is your own interpretation not what you're trying to disprove. If I ask you, what does it mean to BE A PARTAKER? |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 9:10pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Emusan:" ye are GODS " Whatever you partake you become. Yes they are God's, but they have a God. Still inferior, the same way Jesus himself have a God despite having the same Divine Nature. If you have a God, you are not Almighty. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by ichuka(m): 10:58pm On Sep 07, 2024 |
Brothers, Let's look at the book of Galatians 3:15 to -22. . Verse 15 says, "Brothers, I speak according to man, though it is a man's covenant, yet when it has been ratified, no one nullifies it or makes additions. Assuming I signed a contract with you to build a duplex in Nija . I can't come back tomorrow to say I need additional money that building materials has gone up. Also you can't come and say prices of materials and workmanship has gone down , we must. Review the contract.No! If our contract can't be easily review how much more God contract with man. Verse16.. 16Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as one would in referring to many, but rather as in referring to one, “And to your seed,” that is, Christ.. God promised Abraham that he would bring forth Christ and that through Christ the nations would be blessed.the SEED is singular not plural meaning one, which is Christ. Verse17.. 17What I am saying is this: the Law, which came 430 years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise. The law came 430years after God promised Abraham Grace in Christ.we know a promise is something that's related to the future. So before that promise manifested. There's an urgent need to introduce the law. Verse18... 18For if the inheritance is [y]based on law, it is no longer [z]based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise. Yes. Verse19.. Why the Law then? It was added on account of the [aa]violations, having been ordered through angels at the hand of a [ab]mediator, until the Seed would come to whom the promise had been made.. If God covenant to Abraham through promise can't be changed, why was the law added? It was added because of violation/transgressions. Just like a "Catalyst" a catalyst is always added to some chemical reactions, to fasten the process , it's never part of the main materials or products. God gave the law to the Jews because He wanted to show the world through the Jews that He gave the law because of violator /transgressions.it was never the dish. But was added to achieve the main dish. Verse20.. 20Now a mediator is not for one party only; but God is only one. These verse is very lovely and beautiful. There's always two party in a contract. Here,Party A(God) n party B(man ) .if it's left for us , party B, we have no hope to uphold our own part of the contract.because of Sins/TRANSGRESSIONS.but He(GOD) came to our owe side of the contract, because He loves us.and up all our sins/transgression to His cross.fullfiling both side of the contract. That's why verse 20 says "BUT GOD IS ONLY ONE" which means that party A and B are One!!! God(in Christ) party A came down and took the side of party B(man) in the contract for fulfilment. Secondly, Philippians2:9...says..9For this reason also God highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name, 10so that at the name of Jesus EVERY KNEE WILL BOW, of those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11and that every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. The above verses affirms that every other name in the universe is under the canopy of the name "JESUS". I mean every name you as a sane person can mention. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Sand2022(op): 9:22am On Sep 08, 2024 |
Barristter07:Of course Divine nature is God's nature. Why? Because God is Spirit. That is not the point. The point is the features of God's nature. God is uncreated, He is omniscient, he is immutable, He is a Deity. Although all angels are spirits, they don't have an uncreated body, they are not Deities, nor are they omniscient. Jesus is described as the exact representation of that Being. No other persons can come close to that. It is the same with Jesus taken on a slaves form. That was flesh, but you can't say his flesh amd ours are the same. He is perfect and don't feel all that we feel like illness. So just as bodies are not just the same, so can we not say that God's being a spirit means that all spirits will be the same as Jehovah. No spirit is exact facsimile of Jehovah's nature as Jesus is. We the saints can't be like that. When we use nature, we mean the exact same feature inherent in such a nature. No creature has the same facsimile nature as Jehovah. In fact it is not logical to say that a creature nature will be exact facsimile of an uncreated nature. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Sand2022(op): 9:25am On Sep 08, 2024 |
Youareforgiven:Of course this will be ours in the future, but do we conclude that we will all be worshiped as God is in the future? |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 12:39pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Barristter07:The key point is @ color "Whatever you partake you BECOME" and you wrapped it up with "Yes they are God's" I like that. Now the implication of that is, they THEY BECOME GOD which means they have ALL THE ATTRIBUTES THAT MAKE GOD - To be GOD. But being clever by half as you know the implication, you decided to LIMIT it that they are INFERIOR. Based on your illustration of human in Heb 2:14 no human is inferior to ANOTHER HUMAN based on our NATURE as Jesus PARTOOK in flesh and blood you won't agree that Jesus is INFERIOR to other human. You see why your logic and claim is whacked. ![]() Also, the scripture didn't say Jesus PARTAKES in the Divine Nature rather the scripture says JESUS EXISTS IN THAT VERY NATURE which means whatever nature that makes God to be God is what Jesus exists in. If anything exists in human nature it means that being have ALL WHAT MAKE HUMAN TO BE HUMAN. IN Nature nothing like inferior or superior. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 12:48pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Emusan:Partakers exist in that same nature. So you don't have point Yes they are all GODS! I didn't place the limit, Scripture did. Every created being existing in God's nature Have a God they worshipped. Emphasis on " Have a God " . |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 12:54pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Barristter07:Very nonsense. No creature exists in GOD'S VERY NATURE. To exist in VERY OWN GOD NATURE, it means you HAVE ALL WHAT IT TAKE TO BE GOD. No where scripture placed the limit you did. Did you believe that when Jesus partakes in flesh and blood, Jesus was INFERIOR TO OTHER HUMAN? |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 12:58pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Emusan:The question should be when Jesus partake in Flesh and blood, did he exist in that same flesh and blood ? That should tell you exactly the point of what you partake you become. Yes they become God's! Do they have a God ? |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 1:01pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Barristter07:YOU DONT USE QUESTION TO ANSWER QUESTION. Answer my question first. That should tell you exactly the point of what you partake you become. Yes they become God's!No! Answer the question first! Was Jesus inferior to other human when he partakes as blood and flesh? I've told you, you already put galow in your own neck ![]() |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 1:21pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Emusan:He is not inferior because he didn't worship any human as his God. He exist exactly as the same flesh and blood he partakes. The same way anyone that partake as Divine Nature exist exactly as that Divine Nature. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 1:38pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Barristter07:@color-1: You want to be clever by half but I won't give room for that. @color-2: Good, which is what I want to hear. @color-3: This is where you finally buried it. To have EXACTLY THE SAME DIVINE NATURE MEANS THEY ARE GOD ALMIGHTY AS WELL just as Jesus was not INFERIOR AS HUMAN. One thing clear in all this your dubious hide and seek statement is that you know what it means when the scripture says THEY PARTOOK in Divine Nature just what it means when Jesus partakes as blood and flesh but you decided to be perambulating ![]() |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 2:00pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Emusan:Partook is to exist as that. Since you want to equate trinity to mean everyone having same nature and essence is Almighty, it's wrong, because everyone having that essence are many. I didn't equate anyone to God Almighty because they exist in his nature. As long as they worship him as their God, they are inferior. Did Jesus worship any human? That would make him inferior to the human. Irrespective of their having same nature. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 2:09pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Barristter07:No! Is to SHARE and to share doesn't mean YOU HAVE IT ALL. Since you want to equate trinity to mean everyone having same nature and essence is Almighty, it's wrong, because everyone having that essence are many.Scripture is very cleared, they will SHARE in that Divine Nature About Jesus, Jesus EXISTS IN THAT VERY NATURE. So, they are of two different coin side. To have God's Nature means YOU HAVE WHAT MAKE GOD TO BE GOD. I didn't equate anyone to God Almighty because they exist in his nature. As long as they worship him as their God, they are inferior.You already EQUATE ALL THOSE WHO WILL PARTAKE IN THE DIVINE NATURE with God ALMIGHTY when you said "The same way anyone that partake as Divine Nature EXIST EXACTLY as that Divine Nature." To EXIST EXACTLY AS THAT DIVINE NATURE means TO HAVE THE VERY NATURE THAT MAKS GOD TO BE GOD. Did Jesus worship any human? That would make him inferior to the human. Irrespective of their having same nature.Nature is not about WORSHIP. That some people worship some persons today doesn't mean BY NATURE they are INFERIOR to that person. We are HUMAN because WE HAVE THE SAME NATURE. Stop this kindergarten behavior jare.... |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 2:29pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Emusan:You admit that Jesus partook of the flesh and blood make him Exist as Flesh and blood, e reach divine nature, you change mouth. They exist as that Divine nature. Deal with it. Partook is to be what you partook. You can see the ridiculousness of the whole trinity, now we have plenty persons existing as Divine Nature |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 2:34pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Barristter07:The same thing you did, don't forget. They exist as that Divine nature. Deal with it.That is why I'm telling you that, then THEY ARE ALMIGHTY GOD Just as you agree that Jesus was ALSO HUMAN not INFERIOR. To exist in THAT DIVINE NATURE means they have ALL WHAT IT TAKES TO BE GOD ALMIGHTY. Partook is to be what you partook.It's a very simple English word that is why the word also means SHARE WHICH MEANS not not ALL You can see the ridiculousness of the whole trinity, now we have plenty persons existing as Divine NatureYour own is even now worse than Trinity as MILLION OF BELIEVERS are now GOD ALMIGHTY ![]() |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Barristter07: 2:41pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Emusan: Who get God wey e dey worship no be God Almighty. But to deny they exist in that same Divine Nature. It doesn't fly, Jesus partaking flesh and blood make him exist as one. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Emusan(m): 2:56pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Barristter07:That is not the definition of PARTAKE according to you. Definition is general. You already agreed that THE HAVE EXACTLY THE DIVINE NATURE which means THEY MUST HAVE WHAT MAKE GOD TO BE GOD. You know you have already shot yourself in the leg that is why you want to bring another diversion. But to deny they exist in that same Divine Nature. It doesn't fly, Jesus partaking flesh and blood make him exist as one. [/i]That is what I'm saying, Jesus partakes and that make Jesus human, so they partake also make them GOD here very ALMIGHTY GOD! |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Youareforgiven(m): 2:59pm On Sep 08, 2024 |
Sand2022:Why do we want receive worship in first place? Worship is exclusively for our Father who love us and begot us in Christ Jesus. But not receiving worship doesn't in anyway make us different from our beloveth Father. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Courz: 12:29pm On Sep 09, 2024 |
Sand2022:Sand2022, I have a video to share with you. Remember, in your first Trinity thread, I mentioned a testimony of a young boy who had a vision of Heaven which was made possible by Jesus himself. Remember I said the boy said he noticed Jesus and God merging to be one being and separating afterwards. This man in this video also saw the same thing. I am posting this video because the Man explained the oneness of Jesus, God and The Holy Spirit by using what he saw in Heaven. This Man suffered from Septic Shock while he was hospitalised for an ailment and he died for 90 minutes. While his body was on the hospital bed, His spirit was taken to Heaven. He met Jesus, he saw the Paradise of God as stated in the Bible and he was taken to the Throne Room which is a different realm where Almighty God sits on his throne. Now, the Man said it was time for everyone there to approach God and tell him how much they love him and each of them were ushered by a Song sang by a very huge Angel. The Man said Jesus approached God by entering into him. In other words, they merged together to be one. Then people there started to sing praises to God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit. As they are honouring the Father, they are also honouring the Son and the Holy Spirit at the same time. He said in Heaven, the three are One. No questions asked. He was eventually told by Jesus that he had to go back as it was not time to be there. So, he obeyed and went back to his body. The Man also said he saw God's face because he saw him smile at him and this was only possible because he was in Spirit form. This ties in with Revelation 22 Vs 4 that says God's people will be around His throne and in the midst of Jesus and they will see God's face. I have also watched anotherr testimony from a Man who said he was in the Throne room and he saw God's face as well. You can start the video from Timestamp 27:50 to get some context and finish the video to get some insight about the Spirit bodies we possess. I felt I should share this video as it ties in with the Trinity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJd1vybYPrM?si=SUCTJfjdqtoIZv7k |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Sand2022(op): 5:57pm On Sep 09, 2024 |
Courz:I was blessed by the video. Wow, Randy Kay is someone I also follow on YouTube. This insight into Jesus and the father, how Jesus entered inside the Father will explain why Jesus often say that he is inside the Father and the Father is in him. We have more to learn about this triune nature. |
| Re: Part 3: JW PIMO Reconsiders Trinity Doctrine by Courz: 8:27pm On Sep 09, 2024 |
Sand2022:I'm telling you. I have been blessed by many testimonies like this one. Randy Kay's channel is a good one. I have watched many testimonies of Heaven and Hell in his channel. Like the Man said, we may not fully understand the Triune nature of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit because we can only see things from a human perspective. But at least we understand to the level that he explained in his testimony. I love watching these kind of testimonies because it helps me understand certain Bible verses that are always skipped in JW and my bible knowledge has increased ever since. I also notice that when People experience these things, Jesus is always telling them to reveal everything they saw to the body of Christ when they go back to their bodies. For example, one lady went to Hell and Jesus rescued her and specifically asked her to tell people what she saw. |
Part 2: JW PIMO Reconsiders The Trinity Doctrine • JW PIMO Reconsiders The Trinity Doctrine. Part 1 • The Trinity Doctrine Is a False doctrine and it is Unbiblical. • 2 • 3 • 4
Is It True That Our Destiny Is In Our Hands? • If Only U Know That Allah Is God Nb- Osisi,nezan,tudor And Others • He Could Not Answer Me