₦airaland Forum

nateevs:
That's why I told you, that you don't know your left from right. You talk too much, you argue too much, you lost track of who is who, you lose track of even your own talking points.

You are talking about the number one critique of Sterling and Madueke on this forum..Me?

I am resisting so immensely, the urge to call you the names you deserve. Like seriously?

You are threatening to bully him with insults if he doesn't align fast?

Lmao

Kimbeast:
More reason to practice his shooting so he won't be aiming at the goalkeeper next time. We can't have a wasteful winger stinking up everywhere. For context Sterling missed 11 big chances in 31games last season. Madueke is already on 9 in 14games.

Madueke makes all his own chances, so he is allowed to eat his food

So far his shots are not going wide, it's fine

airmark:
You are quoting your February post when I quoted the post you made few days to the closure of transfer window in August, that we shouldn't sign a new left winger I.e Sancho.

After you guys argue ignorantly and foolishly, later when you are proved wrong, you will start denying. Sorry, for wasting my time that time, I must rub salt on your injury regarding Sancho.

Are you sure you are okay airmark?

February I recommended LWF which we did in Neto. Few days to TW closing we got linked to Sancho, another LWF and I said we don't need another LWF... How does that translate to me NOT wanting a LWF for my club?

What exactly is the colour of your problem Airmark?

Henceforth, I will report and hide any trash you post, mentioning me.

timbros:
Are you sure you are okay airmark?

February I recommended LWF which we did in Neto. Few days to TW closing we got linked to Sancho, another LWF and I said we don't need another LWF... How does that translate to me NOT wanting a LWF for my club?

What exactly is the colour of your problem Airmark?

Henceforth, I will report and hide any trash you post, mentioning me.

Not allowed o

We must do this till the end of days till we all unanimously agree on who was right and wrong

Jamiuokolaa:
Not allowed o

We must do this till the end of days till we all unanimously agree on who was right and wrong

Nah... Not when one is blatantly lieing to score cheap points. I don't do such.

I recommended a LWF and we got one. We got linked to another LWF that I said we don't need. Dude is aggressively trying to force it down my throat that I was against the signing of a LWF. All in a bid to win an argument? What kind of rubbish is that?

Once I see a mention of my moniker in his post, that post is gone. Simple.

timbros:
Are you sure you are okay airmark?

February I recommended LWF which we did in Neto. Few days to TW closing we got linked to Sancho, another LWF and I said we don't need another LWF... How does that translate to me NOT wanting a LWF for my club?

What exactly is the colour of your problem Airmark?

Henceforth, I will report and hide any trash you post, mentioning me.

Go and ask Pedro Neto's coach, where he bought him to mainly play from.

You didn't want us to sign Sancho because you knew it meant a straight L for your stance in the Attack vs defence debate. I must use it to strangle you this season.

Quote me again.

timbros:
Nah... Not when one is blatantly lieing to score cheap points. I don't do such.

I recommended a LWF and we got one. We got linked to another LWF that I said we don't need. Dude is aggressively trying to force it down my throat that I was against the signing of a LWF. All in a bid to win an argument? What kind of rubbish is that?

Once I see a mention of my moniker in his post, that post is gone. Simple.

You never see anything. Next time you will think properly before you jump into my post and waste my time with your ignorance.


Attack vs Defence

Felix - 60m
Neto - 52m
Dewsbury - 35m
Guiu - 6m
Sancho - 0
= 153m

Veiga - 14m
Jorgensen - 24.5m
Tosin - 0
= 38.5m

Gucciboy:
Congratulations Chelsea 👑👑👑

The Conference and Champions League Finals gets played in May next year, then the FIFA WCC kicks off in June and ends in July, only to usher in the European leagues in August.

This is asking for too much. Players are already complaining about congested fixtures and it’s looking like hell is few miles away.

Kimbeast:
More reason to practice his shooting so he won't be aiming at the goalkeeper next time. We can't have a wasteful winger stinking up everywhere. For context Sterling missed 11 big chances in 31games last season. Madueke is already on 9 in 14games.

Maybe we should call your Sterling back and send Madueke to Arsenal.

Ibime:
Madueke makes all his own chances, so he is allowed to eat his food

So far his shots are not going wide, it's fine

What is the purpose of creating your own chances only to waste it. At his current rate of 9 in 14matches we are looking at over 20 big chances missed during the course of the season if he doesn't improve. He should take extra training sessions from Jackson on how to be a deadly finisher.

Kimbeast:
What is the purpose of creating your own chances only to waste it. At his current rate of 9 in 14matches we are looking at over 20 big chances missed during the course of the season if he doesn't improve. He should take extra training sessions from Jackson on how to be a deadly finisher.

Jackson, deadly finisher?

It seems one Chelsea hater is behind this Kimbeast account and i suspect Dayo.

Maresca is just waiting for next summer to get a reliable striker and not the one still learning, that missed 1 v1 chances.

Maresca - 'For sure, this season he’s had one-v-one chances he has missed - that can happen - but he can improve that area. He can be a bit more brave on the ball when we need to link with him but overall there are many areas he’s already improved a lot.’

airmark:
You no. 1 critique of Sterling? Critique with no consistent request for his ouster? Critique isonu.

Egbon, stop muddling things up and address the issue of your position in the attack vs defence debate.



Can you try your beautiful skill of twisting and turning on the emboldened? What's Timbros' stance in the attack vs defence debate that trumps mine a billion light years?

Let's start from there.

You sound like you never held down a professional job. I expect more intellectual contribution from a suya merchant.

So because I weighed in on a debate between yourselves, means I cannot hold any outside opinions on other topics? Are you this close-minded in the face of evidence?

I just gave you a screenshot from August showing you where I stated affirmative, even before this point, upgrades on Sterling's and Madueke's positions being more of a priority than a CF position but you are still denying it's existence, but binding it to yet a completely different debate.

Do you lack the capacity to understand that one point of view in not contigent upon the other? What is wrong with you man?

Why are you so desperate?

nateevs:
You sound like you never held down a professional job. I expect more intellectual contribution from a suya merchant.

So because I weighed in on a debate between yourselves, means I cannot hold any outside opinions on other topics? Are you this close-minded in the face of evidence?

I just gave you a screenshot from August showing you where I stated affirmative, even before this point, upgrades on Sterling's and Madueke's positions being more of a priority than a CF position but you are still denying it's existence, but binding it to yet a completely different debate.

Do you lack the capacity to understand that one point of view in not contigent upon the other? What is wrong with you man?

Why are you so desperate?

Stop doing shakushaku around the important question with scribbles that can't conceal your shameful support for Timbros in the Attack vs defence debate.

There's a reason i emboldened and reddened the important part of your post, which clearly shows your position on the attack vs defence debate and not another topic as you untruthfully claimed. Maybe you don't understand the implication of the subordinating conjunction, though, you used in your post below. That's your problem not mine.

nateevs:
Alhaji, you have confused me with someone else. I never joined your attack v defence debate, even though I did acknowledge that Timbros' stance trumps yours by a billion light years.

I ask again, what's Timbros' stance in the attack vs defence debate that trumps mine a billion light years?

You must not leave Timbros to bear the brunt alone.

Arsenal’s Gabriel would win the top scorer award😁

Jamiuokolaa:
You are threatening to bully him with insults if he doesn't align fast?

Lmao

What is happening is that Airmark is and has always been mischievous and very dishonest as he only cares about winning an argument.

Question is, who are the players added to that attack? Aside Neto who wasn't even exceptional for wolves, Sancho and Felix has been labelled disgusting names here. What has happened is simple, we stumbled on a good manager who is bringing out the best in our players regardless of their true ability. He has improved our already decent attack of last season to greater heights and as well as use good pressing to shield our defence.

An honest question you should ask yourself is this, while you can point to a number of our attackers who has improved greatly like Jackson of all people, which of our defenders aside consistent Cucu improved? Sanchez has even relapsed more into his hidden psychosis, Gusto surprises us with stupidity, Fofana has been pretty average and Colwill shows that he is below average in games we lose our dominance.

The answer is simple, we play a very dominant football, attempting an average of 550 passes every game. Then I have to applaud the manager for this instead of lying to myself about these defenders I watch for an hour and 30 minutes every game.

Maybe you are new to this thread so I must warn you about some monikers here like Airmark, Nihilistjnr and Ibime; they can say just about anything to win an argument. For example, when a player they don't like improves, they say it's the manager ( Jorginho, Rudiger). Now, the first two monikers are suddenly pushing a narrative that our defenders are good because Maresca is winning.

The truth will always find a way to reveal itself and it shall when you have your hopes so high thinking we are going to win those vital games that will clinch us the title.

airmark:
Jackson, deadly finisher?

It seems one Chelsea hater is behind this Kimbeast account and i suspect Dayo.

Maresca is just waiting for next summer to get a reliable striker and not the one still learning, that missed 1 v1 chances.

Maresca - 'For sure, this season he’s had one-v-one chances he has missed - that can happen - but he can improve that area. He can be a bit more brave on the ball when we need to link with him but overall there are many areas he’s already improved a lot.’

Blah blah blah.......!

Madueke needs to take finishing lessons from Deadshot. We can't have such wasteful winger with 9BCM in 13games.

swiz123:
What is happening is that Airmark is and has always been mischievous and very dishonest as he only cares about winning an argument.

Question is, who are the players added to that attack? Aside Neto who wasn't even exceptional for wolves, Sancho and Felix has been labelled disgusting names here. What has happened is simple, we stumbled on a good manager who is bringing out the best in our players regardless of their true ability. He has improved our already decent attack of last season to greater heights and as well as use good pressing to shield our defence.

An honest question you should ask yourself is this, while you can point to a number of our attackers who has improved greatly like Jackson of all people, which of our defenders aside consistent Cucu improved? Sanchez has even relapsed more into his hidden psychosis, Gusto surprises us with stupidity, Fofana has been pretty average and Colwill shows that he is below average in games we lose our dominance.

The answer is simple, we play a very dominant football, attempting an average of 550 passes every game. Then I have to applaud the manager for this instead of lying to myself about these defenders I watch for an hour and 30 minutes every game.

Maybe you are new to this thread so I must warn you about some monikers here like Airmark, Nihilistjnr and Ibime; they can say just about anything to win an argument. For example, when a player they don't like improves, they say it's the manager ( Jorginho, Rudiger). Now, the first two monikers are suddenly pushing a narrative that our defenders are good because Maresca is winning.

The truth will always find a way to reveal itself and it shall when you have your hopes so high thinking we are going to win those vital games that will clinch us the title.

Haha

Naso stray bullet take hit Ibime and Nihilistjnr

Nawa

Jamiuokolaa:
Haha

Naso stray bullet take hit Ibime and Nihilistjnr

Nawa

Ibime vs Nihilist used to be intense in this thread. I wonder what happened...

Ibime don slow down completely but Nihilist is still Nihilist: Mr Agenda.

**

swiz123:
What is happening is that Airmark is and has always been mischievous and very dishonest as he only cares about winning an argument.

Question is, who are the players added to that attack? Aside Neto who wasn't even exceptional for wolves, Sancho and Felix has been labelled disgusting names here. What has happened is simple, we stumbled on a good manager who is bringing out the best in our players regardless of their true ability. He has improved our already decent attack of last season to greater heights and as well as use good pressing to shield our defence.

An honest question you should ask yourself is this, while you can point to a number of our attackers who has improved greatly like Jackson of all people, which of our defenders aside consistent Cucu improved? Sanchez has even relapsed more into his hidden psychosis, Gusto surprises us with stupidity, Fofana has been pretty average and Colwill shows that he is below average in games we lose our dominance.

The answer is simple, we play a very dominant football, attempting an average of 550 passes every game. Then I have to applaud the manager for this instead of lying to myself about these defenders I watch for an hour and 30 minutes every game.

Maybe you are new to this thread so I must warn you about some monikers here like Airmark, Nihilistjnr and Ibime; they can say just about anything to win an argument. For example, when a player they don't like improves, they say it's the manager ( Jorginho, Rudiger). Now, the first two monikers are suddenly pushing a narrative that our defenders are good because Maresca is winning.

The truth will always find a way to reveal itself and it shall when you have your hopes so high thinking we are going to win those vital games that will clinch us the title.

Doesn't feel like we are actually good from set pieces.

I pity those that take that Airhead clown serious

nateevs:
We need to score 80 goals minimum to stand a chance of finishing in top four. 87+ for top 3 and 90+ for top 2.

A prolific striker is only going to get you 25 (PL only) of those. Where's the rest going to come from?

That's why the more pertinent problem is the support cast we have and not a prolific striker.

Griffon:
QUALITY support cast is all you need. Shey no be teams dey play without a recognized CF ni, dominate and still win?

Punditry no be by 10 pages a day, if you know you know.

When they were drumming the importance of quality support cast to u, this is what u had to say cos all u were after was a shiny new striker (even recommending guys that are not half the player Nkunku is):

airmark:
Our last game showed that support cast means nothing when your striker is working at cross purposes.

Maresca will be stupid not to get a striker better than Jackson in front of goal.

timbros:
Nah... Not when one is blatantly lieing to score cheap points. I don't do such.

I recommended a LWF and we got one. We got linked to another LWF that I said we don't need. Dude is aggressively trying to force it down my throat that I was against the signing of a LWF. All in a bid to win an argument? What kind of rubbish is that?

Once I see a mention of my moniker in his post, that post is gone. Simple.

You are no saint, you are also a liar that change goalpost every eke market day. Na Airmark and ramuduteur fit you

Airmark I have a quick one for you,.. LiVarpool who is 1st on the log, how many goals does their striker have? Newcastle & villa who have lethal ST where are they on the table. MJ that you're quick to discredit, who is improving before our eyes, what's your target for Jackson this season.
One with a proper football knowledge knows that without a proper supporting cast your team is just a 'Tottenham with Kane' in Nateevs words.

Sportsweb:
You are no saint, you are also a liar that change goalpost every eke market day. Na Airmark and ramuduteur fit you

OK

Kimbeast:
Why?

Is Chalobah not better that Disasi?

Chelsea fans:"what's our set piece coach doing,he hasn't done anything".

*Chelsea scores and barely concede from set pieces.

Chelsea fans:👇🤡🤡🤡🤡

MorataFC:
Is Chalobah not better that Disasi?

Being better than Disasi is not the level we are aiming for. We need the Saliba and Van dyke level or something close.

Kimbeast:
Being better than Disasi is not the level we are aiming for. We need the Saliba and Van dyke level or something close.

Saliba is a yes for me, but I'm not a fan of Vvd's defensive style.

Sportsweb:
Disasi first defender to score for us in the EPL this season

Disasi is good at set piece but turn like trailer and slow to react is his problem.

Tottenham is a weird team. Only two teams have scored more goals than them this season and even with injuries to Van de ven and Romero, they still have the same goal conceded as us yet they are in 10th position. Ange was even fighting with Tottenham fans yesterday.