₦airaland Forum

cutedharmee:
I hope you'll say the same thing if it was your child or your family member?

BlocksNG:
You must be stupid. Those who killed him confessed that they killed him on the order of adedoyin.

AuthorMan:
Only God knows what is hidden to man.
I tried to defend him somewhere because of the little I know about him.
He is a nice man, I have slept in his hotel a couple of times. I and my worker. Although, his other Hilton Hotel in Ife.

If you are one of his contractors, you are allowed to pay for half of the cost of any room you pick.

I was one of the contractors Of his University.
He is a nice man.

But who knows, you can't trust humans.
More so, he is not a christian .

Ijaya123:
He does not not need to be there. since he ordered the killing, he is an accessory to the murder and will be so charged.

BlocksNG:
You must be stupid. Those who killed him confessed that they killed him on the order of adedoyin.

gabbasin:
is there any evidence he ordered the man killed? what's the result of the autopsy? who's the person ordered to do the killing? Did you guys follow this case at all

Xisnin:
His lawyers must be incompetent.

There is no evidence that a murder took place other than the fact that they conceal
the death after the fact.
The autopsy was inconclusive.

It also doesn't make sense to convict a suspect of murder when they were never present
in the murder scene unless it can be proven they gave instruction for the murder which
the prosecution failed to prove.

I suspect the court being influenced by public sentiments.

No murder weapon or method, suspect not present in murder scene and no concrete motive
and still the court went ahead to convict.

Covering up a death should not attract death sentence.

It is time to change the lawyers.

Babangidapikin:
This guy might need Chief Wole Olanipekun to do a Pro Bono for him ...If he is not in the hotel when the incident happened as claimed, how come they are wrapping him in all this. You better change your lawyer ...

Babangidapikin:
This guy might need Chief Wole Olanipekun to do a Pro Bono for him ...If he is not in the hotel when the incident happened as claimed, how come they are wrapping him in all this. You better change your lawyer ...

Xisnin:
His lawyers must be incompetent.

There is no evidence that a murder took place other than the fact that they conceal
the death after the fact.
The autopsy was inconclusive.

It also doesn't make sense to convict a suspect of murder when they were never present
in the murder scene unless it can be proven they gave instruction for the murder which
the prosecution failed to prove.

I suspect the court being influenced by public sentiments.

No murder weapon or method, suspect not present in murder scene and no concrete motive
and still the court went ahead to convict.

Covering up a death should not attract death sentence.

It is time to change the lawyers.

sirsholley:
It seems you didn't follow the case from day 1 of the matter, he was seen alongside his son in the footage recovered from the cctv in the hotel, as a result he is more than guilty. His accomplice(son) has been at large since then.

Agugbadin:
Do you know what the confession of others are.

Babangidapikin:
This guy might need Chief Wole Olanipekun to do a Pro Bono for him ...If he is not in the hotel when the incident happened as claimed, how come they are wrapping him in all this. You better change your lawyer ...

Xisnin:
I am not one of those who believe someone must be punished for any disaster that
happens regardless of the circumstance.

I am pretty consistent in this regard.
You don;t know the damage that someone must be punished at all cost does to the
society.
A person should only answer for a crime they really commit and not assumed or believed to have committed.

You mean the high court judge, the 3 appeal court judges all delivered their judgements based on assumption? Anyway, let the man be executed based on assumption

AuthorMan:
Where did you get this information. Nothing likely that. What they claim was that he died in the room, they discovered and stupidly covered it up and went to bury the guy.
Thats the news we heard.

Xisnin:
You have been listening to third party broadcasters who have a vested interest.
The alleged CCTV was never presented in court.
And assuming it was presented, it allegedly shows the men removing the body, not
the actual murder.

In fact, the first trial judge acknowleged the claim of the main suspect not
being present in the crime scene during the crime but he said that wasn't enough to exonerate him.

A lot of people are confusing media speculations and the actual evidence presented in court.

Rupertek:
You mean the high court judge, the 3 appeal court judges all delivered their judgements based on assumption? Anyway, let the man be executed based on assumption

AuthorMan:
Where did you get this information. Nothing likely that. What they claim was that he died in the room, they discovered and stupidly covered it up and went to bury the guy.
Thats the news we. heard.

YeribanzaGoat:
You need brain-resetting slaps! How can you call a ritualist an innocent man? How did you know that the man was absent during the killing? Even if he wasn't around, isn't it possible to give orders from somewhere else? The type of graduates we have today is terrible.

ultraviolet27:
There was a CCTV operating that day he has also been doing it for years only his cup got filled now.

Rupertek:
Your own version is completely inaccurate. This is not the first time someone died in hotel. The high court judge, 3 appeal court judges, all ignored evidences before them and ruled based on public outcry. Guy, you are defending the wrong customer. By the way, why is Adedoyin's son on the run? Didn't even care to come save his father , being a star witness. He knows their hands are not clean.
You are simply trying to exploit some weaknesses in the criminal justice system to justify a culprit, a murder. Whatever his motive, so far there are sufficient evidence that he ordered the murder, only him, Adedoyin can tell is his motive, we may not know, but that should not exempt him from punishment

Rupertek:
You are a despicable liar. The judges are not stupid. The witnesses said clearly that Adedoyin ordered them to kill the man

Softmirror:
The Gospel singer, pastor that has been trending for beheading a lady comes to mind. See we need to be objective in life if we indeed want a taste of reality.

Xisnin:
His lawyers must be incompetent.

There is no evidence that a murder took place other than the fact that they conceal
the death after the fact.
The autopsy was inconclusive.

It also doesn't make sense to convict a suspect of murder when they were never present
in the murder scene unless it can be proven they gave instruction for the murder which
the prosecution failed to prove.

I suspect the court being influenced by public sentiments.

No murder weapon or method, suspect not present in murder scene and no concrete motive
and still the court went ahead to convict.

Covering up a death should not attract death sentence.

It is time to change the lawyers.

IamtheTruth1:
I hope the same faith befalls you and your family come up with suppose good lawyers . MUMU.

U KNOW PASS BOTH COURTS.

Xisnin:
I am not one of those who believe someone must be punished for any disaster that
happens regardless of the circumstance.

I am pretty consistent in this regard.
You don;t know the damage that someone must be punished at all cost does to the
society.
A person should only answer for a crime they really commit and not assumed or believed to have committed.