₦airaland Forum

Gabrielshow24:
You act as though we are not subject to physical laws!

Christians are taught to follow peace with all men.

If all options of peace cannot resolve the matter then the last result is war!

And if it results in war obviously it shows one party has refused settlement and reconciliation.

So it's subject to context and specificity!
And if you generalize then you commit the fallacy of accidents

otipoju:
Be careful when you claim to speak on God's behalf. Human beings compete for perceived scarce resources for survival.The lion kills the sheep to eat. Is the lion evil.

Jews, Christians and moslems have killed millions in God's name.

Michael547:
🤣🤣🤣shebi you've been quoting bible since na...no be bible question I dey ask you so?
God dey approve war wey dey make him worshippers fight each other? Yes or no sir?

Michael547:
Do you have any example of true worshippers of God killing each other in war?

Gabrielshow24:
The question is vague.
"True" is subjective in human context.
As it is very evident in this thread through various christian sects.

If for instance J.W. participated in a war with the Mormons both parties will always consider themselves true🤷🏾‍♂️.

Do you see how vague your question is?
Or are you not familiar with the war of the churches in ancient England?

otipoju:
Does his worshippers go to ask God for permission before they start fighting each other? Yes or No.

otipoju:
Leave that guy ojare. People like him are unable to really reason.

A whole Egypt na him some body talk sey no get laws.

Country wey get King and prison. One of the most ancient civilizations no get law.

Why moses come run, if he was not wanted by the Laws of Egypt.

Gabrielshow24:
Or you seem to forget so easily with the Islamic jihad?
When they are asked what do they say?
Don't they call themselves true followers of God!!!

But in the context of christians we are taught to adopt peace!!!

So in ideality, no christian sect will go to war against another christian sect!

Michael547:
So are you saying that it is ok for Mormons who claim to be Christians to fight JWs who claim to be Christians?

otipoju:
Then you know nothing about church history.

Google Martin Luther the german priest, Ulrich Zwingli, the Heugenots and the protestant reformation

Dtruthspeaker:
I don't understand, what you have in mind.

Hope you know no matter the law (legal) Egypt"s king may administer or any king may uphold, God's Law (Natural Law) is above them and rules them and their land.

And all Laws and Rights come from God's Law called Natural Law.

So, I do not understand your question because Egypt's legal commands are not relevant here especially as they even commanded the evil ofracism, inslavery of a fellow human and murder of children as a law.

Bet, you never heard
"An unjust law, is no Law" and it is lawful to disobey an unjust law, which is why you saw God blessed the Israelite nurses who disobeyed Pharoah and his legalness.

Gabrielshow24:
Bordering on the hypothetical is fruitless.

Michael547:
Oga....can you point out a war where those who claim to be Christians in either countries have not slain each other?

Dtruthspeaker:
So because they get king and prison, therefore, dem dey above Law?

Then why una dey complain about Tinubu and him system of rule, since himself be king and him get prison and law?

Why una dey judiciary to dey talk say wetin the king and e men dey do, dey unlawfull?

See why God no dey put Hand for una matter! Datna why e good wetin dey happen to una wia police/army fit keep una for prison pass 24 to pass 30days despite all the talk of a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty, Law.

illicit:
Bro are you actually quoting Nigerian criminal code for a crime that was committed in Egypt before Nigeria was even colonized by Britain?
🤭

otipoju:
You see how you dey contradict yourself.

You said Egypt had no laws. Which is a false statement. Your opinion of the law wether draconian or humane , is irrelevant.

Gabrielshow24:
"Ideality"

you can Google and look it up!

illicit:
Are you high or something ni...

Which natural laws supersede any law... Go and kill somebody now

We will send you to go and meet God and face natural law

Nonsense

What are u even saying?

🥴

Dtruthspeaker:
State where I said "Egypt had no law"

otipoju:
Go back and read what you wrote about Moses .

Dtruthspeaker:
Publicly state where I said "Egypt had no law", if indeed it is True.

otipoju:
"Ideality". What has that hot to do with the fact that Christian sects and denominations have gone to war against each other as evidenced in church history.

The catholic church persecuted the heugenots in France and most of them fled on boats to America.

Martin Luther the originator of the protestant movement himself persecuted other Christians like the anababtists that were against some of his beliefs.

Not to talk of men like Ulrich Zwingli. They all killed other Christians in the name of Christ. In fact Zwingli a protestant died in action in 1531 at the battle of Kappel while fighting catholics

@Michael547

otipoju:
No wahala. Enjoy the rest of your day.

You like wahala pass trouble.

Ive stated my opinion. You have yours, we definitely will not come to any sort of agreement.

Stay blessed.

Gabrielshow24:
Am not against your premise.
I have implied that to @Michael547.

You saying the logical implications of my statement is somewhat unnecessary.

The statement is self explanatory!

Gabrielshow24:
revisit and correct this!

Dtruthspeaker:
I quoted it to show you that every normal man is aware of that Natural Law that they even state it in their commands.

AI Overview
Egypt's self-defense laws allow an individual to use force to protect themselves or others in certain circumstances

AI overview
In the UK, self-defense is a complete defense to non-sexual offenses that involve the unlawful use of force. The law is based on a combination of common law and statute, and it allows people to use reasonable force in the following circumstances: To defend themselves or others

[b]There is no place in the world where God's Law (Natural Law) is not in Force

illicit:
Bros

When u are sober, we can continue this...

Who was moses defending, himself or an israelite?

What are u saying nah

Dtruthspeaker:
Why are you twisting yourself sore?

Do you not already know that Moses was defending another?

Don't tell me that you do not see that the Law of self defence also includes defence of another.

In case you did not see it, see it

AI Overview
Egypt's self-defense laws allow an individual to use force to protect themselves or others in certain circumstances

AI overview
In the UK, self-defense is a complete defense to non-sexual offenses that involve the unlawful use of force. The law is based on a combination of common law and statute, and it allows people to use reasonable force in the following circumstances: To defend themselves or others

In Nigeria
Section 32(3) of the Criminal Code provides,
Inter alia:
A person is not criminally responsible for an act or
omission if he does or omits to do the act… when the
act is reasonably necessary in order to resist actual
and unlawful violence threatened to him or to another person in his presence

You don't have any valid thing to say and you are just grasping for air.

illicit:
I cant believe this guy...
You are actually quoting Nigerian law for something that moses did, are u really serious right now?

Dtruthspeaker:
Just say you don't have anything to say because people can see that I quoted the laws of both Egypt and Britain which you mentioned in addition to the Nigerian one to prove that Natural Law is everywhere.