₦airaland Forum

A Govt that can't protect the interest of it's citizens!

Nato008:
See yourself, u don't even realize that a company putting wrong details on there cac is actually a level of fraud....talk more for the same company to be awarded such huge contracts by the govt...so how exactly was it done ?

lol. Company putting wrong details on CAC website? When did company start putting their details on CAC website? Please educate me, I want to learn.

See, if you don’t understand what is been discussed, just read and move on. No point displaying your ignorance publicly.

seunmsg:
Absolute nonsense from Daily Trust. You cannot confirm the status of a company by mere checking on the website of CAC. CAC website is never updated regularly. Even as an auditor, I can’t rely on information from CAC website as absolute proof of the status of a company.

Daily Trust should write to CAC and do a legal search of the company. That’s the best way to get the necessary information. I can bet this is just a sponsored attack on the company by some vested interest.

Auditor indeed!

You don't see anything wrong in offering a 252.89 billion naira contract to a company that doesn't have a known address, a website and whose status on CAC in inactive.

Some of una ehn, Na to dey konk una head for real life.

Shame!

iwaeda:
Mutairu Cardoso[b], please tell us how many projects Infoquest have executed and where the office is. People supporting APC do it emotionally without pausing to reason.

Which one come be Mutairu Kadoso again ?

3ice9ce:
Did you read the report?

Did you read my comment?

God when will it be my turn to cash out from this government money

lexy2014:
How come the ministry of works official could not provide clarity as to the status of the company and here you seem to know more about the company?

can you negate any information that Daily Trust has written and provide the truth?

is there any part of the article that you dont understand?

Do you know the company hence your claim that the article is "a sponsored attack on the company by some vested interest"?

When it comes to issues relating to public procurement, I surely know more than you will ever know.

lexy2014:
can you show where the article said a change of address is the criteria for determining if a company exists or not?

It's the same! My company is inactive too on CAC website. Since the address is not being used any longer!

iwaeda:
https://dailytrust.com/fg-re-awards-abuja-kaduna-highway-contract-to-inactive-company/

Hwen Tinubu is done with Nigeria ehhhh....

Thieves.

AbuTwins:
It's the same! My company is inactive too on CAC website. Since the address is not being used any longer!

can you show where the article said a change of address is the criteria for determining if a company exists or not?

seunmsg:
When it comes to issues relating to public procurement, I surely know more than you will ever know.

very good. then you should have no problems answering my questions:

1. How come the ministry of works official could not provide clarity as to the status of the company and here you seem to know more about the company?

2. can you negate any information that Daily Trust has written and provide the truth?

3. is there any part of the article that you dont understand?

4. Do you know the company hence your claim that the article is "a sponsored attack on the company by some vested interest"?

AbuTwins:
I will take this news with a pinch of salt...

If FG sues Daily trust now those bad news lovers will cry witch-hunting and denial of freedom of journalism!

Crass Journalism everywhere!

The company i work has moved from where it was registered to the permanent site yet hasn't effected that on the CAC records! So automatically the company i work does not exist!

Sincerely, a lot of Nigerians are so uninformed and unwilling to learn. So it’s so easy for some of these media outfit to free them with lies and they just swallow it like that. Anyone that has been dealing with CAC knows that what is on their website does not reflect the current realities about the status of the company.

seunmsg:
When it comes to issues relating to public procurement, I surely know more than you will ever know.

go and sit down! I thought you'll be more sensible in matters like these knowing fully well what the people in power are capable of, but no, you've chosen to walk the part of ignorance and partisanship even in the face of lingering economic crisis.
A lot these have been going on, anyway what do I even know? This government is out to reward those that smuggled them to power

It's obvious that some bast@rds are selfish

How can an Idi0t claim to be an auditor and still see nothing wrong in this

God pun!sh you b@stard

If this is true, its an indictment on Umahi.

Umahi have clearly displayed his first act of corruption.
The federal government will not allow EFCC to touch him. It is after 4 years when he has cleaned portions of the treasury and he become elusive that they will now allow EFCC to begin chase him up and down.

lexy2014:
very good. then you should have no problems answering my questions:

1. How come the ministry of works official could not provide clarity as to the status of the company and here you seem to know more about the company?

2. can you negate any information that Daily Trust has written and provide the truth?

3. is there any part of the article that you dont understand?

4. Do you know the company hence your claim that the article is "a sponsored attack on the company by some vested interest"?

Go back and read my initial comment. When you or those Daily Trust are fronting for are serious about getting the information about the current status of the company, you all will apply to CAC for a legal search instead of checking a website that has not been updated in like 3 years.

seunmsg:
Go back and read my initial comment. When you or those Daily Trust are fronting for are serious about getting the information about the current status of the company, you all will apply to CAC for a legal search instead of checking a website that has not been updated in like 3 years.

that is not what I asked you.

1. How come the ministry of works official could not provide clarity as to the status of the company and here you seem to know more about the company?

2. can you negate any information that Daily Trust has written and provide the truth?

3. is there any part of the article that you dont understand?

4. Do you know the company hence your claim that the article is "a sponsored attack on the company by some vested interest"?

seunmsg:
Sincerely, a lot of Nigerians are so uninformed and unwilling to learn. So it’s so easy for some of these media outfit to free them with lies and they just swallow it like that. Anyone that has been dealing with CAC knows that what is on their website does not reflect the current realities about the status of the company.

can you provide the truth?

AbuTwins:
It's the same! My company is inactive too on CAC website. Since the address is not being used any longer!

Can your inactive company bid and receive government contracts worth N250 billion with your inactive status?

seunmsg:
Sincerely, a lot of Nigerians are so uninformed and unwilling to learn. So it’s so easy for some of these media outfit to free them with lies and they just swallow it like that. Anyone that has been dealing with CAC knows that what is on their website does not reflect the current realities about the status of the company.

Exactly o! One can just try it! But people just dey swallow lies dey react!

lexy2014:
can you show where the article said a change of address is the criteria for determining if a company exists or not?

That's why the company is said to be inactive!

Mervingreat:
Story, so Umahi will be so stupid to award a contract to a dead company ba?

Una no dey taya of lies or what?

But what if he's actually stupid to do so?

seunmsg:
Absolute nonsense from Daily Trust. You cannot confirm the status of a company by mere checking on the website of CAC. CAC website is never updated regularly. Even as an auditor, I can’t rely on information from CAC website as absolute proof of the current status of a company.

Daily Trust should write to CAC and do a legal search of the company. That’s the best way to get the necessary information. I can bet this is just a sponsored attack on the company by some vested interest.

bros stop speaking grammar, CAC update status of companies every now and then. You guys keep supporting crime been perpetrated by government because it favours you

ClassicMan202:
Can your inactive company bid and receive government contracts worth N250 billion with your inactive status?

Hold your peace! The truth will unfold in the next couple of days!

Don't be quick to swallow news like this hook, line and sinker!

seunmsg:
Absolute nonsense from Daily Trust. You cannot confirm the status of a company by mere checking on the website of CAC. CAC website is never updated regularly. Even as an auditor, I can’t rely on information from CAC website as absolute proof of the current status of a company.

Daily Trust should write to CAC and do a legal search of the company. That’s the best way to get the necessary information. I can bet this is just a sponsored attack on the company by some vested interest.

CAC portal is now updated in real-time.
Shut up!

There's no way you'd file annual returns and you will have "inactive" status. As CAC accredited agent, I know this!

AbuTwins:
Hold your peace! The truth will unfold in the next couple of days!

Don't be quick to swallow news like this hook, line and sinker!

It's a yes or no question.

Since you are knowledgeable in public procurement and contracts awards

AbuTwins:
That's why the company is said to be inactive!

A company becomes inactive when it doesn't file it's annual returns.

It has got nothing to do with change of address!

But doesn't you feel it's wrong to award a contract of such magnitude to a company that you can't find through a simple Google search?

cornelman:
But what if he's actually stupid to do so?

Umahi can not be that stupid, I repeat.

TechBaron:
1. A company becomes inactive when it doesn't file it's annual returns.

2. It has got nothing to do with change of address!

3. But doesn't you feel it's wrong to award a contract of such magnitude to a company that you can't find through a simple Google search?

You are right in your 1 and 2. But not filling returns does not make the company non-existent too!

But your 3 get K-leg. Where does that law exist that a company must be visible on google to award such contract?