The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? - Politics - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? (2475 Views)
| The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by GothamCities(op): 3:43pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
The Biafran War: Who Was the Aggressor? The Biafran War, or the Nigerian Civil War, is a deeply emotional subject for many Nigerians, especially the Igbos who bore most of the brunts of the casualties. The scars of that conflict still run deep, and figures like General Yakubu Gowon, who led the federal government during that time, are often seen in a negative light. However, to fully grasp the complexities of the war, we must understand the events that led up to it, including the raids that sparked the conflict. At its core, the war was a tragic consequence of circumstances that forced Gowon to defend the integrity of the Nigerian state. The Constitutional Duty of Yakubu Gowon As head of state, Yakubu Gowon was bound by the Nigerian constitution to defend the unity and territorial integrity of the nation. When Lt. Colonel Odumegwu Ojukwu declared the southeastern region as the independent Republic of Biafra in May 1967, it created a constitutional crisis. Gowon, faced with a potential disintegration of Nigeria, was left with little choice but to act. His decision to go to war was not one of personal ambition but a constitutional necessity. Allowing Biafra to secede would have set a dangerous precedent for other regions to follow, leading to the eventual breakup of Nigeria into weaker nations. While the war was a catastrophe that led to immense loss of life, it is crucial to see Gowon’s actions in the context of his constitutional duty. He was not merely defending the northern part of Nigeria but fighting to preserve the nation as a whole. Timeline of the Biafran War 1. May 1967 – Declaration of Biafra: The war’s origins lie in the political tensions that followed the first military coup in 1966, which saw the assassination of several northern leaders. This led to a counter-coup, which heightened ethnic tensions, especially between the north and the southeast. After a series of failed peace negotiations, Ojukwu declared the southeastern region an independent state, the Republic of Biafra, on May 30, 1967. 2. July 1967 – Raids and Biafran Aggression: In response to the declaration of Biafra, hostilities escalated. Biafran forces began to conduct raids into Nigerian territories, pushing into the Midwest region. On July 6, 1967, Biafran troops, under Ojukwu's command, launched a full-scale invasion of Nigeria by crossing the River Niger and capturing several towns, including Benin and Ore. These actions forced the hand of the federal government, making it clear that Gowon could not sit idly by while Biafran forces took over parts of the country. 3. July 1967 – Federal Response: Gowon ordered the Nigerian army to retaliate, marking the official beginning of the civil war. The federal forces counter-attacked to reclaim the captured territories, pushing back the Biafran troops. The war quickly escalated as both sides engaged in full-scale combat. 4. October 1967 – Recapture of the Midwest: By October 1967, the Nigerian military successfully recaptured the Midwest region, including key cities like Benin and Asaba. This marked a significant turning point in the war, with the Nigerian government now on the offensive. 5. [/b]1968-1969 – Blockades and Starvation[/b]: One of the most tragic elements of the war was the blockade imposed by the Nigerian government on Biafra. This strategy aimed to cut off supplies to the secessionist state, leading to widespread famine and starvation in Biafra. By 1968, pictures of starving Biafran children had captured global attention, but the war raged on. 6. January 1970 – End of the War: The war came to an official end on January 15, 1970, when Ojukwu fled to Ivory Coast and Biafran forces surrendered to the federal government. General Philip Effiong, who took over from Ojukwu, formally surrendered to Gowon, bringing the conflict to a close. In his post-war speech, Gowon declared that there was "no victor, no vanquished," emphasizing the need for reconciliation and rebuilding. The Historical Aggressor: Setting the Record Straight While many perceive Gowon as the aggressor due to his role in the conflict, it is important to set the historical record straight. Biafran forces, under Ojukwu’s leadership, initiated the military hostilities by launching raids and seizing key Nigerian territories. This left Gowon with no choice but to respond militarily to defend the nation’s sovereignty. As a head of state, his primary duty was to protect Nigeria’s territorial integrity, which had been violated by the Biafran military incursions. The Past is Now Bygone. We Must embracing Unity The war left deep wounds, particularly for the Igbos, who lost thousands of lives during the conflict. It is understandable that these memories remain painful. However, holding on to these grievances prevents the healing process that Nigeria desperately needs. The war is a part of our collective history, but it must not be the defining feature of our future. The Igbos remain a vital part of Nigeria’s fabric, contributing immensely to its economy, culture, and politics. Letting go of past wounds and embracing a united Nigeria is the path forward, not just for Igbos but for all Nigerians. Only through unity can we achieve the collective prosperity we all desire. The Benefits of a United Nigeria A fragmented Nigeria would be far weaker, both economically and geopolitically. The benefits of remaining united as a nation far outweigh the prospects of smaller breakaway states. 1. Economic Power: Nigeria’s vast natural resources, including its oil reserves, agricultural potential, and human capital, make it a key player on the global stage. A united Nigeria is better equipped to harness these resources for the benefit of all its citizens. 2. International Influence: As the largest country in Africa by population, Nigeria commands respect and influence in international diplomacy, trade, and politics. A divided Nigeria would lose much of this influence, leaving the breakaway nations weaker on the global stage. 3. Security: Unity brings strength in numbers. A united Nigeria is better positioned to defend itself from internal and external threats. Divided, the smaller states would be more vulnerable to exploitation, violence, and instability. 4. Cultural Strength: Nigeria’s strength lies in its diversity. The richness of our cultural heritage, from the Igbos to the Yorubas, Hausas, and other ethnic groups, creates a unique national identity. Unity allows us to celebrate and benefit from this diversity. Fighting the Real Enemy: Corruption and Bad Leadership The real enemy we face today is not each other—it is the systemic corruption and bad leadership that have stifled Nigeria’s development for decades. Corruption is what has held us back from reaching our full potential, depriving us of the basic infrastructure, services, and opportunities we deserve as a nation. Instead of being divided by the memories of the Biafran War, we must unite to tackle the corruption that continues to rob us of our future. Together, we can demand better leadership and accountability from those in power. Together, we can build a Nigeria that serves all its people, not just the privileged few. A Call for Unity To my Igbo brothers and sisters, I understand the pain that history has brought upon you. But I also see the immense potential that you hold as part of this great nation. Together, as Nigerians, we can create a future where everyone thrives, where our children will not have to relive the horrors of the past. Let us come together to build a Nigeria that is united, strong, and prosperous. Let us fight the right battles—the battle against corruption, against poverty, and against bad leadership. Only by standing united can we create the Nigeria we all dream of. It’s time to let go of the past and embrace the possibilities of a united Nigeria, where our collective strength can propel us to heights we cannot reach alone. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by DaddyCoool(f): 3:45pm On Oct 21, 2024*. Modified: 3:54pm On Oct 24, 2024 |
I also support a united Nigeria, but you are telling a total lie in claiming the FG was not the aggressor. FG reneged on Aburi that was painstakingly crafted and which they willingly signed. Also, FG forces were the first to actually attack (see below)
|
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by gidgiddy: 3:52pm On Oct 21, 2024*. Modified: 4:19pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
Lol It's funny how those claim that Gowon had the constitutional duty to protect the unity of Nigeria conveniently forget that it was this same Gowon that went against the Aburi agreement that was meant to ensure the unity of Nigeria and prevent war You see a fire beginning to burn, well meaning people run around and use Aburi to douse the fire, only for Gowon to pour petrol over that fire, use military force the quench the fire, then call himself a hero Gowon did not fight for the unity of Nigeria, he fought to make the North masters of Nigeria |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by omonla555: 3:57pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
I think we should all forget the past wounds and let the past be forgotten. No part of Nigeria was without damage(s), no thanks to the the initiators of the aggressions being Igbo, Yoruba and Hausa. Please let the old wounds heal. Biko, du-Allah, E Jowo. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FourQu: 3:58pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
All these lagos - hebadan expressway revisionism sha ![]() |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FxMasterz: 4:02pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
Yorubas are not the enemies of igbos. Neither are the igbos the enemies of Yorubas or Hausas. Our enemies are our bad leaders. We need to unite and fight the battle against bad leadership and corruption. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FxMasterz: 4:03pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FourQu:The history of the war as posted by the OP is the truth. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FourQu: 4:04pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FxMasterz:Truth to who? First year history 101 students abi? ![]() |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FxMasterz: 4:05pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
DaddyCoool:The federal government retaliated Biafrian raids. Biafrian raids started long before. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FourQu: 4:05pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FxMasterz:I'm not sure igbos need to fight off any bad leader with anybody . . . Especially seeing as the yorubas would love to support and elect another bad leader again just as they have always done ![]() |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FxMasterz: 4:06pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FourQu:The Biafrians were the first to start raiding. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FxMasterz: 4:07pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FourQu:When we unite as one, tribalism will fall. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FourQu: 4:07pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FxMasterz:Nah, the federal were the ones to start with their renegade on a gentleman's agreement in aburi ![]() Don't get it twisted |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FourQu: 4:08pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FxMasterz:We are not one and tribalism has never failed YET so . . . ![]() |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by Odingo1: 4:08pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
Ask yourself why did Gowon refuse to honor Aburi peace accord |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by dododawa1: 4:08pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
Gowon and ojukwu will meet GOD One day. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FxMasterz: 4:09pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FourQu:According to the UN charter, an aggressor is the one party who was the first to take up arms. Not the party that reneges on an agreement. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FxMasterz: 4:11pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FourQu:Even if we want to have separate nations, we can't achieve it by disunity. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by confusedlady(f): 4:12pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
Watching..and waiting for the usual suspects.... |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FourQu: 4:17pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FxMasterz:So WAR? Is that our path to achieving it then? 🤔 Because we all know unity is a mirage |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FourQu: 4:18pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FxMasterz:Well in that case, the pogroms on igbos by the notherners is exactly what prompted the aburi accords that the federal government later renegade on . . . So safe to say, the northerners caused the war right? |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by Christistruth00: 4:21pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by Idiko1: 4:21pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
@OP What constitution granted Gown the power to usurp the position of head of state when his superiors where not dismissed or forced into retirement? I am of the view you realize united is not unity. On the aggression or who was the aggressor, you wrote like a typical Nigerian who has no use for cardinal dates. Please go back to your calendar and figure out May and August which preceded the other. The real enemies Ndigbo faced in the cesspit called Nigeria are not “Systemic corruption and bad leadership” as you may want us believe but those joined the joined the source of corruption and bad leadership to precipitate war of attrition on the Nidgbo and Biafrans. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by GothamCities(op): 4:34pm On Oct 21, 2024*. Modified: 5:08pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
FourQu:The issue surrounding the causes of the Nigerian Civil War is complex, with multiple factors contributing to the conflict. The pogroms against the Igbos in the North in 1966 were indeed one of the key triggers that escalated tensions, leading to the eventual Biafran secession and war. These events, however, must be understood in the broader historical context. The Pogroms and Ethnic Tensions Following the first coup in January 1966, led by predominantly Igbo officers, which resulted in the assassination of several prominent northern leaders, ethnic tensions in Nigeria were exacerbated. Many in the North believed that the coup was an Igbo attempt to dominate the country politically. This led to a counter-coup in July 1966, led by northern officers, which resulted in the killing of the Igbo military head of state, Major General Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi, and other Igbo soldiers. In the months following the counter-coup, large-scale massacres (often referred to as pogroms) against Igbos living in the North took place. Thousands of Igbos were killed, and many fled back to the southeastern region. These atrocities further fueled the desire for secession in the East, as the Igbos felt unsafe and marginalized within the Nigerian federation. The Aburi Accord In January 1967, Nigerian military leaders, including General Yakubu Gowon and Colonel Odumegwu Ojukwu, met in Aburi, Ghana, in an attempt to resolve the growing tensions and avoid civil war. The Aburi Accord was reached, which called for a more decentralized Nigeria, with regional autonomy to address the grievances of the Eastern region and prevent further violence. However, upon returning to Nigeria, the federal government later reneged on parts of the Aburi Accord. The disagreement over the implementation of the accord further deepened the divide, and in May 1967, Ojukwu declared the Republic of Biafra. Who Caused the War? While the pogroms were a major factor in pushing the Eastern region toward secession, it's an oversimplification to say that "the northerners caused the war." The Nigerian Civil War was the result of a complex series of events, including ethnic tensions, political instability, the coups and counter-coups, and the failure of peaceful negotiations like the Aburi Accord. The northern-led massacres of Igbos did contribute significantly to the war, but the war itself cannot be solely attributed to one side or event. The decision by Ojukwu to declare Biafran independence after the failed implementation of the Aburi Accord was the direct catalyst for the war, as it led to a military confrontation with the federal government. Gowon, as head of state, acted to preserve the unity of Nigeria, which was his constitutional duty, even though this action led to war. The pogroms against Igbos in the North were a tragic and crucial factor in the lead-up to the Nigerian Civil War. They created a deep sense of insecurity and resentment among the Igbos, contributing to their desire for secession. However, the war itself was the result of a series of events involving political, ethnic, and military actions on both sides. Blaming one side exclusively for causing the war overlooks the complexities of the situation and the failures of all parties involved to find a peaceful solution. However, the Igbo.coup was what triggered the series of events leading to the war. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by T9ksy(m): 5:34pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
GothamCities:The bolded portion above is the main reason why Ojukwu went to war. He , Ojukwu wants to go back to pre-jan 1966 status quo whilst Gowon and his Northern elite backers prefers the new unification regime as proposed and decreed by the late Ironsi. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by Arda1000(m): 6:24pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
Omo if I didn’t read or know my history well na so u for deceive me… When Baifra was declared there was joy in the whole Eastern region,the aftermath is now history which you guys now twist anyhow because Nigeria is evil. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by Arda1000(m): 6:26pm On Oct 21, 2024 |
GothamCities:so as a leader Ojukwu would have been dining and dancing while his people are been massacred? |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by DaddyCoool(f): 2:50am On Oct 22, 2024 |
FxMasterz:You have just been shown it clearly stated who attacked fiirst. You agree things should make a little bit of sense, rught? What sense does it make Biafra attacking. On what basis would Biafra be attacking Nig??! |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FxMasterz: 9:03am On Oct 22, 2024 |
DaddyCoool:If you're referring to the programs against the igbos in the north as an indication of who first attacked, you should also remember that the programs were the aftermath of the Igbo coup of 1966. Infact, the Igbo coup was the event that triggered every other event that led to the war. Hence, the igbos were the aggressors. Nevertheless, we must forget the past and allow peace to reign. We need a united Nigeria to overcome our common enemies. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FxMasterz: 9:05am On Oct 22, 2024 |
Arda1000:No one massacred anyone. The igbos staged a coup. The north then retaliated with the massacre. It all started from the coup. |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by DaddyCoool(f): 3:15pm On Oct 22, 2024 |
FxMasterz:Which one be "programs" and "Igbo coup"? Simple: FG ordered what they called a "police action" to quell the rebellion in the East |
| Re: The Biafran War: Who Was The Aggressor? by FxMasterz: 5:14pm On Oct 22, 2024 |
DaddyCoool:I meant pogroms and not programs. Sorry for the typo. I was referring to the massacre in the north which was an aftermath of the Igbo coup of January 1966. |
Yahaya Bello: Victim Or Aggressor? By Prof. Mike Ozhekome SAN • Biafrans Are Well Armed Now Against Any Aggressor • Buhari: Queen Elizabeth Backed Nigeria During Biafran War • 2 • 3 • 4
Obasanjo Loses His Cool On BBC Over Allegations Of Corruption • Nigeria: Patients Groan As Federal Doctors Begin Sympathy Strike • Political Questions Concerning Nigeria


