₦airaland Forum

Below is proof that what was before Justice Omotosho was not the issue of Martin and his committee members defection as the suit was filed while they were still in the PDP and as the first document shows that the court sat on the 30th of November 2023.

The suit was against the call for the National Assembly to take over the functions of the Rivers State House of Assembly- which they were still members at the time- and for the governor to continue to deal with them as Assembly members. Look at the 16 entities listed as defendants in the 1st and 2nd documents. No INEC who conducted their elections, no PDP who sponsored their elections, so how would the judgement have reinstated them after they defected the next month; precisely on the 11th of December 2023 and approached a different court on the 13th of December 2023 to protect them against INEC who conducted their elections, and the PDP that sponsored their elections. See the 3rd and 4th documents and read paragraphs 16 and 17 of the 4th document very carefully.

Mine is to state the fact, you can do whatever you want to do with it.


Friday, 11th October 2024.

Copied from Facebook

😂 😂... in other words... the appeal court ruled on a matter THAT WAS INSTITUTED BEFORE MARTINS AMAEWHULE AND HIS 27 COMMITTEE OF CLOWNS defected to the APC..

In other words... circumstances have overtaken this case.

And note also that this was a suit that should have been withdrawn in obedience to Tinubu which wasnt done... Fubara withdrew his.

Now you want fubara to obey a court judgement PROCURED BY WIKE in the guise of "obey rule of law"... you are jokers!! 😂 😂

Keep deceiving Fubara.. e go do am like film... All these Technics and excuses will not save Fubara, he should listen to the interview of yesterday by channels segun, where he was advised properly by the two guests in the program.. swallow your pride and seek peace... Dem go impeach u nothing will happen, everywhere go calm u sef go shock.

Mumu face your state, or are you tired of crying ebimkpami and hardship? Fubara and Wike are made for life.

quote author=honfnj post=132380976]Keep deceiving Fubara.. e go do am like film... All these Technics and excuses will not save Fubara, he should listen to the interview of yesterday by channels segun, where he was advised properly by the two guests in the program.. swallow your pride and seek peace... Dem go impeach u nothing will happen, everywhere go calm u sef go shock.[/quote]

The Judicial chaos, impunity, anarchy and lawlessness they have instituted is gonna consume them all.

D

That one concern una. Shebi Fubara has appealed to the Supreme Court. When Supreme Court recognizes the Martins Amaewhule led House of Assembly in a few weeks and orders Fubara to go and submit the budget to them, let him disobey. That's when he will learn what is called politics.

LandMann:
I have taken time today to study all the court cases in Rivers state and the judgements so far given.

The summary is that Fubara is losing heavily in both federal high court and court of appeal.

So far, Federal high court and court of appeal have ruled against pro-Fubara court cases

So far, there are two issues that pro-Fubara camp has taken to supreme court and it seems pro-Fubara camp will lose both cases cos federal high court and court of appeal ruled against pro-Fubara camp.

The first case is this one op mentioned. Also it started in November, the restraining order is not a judgement...the federal high court later gave a judgement which Fubara rejected and appealed and also lost yesterday. And Fubara has directed that the case be taken to supreme court

The second case has to do with the defection proper and it was initiated at Rivers state HIGH court.... pro-Fubara camp won at the STATE HIGH court but lost when the case was taken to appeal court. The case is currently at supreme court. The second case on the same defection issue was instituted by APP political party, a pro-Fubara camp, at the federal high court and unfortunately APP lost the case.

If pro-Fubara camp lost the two cases at the supreme court, Fubara will most likely face a big problem in Rivers state cos his actions will no longer have any legal backing

From what I can see, Fubara goofed on many fronts.

1. Fubara ought not to have started a confrontation with the state house of assembly so early into his tenure to the extent of demolishing the house of assembly so that the elected state lawmakers won't have anywhere to perform their functions. Fubara attempted to control the state house of assembly and he failed. Using 5 lawmakers to take over the powers of 25 others is morally and legally wrong. If you support this action in a democracy then there's something wrong with you.

2. Fubara was not sincere in accepting the offer of peace agreement everyone agreed to. He pretended to accept the offer of peace just so he can get past supreme court hurdle, cos his election victory was at the supreme court then. Immediately he won the election case, Fubara went ahead to remove the chief justice of Rivers state and install someone loyal to him. At the same time, he also reshuffled his cabinet to redeploy those he perceived as against him. This move was against the peace agreement he had with the others and also caused the issue to escalate.


In summary Fubara is losing heavily in the courts. If he loses at the supreme court, the 25 lawmakers he's been preventing from carrying out their duties will have the legal basis to return and the federal government will give them security to conduct their legislative business. They may likely start impeachment proceedings against Fubara if he continues to behave like a bull in a China shop.

As for every other person who goes about misinterpreting the judgements of the courts, it's time they start getting sued for undermining the judiciary, causing confusion and instigating lawlessness

Not true! The first appeal court ruling you mentioned was simply om jurisdiction. The appeal court simply agreed with the FHC that the SHC did not have jurisdiction and the suit should have been instituted at the FHC.

The issue of defection HAS NOT BEEN RULED ON BY ANY COURT TILL DATE.

D

LandMann:
I have taken time today to study all the court cases in Rivers state and the judgements so far given.

The summary is that Fubara is losing heavily in both federal high court and court of appeal.

So far, Federal high court and court of appeal have ruled against pro-Fubara court cases

So far, there are two issues that pro-Fubara camp has taken to supreme court and it seems pro-Fubara camp will lose both cases cos federal high court and court of appeal ruled against pro-Fubara camp.

The first case is this one op mentioned. Also it started in November, the restraining order is not a judgement...the federal high court later gave a judgement which Fubara rejected and appealed and also lost yesterday. And Fubara has directed that the case be taken to supreme court

The second case has to do with the defection proper and it was initiated at Rivers state HIGH court.... pro-Fubara camp won at the STATE HIGH court but lost when the case was taken to appeal court. The case is currently at supreme court. The second case on the same defection issue was instituted by APP political party, a pro-Fubara camp, at the federal high court and unfortunately APP lost the case.

If pro-Fubara camp lost the two cases at the supreme court, Fubara will most likely face a big problem in Rivers state cos his actions will no longer have any legal backing

From what I can see, Fubara goofed on many fronts.

1. Fubara ought not to have started a confrontation with the state house of assembly so early into his tenure to the extent of demolishing the house of assembly so that the elected state lawmakers won't have anywhere to perform their functions. Fubara attempted to control the state house of assembly and he failed. Using 5 lawmakers to take over the powers of 25 others is morally and legally wrong. If you support this action in a democracy then there's something wrong with you.

2. Fubara was not sincere in accepting the offer of peace agreement everyone agreed to. He pretended to accept the offer of peace just so he can get past supreme court hurdle, cos his election victory was at the supreme court then. Immediately he won the election case, Fubara went ahead to remove the chief justice of Rivers state and install someone loyal to him. At the same time, he also reshuffled his cabinet to redeploy those he perceived as against him. This move was against the peace agreement he had with the others and also caused the issue to escalate.


In summary Fubara is losing heavily in the courts. If he loses at the supreme court, the 25 lawmakers he's been preventing from carrying out their duties will have the legal basis to return and the federal government will give them security to conduct their legislative business. They may likely start impeachment proceedings against Fubara if he continues to behave like a bull in a China shop.

As for every other person who goes about misinterpreting the judgements of the courts, it's time they start getting sued for undermining the judiciary, causing confusion and instigating lawlessness

You seem to be typing under the influence of colos. When did Fubara remove Rivers state Chief Justice?

D

LandMann:
You're the goat who hasn't been following up issues properly and objectively

https://fij.ng/article/confirmed-rivers-state-chief-judge-chief-protocol-officer-removed-amid-power-tussle/

https://www.thecable.ng/more-drama-in-rivers-as-state-assembly-suspends-chief-judge/amp/

That's when the news broke.

Fubara would later change tactic by going to STATE HIGH court to get injunction against the chief judge and the 25 lawmakers he's been preventing from carrying out their duties

https://www.google.com/amp/s/punchng.com/fubara-court-bars-rivers-cj-from-accepting-impeachment-notice/%3famp

You are still high on dementia
What is the name of the Chief Judge removed and what is the name of the one that replaced him?

LandMann:
I have taken time today to study all the court cases in Rivers state and the judgements so far given.

The summary is that Fubara is losing heavily in both federal high court and court of appeal.

So far, Federal high court and court of appeal have ruled against pro-Fubara court cases

So far, there are two issues that pro-Fubara camp has taken to supreme court and it seems pro-Fubara camp will lose both cases cos federal high court and court of appeal ruled against pro-Fubara camp.

The first case is this one op mentioned. Also it started in November, the restraining order is not a judgement...the federal high court later gave a judgement which Fubara rejected and appealed and also lost yesterday. And Fubara has directed that the case be taken to supreme court

The second case has to do with the defection proper and it was initiated at Rivers state HIGH court.... pro-Fubara camp won at the STATE HIGH court but lost when the case was taken to appeal court. The case is currently at supreme court. The second case on the same defection issue was instituted by APP political party, a pro-Fubara camp, at the federal high court and unfortunately APP lost the case.

If pro-Fubara camp lost the two cases at the supreme court, Fubara will most likely face a big problem in Rivers state cos his actions will no longer have any legal backing

From what I can see, Fubara goofed on many fronts.

1. Fubara ought not to have started a confrontation with the state house of assembly so early into his tenure to the extent of demolishing the house of assembly so that the elected state lawmakers won't have anywhere to perform their functions. Fubara attempted to control the state house of assembly and he failed. Using 5 lawmakers to take over the powers of 25 others is morally and legally wrong. If you support this action in a democracy then there's something wrong with you.

2. Fubara was not sincere in accepting the offer of peace agreement everyone agreed to. He pretended to accept the offer of peace just so he can get past supreme court hurdle, cos his election victory was at the supreme court then. Immediately he won the election case, Fubara went ahead to try to remove the chief justice of Rivers state and install someone loyal to him. At the same time, he also reshuffled his cabinet to redeploy those he perceived as against him. This move was against the peace agreement he had with the others and also caused the issue to escalate.


In summary Fubara is losing heavily in the courts. If he loses at the supreme court, the 25 lawmakers he's been preventing from carrying out their duties will have the legal basis to return and the federal government will give them security to conduct their legislative business. They may likely start impeachment proceedings against Fubara if he continues to behave like a bull in a China shop.

As for every other person who goes about misinterpreting the judgements of the courts, it's time they start getting sued for undermining the judiciary, causing confusion and instigating lawlessness

Exactly it's people like the op that keep deceiving Fubara and twisting court judgements.But they will block their eyes because of the money he is sharing. But they forget that the judiciary has marked him 'notorious ' and winning court cases will be hard for him now

Kukutenla:
You are still high on dementia
What is the name of the Chief Judge removed and what is the name of the one that replaced him?

Did you read the links he shared? Also recall he said attempted to remove and not removed.

Iolo:
Did you read the links he shared? Also recall he said attempted to remove and not removed.

Go and read what he wrote well

LandMann:
You're part of the people spreading misinformation on Rivers issue

Read the news below and tell me what what was ruled on here:

https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2024/09/21/rivers-assembly-abuja-court-dismisses-suit-seeking-replacement-of-27-pro-wike-lawmakers/

I even mentioned it in my comment. Instead of you to research first you hurry to quote me to spread propaganda. I pity for your generation

Dunces everywhere.... you mentioned appeal court. I then informed you the appeal court ruling you are talking about was on jurisdiction NOT the substantive suit.

The link you posted is supposed to be in response to my statement that no court had given final judgement on the substantive suit BUT YOU DIDNT READ YOUR OWN LINK... okay read the excerpt below from your link:

The APP had specifically prayed the court to declare the seats of the 27 lawmakers vacant and also direct the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct a bye-election to fill the seats.
Delivering judgement in the suit yesterday, Justice Peter Lifu held that the case of the plaintiff was Statute Barred having not been filed within the 14 days allowed by law.



The alleged defection was said to have been carried out in December last year, while the APP filed the case on July 12, a period of eight months after the cause of action emanated.
Besides, the court held that the suit was a gross abuse of court process on the grounds that several similar suits had been adjudicated upon by the Federal High Court.


Tell your 27 lawmakers that justice okorowo is waiting for them 😂

phantom:
Dunces everywhere.... [b]you mentioned appeal court. I then informed you the appeal court ruling you are talking about was on jurisdiction NOT the substantive suit.

The link you posted is supposed to be in response to my statement that no court had given final judgement on the substantive suit BUT YOU DIDNT READ YOUR OWN LINK... okay read the excerpt below from your link:

The APP had specifically prayed the court to declare the seats of the 27 lawmakers vacant and also direct the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct a bye-election to fill the seats.
Delivering judgement in the suit yesterday, Justice Peter Lifu held that the case of the plaintiff was Statute Barred having not been filed within the 14 days allowed by law.



The alleged defection was said to have been carried out in December last year, while the APP filed the case on July 12, a period of eight months after the cause of action emanated.
Besides, the court held that the suit was a gross abuse of court process on the grounds that several similar suits had been adjudicated upon by the Federal High Court.


Tell your 27 lawmakers that justice okorowo is waiting for them[/b] 😂

Be aware that people you are replying a just stark illiterates...if anything does not favor them they cant contain it and move on, they will keep repeating what you have answered with evidence...going round a table in circles like todlers....

The bitter leaf soup wey wike dey cook for this SIM guy...Hmmmm

Benbellamor:
Be aware that people you are replying a just stark illiterates...if anything does not favor them they cant contain it and move on, they will keep repeating what you have answered with evidence...going round a table in circles like todlers....

😂 😂..look at the last sentence in the post I quoted: I pity for your generation

When I read that sentence, I knew I was dealing with one of these ronu BATIDIOTS. 😂.. Street urchins who have access a 2G tecno phone and free 50MB promo data from glo.. 🤦🏾‍♂️

D

LandMann:
You're a goat and a retärded propaganda agent.

Your last statement in your comment reads:

"The issue of defection HAS NOT BEEN RULED ON BY ANY COURT TILL DATE."

Is your statement accurate in light of existing facts?

No.

1. State high court ruled on the issue of defection. pro-Fubara camp won.

2. State high court ruling declaring their seats vacant was challenged at the court of appeal, making it the second court to rule on the same issue. Appeal court declared the ruling of the state high court null and void. pro-Fubara camp lost

3. Federal high court also ruled on the same issue, making it the third court to rule on the issue of defection, but this time the case was brought by APP. Pro-Fubara camp lost at federal high court as the court declared that there was no sufficient evidence to prove that the lawmakers decamped plus the case was statute barred.

Three courts have ruled on the issue of defection but you tell a stupid lie and try to cover it up with useless excuses.

Is the debate on the reason the court of appeal and federal high court gave for ruling against pro-Fubara camp?

By the way, what is your highest level of education and what class of degree did you graduate with and from which school?

You're a disgrace to whatever school you finished from.

😂 😂... na wa o! When you think you've met the worst idiot you meet one that blows the previous one you've met out of the water... 🤦🏾‍♂️

I refered to you as a dunce but I was wrong... you are dunce who has been spiritually cursed in addition.

I used the simplest English to explain what I explained to you and you still don't get it.

Oga, no court has given a judgement on the substantive suit.

1. SHC gave an exparte order
2. Court of appeal agreed with FHC , in a suit filed by martins and said SHC didn't have jurisdiction
3. FHC / lifu.. dismissed the case as the substantive suit is still being decided on in other suits

THE SUBSTANTIVE MATTER IS STILL STUCK AT VARIOUS FHCs

Should I go on or should I draw pictures for you? Olodo 😂

honfnj:
Keep deceiving Fubara.. e go do am like film... All these Technics and excuses will not save Fubara, he should listen to the interview of yesterday by channels segun, where he was advised properly by the two guests in the program.. swallow your pride and seek peace... Dem go impeach u nothing will happen, everywhere go calm u sef go shock.

Nobody will impeach Fubara as long as Ijaw Nation exists. You can argue that wherever.

phantom:
😂 😂... na wa o! When you think you've met the worst idiot you meet one that blows the previous one you've met out of the water... 🤦🏾‍♂️

I refered to you as a dunce but I was wrong... you are dunce who has been spiritually cursed in addition.

I used the simplest English to explain what I explained to you and you still don't get it.

Oga, no court has given a judgement on the substantive suit.

1. SHC gave an exparte order
2. Court of appeal agreed with FHC , in a suit filed by martins and said SHC didn't have jurisdiction
3. FHC / lifu.. dismissed the case as the substantive suit is still being decided on in other suits

THE SUBSTANTIVE MATTER IS STILL STUCK AT VARIOUS FHCs

Should I go on or should I draw pictures for you? Olodo 😂

For now, the appeal court has recognized Amaewhule and his faction and dealt fubara a heavy blow. You either take it or leave it

LandMann:
I have taken time today to study all the court cases in Rivers state and the judgements so far given.

The summary is that Fubara is losing heavily in both federal high court and court of appeal.

So far, Federal high court and court of appeal have ruled against pro-Fubara court cases

So far, there are two issues that pro-Fubara camp has taken to supreme court and it seems pro-Fubara camp will lose both cases cos federal high court and court of appeal ruled against pro-Fubara camp.

The first case is this one op mentioned. Also it started in November, the restraining order is not a judgement...the federal high court later gave a judgement which Fubara rejected and appealed and also lost yesterday. And Fubara has directed that the case be taken to supreme court

The second case has to do with the defection proper and it was initiated at Rivers state HIGH court.... pro-Fubara camp won at the STATE HIGH court but lost when the case was taken to appeal court. The case is currently at supreme court. The second case on the same defection issue was instituted by APP political party, a pro-Fubara camp, at the federal high court and unfortunately APP lost the case.

If pro-Fubara camp lost the two cases at the supreme court, Fubara will most likely face a big problem in Rivers state cos his actions will no longer have any legal backing

From what I can see, Fubara goofed on many fronts.

1. Fubara ought not to have started a confrontation with the state house of assembly so early into his tenure to the extent of demolishing the house of assembly so that the elected state lawmakers won't have anywhere to perform their functions. Fubara attempted to control the state house of assembly and he failed. Using 5 lawmakers to take over the powers of 25 others is morally and legally wrong. If you support this action in a democracy then there's something wrong with you.

2. Fubara was not sincere in accepting the offer of peace agreement everyone agreed to. He pretended to accept the offer of peace just so he can get past supreme court hurdle, cos his election victory was at the supreme court then. Immediately he won the election case, Fubara went ahead to try to remove the chief justice of Rivers state and install someone loyal to him. At the same time, he also reshuffled his cabinet to redeploy those he perceived as against him. This move was against the peace agreement he had with the others and also caused the issue to escalate.


In summary Fubara is losing heavily in the courts. If he loses at the supreme court, the 25 lawmakers he's been preventing from carrying out their duties will have the legal basis to return and the federal government will give them security to conduct their legislative business. They may likely start impeachment proceedings against Fubara if he continues to behave like a bull in a China shop.

As for every other person who goes about misinterpreting the judgements of the courts, it's time they start getting sued for undermining the judiciary, causing confusion and instigating lawlessness

If Fubara is really loosing, your write up would have been shorter. One only makes long explanations when at a disadvantage. It is common sense.