₦airaland Forum

Donald7610:
No Jews will make heaven without accepting Jesus as their saviour. The Christian Jews has been annihilated by the Judaism Jews long ago, God is for everyone

Krismas:
There is nothing simple about any answer you”l find.
Hebrew Yehoshua was abbreviated to Aramaic Yeshua in one of the most dubious manner ever imaginable.
Then Yeshua was TRANSLITERATED to Greek IESOUS Which is as meaningless as premium gibberish
From where IESOUS was further TRANSLITERATED to a more meaningless Latin IESUS, which was then TRANSLITERATED yet again to the most MEANINGLESS word on planet earth, English JESUS. Because what on earth does Jesus mean??
Now for those who do not understand transliteration. It’s attempting to rename a concept by the sound it makes to you. e.g when the Binis first got introduced to the Portuguese, they thought the name was Kpotoki. Then Kpotoki got transliterated to the Yoruba Kpataki. Both Kpotoki and Kpataki are as far from Portuguese as heaven is from the earth as to be MEANINGLESS.
But in the case of IESOUS, many believe, what the transliterators were trying to establish was really HAIL ZEUS. Since it’s naming based on sound. As for Jesus, they were probably trying to establish the Celtic Esus, or Hesus. Since Jesus in Welsh is Iesus .So, why should anyone’s name go thru such rigmarole if fraud is not intended?

Hamzaay:
Naso everyday Christianity introduce worldly things into the religion just like they introduced Christmas. Bunch of anywhere belle face

Krismas:
If that is true, then, u would have considered shifting ur Christmas and Easter away from days celts celebrate their fertility deities like Ishitar and stop using their symbols like Christmas trees and flip flop lightings and Easter eggs. When will u people stop deceiving yourselfs?

Medici777:
the full armor of God is not physical

femi4:
Ode

Go school you no gree. Even lecturers don't accept Wikipedia as a reliable source of information cos its being put together by non expertise. It's an open source that that can be edited by every Tom Dick n Harry

Lucifyre:
Lol! How is "Ishitar" a deity for the celts?! 😅

Kobojunkie:
The religion has, from its roots, been founded on worldly ideas.

Hamzaay:
Man made religion

LordReed:
Look at this stupíd arse. The one you quoted was it an academic paper?

Meanwhile you quoted History.com did you read further about how a pope started All Saint's Day? Another reading deficient dumbarse.

Lucifyre:
Its a simple answer, you were able to phrase it in your own words. Its just semantics of language which is quite common. So yes that's the general gist of it, albeit seriously lacking in context and nuance. As for the rigmarole, im sure you can find the reason same way you found this. Clue : Tanakh -> Septuagint, Vulgate, Targum. But yes if you told xtains to pray in the name of Joshua for example, you are bound to get ignorant clap backs.

Kobojunkie:
All religions are man-made.

Krismas:
Not only are ALL religion man made as u rightly observed. All religion are In-addition all LIES

femi4:
Don't be daft, that's an extract from a journal

Kobojunkie:
All religions are man-made.

Hamzaay:
Not all bro.

Krismas:
U misunderstood me. Ishtar is a Sumerian goddess I know. But celts and Gauls have their equivalent fertility deities. That what I meant.

Krismas:
Nothing justifies transliterating names

Lucifyre:
Nah, that's an ignorant statement to make. There's a lot of nuance in linguistics, context practicality and use cases that justifies it. Like i said, its very common even for names. For critiquing the historical Jesus or Joshua, there are certainly stronger points, not this.

Kobojunkie:
Stop lying! God of Israel made it clearly known that He is ONLY for the people of Israel. His Son, Jesus Christ, equally made clear in His Gospel that He was sent ONLY to the Lost Sheep of Israel —the bloodline of Jacob.

Donald7610:
■ You lack manner to defend bible publicly

Krismas:
U can’t just make sweeping statements! Give an example that justify transliterating Yehoshua 4different time to get Jesus, which literally has no meaning.

Lucifyre:
Its a simple answer, you were able to phrase it in your own words. Its just semantics of language which is quite common. So yes that's the general gist of it, albeit seriously lacking in context and nuance. [b]As for the rigmarole, im sure you can find the reason same way you found this. Clue : Tanakh -> Septuagint, Vulgate, Targum. [/b]But yes if you told xtains to pray in the name of Joshua for example, you are bound to get ignorant clap backs.

Nonexisting:
Why not tear a bible and use it to sow Halloween dress for them. Foolish people.
Mtchew.

LordReed:
Halloween IS A CHRISTIAN holiday. That's what you ignorant people don't know.

BuyMeLand:
Ooh! Really? How? When?
So you do celebrate Halloween?
Don't blindly do folo-folo

LordReed:
Let me educate you. Start here:

BuyMeLand:
I just de 😂😂😅
You try!
You don decorate your house with skeletons and spirit themes?

LordReed:
I live in Nigeria, what do you think.

BuyMeLand:
Oh oh OH!
There goes the "Christian celebration 🎊

Krismas:
Septuagint was not a translation.
Rather it was the original scripture from which Hebrew works like Torah, Tanakh and Dead Sea scrolls were back-written.
While the religious world keep up the lie that it’s the other way around. As though Hebrew was a written language some 400BCE.