₦airaland Forum

Informative comment

GreatVocalist:
You keep talking about a blocked shot. He had two more chances in the second half, one of which he fired straight to the keeper who made a save out of it.

A good save is determined by the quality of the chance taken. That save wasn't a good one, because the attempt wasn't the best.

COMEDY....3 Shots, one blocked, one saved, one missed.......This is what you call useless? Y'all act like he missed 10 shots or something, comedians!

GreatVocalist:
I don't need to check any stats to know how a player faired in a game I watched from start to finish. If you have to rely on stats displayed online, then you didn't watch the game as you claimed.

Everyone who watched the game attested to his poor performance last night. Then here comes you, the "critical thinker" who thinks he had a good game. You're not a better analyst than most, so what makes your opinion so special?

Nicolas Jackson is not fit to lead the Chelsea attack, period! Last night's game was a further proof. You saw the difference when Nkunku got into the game, and he's not even a striker.

Na gibberish you dey yarn, if Nkunku had started he wouldn't have scored either, the game changed when Sancho was brought on, Madueke removed and Palmer given instructions to push forward. Many of una just dey watch match but you don't see the little tactical nuances. This is why stats are there to counter the emotional sentiments!

Samunique:
For those Chelsea fans who think Enzo is useless, hope you see how uncoordinated Chelsea was today without him in the midfield.

Meanwhile, Noni Madueke needs to be talked to, the dude scored hatrick some days ago, all of a sudden, he starts feeling like he's the new Ronaldo and Messi in town by overdoing things. The dude needs to be calming down


Well done Blues !!!

Noni needs no talk, him and Jackson are two
idiots that shouldnt be allowed into the pitch. Replica of bad African leader, selfish, stupid and arrogant.
See how stupid Noni doesn't pass to PPalmer. Same guy that gave him 3 assist last time. What an idiot

abbey621:
Na gibberish you dey yarn, if Nkunku had started he wouldn't have scored either, the game changed when Sancho was brought on, Madueke removed and Palmer given instructions to push forward. Many of una just dey watch match but you don't see the little tactical nuances. This is why stats are there to counter the emotional sentiments!

Oga, even when Sancho was introduced, Jackson was still nowhere to be found on the pitch.

So before Madueke was removed, Palmer didn't have the instruction to push forward? Dude was practically the only forward having a meaningful game before Sancho's introduction, the attackers were nowhere to be found.

Nor dey form analyst for me, for game wey I watch. No matter what you say, Jackson is still not fit to lead Chelsea's attack.

abbey621:
COMEDY....3 Shots, one blocked, one saved, one missed.......This is what you call useless? Y'all act like he missed 10 shots or something, comedians!

He had three chances, and couldn't make the most of any.

Nkunku came on, first attempt (against three defenders), and he scored out of nowhere. Yet you're defending Jackson?

Baba, how you take dey think sef? Wait sef, are you even a Chelsea fan?

OChimex:
Noni needs no talk, him and Jackson are two
idiots that shouldnt be allowed into the pitch. Replica of bad African leader, selfish, stupid and arrogant.
See how stupid Noni doesn't pass to PPalmer. Same guy that gave him 3 assist last time. What an idiot

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Noni is worse than that wasted space called Jackson.

GreatVocalist:
Oga, even when Sancho was introduced, Jackson was still nowhere to be found on the pitch.

So before Madueke was removed, Palmer didn't have the instruction to push forward? Dude was practically the only forward having a meaningful game before Sancho's introduction, the attackers were nowhere to be found.

Nor dey form analyst for me, for game wey I watch. No matter what you say, Jackson is still not fit to lead Chelsea's attack.

Na mouth you dey use watch football, everybody knows that Madueke removal saw Palmer move into his position.....Una just love arguing for argument's sake!

GreatVocalist:
He had three chances, and couldn't make the most of any.

Nkunku came on, first attempt (against three defenders), and he scored out of nowhere. Yet you're defending Jackson?

Baba, how you take dey think sef? Wait sef, are you even a Chelsea fan?

If it was that easy, even you could have been a professional footballer I've been supporting Chelsea since 99 before the oil money, have you ever been to an actual Chelsea football match? No be you I suppose ask that question, ARE YOU EVEN A CHELSEA FAN?

abbey621:
If it was that easy, even you could have been a professional footballer I've been supporting Chelsea since 99 before the oil money, have you ever been to an actual Chelsea football match? No be you I suppose ask that question, ARE YOU EVEN A CHELSEA FAN?

No one said it was easy, but having someone who is a designated professional footballer play like someone who is not, is quite frustrating.

Being to a game isn't the only criterion for determining a person's support for a team. If you've been to a Chelsea game before, good for you, but that doesn't mean others supporting from other parts of the world aren't fans.

My point is, you're making silly excuses for someone who has been a disadvantage to the team, since last season. In a game where his ineffectiveness was clearly seen by many, you are here making excuses for him.

It's either you're deliberately being dishonest or you're not really a fan, like you claim.

abbey621:
Na mouth you dey use watch football, everybody knows that Madueke removal saw Palmer move into his position.....Una just love arguing for argument's sake!

Yeah, but still Palmer was the only attacker on the pitch who seemed to be doing something in that game. That's not the point, did Jackson's performance improve after Sancho's introduction or not?

GreatVocalist:
No one said it was easy, but having someone who is a designated professional footballer play like someone who is not, is quite frustrating.

Being to a game isn't the only criterion for determining a person's support for a team. If you've been to a Chelsea game before, good for you, but that doesn't mean others supporting from other parts of the world aren't fans.

My point is, you're making silly excuses for someone who has been a disadvantage to the team, since last season. In a game where his ineffectiveness was clearly seen by many, you are here making excuses for him.

It's either you're deliberately being dishonest or you're not really a fan, like you claim.

Again you're not making sense, na you challenged me and asked the question if I was a true Chelsea fan. Furthermore, how is Jackson a disadvantage to the club?

14 goals in his first season, more than Drogba had in his first season. Nobody is saying he's Haaland or even Drogba but for a player that only started playing striker 3 years ago(Winger before), he's not BAD!

Now let me shock you, who did he replace? Kai Havertz, you really think Kai would have scored 14 goals last season? How about Timo Werner?

Let's face it, Chelsea fans are just plain spoiled, United, Arsenal and even Spurs would die for a striker that can score 14 goals or more right now, even the great Osimhen only scored 15 goals in Serie A!

abbey621:
Again you're not making sense, na you challenged me and asked the question if I was a true Chelsea fan. Furthermore, how is Jackson a disadvantage to the club?

14 goals in his first season, more than Drogba had in his first season. Nobody is saying he's Haaland or even Drogba but for a player that only started playing striker 3 years ago(Winger before), he's not BAD!

Now let me shock you, who did he replace? Kai Havertz, you really think Kai would have scored 14 goals last season? How about Timo Werner?

Let's face it, Chelsea fans are just plain spoiled, United, Arsenal and even Spurs would die for a striker that can score 14 goals or more right now, even the great Osimhen only scored 15 goals in Serie A!

Again I'll say it, you're not a proper Chelsea fan if you keep making excuses for someone who keeps failing to deliver effectively in a fast assigned to him.

A player gets the chance to have more than 20-25 goals in a season, but managed to get just 14? If you add Jackson's missed chances to the one he already had, Chelsea would not be in the place they are right now, and we wouldn't be criticizing him this way.

Nor be say he nor see opportunities, he just didn't take them well. He's already treading the same course this season, and you expect the fans to be quiet about that and make excuses for him? If you want to settle for less, then go ahead.

You clearly don't see his attitude on the pitch when he plays badly, dude literally acts like he's got nothing to lose, no matter how he plays -- too lackadaisical.

Chelsea is not known for that. If a player is not ready to play for the badge, then he should be replaced. We're not Man united and Arsenal, or even Spurs. Na this kind mentality make them never win trophies recently.

No matter what, I'm Chelsea through and through, but that one nor mean say make we dey ignore important details. We need quality up front, and Jackson isn't it at all.

GreatVocalist:
Again I'll say it, you're not a proper Chelsea fan if you keep making excuses for someone who keeps failing to deliver effectively in a fast assigned to him.

A player gets the chance to have more than 20-25 goals in a season, but managed to get just 14? If you add Jackson's missed chances to the one he already had, Chelsea would not be in the place they are right now, and we wouldn't be criticizing him this way.

Nor be say he nor see opportunities, he just didn't take them well. He's already treading the same course this season, and you expect the fans to be quiet about that and make excuses for him? If you want to settle for less, then go ahead.

You clearly don't see his attitude on the pitch when he plays badly, dude literally acts like he's got nothing to lose, no matter how he plays -- too lackadaisical.

Chelsea is not known for that. If a player is not ready to play for the badge, then he should be replaced. We're not Man united and Arsenal, or even Spurs. Na this kind mentality make them never win trophies recently.

No matter what, I'm Chelsea through and through, but that one nor mean say make we dey ignore important details. We need quality up front, and Jackson isn't it at all.

I've been supporting Chelsea before the oil money so between you & I , who's not a proper blue? You're simply a glory hunter nothing more, nothing less! If na 20-25 goals per season be your standard for a striker, guess what? That means our club legend Drogba was a massive FAILURE!

Think about it, only Diego Costa and Drogba for one season can claim over 20 goals in a PL season for Chelsea.........So from Shevy to Torres, from Morata to Kai, all of them be rubbish, so why would you hold Jackson to a higher standard than Drogba? No be juju be that? You might want to go back to the history books and check your rationale.

Talking smack about a player not ready to play for the badge, nigga had 14 goals, who did you think he was Haaland? We were begging for Kai to be replaced because his movement and overall play was rubbish, Jackson outscored him and you're still yarning dust!

Make I shock you, Jackson is a natural winger, he's now a makeshit striker but still tries his best, stop daydreaming and wishing he was Haaland 2.0, he's not! If Chelsea wants a goal machine let the owners spend 100 million and get one, for 35 million Jackson is outperforming the likes of Rashford, Jesus, Nunes and so on, APPRECIATE MY FRIEND, APPRECIATE!

abbey621:
I've been supporting Chelsea before the oil money so between you & I , who's not a proper blue? You're simply a glory hunter nothing more, nothing less! If na 20-25 goals per season be your standard for a striker, guess what? That means our club legend Drogba was a massive FAILURE!

Think about it, only Diego Costa and Drogba for one season can claim over 20 goals in a PL season for Chelsea.........So from Shevy to Torres, from Morata to Kai, all of them be rubbish, so why would you hold Jackson to a higher standard than Drogba? No be juju be that? You might want to go back to the history books and check your rationale.

Talking smack about a player not ready to play for the badge, nigga had 14 goals, who did you think he was Haaland? We were begging for Kai to be replaced because his movement and overall play was rubbish, Jackson outscored him and you're still yarning dust!

Make I shock you, Jackson is a natural winger, he's now a makeshit striker but still tries his best, stop daydreaming and wishing he was Haaland 2.0, he's not! If Chelsea wants a goal machine let the owners spend 100 million and get one, for 35 million Jackson is outperforming the likes of Rashford, Jesus, Nunes and so on, APPRECIATE MY FRIEND, APPRECIATE!

Oga, I don't care if you were a Chelsea fan even before the club was created, you're still not a proper fan to me. Just because you choose to settle for less doesn't mean every other Chelsea fan should.

Yes, we're glory hunters. That's the mentality, there's absolutely nothing wrong with not wanting to settle for less. Is it a crime to want to compete for the title and win it like Man city has done recently? We're not happy with Jackson's performances, deal with that! We're not even saying he should leave the club, he just needs to sit on the bench and learn to play with more seriousness, it's not even just about the goals he misses. Don't you see how he gets shoved off the ball easily? If it was Jackson that had Nkunku's goal opportunity in the last game, dude would have easily gone down in the box screaming for a penalty which would definitely not be awarded.

Like I said, Jackson had the opportunities to score up to 25 goals. As a striker, it's not a question of how many goals you scored, as much as it is about how many opportunities you had. If to say he nor dey see opportunities, that's another case.

Don't even put Jackson in the same box with Drogba and Costa. If they had the opportunities that Jackson had last season, then the golden boot race wouldn't have been a contest for them, just as it isn't for Haaland currently.

Dude single-handedly crashed Chelsea out of the FA cup last season. I mean, don't you watch games? The fact that he outscored Rashford and the likes last season does not justify his crucial misses. He is not the type of striker we need right now.

If to say nor be Nkunku injury issues, you think say we go dey get this conversation in the first place? If to say Osimhen sign for Chelsea, you think say na wetin we go dey talk be this? Nor be Palmer score 20+ goals from RW last season? He didn't even have as much opportunities as Jackson did.

Change your mentality bros. There's a reason Abramovich's administration was successful, and that's because they didn't have the mentality of making excuses and settling for less. If not, you think say we for dey brag the way we take dey brag about trophies? Do you want us to become teams like Leeds, Nottingham Forest, and Aston Villa who were once highly revered in the league? Or even Arsenal who have been without a major trophy for two decades? Na wa for you o.

In as much as one shouldn't quit in bad days, that doesn't mean one should not ensure to do all he can to prevent those bad days. That's a simple logic.

GreatVocalist:
Oga, I don't care if you were a Chelsea fan even before the club was created, you're still not a proper fan to me. Just because you choose to settle for less doesn't mean every other Chelsea fan should.

Yes, we're glory hunters. That's the mentality, there's absolutely nothing wrong with not wanting to settle for less. Is it a crime to want to compete for the title and win it like Man city has done recently? We're not happy with Jackson's performances, deal with that! We're not even saying he should leave the club, he just needs to sit on the bench and learn to play with more seriousness, it's not even just about the goals he misses. Don't you see how he gets shoved off the ball easily? If it was Jackson that had Nkunku's goal opportunity in the last game, dude would have easily gone down in the box screaming for a penalty which would definitely not be awarded.

Like I said, Jackson had the opportunities to score up to 25 goals. As a striker, it's not a question of how many goals you scored, as much as it is about how many opportunities you had. If to say he nor dey see opportunities, that's another case.

Don't even put Jackson in the same box with Drogba and Costa. If they had the opportunities that Jackson had last season, then the golden boot race wouldn't have been a contest for them, just as it isn't for Haaland currently.

Dude single-handedly crashed Chelsea out of the FA cup last season. I mean, don't you watch games? The fact that he outscored Rashford and the likes last season does not justify his crucial misses. He is not the type of striker we need right now.

If to say nor be Nkunku injury issues, you think say we go dey get this conversation in the first place? If to say Osimhen sign for Chelsea, you think say na wetin we go dey talk be this? Nor be Palmer score 20+ goals from RW last season? He didn't even have as much opportunities as Jackson did.

Change your mentality bros. There's a reason Abramovich's administration was successful, and that's because they didn't have the mentality of making excuses and settling for less. If not, you think say we for dey brag the way we take dey brag about trophies? Do you want us to become teams like Leeds, Nottingham Forest, and Aston Villa who were once highly revered in the league? Or even Arsenal who have been without a major trophy for two decades? Na wa for you o.

In as much as one shouldn't quit in bad days, that doesn't mean one should not ensure to do all he can to prevent those bad days. That's a simple logic.

If your opinion mattered, Jackson would not have his contract extended....So stay humble and stop rambling......PEACE!

abbey621:
If your opinion mattered, Jackson would not have his contract extended....So stay humble and stop rambling......PEACE!

Yeah, contract extension sitting comfortably on the bench. Peace to you as well.