₦airaland Forum

Badassniggga:
Na why I dey avoid anything wey go make pesin drag me go court be this.

Shey the Nigha even get $50k for account like this?

celeb10:
All this write up na for who to read?

PulaPower:
Summary..

All the serious allegations from Hundeyin were wholly untrue..

Court con later tell Guy man that, since your allegations are baseless, restrict yourself from further talking or publishing about it and he should ensure he deleted and withdraw all what he had published..

Guy man no still do all that. He kept on acting like a mofo!

Court con say be like say you need to drink cold water as your body no gree calm! Naso dem slash defamation indictment against ham and hence why he’s going to be paying €95,000!

celeb10:
All this write up na for who to read?

festacman:
Love him or hate him, David Hundeyin is a proper coconut head. Strong as it comes.

Every progressive society needs more of David Hundeyin and VDM than it needs of conformists who would easily kowtow before oppressors or clowns who dance for daily meals at oppressor's palace.

PulaPower:
Toh..

Bush meat don finally catch hunter..

Naso dem praise unfortunate dude to doom!

festacman:
Love him or hate him, David Hundeyin is a proper coconut head. Strong as it comes.

Every progressive society needs more of David Hundeyin and VDM than it needs of conformists who would easily kowtow before oppressors or clowns who dance for daily meals at oppressor's palace.



David losing a case and awarded damages shows how inaccurate and biased he can be, you are seeing the evidence that he is meant to pay some certain some to some person he said unfounded claims to and you are still spewing all these shii from you, your head doesn't function well at all?

festacman:
Love him or hate him, David Hundeyin is a proper coconut head. Strong as it comes.

Every progressive society needs more of David Hundeyin and VDM than it needs of conformists who would easily kowtow before oppressors or clowns who dance for daily meals at oppressor's palace.

BeeNG3:
As I dey jobless all these epistle this early morning

TheChameleon:

Sccarrr:
Haha

Almiron:
Who go read all these... someone should pls summarize

festacman:
Love him or hate him, David Hundeyin is a proper coconut head. Strong as it comes.

Every progressive society needs more of David Hundeyin and VDM than it needs of conformists who would easily kowtow before oppressors or clowns who dance for daily meals at oppressor's palace.

helinues:


Where he wan see the money?

I believe I can fly without wings ..

Bobloco:
Don't you think the drug lord will pay so that he can buy him over?

NewDea4:
Why does this Hundeyin dude give off ass-bandit vibes, hus temperament and overall demeanor continuously screams 'gay' to me

I bet he's trapped in the closet

AntiChristian:
Too much!

The case between Charles Northcott (Claimant) and David Hundeyin (Defendant) revolves around a libel claim. Here’s a summary of the key points:

Background: Charles Northcott, a documentary maker, filed a libel suit against journalist David Hundeyin. The allegations stemmed from defamatory statements made by Hundeyin on platforms like Substack and X (formerly Twitter) in 2022.

Court Findings: The court ruled in favor of Northcott, stating that Hundeyin's claims were unfounded and damaging to Northcott's reputation.

Damages Awarded: Northcott was awarded £95,000 in damages for the libel, reflecting the court's recognition of the harm caused by Hundeyin's statements.

Evidence Considered: The court noted that there was no corroborating evidence to support Hundeyin's allegations, which contributed to the decision.

This case highlights issues of defamation and the responsibilities of journalists in reporting.

If na Nigeria now they'll say Tinubu or APC is witch hunting him! Now na saner climes!

festacman:
Love him or hate him, David Hundeyin is a proper coconut head. Strong as it comes.

Every progressive society needs more of David Hundeyin and VDM than it needs of conformists who would easily kowtow before oppressors or clowns who dance for daily meals at oppressor's palace.

AntiChristian:
Too much!

The case between Charles Northcott (Claimant) and David Hundeyin (Defendant) revolves around a libel claim. Here’s a summary of the key points:

Background: Charles Northcott, a documentary maker, filed a libel suit against journalist David Hundeyin. The allegations stemmed from defamatory statements made by Hundeyin on platforms like Substack and X (formerly Twitter) in 2022.

Court Findings: The court ruled in favor of Northcott, stating that Hundeyin's claims were unfounded and damaging to Northcott's reputation.

Damages Awarded: Northcott was awarded £95,000 in damages for the libel, reflecting the court's recognition of the harm caused by Hundeyin's statements.

Evidence Considered: The court noted that there was no corroborating evidence to support Hundeyin's allegations, which contributed to the decision.

This case highlights issues of defamation and the responsibilities of journalists in reporting.

If na Nigeria now they'll say Tinubu or APC is witch hunting him! Now na saner climes!