₦airaland Forum

pu7pl3:
Mtchew

Achilles100:
Conclave

Interesting movie, I like it alot. The twist at the end , I didnt see it coming. I recommend.

Baddestguyp:
Who is the demon that made this random movie suddenly appear on my feed while I was surfing my movie website yesterday?

Title: Cheeky (2000)

Wtf am I watching?

joseph1832:
Warlock. 1989.

A marvelous watch. Enjoyed it, even though the last time I watched it I was a kid.

Ishilove, I wholeheartedly recommend this movie to you. Believe me, you'll enjoy it and have a good laugh.

GloriousGbola:
What a difference a year makes

Parizz:
Try and watch tyler perry's Sistas. It’s been on for like three seasons now. Unless you are racist and hate black people, you may not like it.

armadeo:
This is old. Very old. Watched this a long time ago. I wonder what it would look like now

joseph1832:
Believe me, you won't regret it, I certainly didn't... It didn't even look that bad, the visuals was still okay must say.

Other than the fact the movie was actually shot back in 1989, and given the technology available at that time, everything else is okay.

kkins25:
Arcane season 1: Once in a lifetime Legendary Masterpiece.
Arcane season 2: Once in a lifetime Legendary Masterpiece.

Every single image, I mean every single clip from these animations, was brilliantly done. Don't get me started with the soundtrack and background music. Demi-gods came together to put these work of arts together---no doubt about it!

I, KK, pronounce Arcane as one of the greatest Animations produced in the west!

Every metric you can think of scores a solid 100/10.

blingxx:
No no one have seen gladiator 2 to give us reviews ? Wow🤧

abduleez1:
You can go and preach this gospel at the Series thread. We need more disciples over there.

Happy December to you.

oyaskii:
Juror #2 (2024).


12 angry men (1957) with more locations....


As a total sucker for "courthouse drama" coupled with the fact that it was an OG Clint Eastwood flick, this immediately piqued my interest...

A panel of Jury is set up to give verdict on a murder case. As deliberations unfold, Juror #2 suddenly realizes he has a personal connection with said case, and any decision might upend the defendants life or quite possibly his own....

Now whilst the story was engaging, It was riddled with morally questionable plot devices that didn't quite sit well with me, but i allowed because of the narrative. A fine exposè on the complicated nature of justice and the ever present legal conundrum that "Good people can do bad things and Bad people can be innocent" in the eyes of the law.

No prizes for guessing who played "Juror #2", Nicholas Hoult gave a true and honest performance, That said, I wouldn’t expect awards buzz for this one. His extensive work in comic roles made it challenging for me to fully embrace him in such a serious part.

I digress, If i didn't major in science during uni and post grad, i probably would have studied law.. The concept of law and order fascinates me, though I still struggle with the idea of jury systems. The notion of random individuals with no legal expertise, and all the emotional biases that come with being human, deciding life-altering cases seems fraught with flaws. Humans can’t be truly objective. Even in a room of three people deciding on a neutral subject, subjectivity creeps in. Now imagine 6 to 12 jurors being swayed by the courtroom theatrics of lawyers. It’s hard to reconcile.

Back to the film: 12 Angry Men (1957) remains the gold standard for courtroom dramas, is quite frankly still the best despite it's spatial limitations, and as someone who considers themselves, a graduate of the "John Grisham school of literary law 🤭, these kind of movies are starting to feel quite predictable to me, but take nothing away from my bias, this was a very fine film and a decent watch.

7/10

pu7pl3:
Please start taking Hoult seriously, he is about to play Lex Luther in the new James Gunn universe.

Illusioneffect:
I just watched a screening of Nosferatu🔥🔥🔥🔥 Hoult was absolutely great in the movie and Depp's daughter too, it's a movie you'd love

oyaskii:
Juror #2 (2024).


12 angry men (1957) with more locations....


As a total sucker for "courthouse drama" coupled with the fact that it was an OG Clint Eastwood flick, this immediately piqued my interest...

A panel of Jury is set up to give verdict on a murder case. As deliberations unfold, Juror #2 suddenly realizes he has a personal connection with said case, and any decision might upend the defendants life or quite possibly his own....

Now whilst the story was engaging, It was riddled with morally questionable plot devices that didn't quite sit well with me, but i allowed because of the narrative. A fine exposè on the complicated nature of justice and the ever present legal conundrum that "Good people can do bad things and Bad people can be innocent" in the eyes of the law.

No prizes for guessing who played "Juror #2", Nicholas Hoult gave a true and honest performance, That said, I wouldn’t expect awards buzz for this one. His extensive work in comic roles made it challenging for me to fully embrace him in such a serious part.

I digress, If i didn't major in science during uni and post grad, i probably would have studied law.. The concept of law and order fascinates me, though I still struggle with the idea of jury systems. The notion of random individuals with no legal expertise, and all the emotional biases that come with being human, deciding life-altering cases seems fraught with flaws. Humans can’t be truly objective. Even in a room of three people deciding on a neutral subject, subjectivity creeps in. Now imagine 6 to 12 jurors being swayed by the courtroom theatrics of lawyers. It’s hard to reconcile.

Back to the film: 12 Angry Men (1957) remains the gold standard for courtroom dramas, is quite frankly still the best despite it's spatial limitations, and as someone who considers themselves, a graduate of the "John Grisham school of literary law 🤭, these kind of movies are starting to feel quite predictable to me, but take nothing away from my bias, this was a very fine film and a decent watch.

7/10

pu7pl3:
Please start taking Hoult seriously, he is about to play Lex Luther in the new James Gunn universe.

Achilles100:
Just finish seeing this movie, actually came here to recommend it. That ending, I don't know what to make of it? Why did she visit ? Surely the DA doesn't make arrests or even come with cops to make arrests, or do they?

Illusioneffect:
I just watched a screening of Nosferatu🔥🔥🔥🔥 Hoult was absolutely great in the movie and Depp's daughter too, it's a movie you'd love