₦airaland Forum

nihilistjnr:
how can you include goals scored in a qualifier when counting goals scored in |UCL?

Do we count goals in WC qualifiers when assigning WC golden boot?

So if a player scores in qualifiers but his team didnt qualify, that player too will claim he scored UCL goals that season?

This is like trying to count JAMB score towards university GPA.

Henry has 50 goals in the UCL not any qualifiers. Salah is still on 46 or 45.

The fact that you're having to adopt increasingly ridiculous positions already shows that your argument cannot be substantiated


If you're counting goals scored in UCL qualifiers to make an argument for performance in the premier league, then your argument has no academic merit.

Amigoss:
If no be pep,city oil money and 115 charges,this wouldn't be a debate sha...When Abrahamovic oil money came into chelsea henry stood no chance,imagine Abrahamovic came earlier...

Salah is a bigger epl legend than igwe

Bombblacks:
Ronaldo played 7 full seasons in England while this is Salahs 8th season. Why is that guy saying Ronaldo never had the longevity?

Bombblacks:
Ronaldo played 7 full seasons in England while this is Salahs 8th season. Why is that guy saying Ronaldo never had the longevity?

nateevs:
This right here is where I stand in this debate. Henry largely competed in the league mostly when only 1 of United and Arsenal could win the league.

Salah achieved all his accolades in the era where there was a concept of top 4, then top 6, and when easily any one of 4 teams could win the league.

nateevs:
This right here is where I stand in this debate. Henry largely competed in the league mostly when only 1 of United and Arsenal could win the league.

Salah achieved all his accolades in the era where there was a concept of top 4, then top 6, and when easily any one of 4 teams could win the league.

Ibime:
Ronaldo was only world class in 07/08/09 - 3 seasons

nihilistjnr:
Ibime just wannts to argue for the sake of it. His arguments are ridiculously inconsistent.
When Ronaldo left EPL for the first time, he left as the reigning WPOTY, with 3 EPL titles, and European Golden shoe.
Salah has never been WPOTY, has won only one title, and has never been the highest goal scorer in the whole Europe.

How can Salah even be a rival for Ronaldo?

nateevs:
This right here is where I stand in this debate. Henry largely competed in the league mostly when only 1 of United and Arsenal could win the league.

Salah achieved all his accolades in the era where there was a concept of top 4, then top 6, and when easily any one of 4 teams could win the league.

Ibime:
Ronaldo was only world class in 07/08/09 - 3 seasons

Bombblacks:
The debate is still Henry vs Ronaldo for me. Salah will definitely make top 5.

nihilistjnr:
In the last 10 years, City have won the league 7 times. Salah joined Liverpool in 2017. And in his 7 seasons at the Club, City have won the league 6 times.

Arsenal were the Liverpool to United's City in that era, in every conceivable way.

Kimbeast:
This is a myth. When last did Arsenal,United and Tottenham win the league. Salah played in an easy era. I mean few years ago most were of the opinion Mane was even better.

Ibime:
Henry was losing WPOTY to Zidane, Figo, Rivaldo, Ronaldinho and Cannavaro, not Messi and Ronaldo

Secondly Salah can only win WPOTY in the odd years so is only eligible for half the awards. Even years are when International tournaments are played and Egypt will never allow him compete in those years

nateevs:
Without checking the stats, easily four of those titles were won with a point difference of 2 to 8. I might not be perfect with the numbers, but you will find that it tallies with the point I am making - any of four teams could have won in those years, if City slipped.

You can't say the same for the times United and Arsenal dominated the league.

nihilistjnr:
In Henry's time (1999-2006),

United won 4
Arsenal won 2
Chelsea won 2

This looks a lot more competitive than in Salah's time
Man City 6
Liverpool 1

nateevs:
I agree with you that this is data after the fact. The nuance in my argument though, is that we never went into any of those 7 seasons thinking at any point, that it was only City's title to lose.

nateevs:
You what is funny about this statement? You guys will keep saying this over and over until Pep creates another Barca out of City. Then the story changes.

nateevs:
This right here is where I stand in this debate. Henry largely competed in the league mostly when only 1 of United and Arsenal could win the league.

Salah achieved all his accolades in the era where there was a concept of top 4, then top 6, and when easily any one of 4 teams could win the league.

nihilistjnr:
In Henry's time (1999-2006),

United won 4
Arsenal won 2
Chelsea won 2

This looks a lot more competitive than in Salah's time
Man City 6
Liverpool 1

Kimbeast:
This is a myth. When last did Arsenal,United and Tottenham win the league. Salah played in an easy era. I mean few years ago most were of the opinion Mane was even better.

Ibime:
Henry has 1 goal in UCL qualifiers so he is on 49 to Salahs 46 and Salah will equalise him before season end

This argument will be a lot more juicy in May cos Henry will be blown out the water by then

Gucciboy:
Salah has 1 epl title,hazard won 2 epl titles,KDB won 6 EPL titles.

KDB and Hazard>>>> salah

iamoyindamola:
Ramdeuter have come to scatter everything 🤣🤣🤣
Okan legends yin onibale

raumdeuter:
More converts into the Salah greatest camp. Something weu I don see 7yrs ago

At this point, I will start supporting Liverpool for the league title to finally nail the agenda

raumdeuter:
An mu eye bo lapo ni
Sterling 4 titles, Hazard 2 titles
Rico Lewis 2 league titles, Claude Makelele 1 title